Quote:
Originally Posted by BartAllen
I think there are levels. Being outraged at a group of men for harming children is absolutely appropriate. Getting mad at someone for having the wrong opinion and voicing it? Anything above being mildly annoyed is uncalled for.
|
He wasn't arrested for having a wrong opinion and voicing it.
He was arrested for trying to interfere with jurors. He was already on a suspended sentence for doing this and warned if he did it again that he'd go to prison. I'm pretty sure similar laws exist in the United States. What we should be outraged about is that he did this knowing that it endangered the case and almost allowed ringleaders of grooming gangs to go free.
We should also be outraged that his supporters are turning very, very violent.