12-07-2017, 11:55 AM | #41 |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,050
|
I actually just watched Jumanji 1995 2 days ago for the first time since I was a kid. It's a fun movie, but it's still a kids movie. If you don't have any nostalgia for it you might not enjoy it as much as those of us who watched it as kids.
Also seeing a young Kirsten Dunst is weird as hell. I totally forgot she was in the movie. |
12-09-2017, 12:50 PM | #42 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,274
|
Saw it. It's really good! I consistently laughed throughout. There is a good dichotomy between their avatars in the central story and their real life teenage selves that pays off at different points. It's a requel that does it right... it really does pick up right where the original left off (like, literally, in 1996) but the main meat, the middle (which is 91% of the movie) is entirely different. There is a lot of humor that works. There is some misses but more hits than not. I am never super impressed with Kevin Hart doing the same part he does in every movie, or filling the exact roles that Chris Rock would have a decade ago, but he's good... and I hated "Central Intelligence" (also starring The Rock and Hart). There is some big nods to the original, one that was really poignant that honors Robin Williams' character and essentially the man himself. And if you haven't seen the original, don't worry, you won't notice. But you'll be rewarded if you have.
Also, I saw the first one for the first time last night. I'd never seen it ever. I think I avoided it because even as a kid, the trailers seemed dodgy... a board game? Rhinos? What? It is pretty good. It definitely goes to darker places than the new movie, but also has the same whimsy. The ending parts have a lot of heart and effectively pull the heartstrings. The new movie pulls them also at the end, not quite as strongly but effectively. There is a slight inconsistency when comparing the two endings that anyone who has watched both will notice, but I didn't mind. If you're thinking about watching the new Jumanji I'd recommend. It's funny. It's got the feels. If I had a gripe, and this is kind of spoilery, Spoiler:
__________________
|
12-09-2017, 01:01 PM | #43 |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,085
|
I know it’s impossible, but is there any Zathura references?
__________________
|
12-09-2017, 01:23 PM | #44 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,274
|
I don't think so. But then I've never seen Zathura.
__________________
|
12-09-2017, 04:45 PM | #45 |
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
Looks like it's a decent but nothing amazing movie which is fine because Jumanji really isn't anything that amazing either. I still think it's dumb they changed the board to a video game but I'll be checking it out.
Zathura is the same as Jumanji only with Sci-Fi tropes, the movie is ok, it just isn't as fun as Jumanji. But why is this being released along Star Wars? Do they want it to die? Do they forget how big Jumanji was able to get in the 90s, this could've been similar if released in the spring or even the summer. |
12-09-2017, 04:48 PM | #46 |
Mutant Tiger
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hialeah, Florida, USA
Posts: 13,818
|
Its got an 83% on Rotten Tomatoes.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jum..._to_the_jungle |
12-09-2017, 05:02 PM | #47 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,274
|
It's explained pretty well in the movie. I'm not kidding, it begins right where the first one ended, with the board game in the beach.
__________________
|
12-11-2017, 09:29 AM | #48 |
Dub Professor
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dub Side of the Moon
Posts: 3,442
|
Well that's pretty heartening news, Andrew. I had high hopes for this movie since I loved the first one so much. I'm glad the new one is decent at least
__________________
|
12-20-2017, 06:03 PM | #49 |
Mutant Tiger
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hialeah, Florida, USA
Posts: 13,818
|
Its certified fresh with a 79% on RT.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jum..._to_the_jungle |
12-20-2017, 08:15 PM | #50 |
Foot Elite
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,055
|
I saw the film this afternoon and I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it. I thought it was a funny action-packed adventure. I also liked how this movie took the audience inside of the game this time around. In the original the game had come to our world, but we never got explore what the jungle was really like. That was one of the big reasons why this sequel worked.
Spoiler:
As for the reference to Alan Parish (Robin Williams' character): Spoiler:
|
12-31-2017, 10:16 AM | #51 |
Dub Professor
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dub Side of the Moon
Posts: 3,442
|
Just saw this yesterday, I enjoyed it quite a lot. I thought the reasoning behind making the board game a video game was reasonably well done. The acting by the main cast was pretty good; Jack Black as Bethany as Professor Shelly Oberon was great. Kevin Hart's usual schtick was different enough to work in this film and the Rock was good as always. I'm still getting familiar with Karen Gillian but she's been good as Nebula in the Marvel movies.
As far as the ending goes... Spoiler:
I think they could make another movie in the series work, they could change the format of the game again if they wanted and they could even explore the actual origins of Jumanji, which I think could be pretty interesting
__________________
|
12-31-2017, 10:24 AM | #52 |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,085
|
Heck a theory is that even the jungle theme is merely just an aesthetic it can change, that Zathura is Jumanji in a Sci-fi state
|
12-31-2017, 10:55 AM | #53 | ||
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-31-2017, 11:23 AM | #54 | |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,085
|
Quote:
Which you already have a disconnect between the movies as the original creator didn’t like the jumanji movie and references to Jumanji was cut out of the Zathura film. Though if you want to go the “psychological” road of Jumanji. The game changes all depending on the need. A board game maybe needed for some physical theme while a “digital” form maybe needed for those that are disconnected Though if you want to get technical, breaking the law of space and time isn’t uncommon for jumanji I won’t deny. I like the idea of someone creating a bunch of different games just to *uck with people Last edited by Allio; 12-31-2017 at 11:55 AM. |
|
|
|