PDA

View Full Version : Who Are Your Favorite TMNT Artists?


Quiller-Bee
07-19-2003, 12:47 PM
With a new Tales of the TMNT in the works, I've been wondering if we might see the return of a few artists who contributed to the TMNT comics in the past. This got me remembering my own favorites, which eventually led me to this question: Which artists are your personal favorites, and, if you care to elaborate, why?

Sparvid
07-19-2003, 02:41 PM
(Besides Laird & Eastman) Dooney & Farley, followed by Veitch.

Aztec General
07-19-2003, 03:05 PM
Eastman & Laird

Lawson- especially his Return to New York/City At War stuff (By the way, if you disagree with me and don't like him, keep it to yourself. I'm tired of that argument.)

Dooney

Farley

Zulli- I love his art. I really should check out "Puma Blues"

Nate
07-19-2003, 04:58 PM
Eastman & Laird

Lawson- especially his Return to New York/City At War stuff (By the way, if you disagree with me and don't like him, keep it to yourself. I'm tired of that argument.)

Dooney

Farley

Zulli- I love his art. I really should check out "Puma Blues"
.. Yup.

The Master
07-21-2003, 01:34 PM
1. Jim Lawson
2. Peter Laird
3. Kevin Eastman
4. A.C. Farley
5. Todd McFarlane (Only did one poster, but a damn good one. This man should do an issue.)

Raven
07-21-2003, 01:38 PM
todd mcflare same reasons

but I use to like lawson......well now he sucks :(

ah well

Roseangelo
07-25-2003, 02:50 AM
1) Kevin Eastman/Peter Laird
2) A.C. Farley
3) Michael Dooney
4) Chris Allen

damnhooligan
07-25-2003, 02:56 AM
Yup, I'm pretty much in total agreement. I can't toss any other names into the ring.

Karpo_007
07-25-2003, 03:06 AM
I wish Eastman could do one issue of the new Tales series, but unfortunately it doesn't seem likely now... I hope we will see Dooney's and Farley's art.

Jephael
07-25-2003, 06:31 AM
I love Dooney and Farley's artwork!

cqb101
07-25-2003, 07:30 AM
1. Jim Lawson
2. Peter Laird
3. Kevin Eastman
4. A.C. Farley
5. Todd McFarlane (Only did one poster, but a damn good one. This man should do an issue.)

Todd McFarlane did a poster? Where can I see it?

The Master
07-25-2003, 08:15 AM
Todd McFarlane did a poster? Where can I see it?

They used to show it on the official TMNT site when they were selling it, but now its sold out, so I don't know where you can see it. Or get it.

If somebody can find out, I'd love to buy one.

Quiller-Bee
07-25-2003, 08:52 AM
McFarlane's Mikey pin-up was first published in black and white in the back of TMNT vol. 1, #50, along with pin-ups by Erik Larsen and Walt Simonson.

lhb412
07-26-2003, 06:48 PM
No order

-Eastman and Laird, (togther, apart, whatever)

-Lawson, I even like his new stuff, abstract, but not to distracting

-A.C. Farley

-Eric Talbot

-LeSean, only two issues so far, but dang it's cool!

Woops! almost forgot:

-Dooney!

Krakko
07-27-2003, 03:44 PM
my fav is jack kirby

Albrecht
07-27-2003, 04:24 PM
eastman, larid, kirby, berger, le sean and farley.

Quiller-Bee
07-27-2003, 07:46 PM
Okay, here are my own:

MY TOP THREE:
1.) Kevin Eastman & Peter Laird - As a pair or individually. Their renditions hooked me first, so I gotta list 'em first. I prefer Kevin's visual style over Peter's, but just by a hair.
2.) A.C. Farley - This guy's version of the Turtles has always impressed the hell outta me. His renditions of the “classic-style” Turtles are the most structurally sound and three-dimensional, IMHO.
3.) Michael Zulli - His vision of the characters in his three-issue story arc simply blew me away. This guy's a top-notch artist.

THE REST (In alphabetical order by first name.)
• Eric Talbot - I like the “rough ‘n’ cartoony” quality of his art.
• Jim Lawson - While I do prefer his old style to his newer one, I still like his work. While I admittedly have my limits, “weird” and highly stylized visual art doesn't usually bother me.
• LeSean Thomas - His stuff is wild and dynamic. Me like!
• Mark Bode - Love his sh**. Similar enough to his father's style to imagine what his take on the TMNT might have been like.

SkaterMike
07-31-2003, 11:02 AM
Definitely Dooney and Farley, their paintings are a big inspiration for me. I also love LeSean's style (especially the colouring in the Dreamwave series, even though he doesn't do it). I also like Eastman and Lairds art on the City at War arc.

HorseTechie
08-05-2003, 10:29 AM
Okay, here are my own:

MY TOP THREE:
1.) Kevin Eastman & Peter Laird - As a pair or individually. Their renditions hooked me first, so I gotta list 'em first. I prefer Kevin's visual style over Peter's, but just by a hair.
2.) A.C. Farley - This guy's version of the Turtles has always impressed the hell outta me. His renditions of the “classic-style” Turtles are the most structurally sound and three-dimensional, IMHO.
3.) Michael Zulli - His vision of the characters in his three-issue story arc simply blew me away. This guy's a top-notch artist.

THE REST (In alphabetical order by first name.)
• Eric Talbot - I like the “rough ‘n’ cartoony” quality of his art.
• Jim Lawson - While I do prefer his old style to his newer one, I still like his work. While I admittedly have my limits, “weird” and highly stylized visual art doesn't usually bother me.
• LeSean Thomas - His stuff is wild and dynamic. Me like!
• Mark Bode - Love his sh**. Similar enough to his father's style to imagine what his take on the TMNT might have been like.
I could write my own post, but what you said about the above artists is pretty much the as my favorites list. And I also like Dan Berger, since his style is pretty flexible and really animated too.

I also got to meet Michael Zulli for the first time this May at a comic con, and he's really cool. Funny personality and easy going too. Mark Bode was ther too, but he seemed to be a little more reserved. But still cool to meet.

Quiller-Bee
08-05-2003, 01:36 PM
Wow—I completely zoned and forgot to list Mr. Berger! (Mea culpa, mea culpa!) Add Dan's name to my own list for the exact same reasons you gave. :D

Albrecht
08-05-2003, 01:40 PM
eastman, larid, kirby, berger, le sean and farley.


looky, I said dan berger.

Raven
08-05-2003, 09:04 PM
eastman, larid, kirby, berger, le sean and farley.


looky, I said dan berger.
:roll: ok thats great............do you want some type of award or somthing for that

Loolaa
08-06-2003, 10:03 AM
My favourite TMNT artists:

Dan Berger, I love his art in #45, and that little story in one of the Turtle Soups. (Too lazy to find which one...).

AC Farley.

Eastman and Laird, obviously.

and Chris Allan. :D

Dr. Doom
08-06-2003, 11:39 PM
As far as TMNT artists go, all I can say is that I HATE Jim Lawson's artwork. I find it to be unbareable. I don't wanna hurt anyone's feelings or anything, but it's just rediculous how bad it is.

Actually tho, there are a few people I like. I always liked Chris Allen and that variant cover Pat Lee drew was friggin' amazing. And my wet dream come true would be if Joe Mad drew them. You've all seen that picture he did for Wizard.

But seriously, Jim Lawson is horrible.

Leo656
08-07-2003, 02:04 AM
Preach on, Brother Doom.

Amanda
08-07-2003, 02:10 AM
I just love how Farley drew the Turtles. Especially their eyes :)

Amanda

Quiller-Bee
08-07-2003, 02:34 AM
As far as TMNT artists go, all I can say is that I HATE Jim Lawson's artwork . . . .

. . . But seriously, Jim Lawson is horrible.
There's no need to beat around the bush, man. Just go ahead and tell us what you really think.

I just love how Farley drew the Turtles. Especially their eyes :)
Same here. He did a bang-up job on their eyes.

The Master
08-07-2003, 08:36 AM
This may sound stupid, but they should really put Farley's pics back up in the Profiles section of the official website. Those Fox Box ones pale in comparison.

Yeah, stupid thought, ignore me.

Dr. Doom
08-07-2003, 11:42 AM
No, I agree.

Dr. Doom
08-07-2003, 01:44 PM
I like LeSean too!

-=Eyes shift=-


Ssssssh, don't disagree, he's watching!!!!

Jephael
08-07-2003, 03:54 PM
This may sound stupid, but they should really put Farley's pics back up in the Profiles section of the official website. Those Fox Box ones pale in comparison.

Yeah, stupid thought, ignore me.

Hey, don't feel bad. I kinda felt the same way about those pics! I miss the old Farley images.

Kid Icarus
08-07-2003, 06:16 PM
I've gotta go with LeSean and Dooney.

Amanda
08-07-2003, 06:54 PM
I like LeSean too!

Well i've only been able to get the first issue of the DW comic and I must say I quite like it so far. LeSeans art is unique and very expressive.

Now if only the other issues are still on the shelf when I go to Sydney next... :tneutral:

Amanda (crossing her fingers)

azure turtle
08-08-2003, 03:09 PM
G'nah... Hard to decide. Lessee... I dig Kevin Eastman and Peter Laird's work on the earlier issues of Mirage. They create a strong sense of atmosphere with their art. Dan Berger, because his turtles have such great facial expressions ('specially in the daily strips). LeSean, for the energy and movement he can put into the TMNT. I also like Mark Bode, Rick Veitch, and yes, Jim Lawson (though I like his earlier work the best).

Dr. Doom
08-08-2003, 04:58 PM
Yeah, I remember bringing my dislike of his artwork up back at Mikey's a LOOOOOOOOONG time ago and you saying that.

Aztec General
08-08-2003, 07:07 PM
Yeah, I remember bringing my dislike of his artwork up back at Mikey's a LOOOOOOOOONG time ago and you saying that.


God, enough of the Lawson bashing. Everyone. I don't care whether you like his artwork or not but:
1) Using words like "sucks" or "hate" are not opinions they're immature put downs. If you don't like his work, feel free to be honest but at the same time try to be mature and tactful. Example "I prefer his older style" or "I don't like his new style" or "I'm not a fan of his work" or even "I'd prefer someone else"
2) In how many damn threads must people profess their undying hatred of Jim Lawson? It's gotten to the point where people can't even mention Vol. 4, TMNT comics, or artwork without someone feeling the need to say "Jim Lawson SUCKS and I HATE his art!" It is truly killing the discussions here.
3) If you notice, this thread is about your FAVORITE TMNT artists (ie: the ones you LIKE)
4) There already was a thread on Lawson's work specifically, if you want to talk about his work, then put your comments there, or start a new thread and sticky it if you feel the need to talk about it so endlessly.
5) Lawson's style is what it is. It's as simple as that. I happen to like it, but you are all free not to. If it pains you so much to look at then maybe TMNT comics are not for you.

This is a discussion board people, let's try and be civil.

Dr. Doom
08-08-2003, 07:14 PM
I'll stick with my way thanks. Don't so uptight, man, there's no point in trying to dictate what other people say, that ain't your place.

Karpo_007
08-09-2003, 02:51 AM
I happen to agree. You can express your opinion without immature comments, it's really getting old. And like Ratking said, if you wan't to talk about Lawsson's art, there is a thread for it.

Dr. Doom
08-09-2003, 03:07 AM
What the hell's the big deal? Why does their need to be limitations on a topic? If everybody stuck to exactly what the subject was named, this place would be pretty goddamn boring.

Karpo_007
08-09-2003, 04:37 AM
No, people are getting tired of "Lawson sucks11!1" in every comic book thread.

cqb101
08-09-2003, 06:59 AM
I'm not getting tired of it.

Aztec General
08-09-2003, 09:12 AM
I'll stick with my way thanks. Don't so uptight, man, there's no point in trying to dictate what other people say, that ain't your place.

1)Trying to encourage mature discussion is not being uptight. And if you bothered to read my post, you'll notice that I encourage free speech as long as it's mature speech.
2) If people stayed on topic this board would function a hell of lot better actually. Because then we could actually have discussions. For example which sounds better to you:

Post 1: "Splinter's death was a surprise"
Post 2: "Lawson SUCKS and I HATE him. I hope he dies for drawing so bad!!!!!!!!"
Post 3: "Lawson doesnt suck, I like his work"
Post 4: "Lawson draws worse than my kid sister. Hey mods ban me!! I'm crazy and I have a big sig."
etc...

or

Post1: "Splinter's death was a surprise"
Post 2: "Yeah, I wasn't expecting it. Did anyone notice the Rat King."
Post 3: "Yeah, what was with the Rat King? Is he Splinter's guardian angel or did he contribute to his death?"
etc...

Now, naturally these are just quick examples, but which one do you think makes more sense? Well, I'll save the breath of some smart ass, the second example of course. If everyone tried to stay on topic as best as possible, and tried not to be so antagonistic, this board would function better and be more fun to discuss on.

As of now, this not the place where I want to discuss the new TMNT comics. And that is really sad, because I'd like to, and this is the best TMNT community on the internet. But, as usual a few rotten apples have to spoil it for everyone.

Leo656
08-09-2003, 03:55 PM
If you're implying that I'm one of these so-called "bad apples", well, you wouldn't be entirely wrong, but you would be if you expected me to care. Jus' sayin'.

Sparvid
08-09-2003, 04:00 PM
I don't quite see how someone can hate Lawson's "style", since he's had a few... If you compare:

Any Tales of TMNT issue.
The early Archie issue with the Chameleon guy.
Return to NY.
City at War.
volume 4.

Those look pretty different to me. I love the Tales art, and I hate the Archie art (still wonder if there's some story there, was he force to draw the whole issue in a couple of days?), and I find everything he has done since City at War "acceptable" in the way that I don't see anything really wrong with it...

Jephael
08-09-2003, 04:21 PM
TMNT Adventures #9 wasn't the only issue of the Archie series Lawson did. If you check out his artwork in #11 and #24, you can see that he is very good at his artwork.

Dr. Doom
08-10-2003, 03:09 AM
Yanno, I'm kinda new, here, this is my first time saying anything about it, so don't try to pin it on me that people won't stop bringing it up. I'm entitled to express my opinion, I ain't gonna beat it into the ground. It certainly isn't my fault, so don't start pointing fingers in my direction. And enough with this conceited "mature conversation" crap. The fact that we're all posting on a ninja turtles board rules that out entirely. What do you want us to do, discuss the riveting article we just read in the latest New Yorker about modern art?

Karpo_007
08-10-2003, 02:10 PM
Speak for yourself, level of discussion on this board is usually very high and mature.

Dane E5R
08-10-2003, 07:02 PM
Dudes, he's new here. What is he just EXPECTED to know that the topic has already been brought up here a dozen times? He was just giving his opinion, and there was no reason WHATSOEVER to jump down his throat.

Dr. Doom
08-10-2003, 07:50 PM
It's not even that, It's just the principle of somebody just up and trying to tell me what to say and how to act. I'm allowed to come online and goof around if I damn well feel like it. Don't try to act like you're so much more "mature" than I am just cause I don't take myself seriously.

Karpo_007
08-10-2003, 11:21 PM
This board has rules, you can't always say what you want. In example, bashing any of the TMNT universes [except Next Mutation maybe :wink: ] is forbidden. There is not a rule not to bash Lawsson's art, but like said it gets old heard in every thread.

Dr. Doom
08-10-2003, 11:46 PM
That's all you needed to say. We coulda avoided this whole debate if you just said "we get a lot of that, try not to brinng it up again."

Karpo_007
08-10-2003, 11:51 PM
I guess you're right...

Dr. Doom
08-10-2003, 11:51 PM
No hard feelings?

Karpo_007
08-10-2003, 11:54 PM
None.

Dr. Doom
08-11-2003, 12:05 AM
awsome -=shakes hand=- :anime:

HorseTechie
08-12-2003, 10:29 AM
Yay! Thus... let's move on then, shall we?

Dr. Doom
08-12-2003, 01:00 PM
Aye.

Raven
08-12-2003, 01:34 PM
micheal turner hasent done any TMNT art to my knoweldge, but it would be cool if he did a issue or somthing, I mean hes my favorite all ready. So it would be cool if he did a piece on the turtles.

Dr. Doom
08-12-2003, 01:47 PM
I feel the same way about Joe Madureira. The difference being we've all seen that peice he did for wizaqrd.

impetus
08-27-2003, 09:32 AM
... and we all know that Joe Mad (as much as I love his art) couldn't finish out a comic book on time if his life depended on it. Look at the disaster that was Battle Chasers. Great book with some of the very best art in any series ever (check out the monster art!), but months and months of delays, followed by promises that he'd got on track, then more delays, then he just dropped the book in the middle of the first storyline.

Back to topic, though (and this is only in terms of artwork):
1. Dan Berger
2. AC Farley (paintings)
3. Richard Corben (guest artist)
4. Eastman and Laird
5. Michael Zulli (guest artist) everyone read The Last Temptation (http://darkhorse.com/products/profile.html?sku=49259)!
5. Jim Lawson

impetus
08-28-2003, 08:14 PM
Holy Hand Grenade!!! I forgot LeSean!!! Guess I was wrapped up in my Mirage mindset...

kicknz
09-02-2003, 06:37 AM
My all-time favorite artist, TMNT or otherwise, is Jim Lawson. I am a SERIOUS collector of his stuff and have a lot of really obscure items, some never officially released.

After him it's . . .
Eastman & Laird
Eric Talbot
AC Farley
Michael Dooney

darthsmozers
09-21-2003, 09:32 AM
Didnt Chris Allen do TMNT Adventures?

Jephael
09-21-2003, 09:40 AM
Yep, he did the art for most of the series from #28 to #72.

Leo656
09-21-2003, 10:52 AM
I liked Allan's stuff a lot.

Machias Banshee
09-21-2003, 11:28 AM
I love Chris Allen's work! That was the art that got me interested even further into the archie Series... :rolling: