05-27-2010, 09:59 PM | #41 |
I'm SUPER into myself
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,667
|
|
05-27-2010, 10:02 PM | #42 | |||
PerfectlyTunedFightEngine
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Upsidedown
Posts: 7,926
|
Quote:
Can Nick/Viacom even use Krang? Doesn't Wolf still retain the rights to him? As for Cullen's involvement in the Transformers movies, I was lead to believe that he was only included in the cast after word got leaked that Bay wasn't intending on using him and the fanbase went apes#it.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------ Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
05-27-2010, 10:06 PM | #43 | ||
Thug
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-27-2010, 10:11 PM | #44 |
Stone Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 740
|
As long as he keeps the Turtles the Turtles - no drastic character changes, not too dark and heavy - this could be pretty cool. I kinda like the first Transformers though it was a little "talky."
If he has anything to do with Krang being in it, I'll love Michael Bay forever (in a masculine manly way). |
05-27-2010, 10:14 PM | #45 |
無問題
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Moesko Island, WA
Posts: 14,314
|
I haven't seen any of these three yet, but I was told that the last two actually were good.
__________________
|
05-27-2010, 10:16 PM | #46 |
So tired of this place
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shell Ri La
Posts: 26,809
|
This is your brightside?! MEH! God forbid! This film better not stray too far from the comics or I'm gonna be unpleasureable to be around. In case you didn't know bud, this movie is to be somewhat based on the first issue of the original comics AKA the no krang, no bebop, no rocksteady, no technodrome, no pizza, & dead shredder version.
__________________
I'm convinced that none of you have ever experienced joy
|
05-27-2010, 10:17 PM | #47 | |
Stone Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nope.avi
Posts: 825
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2010, 10:23 PM | #48 |
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
We already have a movie based on vol.1 #1.
|
05-27-2010, 10:23 PM | #49 |
So tired of this place
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shell Ri La
Posts: 26,809
|
Lol if you think that movie is at all accurate or even close, you're buggin'.
__________________
I'm convinced that none of you have ever experienced joy
|
05-27-2010, 10:23 PM | #50 | |||
PerfectlyTunedFightEngine
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Upsidedown
Posts: 7,926
|
Quote:
Anyone have more clarification on this?
__________________
------------------------------------------------------ Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
05-27-2010, 10:24 PM | #51 |
Thug
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 59
|
|
05-27-2010, 10:27 PM | #52 | |
Stone Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nope.avi
Posts: 825
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2010, 10:29 PM | #53 | |
Emperor
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 8,979
|
Quote:
Mirage owned all of the characters from the OT, so Nick now owns all of them. Fred Wolf only owns the series itself. |
|
05-27-2010, 10:31 PM | #54 | |
Thug
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2010, 10:41 PM | #55 |
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
Its close enough that a movie being 100% accurate would be retreading the same ground.
|
05-27-2010, 10:45 PM | #56 |
Thug
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 59
|
The 1990 movie was the right one for its time. It combined elements of the comics and `87 series.
|
05-27-2010, 10:49 PM | #57 | |
So tired of this place
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shell Ri La
Posts: 26,809
|
Quote:
Correctomundo. It was 50/50 as far as the content combo goes. I'm sayin' the OG isn't close to being directly based on the comics except for the fact that there is an origin, & splinter falls off of a roof. Thats about it. If anything its just a darker take on the cartoon with a few creative liberties; I.E. Casey Jones coming in right from the start, the addition of Tatsu, & so forth.
__________________
I'm convinced that none of you have ever experienced joy
|
|
05-27-2010, 11:00 PM | #58 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,278
|
1. People whining about Bay inserting explosions and nonsense are just knee-jerking, and otherwise aren't really well versed in the politics or track record of Platinum Dunes.
2. There's nothing stopping anybody from including any characters from the OS cartoon in the movies and there never has been -- except Kevin and Peter, and thank god for them doing so (in fairness though, it's not like their exclusion helped the last few movies suck any less than they did, though). 3. A studio like Platinum Dunes -- having put out the very grown-up films they have and quite successfully -- is nothing but a huge, huge boon for this reboot movie. For the first time we may be looking at a situation where the people heading up the movie can look TPTB (Paramount/Viacom/Nick) in the eye and tell them, "We want to make this movie our way" (be it -- gasp -- PG-13) and they might not get a great deal of argument back. 4. Sorry, Krang in a new TMNT movie reboot would be b*******. No offense, Krang.
__________________
|
05-27-2010, 11:01 PM | #59 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,278
|
Yeah, 50% solid and 50% solid... excrement.
Which is still a hell of a lot better ratio than TMNTs Parts 2, 3, and 4.
__________________
Last edited by Andrew NDB; 05-27-2010 at 11:09 PM. |
05-27-2010, 11:03 PM | #60 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,278
|
Nonsense. And even if you were right and "Danny & The Troubled Kids: The Motion Picture" was, no one throwing money at this new movie is going to be worried about "retreading the same ground" from a movie that came out 22 years before it.
__________________
|
Tags |
live action films |
|
|