PDA

View Full Version : 28 weeks later?


Donnieee
01-01-2008, 10:11 AM
Has anyone seen it? was it good? did it scare you?

I have seen 28 days later and it scared me a lot so when I heard about the sequel I got really excited. "I have to see that" I thought when I saw some of the trailer, but to be honest I have not seen it yet. So now I ask you, have you seen it and was it worth it?

The Terror of Death
01-01-2008, 10:29 AM
Yes it was worth it. It was better than the first one imo. As soon as I left the movie theater I put it as #1 on my horror movie list. The only fault I had with the movie is that it should have been a little longer but despite that you should definatly check it out. I wouldnt say it scared me but there were moments that had me on the edge of my seat. Especially the first few minutes.

Donnieee
01-01-2008, 12:10 PM
Yes it was worth it. It was better than the first one imo. As soon as I left the movie theater I put it as #1 on my horror movie list. The only fault I had with the movie is that it should have been a little longer but despite that you should definatly check it out. I wouldnt say it scared me but there were moments that had me on the edge of my seat. Especially the first few minutes.

ah okey... Have you seen dawn of the dead?

The Terror of Death
01-01-2008, 12:31 PM
ah okey... Have you seen dawn of the dead?

I saw the remake. Its overrated imo.

Donnieee
01-01-2008, 01:02 PM
I think it is rather good but a little bit to bloody for me..:)

Jo Dawn
01-01-2008, 03:18 PM
I liked it... Though I didn't think it was scary. But then again, these kinds of movies don't scare me.

I thought it was facinating... It dealt with the 'after', which is something I always wanted to see in a 'zombie-like' film.

Donnieee
01-01-2008, 03:54 PM
Oh, that is fascinating. I have allways wanted to see a movie that deals with the aftermath of a catastrophe.

cqb101
01-02-2008, 06:20 PM
Not as good as the first, but a worthy sequel non the less.

Donnieee
01-02-2008, 06:41 PM
Not as good as the first, but a worthy sequel non the less.
okay.. which of them is the best?:D

cqb101
01-02-2008, 07:05 PM
okay.. which of them is the best?:D



Um, the first. Like I said.

Brodie
01-02-2008, 08:40 PM
I dug it, but I believe viewers get hosed with the fate of certain characters.

cqb101
01-03-2008, 08:59 AM
I dug it, but I believe viewers get hosed with the fate of certain characters.

I'll agree with that.

KROW
01-11-2008, 04:05 PM
I saw the remake. Its overrated imo.

Agreed. The original is much better.

Donnieee
01-13-2008, 12:40 PM
There seems to be a mixed feeling about that movie, cause everyone I have talked to either say it is good or it is very bad. Maybe I should make my own opinion about it..:)

By the way. I saw 28 weeks later just a couple of days ago and thought it was very good. But very bloody.

KROW
01-13-2008, 10:51 PM
There seems to be a mixed feeling about that movie, cause everyone I have talked to either say it is good or it is very bad. Maybe I should make my own opinion about it..:)

By the way. I saw 28 weeks later just a couple of days ago and thought it was very good. But very bloody.

The original Dawn was much better, in my eyes. It had more gore and shock value. The remake just felt too Hollywood for me. It was filled with jump-at-you shots and bloody faces, and the fact that the zombies ran full-shot at everyone was 1) a take on 28 Days Later, and 2) against everything a zombie should be.

As for the 28 films, both were good. Weeks was a good follow-up, despite the doom and gloom it brought at the end.