View Full Version : Taking stories from the Mirages...
Sparvid
11-30-2002, 06:39 PM
About that, just how many stories can you "adapt" to the show, before runnig out of them? I mean, there's much likely going to be more episodes then Mirage stories.
Mondo_Gecko
11-30-2002, 07:02 PM
Yes maybe they will add Bebop & Rocksteady & Krang.
They've said they'll be trying to follow the Mirage storyline, but it'll probably be very spread out. And they've promised that this will NOT be a Mirage remake, there're going to be new ememies and plot threads totally unique to this universe.
Mondo_Gecko
11-30-2002, 07:16 PM
Hmm new enemies sounds cool. Maybe some neat mutants
Jephael
11-30-2002, 07:18 PM
That's always a possiblity, but unfortunatly, Bebop and Rocksteady won't be making any appearances and Krang may be a Utrom.
Mondo_Gecko
11-30-2002, 07:29 PM
I wonder if they'll bring over anything from the Archie Series. That would be cool.
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 06:18 AM
Probably not, I belive that they wont bring back anything from either archie or the cartoon. They probably just create new ones when there is a need.
Shellfox
12-01-2002, 08:26 AM
Have to remeber nothing is written in stone for the future. Just because they say we won't see Bepop and Rocksteady now does mean we may not see them in say the second season (if there is one) due to fan out cry, or simply running out of ideas as the show progresses
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 08:34 AM
Peter Laird is pretty much against the old cartoon and he is strongly involved in making the new show so they wont appear.
Shellfox
12-01-2002, 08:49 AM
As I said time is not written yet and just because hes invloved now doesn't mean he'll be involved later, and never underestimate the power of the fans, remeber its the fans that kept Quantum Leap on the air for like 3 years longer than the powers that be thought it would be. So just cause the boss says they won't be on now can be viewed as fact, but there is a big diffrince between now and 2 years from now, so just saying it won't is a bit pointless because the possiblity exists it may be small but it exists none the less. Laird may not always be involed for this season yes, but later well we just have to see
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 09:31 AM
Maybe it exist but it is very small. You have to remember that Mirage owns all right to TMNT So they can't ever walk over Lairds opinnion.
Sparvid
12-01-2002, 09:49 AM
Based on what I've seen Peter say, he will be involved as long as possible.
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 09:51 AM
Yes he will. And i can't imagine a situation where he would want those characters in.
Do you think they'll bring in Lotus Blossom? I always thought that was a great storyline. she was only in the cartoon right?
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 10:22 AM
Yeah we probably wont see her again either.
heretic888
12-01-2002, 10:24 AM
yes, i agree completely.
just accept facts: venus, krang, bebop, rocksteady and all of them are dead and gone. and there is nowhere near enough of a 'fan outcry' to bring them back.
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 10:25 AM
Yeah. Most of the "Fans" think that TMNT were only a Childrens show. They have no idea that TMNT was not originally like that.
tekcop
12-01-2002, 11:56 AM
Y'know they probably couldn't use Rockstead, Bebop, and Krang even if they want to. Artisan (or whoever has the rights to the cartoon) probably has the rights to all the "cartoon-only" characters.
Jephael
12-01-2002, 12:41 PM
Now that's something I never took into account.
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 12:53 PM
Yeah me either. I wonder if the FANS are really that powerful? Hmm maybe if you pushed and pushed Bebop & Rockteady could come back. Maybe they could make them smarter and maybe more challenging huh then they woulden't b eso blundering like Laird said
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 12:53 PM
Well You should not got your hopes up in the first place. It has been clear from the start that this time it will be a adaption of the original TMNT. And there is no room for characters like those.
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 12:56 PM
Do you think that they'll have other mutants though? From what i've heard the only mutants in the original version where the turtles, splinter and leatherhead. And i like a few more mutants then that.
Jephael
12-01-2002, 12:59 PM
If you think about it though, wouldn't you rather see more original characters instead of the same bunch of secondary characters from before?
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 01:01 PM
I think some brand new characters would be cool that way nobody would really have any expectations
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 01:09 PM
Of course there will be new characters. Atleast if the show is going to have other seasons.
Aztec General
12-01-2002, 01:34 PM
To everyone who wants the old cartoon/Archie comics back:
They are over and done!!! I don't know how to say it politely. Peter Laird has taken back the control of his creations. What you saw on the original cartoon had almost NOTHING in common with Laird's (and Eastman's) TMNT. The cartoon writers created their own 30 minute camp and bad jokefests for children aged 4-9, which happened to feature characters by the same name as E&L's comic book series. Think of it as the Batman show from the 1960s as compared to Frank Miller's Batman. Laird & Co. also did not take part in the Archie comics, so you can be fairly certain that there will be no returning characters from there either.
Laird wants a more serious action show, with an evolving story, and interesting characters. You can expect it to be similar to the Mirage comics, the first movie, plus whatever new aspects Laird decides to create in this NEW TMNT universe. Please put this debate to rest.
If you don't believe me, just read what Laird wrote on the official website.
I have just one question for all of the original cartoon fans out there. Would you still like the show now? I understand you liked it as a kid and you have fond memories (we all do) but: Have you seen it lately? By today's standards, and by the standards of adult intelligence the show is awful! There is absolutely no substance, no character development, no story, and even no action! There's only bad jokes and pizza references. (Although I'm told the first season is decent. I remember it being good, but I haven't seen it in awhile.)
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 02:01 PM
Wow that really puts things in perspective of what the show will be about. But I disagree with Laird I still enjoy the show today no matter what he says.
Jephael
12-01-2002, 02:03 PM
I'm with ya on on that, Mondo! I can never get tired of the show, and I would love it if they brought it back to television.
Apple Cat
12-01-2002, 02:03 PM
---delete this
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 02:06 PM
Yeah maybe he forgot that.
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 02:08 PM
Yeah Maybe because of the new show thay'll bring back the old show ooo i'm getting excited already. I hope that they do that.
Apple Cat
12-01-2002, 02:25 PM
---delete this
Jephael
12-01-2002, 02:30 PM
I know that he actually liked TMNT Adventures and he even did some cover art for several issues, though he didn't care for much of the toon.
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 02:39 PM
Ratking said all that there is to it. I know that I have over grown the show too. Well there are few good episodes I like but most of it is just boring. As for the New show being for children, So was the First Movie. And no one can say that it was bad. So is justice League and Batman TAS. mI like both shows and both have elements that needs older audience to figure out. The New show is not just for children, but because it's time slot, some compromises will be made. Just like in the first movie.
As for archie, It is the best TMNT comic published outside Mirage. And it did greatly what it was supposed to do, brought TMNT to the younger fans. But it was much better than the cartoon in every way. And it wasn't entirely for children either. Some things in might have gone over some younger readers heads.
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 02:47 PM
Laird liked TMNT Adventures!!!! Alright!!! I love that comic , i'm glad i have every issue and the equally as great Mighty Mutanimals!!!!!
Deepflame
12-01-2002, 02:52 PM
Lucky ~~~~~! Got all issues... I want!
Aztec General
12-01-2002, 02:53 PM
Ratking said all that there is to it. I know that I have over grown the show too. Well there are few good episodes I like but most of it is just boring. As for the New show being for children, So was the First Movie. And no one can say that it was bad. So is justice League and Batman TAS. mI like both shows and both have elements that needs older audience to figure out. The New show is not just for children, but because it's time slot, some compromises will be made. Just like in the first movie.
As for archie, It is the best TMNT comic published outside Mirage. And it did greatly what it was supposed to do, brought TMNT to the younger fans. But it was much better than the cartoon in every way. And it wasn't entirely for children either. Some things in might have gone over some younger readers heads.
1st Paragraph: Well said Karpo! There's no reason why a show can't be viewable by children but be intelligent enough for older teens and adults to enjoy it. If you are looking for comparisons, I'm expecting (and hoping) the new show to be comparable to the first TMNT movie (with more weapon use), or the X-Men show from the '90s, or Batman: TAS, or the Spiderman show from the '90s. If the show is of the same quality as any of the above, it will be a winner and a success.
2nd Paragraph: I'll grant you that the Archie comic was far better than the cartoon. I'll also grant you that it had some decent stories. Although as a whole it was a little bizarre (Cuddly the Cowlick?). But at the same time no one should expect any of the original characters from that series to reappear.
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 03:08 PM
Yeah. It's not even possible in theory because archie probably owns rights to all of those characters not taken from mirage.
Apple Cat
12-01-2002, 04:27 PM
---delete this
Karpo_007
12-01-2002, 04:59 PM
And the reason would be?
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 05:25 PM
It Be Cool tO See Some Archie Stuff i n the new show.
Apple Cat
12-01-2002, 05:33 PM
---delete this
Jephael
12-01-2002, 05:42 PM
Wouldn't it be weird though if they changed things so that Bebop and Rocksteady were members of the Mutanimals?
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 06:01 PM
wow thats a cool thought
Shellfox
12-01-2002, 07:35 PM
Well they were sorta good in the book so its not so far fetched
Apple Cat
12-01-2002, 08:15 PM
---delete this
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 08:31 PM
I think the Archie Comic Book
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 08:32 PM
You know who also made cool mutnimals, Ace Duck and The Frogs
Shellfox
12-01-2002, 08:34 PM
And Mona Lisa, just to give it a bit of Gender blance
Mondo_Gecko
12-01-2002, 11:10 PM
How could I leave out Mona Lisa?? Silly Yeah she rocks
Sparvid
12-02-2002, 05:48 AM
Yeah. It's not even possible in theory because archie probably owns rights to all of those characters not taken from mirage.Doesn't the creators own the rights to the characters that were created for the Archie universe? *checks a few scans* On the bottom of page 1 of TMNT Adventures #6, it says that Leonardo, Shredder, Leatherhead (and so on) are registred trademarks of Mirage Studios, but "Mary Bones and Jess Harley © 1989 by Ryan Brown".
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 07:29 AM
Really? I tought that the companies had all the rights over the charaters that were made by their employes.
Sparvid
12-02-2002, 08:09 AM
I have no idea what kind of rules they usually have at Archie...
Shellfox
12-02-2002, 08:46 AM
Creator doesn't always own the charter, Stan Lee Doesn't own Spider-Man, not sure why but he doesn't
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 09:27 AM
Diffrent companies have diffrent policies I guess.
tekcop
12-02-2002, 11:58 AM
Let me see... I think I have this down right.
Peter Laird owns the rights to most all characters that appeared in the Mirage comics first.
Artisan owns all rights to the characters that were in the cartoon first.
The creators either own or co-own the rights to their Archie comic characters but are probably only able to use them in Archie publications.
Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, Joe Simon, etc. don't own Spider-man or any of their creations because they created them for Marvel Comics as work-for-hire writers/artists.
I think that's about right.
Sparvid
12-02-2002, 12:19 PM
How about the Image series then? I'm guessing that the characters that was created there is owned by the writer/artist whoever they were...
tekcop
12-02-2002, 12:29 PM
How about the Image series then? I'm guessing that the characters that was created there is owned by the writer/artist whoever they were...
Yeah, Image usually lets the creators keep the rights to their characters and I can't think of any reason they wouldn't let the TMNT Vol. 3 writers and artists do the same.
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 12:46 PM
Thats probably true. Still there is no chance that characters like those can appear. And there is a fera that even if the show is success, It wont have a second season. I think this happened with Next Mutation. It was because Fox didnt own the rights to the TMNT and so didn't make enough money. And Fox is the Netwok again so im a little worried.
Anarchistguy
12-02-2002, 02:33 PM
Yeah! The show sounds good so far, but how can it contain serious
action when it's gonna be on the FOXBOX??? Look at all the crappy shows
in the lineup!!!
MzTheInsomniac
12-02-2002, 02:44 PM
IT'D BE BETTER IF THE TOON WAS ON CN
Apple Cat
12-02-2002, 02:54 PM
---delete this
Renee
12-02-2002, 02:56 PM
Im guessing he means Cartoon Network...
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 03:04 PM
Well it's not the Foxbox that worries me, It's the fox in general. It cancelled Next mutation even tough it was a succes. That was because Mirage owns the TMNT and so Fox cant make enough money. Well hopefully the company wont do that to the new tmnt show.
Ps. It is not a bad thing that NT:NM got cancelled, but if their policy is the same, it can be trouble.
Actually, I think it was Saban who cancelled TNM, not Fox. I'm not completely sure what happened, but I know TNM was signed for a second season.
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 03:15 PM
This is what i got from here: http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/muses/353/tmntn.html
Here's the skinny from Molly Bode of The Official TMNT Website:
We were all very surprised when Fox took the Turtles off the air. They did not even have the decency to tell us they were doing it. The first we found out about it was when someone sent me e-mail that it was not listed in their TV Guide. The only thing I can think of is that they took it off the air because they do not own it. They make more money showing something that they own. FoxKids and Saban are in a partnership. Anything on FoxKids has to be produced by Saban. Fox owns more of Power Rangers than TMNT.
It says it was posted by official website.
The only thing I can think of...
They don't actually know who exactly gave the order to cancel it, or why. That's the reason the Mirage crew came up with, not the reason Fox or Saban gave them. They didn't give Mirage a reason. I'm not saying the companies aren't in it for the money, but we don't know the whole story. I know for a fact they were planning a second season, it says so on that same site.
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 03:27 PM
Yeah well, my worrie was that something like that could happen again. Hopefully not. IF the show is as good as it seems to be, I wish it would last many seasons.
Mondo_Gecko
12-02-2002, 03:53 PM
What was the channel that the old TMNT was shown on?
Karpo_007
12-02-2002, 03:54 PM
I think in many channles. I know that it was on USA and CBS. Probably many others.
Mondo_Gecko
12-02-2002, 03:56 PM
Yeah i think i watched on CBS and YTV
Shellfox
12-02-2002, 07:29 PM
Paramount
considering Fox rarly makes anyshow for more than one seaon I dought the TMNT well be on long term. Power Rangers and NASCAR are the only shows from the last few years that have made more than 1 season on FOX. Batman, Spidey and X-Men lasted for a bit, but the times were a bit diffrent and they had more name power, TMNT may follow them but with how FOX is for younger fans I dought it.
Anarchistguy
12-02-2002, 08:06 PM
You're quite right. DAMN FOX!!!
tekcop
12-02-2002, 08:41 PM
What was the channel that the old TMNT was shown on?
The old show was syndicated. Any channel that wanted it and had the money could air it.
considering Fox rarly makes anyshow for more than one seaon I dought the TMNT well be on long term.
Well... Fox has nothing to do with the making of the new show so if they did cancel it, then it, in theory, could appear on a different network. For example, the Superman and Batman cartoons have been on three different networks.
Shellfox
12-02-2002, 08:52 PM
Ok true but Supes and Bats have ties to WB/CN, Shows on fox with the exception of Power Rangers and Digimon, seem to stop making/appearing in new eps in the states after FOX drops them, its possible for them to appear else where, but history does make me skeptical
tekcop
12-02-2002, 09:16 PM
Ok true but Supes and Bats have ties to WB/CN, Shows on fox with the exception of Power Rangers and Digimon, seem to stop making/appearing in new eps in the states after FOX drops them, its possible for them to appear else where, but history does make me skeptical
True... but what networks do X-Men Evolution and Jackie Chan Adventures air on? TMNT could move in with their cousins.
Karpo_007
12-03-2002, 04:28 AM
´That is the reason why Fox is not the best possible Network.
azure turtle
12-03-2002, 07:32 PM
True... but what networks do X-Men Evolution and Jackie Chan Adventures air on? TMNT could move in with their cousins.
Both shows are on the WB. I'm not worried about the TMNT not getting enough viewers, though. I think the current lineup for the Fox Box is very appealing for kids.
Anarchistguy
12-06-2002, 09:31 PM
and Laird didn't say that he didn't like the old cartoon
YES HE DID!!
Karpo_007
12-07-2002, 05:07 AM
Yeah he has adi many times that it got boring after the first season. Personally I like the second season tooo, but seasons 3-6 are pretty much plot recycling. There are few good David Wise eps tough.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.