Incredibles 2

[Raph's Girl]

Incredibles 2 has been confirmed! I repeat INCREDIBLES 2 IS HAPPENING!



Also... Cars 3 but we don't care about that one...

http://comicbook.com/blog/2014/03/18/the-incredibles-2-in-development-at-pixar/

[Candy Kappa]

YEEEES!! Oh yes! Bring it on!

Not Cars though...

[Slade]

SWEEET!!!! I was hopeing one day this would happen.



Also, I like Cars....

[ObiWanFan4life]

I can't believe this is actually happening. Can't wait to see it.

[RaphAndDonnie]

Amazing news! I love The Incredibles. :D

[Whatswiththeheadbands?]

Well it's about flipping time Pixar.

I'm still annoyed that Finding Nemo (which doesn't need a sequel) is getting a sequel before Incredibles (the film that needed a sequel0

[Turo602]

It's about time. Better late than never, I guess.

[The Stryker]

Never got the desperation for a sequel. I always thought the first was just alright

[TurtleTitan97]

YES!!!!:D

I don't know which one I should be excited for more, the new Peanuts film, or this!:D

[Peanut]

Are we not all over Pixar yet? Like...seriously. Especially considering Disney has put out two CG features (Tangled and Frozen) that absolutely mop the floor with nearly everything Pixar has ever done.

I think the fact that they're making this movie is a sign they may be running on fumes and need to crank out some sequels to (undeservingly) popular movies from their back catalogue. They'll never make anything as good as Toy Story 3 ever again.

[BabyTurtles]

FINALLY!!
took them long enough!!

[Whatswiththeheadbands?]

FINALLY!!
took them long enough!!

^^This. So much

[The Stryker]

Are we not all over Pixar yet? Like...seriously. Especially considering Disney has put out two CG features (Tangled and Frozen) that absolutely mop the floor with nearly everything Pixar has ever done.

I think the fact that they're making this movie is a sign they may be running on fumes and need to crank out some sequels to (undeservingly) popular movies from their back catalogue. They'll never make anything as good as Toy Story 3 ever again.

Agreed completely.

What's next? Ratta-2-ouie?

[Donatello19]

Are we not all over Pixar yet? Like...seriously. Especially considering Disney has put out two CG features (Tangled and Frozen) that absolutely mop the floor with nearly everything Pixar has ever done.

I think the fact that they're making this movie is a sign they may be running on fumes and need to crank out some sequels to (undeservingly) popular movies from their back catalogue. They'll never make anything as good as Toy Story 3 ever again.

I agree with you completely. Most of the stuff Pixar has put out recently is either terrible (Cars 2) or just OK (Brave, Monsters University). disney on the other hand has been releasing amazing movies, especially Frozen, which is the second highest grossing animated film of all time (second to Toy Story 3, but they're not that far behind and still have a chance of beating them, although TS3 is one of my all time favorite movies). I haven't been impressed by Pixar and as much as I love the Incredibles...they're relying too much on sequels now. They saw the success of TS3, and went all franchise happy. First Cars 2, then Monsters University, next Finding Dory, and now Cars 3 AND Incredible 2. Come on...at least every Disney movie is it's own, original thing...

[TMNT_Guy]

Are we not all over Pixar yet?
Eh, the problem with Pixar is every movie they make anymore seems to revolve around making toys. Cars for the boys and Princess Merida dolls for the girls, because apparently little girls will only buy a doll if it’s a Princess.

Why couldn't we get that Newt movie instead of Brave? Pixar seems to becoming the movie making equivalent of Rareware, I think this comic captures my frustration with Pixar:

http://dtoons.com/conroy/comics/2011-06-29-toystory4.jpg

[Donatello19]

Eh, the problem with Pixar is every movie they make anymore seems to revolve around making toys.

Almost every movie is like that nowadays...even if it wasn't the intention, toys will be made anyway. Heck, the only reason TMNT even exist today is because of the OT, which was only made to sell toys.

[ObiWanFan4life]

Are we not all over Pixar yet? Like...seriously. Especially considering Disney has put out two CG features (Tangled and Frozen) that absolutely mop the floor with nearly everything Pixar has ever done.

I think the fact that they're making this movie is a sign they may be running on fumes and need to crank out some sequels to (undeservingly) popular movies from their back catalogue. They'll never make anything as good as Toy Story 3 ever again.


I sadly have to agree with you here.

[TigerClaw]

I never saw the Incredibles, But I got that movie for free when I signed up for that Disney Anywhere service, Gonna have to watch it sometime.

[Leofan26]

Hmm, we'll I hope the guy came up with a better plot than the last film like the prouder said, even though this seems like a last attempt to help Pixar I'm still looking forward to this :P

[TheBlueTurtle1]

Awesome news, and Cars 3 should be fun;)

[Eiko]

Incredibles 2: Yes
Cars 3:No

[Candy Kappa]

I agree with you completely. Most of the stuff Pixar has put out recently is either terrible (Cars 2) or just OK (Brave, Monsters University). disney on the other hand has been releasing amazing movies, especially Frozen, which is the second highest grossing animated film of all time (second to Toy Story 3, but they're not that far behind and still have a chance of beating them, although TS3 is one of my all time favorite movies). I haven't been impressed by Pixar and as much as I love the Incredibles...they're relying too much on sequels now. They saw the success of TS3, and went all franchise happy. First Cars 2, then Monsters University, next Finding Dory, and now Cars 3 AND Incredible 2. Come on...at least every Disney movie is it's own, original thing...

Eh, personally I think Disney have a finger in turning Pixar into a sequel grinder. Disney even did their own Cars Spin-Off with planes. Disney have sequels all over the place, there even is a Cinderella 3 and the Little Mermaid 2, Peter Pan 2, Tarzan 2 and Lion King 3.

And there is still original movies in the works, as Inside Out, that unnamed Dia de los Muertos movie and a dinosaur movie.

[Donatello19]

Eh, personally I think Disney have a finger in turning Pixar into a sequel grinder. Disney even did their own Cars Spin-Off with planes. Disney have sequels all over the place, there even is a Cinderella 3 and the Little Mermaid 2, Peter Pan 2, Tarzan 2 and Lion King 3.

And there is still original movies in the works, as Inside Out, that unnamed Dia de los Muertos movie and a dinosaur movie.

Planes was originally meant to be direct to DVD. It's made by Disney toon studios, which is a smaller branch of the company that made all the non canon, crappy sequels you mentioned. Not part of the Disney animated canon.

[TMNT_Guy]

Eh, personally I think Disney have a finger in turning Pixar into a sequel grinder.
I can believe that.

Disney pressured Pixar into making Toy Story 3, so it's a possibility that they've been doing that to Pixar with every sequel. I wouldn't be surprised if Disney is the real reason Newt was canceled in favor of Brave, because Princess toys sell better Lizard toys.

[turtle1237]

Are we not all over Pixar yet? Like...seriously. Especially considering Disney has put out two CG features (Tangled and Frozen) that absolutely mop the floor with nearly everything Pixar has ever done.

I think the fact that they're making this movie is a sign they may be running on fumes and need to crank out some sequels to (undeservingly) popular movies from their back catalogue. They'll never make anything as good as Toy Story 3 ever again.



Not sure on that, Toy Story, Monsters Inc? A Bugs life? And other hits, I enjoy the last few movies, yeah Cars 2 was well ugh, but Brave was pretty good.

[The Stryker]

Not sure on that, Toy Story, Monsters Inc? A Bugs life? And other hits, I enjoy the last few movies, yeah Cars 2 was well ugh, but Brave was pretty good.

I would go as far to say that Toy Story 1 and 3 are the only truly great Pixar movies. Everything else is mediocre to bad.

[raph27]

I still want Newt to happen.
Incredibles 2- YES. Can't wait.
Cars 3- YES! I actually liked Cars and Cars 2 and I want this one to be good after Planes was sh*t.

[Candy Kappa]

Brave is one of Pixar's best, the story is great, the charavter design is clever and well done and the effects and animation is puuure animator's porn, animating hair is hard enough, they had to make wet hair and succeeded perfectly.

[TheBlueTurtle1]

I still want Newt to happen.
Incredibles 2- YES. Can't wait.
Cars 3- YES! I actually liked Cars and Cars 2 and I want this one to be good after Planes was sh*t.

I actually agree with you, I liked Cars 1 and 2 a lesser degree Cars 2 was fun.

Incredibles 2 should have been done years ago, wonder if the kids will be grown up, or Frozen will be in it.

[sdp]

I really wanted to believe Pixar would be great forever and that Disney had let them continue their own thing. The internet always overreacts but I think they're golden age is indeed over. I haven't really cared for their movies anymore, maybe they aren't terrible but they kind of phone it in like Dreamworks and other studios. I wonder how much Disney had to do with it or if it was just inevitable. Whatever happened to the no sequels, sure when they started I thought it was ok but now almost everything will be a sequel and their stories were pretty stand alone, forcing sequels isn't entertaining. Even while I think Toy Story 2 wasn't bad looking back it, they really should'nt have made it. I'm also not too big of a fan of TS3. In fact the Disney sequel could've turned out just as fun even if it wasn't as "emotional", but TS3 felt too much like the brave little toaster to me.

Many have wanted a sequel for The Incredibles forever and now that it's getting it many are complaining haha. I never liked The Incredibles much but a sequel doesn't make sense, the story was resolved and sure they can have other superhero adventures but that wasn't why they were created, all of them are parodies/archetypes of superheroes to tell that story, not to be actual superheroes.

[TheAnvil]

I would go as far to say that Toy Story 1 and 3 are the only truly great Pixar movies. Everything else is mediocre to bad.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CY0Qjx5K53o

You must have the worst opinions of anyone, ever.

[Candy Kappa]

I
Many have wanted a sequel for The Incredibles forever and now that it's getting it many are complaining haha. I never liked The Incredibles much but a sequel doesn't make sense, the story was resolved and sure they can have other superhero adventures but that wasn't why they were created, all of them are parodies/archetypes of superheroes to tell that story, not to be actual superheroes.

Incredible are still the best Fantastic Four movie we've had.

[Peanut]

You must have the worst opinions of anyone, ever.

Why? Because they're different than yours? Get lost.

[TheAnvil]

Why? Because they're different than yours? Get lost.

No, because he's a cynical asshole that constantly starts arguments on here with his stupid opinions... Ones that he uses to attack other people.

[Peanut]

I don't see how him stating that opinion attacked anyone? Maybe if you're a child you'd take a dissenting opinion of something you like as an attack, but I'd hope you're more mature than all that.

[Redeemer]

Well it's about flipping time Pixar.

I'm still annoyed that Finding Nemo (which doesn't need a sequel) is getting a sequel before Incredibles (the film that needed a sequel0
Why does it need a sequel???

Never got the desperation for a sequel. I always thought the first was just alright

I feel the same, it didn't scream sequel for me.

[Raph's Girl]

Disney even did their own Cars Spin-Off with planes. Disney have sequels all over the place, there even is a Cinderella 3 and the Little Mermaid 2, Peter Pan 2, Tarzan 2 and Lion King 3.


There's also a Little Mermaid 3 which was a really well done prequel to the first movie as we found out how Ariel's mother died and how it effected Triton.

I liked Cinderella 3 as it was more or less a continuation of the Little Mermaid films. The prince being Ariel's son (the old king had a room dedicated to his late wife...wall to wall paintings of Ariel and on a pedistool was the seashell that held her voice. So yeah. Ariel dies sometime between The Little Mermaid 2 and the events in Cinderella).

There was never a Lion King 3. The movies are Lion King, Lion King 1 1/2 (the first movie from the POV of Timone and Pumbaa), and Lion King 2.

Incidentally before Muppets Most Wanted I saw the trailer for the next Planes movie...Planes: Fire and Rescue. It's basically a Planes/Cars crossover film!

[ranger_scout]

The film was originally scheduled for a June 2019 release, but Disney & Pixar will now release it on June 15, 2018.

http://variety.com/2016/film/news/incredibles-2-toy-story-4-pixar-1201901499/

[drgon78]

Well that is great news.:D

[Utrommaniac]

I liked Cinderella 3 as it was more or less a continuation of the Little Mermaid films. The prince being Ariel's son (the old king had a room dedicated to his late wife...wall to wall paintings of Ariel and on a pedistool was the seashell that held her voice. So yeah. Ariel dies sometime between The Little Mermaid 2 and the events in Cinderella).
Something about the King in Cinderella being Eric is funny to say the least.

And why would they have moved so much more inland - or at least completely remodeled the castle?

Really excited for Incredibles 2, though. Just have to wait for the story details.

[ProphetofGanja]

https://s33.postimg.org/4igxe9g9b/incredibles_2_first_trailer.jpg

THE INCREDIBLES 2 Teaser Trailer Is Scheduled To Be Shown Next Week Before COCO Screenings (https://www.comicbookmovie.com/animated_features/the_incredibles/the-incredibles-2-teaser-trailer-is-scheduled-to-be-shown-next-week-before-coco-screenings-a155190)

[drgon78]

Can't wait, that is only a couple weeks away.

[Vicky82]

Teaser Trailer is up

ZJDMWVZta3M

[ProphetofGanja]

Super tight

[Spike Spiegel]

I hope it has the balance of fun and drama that the first one did...

[TheSkeletonMan939]

Please, please, please tell me this isn't indicative of the marketing using Jack-Jack as a "omg so cute!!!" tactic.

[PApagreg]

I was kinda hoping we would get a timeskip but this is good too.

[Utrommaniac]

I was hoping for a timeskip too, but man...it's just the Incredibles, darn it!
Granted, it seems like a small time skip. Long enough for Jack Jack to have two teeth, and I don't think he had any in the first movie. So that's...a couple months. Not to mention the new house, which I hope has been given the proper safety measures given the baby's powers.

Man, baby proofing must be bad enough for Supers as it is, and then you get that one.


I don't think there's ever been a more accurate image for describing the parenthood of a baby than this:
https://i.imgur.com/x9SXLj7.png?1

[Redeemer]

I really hope this movie can be as good as the first one and hopefully we will have 3rd movie, it will probably take another 10 years, but oh well.... :lol:

[raph27]

Please, please, please tell me this isn't indicative of the marketing using Jack-Jack as a "omg so cute!!!" tactic.

Oh no. Please not Baby Groot again.

[drgon78]

Yeah, I would have liked some actual footage of the movie or at least not focusing on just Jack-Jack.

[Coola Yagami]

The plot worries me. I just hope they don't pull a Cars 2 and make it an Elastigirl movie. Kind hope the rest of the family gets decent screen time and at the very least Mr. Incredible shows up to kick some ass in the end.

[ranger_scout]

Here is the first official photo.

http://media.comicbook.com/2017/12/incredibles-2-1064283.jpeg

http://comicbook.com/movies/2017/12/08/incredibles-2-first-look-released-/

[NinjaPug]

YBpdL9hSac4

[Utrommaniac]

Oh god, I got a good laugh at the disheveled and exhausted Robert.

He looks like he's aged 30 years looking after the kids (probably Jack Jack specifically)

[PApagreg]

Good to see Helen is still the poster woman for thiccness, however this does feel like a retread from the previous movie except the roles are reversed.

[Donatello19]

It doesn't really look bad or anything, but I'm not impressed with what I'm seeing so far. This kind of plot really doesn't seem like something worthy of an Incredibles sequel.

[Shark_Blade]

It doesn't really look bad or anything, but I'm not impressed with what I'm seeing so far. This kind of plot really doesn't seem like something worthy of an Incredibles sequel.
You're quickly judging it's "unworthy" based on a minute and a half teaser video? :lol::lol::lol: Boo hoo.

Meh, I did the same with Tangled, boy was I wrong.

hW19ERnFUbI
^That teaser is so stupid I literally lost all hope when I went to see it. I was proved wrong and it's a brilliant film.

So Imma just kick back and see for myself, reserving all judgment for now.

[Allio]

Just thought about it. This is basically a story surrounding Robert being unemployed

[plastroncafe]

I disagree, I think this is a story about him being a full-time dad, which is akin to being over employed but underpaid.

[Allio]

Technically both as he is a full time father because of his unemployment from the first film. And Helen took the job presented because they needed the income

[drgon78]

I can't wait...though I thought the release date was in March not June. Too bad the trailer didn't even show most of the new characters or even much of the Underminer. Though it does look like that Mr. Incredible has fought him before.

Maybe this movie will explain what happened to all those super villains running around when super heroes where made illegal.

[ProphetofGanja]

Elastigirl is bae

[NinjaPug]

i5qOzqD9Rms

[drgon78]

I have been waiting for so long for this one.

Violet has a offensive use of her powers now.

[ranger_scout]

Fans who attended Cinema Con got to see the opening sequence.

The opening sequence picked up right where the original 2004 film left off, with the superhero family preparing to fight the mole-like villain The Underminer, who is bound and determined to destroy City Hall. In the clip, a love interest for Violet (voiced by Sarah Vowell) recalls the scene and laments that seeing her as a superhero will make their upcoming date "weird." What to do?

There also was a full action segment that has Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson), Elastigirl (Holly Hunter), Violet, Dash (Huck Milner) and Jack Jack battling the Underminer and getting some last-minute assistance from Frozone (Samuel L. Jackson). They unleash their powers to try to stop the destruction of City Hall — while working to keep residents safe from harm.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/disney-reveals-opening-incredibles-2-at-cinemacon-1105355

[plastroncafe]

Weird they left out Sarah Vowell's name.
If you like pop history you should really check out her books. Assassination Vacation is entertaining as hell.

[drgon78]

Still got almost two months to go for this one.

Maybe we will get some new clips or promotional art from the Con.

Did this Cinema Con have anything for Wreck It Ralph 2?

[NinjaPug]

Still got almost two months to go for this one.

Maybe we will get some new clips or promotional art from the Con.

Did this Cinema Con have anything for Wreck It Ralph 2?

Yes, they showed the same footage with all the Disney princesses that they showed at D23 last year.

[ranger_scout]

Brad Bird revealed why he decided not to age up any of the kids for this film.

http://ew.com/movies/2018/04/26/incredibles-2-time-jump/

[drgon78]

I wouldn't mind a third movie were 2-5 years has gone buy, at least the series would still be in the 1960's.

[DWC]

I still haven't seen the first Incredibles but I will be watching it before I go to see the sequel when it comes out.

[ranger_scout]

Right now the film is tracking for a weekend debut of $140 million. That would break Finding Dory's record for the highest opening weekend for an animated film.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/incredibles-2-tracking-140m-box-office-debut-1114590

[drgon78]

I really hope it does that well. First of all it is one of few Pixar movies that should have gotten a sequel. Second, anything and everything should do better then Finding Dory.

[AT-Man]

Here's a nice little video for kids.


XPBOfW7ocK0

[drgon78]

Saw the movie twice yesterday and of course loved it. My only complaint would be the villain could have been better.

I hope one day that Violet and Dash get actual superhero names.

[Krutch]

Saw it last night - Quite the charming movie. Predictable? Sure, but not in a way that hurts the viewing experience. Loved the family dynamic.

[Autbot_Benz]

Incredibles 2 causing people to get seziures from strobing lights

https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/incredibles-2-strobe-light-warning-1202848920/

[Redeemer]

Saw the movie today and thought it was better than the first one. I was shocked how much content this movie had in it. Also Jack Jack stole the movie :lol:

[Shark_Blade]

Incredibles 2 causing people to get seziures from strobing lights

https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/incredibles-2-strobe-light-warning-1202848920/
That’s like a news saying people who can’t swim found drown in a pool.

They shouldn’t watch anything then. Go read a book or something.

[mexichrist83]

Incredibles 2 causing people to get seziures from strobing lights

https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/incredibles-2-strobe-light-warning-1202848920/

Having seen the movie I think this is a very responsible acknowledgement to the flashing/strobe effects that are featured in the movie. Those type of effects don't bother me personally but while I was watching the movie I did think to myself "I hope there isn't anyone in the audience with epilepsy" during some of those sequences because there are a few and one in particular is quite lengthy. If something like that can be harmful to someone going to the movie uninformed then they should at least have the opportunity to be made aware beforehand. I go to many concerts and I have been to shows that feature strobe lights and the venue will post notices at the entrances informing people about the strobe lights so I think that's a responsible thing to do at the movie theaters as well.

[Autbot_Benz]

That’s like a news saying people who can’t swim found drown in a pool.

They shouldn’t watch anything then. Go read a book or something.

What an insensitive thing to say. People who have epilepsy or suffer from seizures should be able to enjoy any movie that the general public can. It doesn't hurt to put a warning up if the movie has a lot of strobing lights.

https://i.imgur.com/N7Lg7U6.jpg

[Redeemer]

Incredibles 2 causing people to get seziures from strobing lights

https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/incredibles-2-strobe-light-warning-1202848920/

My theater had signs up and plenty of notices around the theater thankfully. At least they are trying to warn people.

Having seen the movie I think this is a very responsible acknowledgement to the flashing/strobe effects that are featured in the movie. Those type of effects don't bother me personally but while I was watching the movie I did think to myself "I hope there isn't anyone in the audience with epilepsy" during some of those sequences because there are a few and one in particular is quite lengthy. If something like that can be harmful to someone going to the movie uninformed then they should at least have the opportunity to be made aware beforehand. I go to many concerts and I have been to shows that feature strobe lights and the venue will post notices at the entrances informing people about the strobe lights so I think that's a responsible thing to do at the movie theaters as well.

I don't feel bad for who see the movie knowing the have epilepsy. I feel bad for the people who don't realize they have epilepsy and have a seizure in the middle of the movie!!! :o

I was kind of shocked that they chose the lighting affects they did knowing how it could affect people with epilepsy especially given how long one of the scenes were. I looked away bc I was paranoid :lol:

[PApagreg]

So I just saw it and I thought it was a good but predictable movie.

Pros
The animation of course improved compared to the 1st movie, giving more detail and life to the environment and the characters. I like how Helen is sort of the focus when it comes to the superhero aspect of the movie because we already seen Bob do it in the 1st one and they actually gave an in-universe explanation for it. It also helps her powers are a bit more interesting than Bob's in the visual department with her changing shapes while Bob hits things. I also enjoyed watching Bob struggle to become a house husband and slowly go insane from it, hell most of my laughs came from him getting frustrated. The rest of the characters are good but they aren't really that much different from the previous movie.

Meddling/Nitpicking
Remember how ambiguous the time period was in the 1st one, like you would't know it was set in the 50s/60s without paying attention, well here they just shove the 50s aesthetic down your throat to the point you are expecting Oral Puppington to make a cameo. I know this is nitpicking but its kind of jarring when you watch to 2 films back to back and go from subtle to jump scare. Also I still think it was a huge missed opportunity for the sequal to not have a time skip.
Bad-
Pretty much the bad guy in this movie, by the time you see the brother and sister team you pretty much have a multiple choice of who is going to be the bad guy and I chose C(which was the sister). At first I thought they made the Screenslaver in order to give Elasticgirl a fake villain who can she fight against but nope instead it was a plot to make Supers extra illegals because her father called Supers instead of going to the panic room and that means Supers are bad because they make humans weak. Well going by that logic Police and Firemen should't exist because they solve other people's problem too. Also to add salt to the wound we got another Tech villain So yeah a weak villain that really hurt the film imo

I give it 7 Helen ass shots out of 10

[drgon78]

50's? Don't you mean 60's? The first movie takes in 1962(well 1947 in the beginning) with 3 month time skip at the end so still 62 or maybe 63. Though Jonny Quest didn't come out until 64 this is an alternate world with superheroes and better tech so you never know.

I am fine with them not doing a time skip for this one though a 2-5 year one for a third movie would be interesting.

[Redeemer]

50's? Don't you mean 60's? The first movie takes in 1962(well 1947 in the beginning) with 3 month time skip at the end so still 62 or maybe 63. Though Jonny Quest didn't come out until 64 this is an alternate world with superheroes and better tech so you never know.

I am fine with them not doing a time skip for this one though a 2-5 year one for a third movie would be interesting.

I am hoping for a time skip in the 3rd movie. I usually don't like time skips, but I want the next movie to be more about the kids coming into there own.

[PApagreg]

50's? Don't you mean 60's? The first movie takes in 1962(well 1947 in the beginning) with 3 month time skip at the end so still 62 or maybe 63. Though Jonny Quest didn't come out until 64 this is an alternate world with superheroes and better tech so you never know.

I am fine with them not doing a time skip for this one though a 2-5 year one for a third movie would be interesting.

I meant the aesthetics of the 50s which in my defense its hard to differentiate between the 50s and 60s when the latter doesn't have any hippies or psychedelic drugs.

[Autbot_Benz]

Angry Feminist at the NY Post rants at us perverts to stop objectifying Elastagirl

https://twitter.com/MarisaDellatto/status/1009539791338209280

Not my fault she has a thicc booty :lol:

[ranger_scout]

Disney and Pixar definitely created a worthy sequel to the orginal. I am glad that we to go see Helen/Elastigirl in action by herself. It was really great seeing her kick some serious butt during some scenes.

I also loved how Violet, Dash and Jack-Jack were the ones who had to save everyone before the climax. Plus, we got to see a similar moment to the Jack-Jack Attacks short where a person's memory is erased after discovering a superhero's powers. I didn't realize that it did more than just forgetting that moment.

[drgon78]

I do find it strange that Rick Dicker didn't tell Bob and/or Helen about Jack Jack's powers.

[Shark_Blade]

I love the new movie. I don’t understand why it took so long to make??

The cinematography of the action scenes are just gobsmackingly good, so out of this world!

The characters are a lot more detailed now. For example it is more apparent that Violet has eyebags and crevices on her face.

Ah I wanna see it again.

[ranger_scout]

Yesterday I went back to see the film for a second time. This sequel was definitely worth the wait. I am so glad that Brad Bird didn't jump ahead far into the future at all and decided to let the kids be the same age. There really was still so much to explore with the Parr children when they were still so young. Also, it's really nice to see little Jack-Jack begin to use his powers. He truly is one of the best infants Disney has ever had in their world of animated films.

[ABrown]

Angry Feminist at the NY Post rants at us perverts to stop objectifying Elastagirl

https://twitter.com/MarisaDellatto/status/1009539791338209280

Not my fault she has a thicc booty :lol:

Yeah, I'm not gonna lie. I took much more notice of her this time around than I did in the first one. I've read that a lot of people are taking notice of her now because they were 5-8 year old kids when the first one came out, are now they're 18-21 year olds. I was in my mid 20's when the first one came out, and I'm now in my late 30's. It's interesting cause I would absolutely say that when the first movie came out, I preferred girls to be a little more skin and bones. But at this point in my life, I like a girl to have a little more "healthy" look.

[Spike Spiegel]

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/DisloyalWeepyImperatorangel-size_restricted.gif

This was a lot of fun, but if they do make another sequel, I hope they take their time with it. This is the first new Pixar flick I've bothered watching since Toy Story 3.

That short film Bao generated some interesting responses from the audience I was with.

[ProphetofGanja]

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/DisloyalWeepyImperatorangel-size_restricted.gif

This was a lot of fun, but if they do make another sequel, I hope they take their time with it. This is the first new Pixar flick I've bothered watching since Toy Story 3.


What, 14 years wasn't enough time for you?

[Spike Spiegel]

What, 14 years wasn't enough time for you?

I was talking not in terms of time exactly, but rather attention to character and story.

Considering some of the other Pixar sequels, I think we were exceedingly fortunate to get a film like this.

[Donatello19]

I'm so sick of everyone and their mother (and Pixar themselves) throwing around "14 years". They did not spend 14 years working on this film, it just happened to be released 14 years after the original film.

[PApagreg]

I'm so sick of everyone and their mother (and Pixar themselves) throwing around "14 years". They did not spend 14 years working on this film, it just happened to be released 14 years after the original film.

Nobody with a quarter of brain thinks the crew spent 14 years working on the filmb

Angry Feminist at the NY Post rants at us perverts to stop objectifying Elastagirl

https://twitter.com/MarisaDellatto/status/1009539791338209280

Not my fault she has a thicc booty :lol:

And here is something as dumb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s7P1eYfvyw&t=

This dude thinks Incredible 2 is feminist propaganda

[plastroncafe]

I think by "working" they mean that this movie was in development for 14 years. Which, let's be honest...is likely true, on a technicality.
In that when the first one was in theaters they started thinking about making a sequel while.

Or are we not counting pre-production?

[Sumac]

I'm so sick of everyone and their mother (and Pixar themselves) throwing around "14 years". They did not spend 14 years working on this film, it just happened to be released 14 years after the original film.
Depends what do you count as development.

[Donatello19]

Nobody with a quarter of brain thinks the crew spent 14 years working on the filmb

Well I've seen a LOT of people who think that. And that's not even mentioning all of the casuals who like to say it just because it's what they heard.

[drgon78]

I am just glad it got done at all regardless if they started 14 years ago or 4 years ago.

[CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy]

Took my son to see it. We had a blast; definitely a worthy father-son movie experience. That strobe-light scene, though... damn! :teek:

[The Deadman]

INCREDIBLES 2 Becomes First Animated Film To Cross $600 Million At Domestic Box Office
https://toonado.com/movies/incredibles-2-becomes-first-animated-film-to-cross-600-million-at-domestic-box-office-a563

[newfan]

Long awaited I guess?

I liked it, all but they ignored something in the first movie otherwise decent enough.

[Coola Yagami]

Yeah... they should have toned down that strobe light affect. I was alright but I had the feeling that if I was trapped in a room with that flashing for an hour I'd be passing out and puking.

[drgon78]

Highest grossing animated movie for domestic anyway, Frozen is still #1 for total amount. I love Incredibles 2 and hope we get a third one no later then 2025.:lol: