Pro Wrestling Discussion - Page 279

*XERO* · 10-19-2010, 01:29 PM

Yeah, but like you said, if he did it a few years back, it would've helped a lot.

Being 'built like a wrestler' can only get you so far if you don't have the youth to operate.

The Clerk · 10-19-2010, 03:11 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRTPeh6mgRY

He's not bad, but wouldn't make a living just based on that.

How do you put the actually YouTube video on here? Ben! Help!

*TheCanadiandrome* · 10-19-2010, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benvenuto

I gotta say, I'm looking forward to the Bryan/Ziggler match the most at Bragging Rights.

yeah perhaps. just too bad i won't be able to catch the PPV

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker

No it doesn't. It's political. Vince has a video on WWE.com explaining it.

it's also perhaps getting WWE in more trouble as well

The Clerk · 10-19-2010, 03:36 PM

Oh yeah, the Amdrag/Dolph match will be the highlight for me. I'm a huge mark for both those guys. Also I'm kind of surprised they have a buried alive match, with the TV PG thing and all.

*XERO* · 10-19-2010, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Clerk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRTPeh6mgRY

He's not bad, but wouldn't make a living just based on that.

How do you put the actually YouTube video on here? Ben! Help!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRTPeh6mgRY

The part that is highlighted after the '=', copy and paste then put it in the Youtube brackets.

And viola!

*BubblyShell22* · 10-20-2010, 07:58 AM

I didn't know there was a buried alive match at the PPV, but I have a feeling Taker will lose it. He's been losing a lot of matches lately.

*The Stryker* · 10-20-2010, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Clerk

Also I'm kind of surprised they have a buried alive match, with the TV PG thing and all.

I don't get what's not PG about a buried alive match. It's just dirt and a box.

I think some people confuse PG with G far too often.

*shuriken* · 10-20-2010, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BubblyShell22

I didn't know there was a buried alive match at the PPV, but I have a feeling Taker will lose it. He's been losing a lot of matches lately.

Which is exactly the reason why I think he's gonna win. Kane has owned Taker twice already. To keep the Rivalry going Taker's gotta win, what with all the odds stacked against him. Plus being buried alive gives Kane a chance to rest for a bit and possibly have a third Wrestlemania match in which he ends the streak. Here's hoping anyway.

*BubblyShell22* · 10-20-2010, 01:28 PM

It would be cool if he did win because I'm sick of them having him be weak and losing matches. But at the same time, I just doubt it because I think they want Kane to be more dominant. I have a feeling this feud will be carried out longer than we want it to.

As for the Stand Up For WWE thing, I think it's stupid, and I'm not participating it in if it's for politics. I hate politics with a vengeance.

*TheCanadiandrome* · 10-20-2010, 03:15 PM

ah, i'm thinking Taker takes it at Bragging Rights. a good feud has both Wrestlers looking strong, not having one keep dominating constantly to the point where u just don't even give to sh*ts any more. and if Kane were to win again at Bragging Rights i just don't see how that would be good. end the feud once and for all at Bragging Rights and be done with it.

*The Stryker* · 10-20-2010, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BubblyShell22

As for the Stand Up For WWE thing, I think it's stupid, and I'm not participating it in if it's for politics. I hate politics with a vengeance.

Yeah. I bet you do.

The only person I endorse beating Taker at Mania right now is Cena.

*shuriken* · 10-20-2010, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker

Yeah. I bet you do.

The only person I endorse beating Taker at Mania right now is Cena.

Can I ask why? Don't get me wrong, I like Cena took me a while but he's a charismatic guy that is good in the ring and on the mic but him beating Undertaker would just be so... predictable. I guess Kane Beating Taker at Mania is predictable too but it just makes much more sense though. With his latest titile reign this is the first time he's been a world Champion (excluding ECW Champ which was like the Hardcore title) since like 1998. This push was great and I am loving this feud, especially once Bearer came back. You also have to take into account that Taker isn't that young anymore and he might be thinking about retiring after Wrestlmania. It's fitting that Kane beat him at Wrestlemania, much like the Rock finally beat Austin in an awesome match. Plus I think Kane and Taker work very well together, haven't seen a Taker Cena match in a while but I don't see it being as good. Granted he's the face of WWE but why have him beat Taker. He seems like the LAST guy to care about beating the streak.

The Clerk · 10-20-2010, 10:16 PM

If Cena ended Taker's streak I would be so upset. I'm not saying this because I dislike Cena it's because it wouldn't make sense, much like shuriken said. If the likes of Flair, Edge or even HBK couldn't do it why would they have Cena do it? Cena has already broken enough records in the company; first to pin Khali, first to break Master Lock, Made Trips AND HBK tap at a WM main event, was champion for over a year. He doesn't need this.

And why would he want to end it? Unless a heel turn happens I can't see this happening.

*The Stryker* · 10-21-2010, 12:03 AM

First off. I'm more of a supporter of Taker retiring with the streak intact. But if it had to end, I hope it's Cena that gets the honor.

He doesn't need it because he's already established but who cares. He's the last big match Taker can have at Mania unless they sign Sting. He's a company guy and he's dependable.

Giving the win to somebody like Dibiase or any other young guy is a gigantic risk. You end the streak, give the guy a huge rub, what if he still flounders? Big whoop, everybody loses.

Also, Lashley broke the master lock. Also really funny that you think pinning Khali and breaking the master lock were historic events.

Redmage1987 · 10-21-2010, 12:20 AM

My Favorite Wrestler is Randy Savage, Hulk Hogan would be next. Here's a Couple of videos for fans of Randy Savage.

Be Warned, this one is loud.

*shuriken* · 10-21-2010, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker

Also, Lashley broke the master lock.

Yeah I remember that, everyone was all "oh Sh*t Lashley broke the master lock!", he became US Champion and then left to TNA.

I'd rather have the Miz end the Streak then Cena to be honest. But I can see why you'd have Cena end it. Unless he does retire with the streak intact, but I don't see it happening. They'll probably put over someone else at the end of Taker's career. I'm sticking to my guns and hoping that it'll be Kane.

*The Stryker* · 10-21-2010, 06:17 AM

Kane would be awful since the guy has been considering retirement for 2 years now.

Redmage. Do you ever talk about anything past 1995?

The Clerk · 10-21-2010, 08:13 AM

did I say historic? No. But I'm just saying he was the first person to do those things. Sure Lashley did it but he wasn't the first to. And Taker couldn't even pin Khali at first. Khali pinned the Dead Man just by placing his foot on him! If someone like Taker, whom fueded with Khali for at least two months, couldn't pin/make him tap and then Cena does?

You say Cena is dependable, which is true, but what does it matter? Stone Cold is a prime example; people praise him and he no shows because he doesn't want to get pinned by Brock. He beats his wife. What I'm saying is just because you think someone is "dependable" doesn't make them worthy of it. If someone beeating their wife is worthy of what Austin got then anyone should be worthy of beating Taker. But a long time ago Taker said in an interview if he were to ever lose at a WM he'd want it to be to Kane. And Vince also said he doesn't want the streak to end.

If not Kane, I vote Orton. Bring the Legend Killer gimmick back.

*BubblyShell22* · 10-21-2010, 08:48 AM

Yeah, I think it should be Kane or Orton to beat Taker. Cena would be good for it, but he's beaten the odds too many times that it gets tiring after awhile. Kane would be fitting especially with the feud they have now. Orton would also be good since he's kind of going back to his heel days with the punt and all.

And, yes, Stryker, I despise politics.

*The Stryker* · 10-21-2010, 09:55 AM

Just saying. I bet you do. Probably makes your brain all hurty.

Actually Lashley was the first to break the master lock and Taker beat Khali a few times before Khali moved to raw.

Your Austin rant makes no goddamn sense whatsoever. What does Austin's attitude have to do with Cena? Last I checked every person is different and Stone Cold beat his wife way after he was a megastar.

Which brings me to this. You complain about a guy needing the win and already having enough and then you bring up Orton. Orton? Seriously? The guy that WWE tried to push as the face of the company for years and years before they finally got it sorta right?

You cannot say Cena is a bad choice and then say Orton is a great one. They're both pratically in the same position in terms of legacy and whatnot. What Cena has over Orton is once again dependability. Orton is somewhat injury prone, has failed wellness tests and has been an embarassment for the company on the road.

He may be reformed or whatever but his track record isn't good at all.

10-19-2010, 01:29 PM	#5561
XERO Hybrid Theorist Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Alamo City Posts: 8,063	Yeah, but like you said, if he did it a few years back, it would've helped a lot. Being 'built like a wrestler' can only get you so far if you don't have the youth to operate. __________________ "Travel at the speed of light... then hit the nitro!"

10-19-2010, 03:11 PM	#5562
The Clerk Stone Warrior Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 818	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRTPeh6mgRY He's not bad, but wouldn't make a living just based on that. How do you put the actually YouTube video on here? Ben! Help! __________________

10-19-2010, 03:36 PM	#5564
The Clerk Stone Warrior Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 818	Oh yeah, the Amdrag/Dolph match will be the highlight for me. I'm a huge mark for both those guys. Also I'm kind of surprised they have a buried alive match, with the TV PG thing and all. __________________

10-20-2010, 07:58 AM	#5566
BubblyShell22 Leo-holic Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Indiana Posts: 16,912	I didn't know there was a buried alive match at the PPV, but I have a feeling Taker will lose it. He's been losing a lot of matches lately. __________________ "A warrior who never fails, never learns."-The Ancient One. "Embrace your inner a**holiness."-Mr. Anderson.

10-20-2010, 01:28 PM	#5569
BubblyShell22 Leo-holic Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Indiana Posts: 16,912	It would be cool if he did win because I'm sick of them having him be weak and losing matches. But at the same time, I just doubt it because I think they want Kane to be more dominant. I have a feeling this feud will be carried out longer than we want it to. As for the Stand Up For WWE thing, I think it's stupid, and I'm not participating it in if it's for politics. I hate politics with a vengeance. __________________ "A warrior who never fails, never learns."-The Ancient One. "Embrace your inner a**holiness."-Mr. Anderson.

10-20-2010, 03:15 PM	#5570
TheCanadiandrome Big, Bad & Bold Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Inside the Technodrome; Shredderville; Saskatchewan Posts: 19,618	ah, i'm thinking Taker takes it at Bragging Rights. a good feud has both Wrestlers looking strong, not having one keep dominating constantly to the point where u just don't even give to shts any more. and if Kane were to win again at Bragging Rights i just don't see how that would be good. end the feud once and for all at Bragging Rights and be done with it. __________________ Add me: PSN/XBL; Nintendo Network ID: BDS-3.1.6; Switch FC: SW-3378-5206-8020* TMNT Fan Club: http://sot.ag/4jZR0 Visit My Wish List: http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=30904 My Collection: http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=40276

10-20-2010, 10:16 PM	#5573
The Clerk Stone Warrior Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 818	If Cena ended Taker's streak I would be so upset. I'm not saying this because I dislike Cena it's because it wouldn't make sense, much like shuriken said. If the likes of Flair, Edge or even HBK couldn't do it why would they have Cena do it? Cena has already broken enough records in the company; first to pin Khali, first to break Master Lock, Made Trips AND HBK tap at a WM main event, was champion for over a year. He doesn't need this. And why would he want to end it? Unless a heel turn happens I can't see this happening. __________________

10-21-2010, 12:03 AM	#5574
The Stryker Stupid Rich Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Room 237 Posts: 11,152	First off. I'm more of a supporter of Taker retiring with the streak intact. But if it had to end, I hope it's Cena that gets the honor. He doesn't need it because he's already established but who cares. He's the last big match Taker can have at Mania unless they sign Sting. He's a company guy and he's dependable. Giving the win to somebody like Dibiase or any other young guy is a gigantic risk. You end the streak, give the guy a huge rub, what if he still flounders? Big whoop, everybody loses. Also, Lashley broke the master lock. Also really funny that you think pinning Khali and breaking the master lock were historic events. __________________ @~<3 Mom~@

10-21-2010, 12:20 AM	#5575
Redmage1987 Hench Mutant Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Missouri Posts: 289	My Favorite Wrestler is Randy Savage, Hulk Hogan would be next. Here's a Couple of videos for fans of Randy Savage. Be Warned, this one is loud.

10-21-2010, 06:17 AM	#5577
The Stryker Stupid Rich Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Room 237 Posts: 11,152	Kane would be awful since the guy has been considering retirement for 2 years now. Redmage. Do you ever talk about anything past 1995? __________________ @~<3 Mom~@ Last edited by The Stryker; 10-21-2010 at 07:32 AM.

10-21-2010, 08:13 AM	#5578
The Clerk Stone Warrior Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 818	did I say historic? No. But I'm just saying he was the first person to do those things. Sure Lashley did it but he wasn't the first to. And Taker couldn't even pin Khali at first. Khali pinned the Dead Man just by placing his foot on him! If someone like Taker, whom fueded with Khali for at least two months, couldn't pin/make him tap and then Cena does? You say Cena is dependable, which is true, but what does it matter? Stone Cold is a prime example; people praise him and he no shows because he doesn't want to get pinned by Brock. He beats his wife. What I'm saying is just because you think someone is "dependable" doesn't make them worthy of it. If someone beeating their wife is worthy of what Austin got then anyone should be worthy of beating Taker. But a long time ago Taker said in an interview if he were to ever lose at a WM he'd want it to be to Kane. And Vince also said he doesn't want the streak to end. If not Kane, I vote Orton. Bring the Legend Killer gimmick back. __________________

10-21-2010, 08:48 AM	#5579
BubblyShell22 Leo-holic Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Indiana Posts: 16,912	Yeah, I think it should be Kane or Orton to beat Taker. Cena would be good for it, but he's beaten the odds too many times that it gets tiring after awhile. Kane would be fitting especially with the feud they have now. Orton would also be good since he's kind of going back to his heel days with the punt and all. And, yes, Stryker, I despise politics. __________________ "A warrior who never fails, never learns."-The Ancient One. "Embrace your inner a**holiness."-Mr. Anderson.

10-21-2010, 09:55 AM	#5580
The Stryker Stupid Rich Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Room 237 Posts: 11,152	Just saying. I bet you do. Probably makes your brain all hurty. Actually Lashley was the first to break the master lock and Taker beat Khali a few times before Khali moved to raw. Your Austin rant makes no goddamn sense whatsoever. What does Austin's attitude have to do with Cena? Last I checked every person is different and Stone Cold beat his wife way after he was a megastar. Which brings me to this. You complain about a guy needing the win and already having enough and then you bring up Orton. Orton? Seriously? The guy that WWE tried to push as the face of the company for years and years before they finally got it sorta right? You cannot say Cena is a bad choice and then say Orton is a great one. They're both pratically in the same position in terms of legacy and whatnot. What Cena has over Orton is once again dependability. Orton is somewhat injury prone, has failed wellness tests and has been an embarassment for the company on the road. He may be reformed or whatever but his track record isn't good at all. __________________ @~<3 Mom~@