The Technodrome Forums

Go Back   The Technodrome Forums > General Forums > General Discussion > Everything Else

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2019, 02:54 PM   #1
Fang Wolf
Proud Swedish Furry
 
Fang Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In Europe: Sweden
Posts: 3,513
Exclamation Judged and Accused


How many of your artist/animator have be Judged because of your works and who you are?
Be in my shoes and suffer for accused for that you draw - that will you do in real life.
For some people is art = reality - There is no difference between them....
Yes, I have..So have you be in this kind of thing?

Warning for nsfw rant - about me as Furry:
Spoiler:
I'm a Furry and be accused of being in beastaliy because I'm Furry and that is not true!
I would never do that kind of thing...why think people we furries do that kind of things?

- Never understand People in this world....
__________________

Last edited by Fang Wolf; 04-26-2019 at 04:36 PM.
Fang Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2019, 03:29 PM   #2
Andrew NDB
Weed Whacker
 
Andrew NDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 20,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fang Wolf View Post
Warning for nsfw rant - about me as Furry:
Spoiler:
I'm a Furry and be accused of being in beastaliy because I'm Furry and that is not true!
I would never do that kind of thing...why think people we furries do that kind of things?
I don't think that's a very big leap to make, mentally, for a lot of people looking from the outside in. Personally, I think it's not "I have a fantasy about having sex with animals" but rather, "I have a fantasy about having sex as an animal."

Working in the hotel industry you sure hear a lot of stories about what goes on in those "Furry" cons...
Andrew NDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2019, 03:33 PM   #3
IndigoErth
Team Blue Boy
 
IndigoErth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.S., East Coast
Posts: 12,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fang Wolf View Post
I would never do that kind of thing...why think people we furries do that kind of things?
My two cents... Because despite the intelligence of the species, human beings can be rather simple minded beasts who think all the answers should be simple. A black and white world is easy, all the gray area requires thought and most are too lazy for the more complex thought required.

The furry thing is not something I'll personally ever understand, but I at least can appreciate the amazing amount of talent that goes into a lot of those costumes.
IndigoErth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2019, 03:54 PM   #4
Fang Wolf
Proud Swedish Furry
 
Fang Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In Europe: Sweden
Posts: 3,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndigoErth View Post
Because despite the intelligence of the species, human beings can be rather simple minded beasts who think all the answers should be simple.
A black and white world is easy, all the gray area requires thought and most are too lazy for the more complex thought required.
Yes, world is black and white. (all as no normals is a big sins)
Some people I have meet don't know what is the difference between human intelligence creatures
(Mutants, werewolfs, ect, ect..) and no intelligence beasts.

Here is The Guide tell what I mean.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew NDB View Post
I don't think that's a very big leap to make, mentally, for a lot of people looking from the outside in.
Personally, I think it's not "I have a fantasy about having sex with animals" but rather, "I have a fantasy about having sex as an animal."
Yes, you can have fantasy or dream about it. (No wrong with that...)
But if you do thing as animation, artworks or says someting about you be accused of it.
People think you in it and drag you down in dirt (called weirdo, ect, ect, ect).
__________________

Last edited by Fang Wolf; 04-26-2019 at 04:19 PM.
Fang Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2019, 04:29 PM   #5
FredWolfLeonardo
Big Blue Boy Scout
 
FredWolfLeonardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 3,845
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeandRaph87 View Post
The biggest villains were the censors.
What they could do without being held back is my question.
Shredder could've done more than blow up the Channel Six building.
I don't mean as far as murdering Splinter, but think of the possibilities if censors were not an issue.
Shredder and Krang combined had the biggest arsenal of any villains in all of the cartoons.
FredWolfLeonardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2021, 08:26 PM   #6
Fang Wolf
Proud Swedish Furry
 
Fang Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In Europe: Sweden
Posts: 3,513
People judged everything as Different what they think is normal..
__________________
Fang Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2021, 08:30 AM   #7
Leo656
The Franchise
 
Leo656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 21,704
I think there's "degrees" of everything. Like there's people who have one or two beers with dinner, and there's people who get fall-down piss-their-pants drunk every chance they get. But it's unfair to accuse people on One Side of that equation of being The Other Side by default. Like when I have a few beers at a holiday party, there's always at least ONE person giving me the side-eye, and my wife is always like "No, he's not like that at all, he's never a problem drinker." But people ASSUME you are, and man, that can be annoying as hell.

So yeah, I think there's degrees. Some people just like the artwork, and that seems pretty much fine and "harmless"; I don't get why some people get all bent about it. Lola Bunny or Jessica Rabbit, it's a cartoon either way so we've already crossed one "line" into Nonsense. But nobody ever really gets side-eyed for saying they'd bang Jessica Rabbit; it's more or less a given, from what I've seen. But... it's still just a cartoon... so while I see there's still a few degrees of separation between one and the other... either one is "silly" if we're being honest about it. So if a person is already one who finds cartoon characters arousing, well... I don't see the big deal either way. FW April or Krystal from Star Fox, it's really not THAT different. You're never gonna bang either one of 'em in Real Life, so who cares what you're thinking in your head? I mean, if Lola Bunny is Wrong then I dont wanna be Right.

Other people do the fursuit and convention thing, and I gotta admit, that's a bit more outlandish to me, but... MOSTLY because I can't fathom anyone spending so much time, money and effort on ANY thing. It's also none of my business. But I'd never participate. At the same time I don't go to "regular" cons or dress up in elaborate super-hero attire either; again Too Much Work! But I have no problem with people who do, and a lot of time their craftsmanship is admirable. As for what people are doing behind closed doors at such affairs... eh, once again, not my business. If people wanna dress up like Care Bears and screw around, that's their business, just like the people down the hall at the same hotel dressing up like Batman and Batgirl and doing their own weird sex stuff is their own business. I don't see much separation between the two, frankly. Either one is kinda "weird" if you wanna be judgmental about it.

Either way, I think it's all pretty harmless and I think it's kinda weird that a lot of people talk about furries the same way they talk about pedophiles or actual zoophiles. I highly doubt that the same people who jack it to Thundercats are also molesting their pets. Y'know who I've seen in the news a lot over the years get in trouble for molesting animals? Chicks who work at vet clinics and animal shelters and horse farms. Lotta "after-hours" stuff going on in those places if you go strictly by what the headlines report. But do we automatically assume that every woman who becomes a vet secretly wants to molest animals? No, we don't assume that. Or likewise, how many times is it in the news every single year that some female teacher got caught having sex with her underage students? Literally dozens, and I'm sure there are tons who never get reported. But do we automatically assume that every female teacher wants to have sex with her students? No, we don't. No matter how many times it actually HAPPENS, we don't cast those aspersions on those types of people.

I don't know. I think there's way worse stuff in the world than people getting horny for cartoon characters, and I do think it's kinda funny that Those People get judged a lot more harshly than a lot of people who actually do Bad Stuff in real life. It's odd.
__________________

"I left some words quite far from here to be a short reminder...
I laid them out in stone, in case they need to last forever..."

"But hey... I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know."
nWo Tech: The Official Thread Poison of the Technodrome Forums
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxr...awnHgDz1ceDcfA
Leo656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2021, 12:19 PM   #8
Sumac
Foot Elite
 
Sumac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,052
Furries are single handedly responsible for their...ahem..."reputation".
So, they should deal with it.

Usually, I am "live an let live" type, so I don't have strong feelings about weirdos doing some crazy ****, but furries creep me out. The whole idea of pretending to be a "cartoon animal" is just...bizzare, to say the least.
__________________
Now with 200,1% more poison!
Sumac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 01:32 AM   #9
Coola Yagami
Emperor
 
Coola Yagami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,299
I can't say I understand furries either, but to each their own.

It's just funny how people are quick to vilify anything related to sex but not when it's related to animated violence.

Like if someone draws Jessica Rabbit in all her glory, people think the person is sicko.

But yet actual DC artists can draw the Joker standing in a room, covered in blood, dead bodies all around him, and no one is accusing the artist of having sick homicidal tendencies and being a potential danger in real life.

Like when I read Dollhouse's plans in the New 52 Catwoman comics, it made my skin crawl, but over how sick the character was, not because I was thinking the comic book writer was some deranged mass murderer that somehow snuck into DC offices to script this.
__________________
"I was down with TMNT once, but then they changed what TMNT was. Now what I was down with is no longer TMNT and what TMNT now is seems weird and scary. And it'll happen to YOU."

Check out my blog for Comic Reviews and other things. https://markepicblogofrandomness.blogspot.com/
I also started The AEW Crew, the All Elite Wrestling Fan Club! https://www.facebook.com/groups/637508120044168/
Coola Yagami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 02:21 AM   #10
Andrew NDB
Weed Whacker
 
Andrew NDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 20,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coola Yagami View Post
Like if someone draws Jessica Rabbit in all her glory, people think the person is sicko.
Do they? I think it's fine to do that. It's just more the people that get off on stuff like that and obsess on it that is iffy, not the artists.
Andrew NDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 02:27 AM   #11
Leo656
The Franchise
 
Leo656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 21,704
To my point earlier, though... I've personally never heard anyone belittle anyone else for lusting after Jessica Rabbit. To the contrary, I've seen grown men in a public setting make jokes about wanting to f*ck Jessica Rabbit, and it's taken no differently than if they'd said they wanted to f*ck Britney Spears.

I mean it's just kinda "interesting". I'm on the record that I have zero problem with anyone being attracted to a cartoon character. I just think that once you're already into that territory it's kinda silly to say "Well, This One with huge breasts, long legs, a round ass and 'F*ck Me' eyes is Perfectly Okay... but This Other One with all the same features BUT she's also got a tail, that's gross and you're a horrible person now." Like it's 99% the same thing, c'mon. Either way, it's a drawing. If it's purposely drawn to be arousing then people shouldn't act disgusted and horrified by the fact that some people ARE in fact aroused by it. It's okay not to be into it, like it's okay not to like rap music or the color orange or whatever. But when people overreact so hyperbolically to it as some do - "Oh my god those people should be gassed to death or thrown in jail", etc. etc. - that's what I find weird. Like really? People should be killed or locked up because they got aroused by a drawing. We've all heard it said. "Too far", says I. Way, way too far. Sounds way too much like "Kill all the f*gs", to me.

To your Sex vs. Violence point, however... yeah, I've never understood that. As a kid, I was allowed to watch horror movies if I REALLY wanted to; my Mom was scared they'd give me nightmares, and very rarely they did, but I liked being scared, so whatever. So I could watch all the Freddy and Jason movies I wanted to, no problem. But if my Dad fell asleep with the TV on, and I came downstairs to take a piss and saw naked tits on the living room TV on my way to the bathroom, good LORD did my Mom throw a fit. She'd be screaming at my Dad for like two hours, while he'd be saying "So what? Big deal, he saw tits, gimme a f*cking break." It was ridiculous!

Meanwhile, one time when I was like 4 she brought me over to her friend's house, and they rented The Toxic Avenger and had me watch it with them. Why? Good f*cking question! The brief nudity, she covered my eyes, but the guy getting his guts ripped out was PERFECTLY fine for a 4-year old. Yeah, and what do you think I saw in my sleep for the next week? Christ, I really think I would've been better off seeing two seconds of tits at that age than the rest of what's in that f*cking movie. But oh NO... you can show your kid people drowning in toxic waste, ripping people's heads off, people's guts getting torn out, but GOD FORBID they see TITS, that's gonna f*ck 'em up.

I mean... I AM a huge pervert, so maybe she wasn't 100% wrong. But I kinda think it had less to do with the fact I saw so many tits at a young age, and more to do with the fact that I wasn't "supposed" to see them and that made them more glamorous and exciting. Like maybe if it wasn't such a big earth-shaking deal I wouldn't have given a sh*t. I don't know.

But I definitely think it's stupid and ridiculous how as a society we glorify violence but censor sex and nudity. Like, one is a Natural Act and the other is an Unnatural Act, by definition. And yet we've got the entire thing backwards, we celebrate the Unnatural and we vilify the Natural, and it makes no goddamn sense.

But I think it has a lot to do with why so many people are so screwed up.
__________________

"I left some words quite far from here to be a short reminder...
I laid them out in stone, in case they need to last forever..."

"But hey... I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know."
nWo Tech: The Official Thread Poison of the Technodrome Forums
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxr...awnHgDz1ceDcfA
Leo656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 05:54 AM   #12
Sumac
Foot Elite
 
Sumac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coola Yagami View Post
I can't say I understand furries either, but to each their own.

It's just funny how people are quick to vilify anything related to sex but not when it's related to animated violence.

Like if someone draws Jessica Rabbit in all her glory, people think the person is sicko.

But yet actual DC artists can draw the Joker standing in a room, covered in blood, dead bodies all around him, and no one is accusing the artist of having sick homicidal tendencies and being a potential danger in real life.

Like when I read Dollhouse's plans in the New 52 Catwoman comics, it made my skin crawl, but over how sick the character was, not because I was thinking the comic book writer was some deranged mass murderer that somehow snuck into DC offices to script this.
I think it is something uniquely American and related to Puritan values. But wherever it comes from the hypocrisy is obvious: violence and blood are good and won't effect anyone, tits and nudity is horrible and turn little kids to pervert rapists.

One of the best demonstration of the issue is the recent Mortal Kombat game: American SJWtards were angry at developers for "too sexy costumes", so most women in the new game have ended up being covered from head to toe, while violence reaches an unprecedented level. This binary is absolutely idiotic and baffling, even though advertisements and jokes featuring sex are everywhere in American culture.

This whole issue baffles me, not only on ideological, but purely on logical level. Somehow, in the minds of some people, such natural things as nudity and sex are more traumatizing than hardcore violence!? How!?

Or as George R.R. Martin said: “I can describe an axe entering a human skull in great explicit detail and no one will blink twice at it. I provide a similar description, just as detailed, of a penis entering a vagina, and I get letters about it and people swearing off. To my mind this is kind of frustrating, it’s madness. Ultimately, in the history of [the] world, penises entering vaginas have given a lot of people a lot of pleasure; axes entering skulls, well, not so much.”

We have similar issue in Russia, where majority of people are hellbent to stop any kind of sex education in schools, thinking it will make kids into perverts and sex deviants. And I mean, not SJW ****-propaganda about "boys can be girls", but just general stuff, like diseases and medical information is considered "taboo".

In Western Europe people are much more open-minded when it comes to sex and nudity, which seemingly baffles a lot of Americans when they see their comic books.

Reaction of SJWs on this stuff is whole another matter, but I doubt that majority of SJW angry about sex and nudity for political reasons, more like, because, they themselves ugly freaks and thus need to eliminate any reminder of what real beauty looks like, not that it will help them, since they main ugliness on the inside not on outside.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo656 View Post
To my point earlier, though... I've personally never heard anyone belittle anyone else for lusting after Jessica Rabbit. To the contrary, I've seen grown men in a public setting make jokes about wanting to f*ck Jessica Rabbit, and it's taken no differently than if they'd said they wanted to f*ck Britney Spears.

I mean it's just kinda "interesting". I'm on the record that I have zero problem with anyone being attracted to a cartoon character. I just think that once you're already into that territory it's kinda silly to say "Well, This One with huge breasts, long legs, a round ass and 'F*ck Me' eyes is Perfectly Okay... but This Other One with all the same features BUT she's also got a tail, that's gross and you're a horrible person now." Like it's 99% the same thing, c'mon. Either way, it's a drawing. If it's purposely drawn to be arousing then people shouldn't act disgusted and horrified by the fact that some people ARE in fact aroused by it. It's okay not to be into it, like it's okay not to like rap music or the color orange or whatever. But when people overreact so hyperbolically to it as some do - "Oh my god those people should be gassed to death or thrown in jail", etc. etc. - that's what I find weird. Like really? People should be killed or locked up because they got aroused by a drawing. We've all heard it said. "Too far", says I. Way, way too far. Sounds way too much like "Kill all the f*gs", to me.
I think, major difference, between cartoon animals and sexy girls like Jessica Rabbit is that they are "codified" on different level.

I have a theory, well, it is more like a fact, that people are attracted to certain things in other sex, like most women would be attracted to a healthy strong man with big muscles and most men would be attracted to a sexy woman, with big hips and tits.

I think it is "hard-wired" into human psyche, so it doesn't really matter whether those things exist on a real human or a fictional character. We can "feel / understand" that this is supposed to be attractive, even beyond our logical functions.

This is why drawing of fictional humans are considered to be OK to masturbate too. Well, by a lot of people.

However, when it comes to cartoon animals, our human minds can read that this is not OK, because, they can "feel / understand" that those creatures ARE not humans. Thus controversial reaction.

It's like a logic error: one hand character has some things humans hard-wired to find attractive, on the other - it is not a human, thus it should not be attractive. Thus confusion and repulsion.
__________________
Now with 200,1% more poison!

Last edited by Sumac; 01-09-2021 at 06:05 AM.
Sumac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 11:16 AM   #13
Leo656
The Franchise
 
Leo656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 21,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumac View Post

One of the best demonstration of the issue is the recent Mortal Kombat game: American SJWtards were angry at developers for "too sexy costumes", so most women in the new game have ended up being covered from head to toe, while violence reaches an unprecedented level. This binary is absolutely idiotic and baffling, even though advertisements and jokes featuring sex are everywhere in American culture.

This whole issue baffles me, not only on ideological, but purely on logical level. Somehow, in the minds of some people, such natural things as nudity and sex are more traumatizing than hardcore violence!? How!?
I haven't played the newest one yet, but I've heard a little bit about all that. And that is so, so, SO stupid. It's like the entire thing in a nutshell, right there.

Madness.
__________________

"I left some words quite far from here to be a short reminder...
I laid them out in stone, in case they need to last forever..."

"But hey... I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know."
nWo Tech: The Official Thread Poison of the Technodrome Forums
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxr...awnHgDz1ceDcfA
Leo656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 11:31 AM   #14
Fang Wolf
Proud Swedish Furry
 
Fang Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In Europe: Sweden
Posts: 3,513
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coola Yagami View Post
It's just funny how people are quick to vilify anything related to sex but not when it's related to animated violence.

Like if someone draws Jessica Rabbit in all her glory, people think the person is sicko.
Yes, I have done animation about Celestia x Shredder. (MLP)
BANG, People start to accusing me for have sex with animals....
- judged and black mark - Like I was in beastaliy....

But Pony is human-level intelligence.
So Why would that be mark as beastaliy?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Coola Yagami View Post
But yet actual DC artists can draw the Joker standing in a room, covered in blood, dead bodies all around him, and no one is accusing the artist of having sick homicidal tendencies and being a potential danger in real life.
Yes, that is true. No one jugded artis for that.
That is really okay...

OBS: But world full of nutbrains as down understand was art and was in real.
__________________

Last edited by Fang Wolf; 01-09-2021 at 11:38 AM.
Fang Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2021, 11:05 PM   #15
Hamato Yoshi
Stone Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 770
Reminds me of this song from sitcom MWC :

https://marriedwithchildren.fandom.com/wiki/Branded

Hamato Yoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
accusations, accused, furry hate, furry justice, furry woes, i dont touch animals, judged, rant, think of the furries

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.