Hyperstone Heist vs. Turtles in Time??

[darthsmozers]

Can someone explain the differences in these two games for me? I never had the Sega game (Wasn't HH a Sega game?)

[Ratking]

yes it was a sega game. It was the TIT for sega. It was different yet basicly the same yet not as good. Its just like the TMNT:TF series, as in the snes one was better again than the sega one.

I pefer HH than the snes one because i played TIT so, soo many times. I think easily more ppl would have liked the TIT from snes over the sega one. Also snes was bigger in the states than sega, where as segs was bigger in Europe and Aussie than snes, so i think more ppl here are from the states than europe (?) so TIT for snes would be more popular.

[Reznorite420]

You'll find a negative review of the Hyperstone Heist (by me) on this page (http://www.thetechnodrome.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1499&postdays=0&postorder=asc&star t=40).

[Prowl]

Not the case here. I enjoyed the Sega one. Darker graphics better animation, and characters from the movie (well Tatsu at least).

I guess they were basically the same game, but we've had a lot more fun replaying the sega one, and the snes one is, I don't know, somewhere in the garage. I loved the old Nes acrade game, though.

[Reznorite420]

Darker graphics better animationYou mean "cheaper".and characters from the movieTurtles In Time had that too (Tokka and Rahzar).

[Prowl]

That is of course if you consider turtles, the movie 2 a movie. I am refering to the only turtle movie I cared about.

No, not cheaper. They were both sprite-based games, and one of them offered the option to play with daker-toned characters, which, as a fan of the comic series, I enjoyed. I also enjoyed the more-then-2-frames-of-animation per attack that the genesis version had.

[Karpo_007]

I think tha you could choose darker looks in the snes game too. The animation could have been better on Sega, because it was a more powerful system.

[Prowl]

Sega had a faster processor, true, and the snes had a larger color pallet. The turtles game (niether of them) took real advantage of the pallet, and honestly, they didn't have to. They weren't going for realism. I enjoyed both games, and I did like the 3D surfing levels on TIT (I said tit) :). But ultimately, I enjoy the genesis one more.

[Karpo_007]

I guess it's a matter of opinnion, but personally, I don't see that big diffrence in the two games.

[Prowl]

No, you're actually right, Karpo. They are basically the same. Differnet story, same engine practically (much like 3D shooters are now). I was meraly partial to the animation. I was big into that in those days, and I loved the way slashing felt in the first arcade game, and I got that same feeling from the HH game. But yeah, it all comes down to opinion, and they were both great games. Some of the most interesting use of mode 7 on the snes too.

[Karpo_007]

Yeah. The Snes version differs from the arcade one quite a bit. Especially those "3d" levels with mode 7...

[Brothaman]

Yeah!! I like Snes Version better. Turtles In Time For snes was better than the Arcade version. I just wish they remade TMNT 2 & 3 from NES and remade it for Super Nintendo with better graphics. Well I got mame to play TMNT 2 but I would love to see the Manhatten Project remade with better graphics.

[Karpo_007]

Well I can't say wic is better version of Time, they are so diffrent. I like the future levels in Arcade version, and special levels in snes version, I just say that I like them both.