11-21-2007, 04:30 PM | #41 |
Allons-y!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Castle Doom
Posts: 4,535
|
The latter statement may be true, but I wouldn't say nobody cares about it. All three movies are fantastic.
__________________
|
11-21-2007, 06:24 PM | #42 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,744
|
Back to the Future is the best triology of them all. There is NO better triology. The first game was alright, but the second BTTF game sucked. There was talk of a number 4 but Michael J Fox cant do it bc of the Parkinsons (sp?). They tried a cartoon, but that didn't last long.
|
11-21-2007, 06:42 PM | #43 |
Denki Wo Kitte Kudasai
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,439
|
|
11-21-2007, 09:04 PM | #44 | |
Second Gear
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
|
Quote:
And I'm not even saying Back to the Future is bad, I loved it when I was a kid, but saying that it's still on the minds of the mainstream as much as Ghostbusters is is a joke. And mentioning it in light of a new videogame is an even bigger joke. |
|
11-22-2007, 06:26 PM | #45 | |
Wacky Action
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: on Earth
Posts: 12,784
|
Quote:
__________________
Live and let live... or go to hell.
|
|
11-22-2007, 09:32 PM | #46 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,744
|
I never said it was mainstream anymore. I just said it was the best triology.
Pirates, the first movie was the only good one. X-Men, 3rd was kinda eh Bourne Triology, good, but not as good as BTTF Spider-Man, are you serious? three was the worse of them all, quite disappointing Indiana Jones, yes good, but Temple of Doom, did you seriously like it? Lord of the Rings, eh alright but over rated Star Wars, yes, original triology good |
11-22-2007, 09:56 PM | #47 | |
Rat-faced Dude-guy
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 26,216
|
Quote:
I wanted to comment on the title only. "Ghostbusers! Sounds like something Buslady'd be into. Bus drivers whose primary customers are the undead...brilliant!" I'm done now. A Ghostbuster game would be cool, I guess as long as it's not as bad as the ones reviewed by James the AVGN. Maybe this is the fore-bearer for the 3rd movie.
__________________
"Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656 |
|
11-22-2007, 10:09 PM | #48 | |
Y'all need Jesus
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,938
|
Quote:
|
|
11-23-2007, 02:23 AM | #49 | ||
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 477
|
Quote:
I only bring it up because I just watched Alien and Aliens last night and was just reminded how awesome they are. And of course, they've been making Alien games for some time now. Quote:
Although to be fair, I really need to see all three Bourne movies in succession to accurately judge that one.
__________________
Last edited by Janus Prospero; 11-23-2007 at 02:42 AM. |
||
11-23-2007, 03:42 AM | #50 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,797
|
I agree that Back to the Future is not the best trilogy but it's definitely a classic and comparing it to mediocre trilogies like "Pirates" or "X-Men" is BLASPHEMY!
|
11-25-2007, 09:20 AM | #51 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,744
|
Pirates isn't even really a triology, it's crap lol. The first movie was the best of those three. The other two just sank, pun intended. I'm surprised no one brought Matrix up. That's a triology to say the least.
|
11-25-2007, 09:27 AM | #52 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,797
|
What's a "triology"?
And the Matrix trilogy sucks. |
11-25-2007, 11:13 AM | #53 |
Wacky Action
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: on Earth
Posts: 12,784
|
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (live-action) was a trilogy, and it certainly lived up to the trend of "the first was the only undisputed champion" trend.
Unfortunately, Ghostbusters may never be a trilogy... in the traditional sense... unless they do three of these CGI films.
__________________
Live and let live... or go to hell.
|
11-25-2007, 11:24 AM | #54 | |
Gorgeous and modest too
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,699
|
Quote:
And to say X-Men and Spider-Man are better 'trilogies' than Back to the Future is a lie, and I will fight anyone who says otherwise.
__________________
|
|
11-25-2007, 12:56 PM | #55 | ||||
Rat-faced Dude-guy
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 26,216
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656 |
||||
11-25-2007, 01:24 PM | #56 | |
Gorgeous and modest too
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,699
|
Battle of definitions!
Quote:
__________________
|
|
11-25-2007, 01:28 PM | #57 |
Thug
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 76
|
..........
Last edited by cross; 12-04-2007 at 06:41 AM. |
11-25-2007, 02:32 PM | #58 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,797
|
|
11-25-2007, 03:10 PM | #59 |
Gorgeous and modest too
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,699
|
Hey, my dictionary at home says the same thing, but I can't very well quote that.
__________________
|
11-25-2007, 07:38 PM | #60 |
Second Gear
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
|
What the hell is even going on in here? Fighting over what a trilogy is? Arguing about if Spider-Man is better than Back to the Future? Seriously, guys. That's some stupid sh*t that should be relegated to the TV and Movies section. Not here.
We argue about which suit Mario looked cutest in, and whether or not the casual game player is ruining our industry! Keep the menial crap out of here! Leave the VG section for the important stuff! |
Tags |
i ain't fraid of no sjw, who ya gonna cuck |
|
|