Spider-Man 4

[Raph's Girl]

Right now on ebay an org called Stand Up To Cancer is offering a walk-on-role to Spider-Man 4. Bidding is currently at $5000 and the auction ends Sept 5th

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180282289817


Get a chance to be a part of one of the most successful film series in history!

You and your guest will enjoy:

* A visit to the set of Spider-Man 4 (one shooting day)
o Location of visit will be determined by Sony Pictures based on scheduling of visit

* A meet and greet with the cast (1 hour)

* A walk-on/ extra role in the film for the auction winner only
o Role and length of screen time to be determined by Sony Pictures

* Trip to the New York premiere
o Location of American premiere may be changed at Sony Pictures’ discretion

* Designer outfits to wear to premiere for winner and guest from top designers
o Designers to be chosen by Sony Pictures
o Winner and guest may keep the outfits

* Winner and Guest will walk the premiere’s red carpet

Who:

* Any winner or guest under the age of 18 must be accompanied by legal guardian
* Liability and confidentiality contracts must be signed prior to set visit
* Cast at meet and greet based on availability

[Jester]

Great that the money is going to Cancer research, but is seems that Sony is really phoning this in. If the person with the winning bid pays out over 5 grand, they should get the works.

[Raph's Girl]

Great that the money is going to Cancer research, but is seems that Sony is really phoning this in. If the person with the winning bid pays out over 5 grand, they should get the works.

The starting price was 99 cents so these bidders either really want to be in the film or are just doing it cuz the money is going to a good cause. Gonna be interesting either way. And the winner will be announced on a tv special that'll air on ABC, CBS, and NBC Sept 5th. I wish I had enough money to do this. Not to get in Spidey 4 but to just donate to cancer research.

[GK Punk]

Then just donate money to Cancer research. They could use donations with out having to give something out. Every little bit counts.

[gobo]

Yeah really. :P I can't believe you didn't know that it works that way.

Don't have $5,000+ but want to make a difference? Donate here (http://donations.ebay.com/charity/charity.jsp?NP_ID=26913). Just click the 'Donate Now' tab.

[Drtooth]

Then just donate money to Cancer research. They could use donations with out having to give something out. Every little bit counts.

It really doesn't matter... the studio et al can write off any of the prizes as a Tax write off (someone correct me if I'm wrong), so the studio doesn't EVEN have to pay anything. It's just free PR...

[GK Punk]

Right, which has nothing to do with what I was saying. I'm saying don't wait for a BENEFIT for donating to cancer research, if you really want to help, then help.

[Drtooth]

Right, which has nothing to do with what I was saying. I'm saying don't wait for a BENEFIT for donating to cancer research, if you really want to help, then help.

Any big company that will willfully donate money towards something will use it to get a bang out of their bucks. The good PR isn't enough. Besides, other than a costume and a couple plane tickets, it's the prize winner who's paying the tab for them. So essentially, the company isn't paying anything, minus the cheap prize winnings. The winning bid will no doubt be numerous times the worth of the prize itself in cost to the company.

So technically, they aren't EVEN paying the bills here themselves. The winning bidder is. So technically, the company is just finding a way to take the credit while donating a paultry sum of gifts...

Let's see what we got....


* A visit to the set of Spider-Man 4 (one shooting day)
o Location of visit will be determined by Sony Pictures based on scheduling of visit

Plane ticket, unless you have to pay for your own transportation. And I bet its coach. Unless they just swing a corporate jet over...

* A meet and greet with the cast (1 hour)

Cost? Nada.

* A walk-on/ extra role in the film for the auction winner only
o Role and length of screen time to be determined by Sony Pictures

Not only do they not have to pay an extra, they get someone who will stand in the background for free.

* Trip to the New York premiere
o Location of American premiere may be changed at Sony Pictures’ discretion

Again- Plane ticket or corproate jet....

* Designer outfits to wear to premiere for winner and guest from top designers
o Designers to be chosen by Sony Pictures
o Winner and guest may keep the outfits

This pretty much is the ONLY thing that would cost a real fortune....

* Winner and Guest will walk the premiere’s red carpet

Free, unless you count a limo... though, the winner could wind up sharing it with some smaller person who worked on the film (Head of the Dolly Grip Union or something)

So, you have a couple plane tickets and a couple designer suits... that's several thou right there (though some of it may just be extra stuff lying around)... but if people bid enough, it could be several times that.

Though I agree... cut the middle man out and donate some of the proceeds to something. Even if it is a PR stunt/tax write off...

[Cure]

Dude, he was talking to Raph's Girl. He meant she could donate without expecting anything in return.

[odupianist]

What if I don't want to meet the actors but I want to meet the director and only one of the actors (Bruce Campbell)? lol

[GK Punk]

Dude, he was talking to Raph's Girl. He meant she could donate without expecting anything in return.

Yeah, exactly.

[Raph's Girl]

Yeah, exactly.

Yeah yeah...Actually I donated to breast cancer research this month. It was $5 but at least it was something...and I got some books I needed.

I'd donate to that org on ebay if I could but alas I cannae afford it. Buying groceries and paying bills has a higher priority.

[GK Punk]

It wasn't necessarily calling you personaly out, just the mentality that so many have towards needing something in return for donating to Cancer research. And nothing wrong with Donating only 5 bucks, every bit counts.

as for groceries and all that, I usually try to buy items that donate to atleast Breast cancer research whenever I go shopping. I'm seriously wearing pink hair ties right now because of it. :o

[Raph's Girl]

as for groceries and all that, I usually try to buy items that donate to atleast Breast cancer research whenever I go shopping. I'm seriously wearing pink hair ties right now because of it. :o

Yeah... I try and buy anything that'll donate to animals or breast cancer research. Im a member of the World Wildlife Fund. There's an e-card company called Care2 that whenver I send an ecard thru them to somebody they donate $1 to WWF and several other wildlife orgs. So hey...I do my part alot. I give $1 here or there. It's why Im poor. Much of my money goes to charities and the rest goes to paying the bills! :lol:

I wouldn't wear pink hair ties tho...I hate the color. But if it has to do with breast cancer research Im all there. My grandmother and one of my aunts are breast cancer survivors.

[Raph's Girl]

Well there's 7 hours left on the bid and the winner will probably be announced tonight at the stand up to cancer thing on tv. The current price is $12,700.00!

[Spitfire]

I don't know why you'd want to win that. 90% of the time with contests like these the winner gets put in but their scene is cut.

[Raph's Girl]

Looks like Sam Raimi is returning to direct Spidey 4. Tobey McGuire has also signed on to return as Peter/Spidey. No word on who the villian is but I really hope it's Lizard.

http://www.comics2film.com/index.php?a=story&b=35458

[Drtooth]

I wish they knew they were making Spidey 4 when they made Spidey 3... maybe then, they wouldn't have had to completely fill the thing with as many villains as possible...

[Raph's Girl]

Kirsten Dunst has said that she's "in".

'Spider-Man' actress Kirsten Dunst is out making the rounds promoting her new movie 'How to Lose Friends and Alienate People' with Simon Pegg. MTV Splash Page asked the actress if she'd yet signed on for the recently announced 4th and 5th installments to the franchise.

"I'm in," was Dunsts response.

http://splashpage.mtv.com/2008/09/29/kirsten-dunst-talks-spider-man-4-is-she-in-or-out/

[gobo]

Goshdarnit, I guess Bring It On 10 will have to try and make it without her... :P


EDIT: Can I maybe blame this one on Jester? Krow maybe?? One of those guys are to blame, I'm sure of it!

[ZariusTwo]

Ugh.

Dunst seriously is the worst MJ on the f*cking planet. I wish they'd reboot the franchise, it's out of steam, and Raimi's style is good for a few things, but since he's stuck in the 1960s, we're not going to get anything more concrete where Peter's concerned. He doesnt "get" him at all. The villains he seems to care about more.

[Drtooth]

It would be way too soon to reboot, I think. It has to wait a little while longer. Rebooting Hulk had mixed results.

Something tells me this will be like the 1970's Superman films... 2 great ones at the beginning, and forgettable stuff thereafter. They really should have cut the amount of villains in 3 in half.

[Jester]

Goshdarnit, I guess Bring It On 10 will have to try and make it without her... :P


EDIT: Can I maybe blame this one on Jester? Krow maybe?? One of those guys are to blame, I'm sure of it!
I didn't do nothing!!

See what I did there?

[MrPliggins]

I liked Kirsten at first, but I like her less and less as the sequels go on. In 3 she seemed to have absolutely no chemistry with Peter. I know that was the point, but still...

[gobo]

I didn't do nothing!!

See what I did there?
Looking back, my 'The Jester made me do it' joke/excuse for the initial bad joke was rather unclear... This is what happens when I get bored. >_<
I liked Kirsten at first, but I like her less and less as the sequels go on. In 3 she seemed to have absolutely no chemistry with Peter. I know that was the point, but still...
Few can avoid-act like Kirsten. Tell her what to do, and she might be able to hit that mark. But, tell her what not to do, and she gets it every time.

[KROW]

Goshdarnit, I guess Wimbledon 2 will have to try and Deeply Get Over It without her... :P


EDIT: Can I maybe blame this one on Jester? Krow maybe?? One of those guys are to blame, I'm sure of it!

Fixed it for you. Read the manual (http://www.punoftheday.com/about_puns.htm) next time.

[ZariusTwo]

It would be way too soon to reboot, I think. It has to wait a little while longer. Rebooting Hulk had mixed results.

Something tells me this will be like the 1970's Superman films... 2 great ones at the beginning, and forgettable stuff thereafter. They really should have cut the amount of villains in 3 in half.

I think the first two barely hold up. Sam didnt "get" Peter and MJ at all, and seeemed to have a ball with everyone else, which I thought were some of the best interpretations period of Norman, Harry, and Doc Ock.

[AquaParade]

Spider-man 3 didn't sit well with me. I'm a huge fan of Spidey though and I'm hoping he can get it right this time. A proper sequel(s) to Spider-man 2 definitely has my undivided attention. While Peter Parker was portrayed in what I found an appropriate way in the trilogy, i definitely think there are a couple attributes missing from his comic counterpart. I'm excited for James (Vanderbelt?..forgot the last name)'s script, so if they can fix up Peter just a little bit, I think this series will be back on track in a very good way.

[Mecha Cow]

It doesn't matter if the writers get the character right, because Maguire's got the charisma of a wet sponge and Raimi doesn't seem to have any interest in taking his source material seriously anyway.

Despite those things, Dunst is still the worst part of these movies. I figured Marvel would pull the plug after Raimi clearly took the piss with Spidey 3, but I guess they didn't get the joke (or it still made a boatload of cash).

[ZariusTwo]

It doesn't matter if the writers get the character right, because Maguire's got the charisma of a wet sponge and Raimi doesn't seem to have any interest in taking his source material seriously anyway.

Despite those things, Dunst is still the worst part of these movies. I figured Marvel would pull the plug after Raimi clearly took the piss with Spidey 3, but I guess they didn't get the joke (or it still made a boatload of cash).

That was their own fault. They begged Raimi to abandon a cohearant script he had with Vulture and Sandman, and stick an overrated, irrelevant character into it just to sell toys. Sam had every right to mangle the script and make it a piss-take, it'd lost any appeal to him.

[Mecha Cow]

Yeah, I know, but I figured Marvel wouldn't want to work with him anymore after that.

[ToTheNines]

They begged Raimi to abandon a cohearant script he had with Vulture and Sandman, and stick an overrated, irrelevant character into it just to sell toys.

STFU, dopplegangers rule!

[ZariusTwo]

Wait until the Clone becomes optional before stickin' up for 'em hon:lol:

As for Marvel bringing back Raimi, hasnt Avi Avrad, the idiot who put him up to it, gone now?

[Raph's Girl]

Sam Raimi apperantly wants Morbius to be the villian for Spidey 4.... Ugh....Vampires are totally over rated. :ohwell:

http://joblo.com/raimi-wants-morbius

[VaughnMichael]

Sam Raimi apperantly wants Morbius to be the villian for Spidey 4.... Ugh....Vampires are totally over rated. :ohwell:

http://joblo.com/raimi-wants-morbius
I wouldn't say so much over rated at the moment as over done.

[The Stryker]

Sigh.

I was actually looking forward to a Spider-man movie without the hack and the mannequin. Oh well.

[Drtooth]

Freaking 15 year olds and their internet culture... ruinin' all them vampires for us people who liked their campy attributes... people who wanna watch Blackula and Love at First bite and Groovy Ghoulies and like that....:tcouch:


They might as well revisit Spider-man's villains from The Electric Company while we're at it:

aAN_AnwAeak

[Spitfire]

Sam Raimi apperantly wants Morbius to be the villian for Spidey 4.... Ugh....Vampires are totally over rated. :ohwell:

http://joblo.com/raimi-wants-morbius

He's a cool character in his own right but not enough to carry a whole film. If it had some others in it he would make a good supporting villain. Honestly I see him fitting in better with Ghost Rider. Yeah vampires are over done but so are ninjas, zombies, and pirates. At least he was an established character. There's a bunch of others I'd prefer to see so this comes rather left field.

I watched Spider-man 2 recently and it didn't do anything for me. It used to be my favorite comic movie, saw it five times in theaters two of them Imax, but it lost that magic. I hated 3 but I need to give it another chance since I've only seen it once and I went in with expectations that were way too high.

I'll see what happens. I'm sure I'll end up in the theater. Spider-man is on the list with Batman and the Ninja Turtles of series I'll always give a chance...

[Ninjinister]

He's a cool character in his own right but not enough to carry a whole film. If it had some others in it he would make a good supporting villain. Honestly I see him fitting in better with Ghost Rider. Yeah vampires are over done but so are ninjas, zombies, and pirates. At least he was an established character. There's a bunch of others I'd prefer to see so this comes rather left field.


Or maybe Blade, neh?

[gobo]

Vampires suck.

[Ninjinister]

Vampires suck.

Isn't that their whole modus operandi?

[Jester]

Wow....that pun was even to lame for me....:P

LOVE YOU!!

[Raph's Girl]

Oooh... Bruce Campbell's gonna have a bigger role in Spider-man 4.....

http://io9.com/5358320/expect-more-bruce-campbell-in-spider%20man-4

If Bruce Campbell's cameos in the Spider-Man movies always leave you wanting more, there's good news: America's favorite B-movie actor will have a larger role in the franchise's fourth installment.

Campbell told Access Hollywood that shooting for Spider-Man 4 will start in January 2010, and that he's been told he has a "major part" in the movie. Even Campbell doesn't know precisely what that role will be, but Access Hollywood notes there has been some fan speculation that Campbell could play master of illusions Mysterio — although those were rumors concerning Spider-Man 3.

/Film, on the other hand, speculates that the all the characters that Campbell has played are, in fact, a single character (one who has trouble holding down a job), and suspects that Campbell's "major" role means he'll be an important catalyst in the film rather than having more screen time.

Even if /Film is right that Campbell has been playing a single character throughout the franchise, that doesn't preclude a genuinely larger role for Campbell in the fourth movie, one that could shed light on his earlier performances. Is it possible that Campbell's character has been stalking Peter Parker since that fateful night in the wrestling ring? After all, he witnessed Peter's incredible feats of athleticism, and is the one who dubbed him "Spider-Man."

[Ninjinister]

/Film actually has an interesting theory. It may or may not be full of bunk and hyperbole, but it's interesting nevertheless.

[Hordak]

Would love to see Campbell as Mysterio!

[cqb101]

Oooh... Bruce Campbell's gonna have a bigger role in Spider-man 4.....

http://io9.com/5358320/expect-more-bruce-campbell-in-spider%20man-4

Take that with a HUGE grain of salt. Campbell always talks things up to be more than they actually are. Remember that whole Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash fiasco? Yea...

[Hordak]

Yea but at least we got a comic out of that one loL! It was actually good! Missed the sequel though.

[odupianist]

Yea but at least we got a comic out of that one loL! It was actually good! Missed the sequel though.

The sequel is still coming out. I think they're on issue 2 or so.

[Hordak]

Ok cool! Might have to look into that! Thanks!

[Magneto]

Would love to see Campbell as Mysterio!

If, and hopefully he will be, Mysterio is ever chosen to be a villain in a Spider-Man sequel .... Campbell would be an spectacular choice.

[Raph's Girl]

sighs* Fraking Spider-Man 4.... I want Lizard in the movie not Black Cat and Vulture!

http://www.movieline.com/2009/12/exclusive-spider-man-4-circling-john-malkovich-anne-hathaway.php

[Oculus Orbus]

I'm a huge Spiderman fan. It's been said many times that Raimi wanted Lizard to be the bad guy in the new film, so he might have a role. Now, with the latest news, I'm affraid that we're gonna have more of what we had in Spiderman 3, wich is basically a nonsense carnival of characters.

That's really sad because there's so many good stories in the comics that would do great in a film. "Kraven's last hunt" would be amazing, to name one.

[cqb101]

John Malkovich would be an awesome Vulture.

[Voltron]

The Vulturess? What the hell is that horse sh*t? Man, if that happens Raimi should be put in jail.


I mean, who doesn't want to see Ann Hathaway in skin tight leather?:o

[ZariusTwo]

Lizard is beyond overrated and would look dopey on screen

[odupianist]

Malkovich would be a great Vulture, but Vulturess? Really?

[GK Punk]

I'm a huge Spiderman fan. It's been said many times that Raimi wanted Lizard to be the bad guy in the new film, so he might have a role. Now, with the latest news, I'm affraid that we're gonna have more of what we had in Spiderman 3, wich is basically a nonsense carnival of characters.

.

Spider-Man. Not Spiderman.

The - is what makes him superior.

[Brodie]

GK, only the hugest fans don't use hyphens on his name.

[Oculus Orbus]

Spider-Man. Not Spiderman.

The - is what makes him superior.

Right. But, in self-defense, I have to say that here in Spain, the cover of the comics say Spiderman, never Spider-Man (and is always mentioned that way in any other media, except for the films). I've read this comics all my life and own hundreds of them, so sometimes it just comes out that way when I'm writing in english.

You can check it yourself in any spanish shop (http://www.planetacomic.net/resultados.aspx?IdSeccion=1&buscador=PC_COMICS&valor=spiderman&p=1).

Also (and now I'm not trying to justify myself, just saying as a matter of interest), it didn't have the hyphen when it was first being produced:

"Underneath the paste up you can now get a better sense of the original attempt at the logo. Observe the webbing drawn right into the letters and, most importantly, no hyphen in the Spider-Man name! This means that both Lee and Ditko started producing at least a page of artwork with the book's titular characters still named "Spiderman" (no hyphen) as it had been when Lee and Kirby conceived of their version that was discarded by Lee when the strip was then handed over to Ditko."

You can read the whole thing here (http://www.ditko.comics.org/ditko/artist/araf15ar.html).

And, it's also true that many times he is called Spiderman by the fans anyway, even if it's not correct.

[Duke]

zvwbVGDk_5A

[AquaParade]

I'm gonna call the "Vulteress" thing a falsie (oooh, "falsie", I like that) Raimi seems to be pretty heads up on his Spider-man stuff for the most part. Now that he has total creative control of the Spider-man movie franchise again, I am pretty confident he wouldn't make that move. Besides, didn't he say he wanted to do one villain this time around?

[KROW]

Oooh... Bruce Campbell's gonna have a bigger role in Spider-man 4.....

http://io9.com/5358320/expect-more-bruce-campbell-in-spider%20man-4
/Film, on the other hand, speculates that the all the characters that Campbell has played are, in fact, a single character (one who has trouble holding down a job), and suspects that Campbell's "major" role means he'll be an important catalyst in the film rather than having more screen time.

Even if /Film is right that Campbell has been playing a single character throughout the franchise, that doesn't preclude a genuinely larger role for Campbell in the fourth movie, one that could shed light on his earlier performances. Is it possible that Campbell's character has been stalking Peter Parker since that fateful night in the wrestling ring? After all, he witnessed Peter's incredible feats of athleticism, and is the one who dubbed him "Spider-Man."


Coulda swore I said something like this in the Spider-Man 3 thread. I'd definitely go for that plot twist, though I won't hold my breath.

[odupianist]

BC as a villain would be great. It's always been talks of him being Mysterio, but who knows. Could be fun to have him as a bigger player this time

[Mecha Cow]

"The Vulturess." Jesus. I wish they'd reboot this series already.

[The Stryker]

I wish someone would abort Raimi and Macguire.

No idea how this would be accomplished but whatever.

[Raph's Girl]

Reportadly this film has been put on the back burner as the studio doesn't like the idea of Vulture as a villain. :lol:

[Mecha Cow]

I wish someone would abort Raimi and Macguire.

No idea how this would be accomplished but whatever.

http://johnnyism.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/arnold-schwarzenegger-the-terminator.jpg

Reportadly this film has been put on the back burner as the studio doesn't like the idea of Vulture as a villain.
Already been debunked (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/43405).

[Spitfire]

The Vulture is one of Spidey's villains I really don't like. He might translate well to film though who knows. I just never found him very interesting. I could also live without Spidey getting turned old and crapping himself.

[Godzilla]

The Vulture is one of Spidey's villains I really don't like. He might translate well to film though who knows. I just never found him very interesting.

I pretty much put Vulture in with the Chameleon. Where, he's one of those classic foes, but not particularly necessary to see up there on the silver screen. However, alot rides on the casting and exactly what type of storyline Raimi and company want to present. Vulture was originally to have been in Spider-Man 3, and personally ... I think he would have worked FAR BETTER than a obviously forced-by-studio, Venom.


I could also live without Spidey getting turned old and crapping himself.

I doubt we'll be seeing that anytime soon. :lol:

[Turo602]

Spidey 4 is no more and is going to be rebooted for 2012. Raimi and Mcguire are out and their will be a new director and a new cast.

This sucks big time. I can't see anyone else being Spider-Man. But im glad this means no Kirsten Dunst she wasn't a very good Mary Jane. The girl who played Gwen in Spider-Man 3 should of been MJ instead.

[The Stryker]

Spidey 4 is no more and is going to be rebooted for 2012. Raimi and Mcguire are out and their will be a new director and a new cast.

This sucks big time. I can't see anyone else being Spider-Man. But im glad this means no Kirsten Dunst is out she wasn't a very good Mary Jane. The girl who played Gwen in Spider-Man 3 should of been MJ instead.

Please....Don't play with my emotions.

That would be the greatest news ever.

[Mecha Cow]

Good riddance (http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/urgent-spider-man-4-scrapped-as-is-raimi-and-cast-out-franchise-reboot-planned/). Hope Marvel can get the rights back.

[The Stryker]

EtOb40IvdcM

[ThirdMarioBro]

Good riddance. After the emo crap fest that was Spidey 3, I was done.

[Raph's Girl]

This is gonna be interesting. I hope they cast somebody good to play Peter. :P

[The Stryker]

Good riddance. After the emo crap fest that was Spidey 1,2 and 3, I was done.

Fixed for accuracy.

[ToTheNines]

I can't see anyone else being Spider-Man.

Are you serious?

[Turo602]

Well its not like Toby was any good, but I just can't see anyone else being him. Don't get me wrong but I actually enjoyed those movies. But their could be some improvements.

[cqb101]

Saw this news earlier and I did a happy dance. I just wish the rights would revert back to marvel.

[Spitfire]

Unless they get another good director or some good new blood I have little hope. The weakest part of these movies was always the cast but I could usually look past that. Though it's been awhile since I've watched them I know last time I watched Spider-man 2 I didn't enjoy it very much. It was the 2.1 cut though which has some pointless scenes and the altered scenes I didn't like. I like Rami but it's obvious his heart isn't in it anymore.

[Oculus Orbus]

I think these are good news. I did enjoy Spider-Man 2 (Spider-Man 1 was too different to the stories in the comic), but Spider-Man 3 was completely awful. I just didn't get it.

After three films, it's a good thing that there's gonna be a change. Let's see what they do.

[Brodie]

This...is the greatest news....I've ever heard...or ever will hear.

[ThirdMarioBro]

Fixed for accuracy.

Thank you.

[Fledermaus]

A reboot? No more vultures? No more emo spidey taking his mask off in the heat of battle? :')

YESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Looks like 3d animation might not be such a bad future, after all. :) I definitely want to work on these movies.

[saiyan_monkey]

Im looking forward to it. The 1st 3 werent that bad and a 4th movie to go with my 6 disc trilogy pack sounds good.

[The Clerk]

Isnt the 4th one going to Petey in hih school?

[Raph's Girl]

Isnt the 4th one going to Petey in hih school?

Just go to the Spidey reboot thread.

[CyberCubed]

I wonder how differently things would have been had this movie happened.

[Cowabung-Gal]

Who else agrees that Hoffman was one of the best characters in the Raimi trilogy?

j9ym1e3gjxs

If Spider-Man 4 does become a reality, Hoffman needs to be in it

[BornAgain]

Hoffman was great even if I tend to forget his existence. I’d love to see Spider-Man 4 with Raimi and Tobey but I wonder if they could recapture the magic of the original trilogy. I even think the third movie is pretty good even if I have my issues with it. There’s something at its core that still makes it more appealing than *most* MCU films.
Maybe it’s the practical effects or the TLC you can feel put into it. It’s a film more than a product whereas the reverse feels true for the MCU.

Don’t get me wrong, I do love the MCU when it’s firing on all cylinders. I rewatched Civil War the other day just to confirm that that the MCU used to be awesome - it was.

[ZariusTwo]

Has anyone been following the progress of the Spider-Man 4 fanfilm? The director Eric updates his Youtube channel semi-regularly with news on the project whenever he gets permission.

5CTGBwAL6qw

K4YmdRv4Nfg

https://www.youtube.com/@ErikonPaper/videos

Looking back on my posts in here...yikes, I was way too harsh on Raimi back then. I sort of have a better appreciation for these films now (still don't like Dunst's MJ though), also my comments about Venom's lack of relevancy aged REALLY badly...