View Full Version : Spider-Man 2017 film
Raph's Girl
04-12-2016, 11:53 PM
So apparantly the subtitle for the next Spider-Man movie is Homecoming. What? Does the villain attack the high school dance?? :roll:
http://media.comicbook.com/2016/04/spidermanhomecoming-178727.jpg
http://comicbook.com/2016/04/13/spider-man-homecoming-logo-revealed/
Andrew NDB
04-12-2016, 11:56 PM
So apparantly the subtitle for the next Spider-Man movie is Homecoming.
No it's not.
joefsas
04-13-2016, 02:36 AM
http://geektyrant.com/news/spider-man-homecoming-is-the-official-title-of-the-new-spider-man-film
ZariusTwo
04-13-2016, 02:57 AM
Homecoming is the name of one of the storylines from the comic, though I hear the film will be inspired by both the Ultimate comics and the Spidey Loves MJ books from the 2000s
ToTheNines
04-13-2016, 04:51 AM
They're pretty confident, if they're really going with such a cheesy subtitle.
Whatswiththeheadbands?
04-13-2016, 06:07 AM
So apparantly the subtitle for the next Spider-Man movie is Homecoming. What? Does the villain attack the high school dance?? :roll:
Well, stuff like that happened in the comics, so why not?
Etsyturtle2
04-13-2016, 06:49 AM
Does the term homecoming have something to with Spider-Man finally being in the MCU?
NinjaPug
04-13-2016, 08:22 AM
There's already another thread for this.
Baxter Stockmen
04-13-2016, 01:08 PM
I really feel like they should have just called it "Marvel's Spider-Man"
The whole homecoming thing just bugs me.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
04-13-2016, 01:12 PM
Spectacular. It's so obvious. But nope, go with Home-Coming instead.
Andrew NDB
04-13-2016, 01:48 PM
Damn, they're actually using that title? That's ballsy.
Baxter Stockmen
04-13-2016, 02:10 PM
Probably just going to rub it in sony's face that they can call it whatever the hell they feel like and they'll still make a better spider-man movie than they ever could.
CyberCubed
04-13-2016, 04:33 PM
Probably just going to rub it in sony's face that they can call it whatever the hell they feel like and they'll still make a better spider-man movie than they ever could.
You do realize Sony is still making this movie, right?
ZariusTwo
05-19-2016, 10:32 AM
Potential plot leak
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/rumour-spider-man-homecoming-plot-leaks-online-a141822
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
05-19-2016, 10:39 AM
Potential plot leak
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/rumour-spider-man-homecoming-plot-leaks-online-a141822
Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. That sounds really good!
Foombamaroom
05-19-2016, 10:44 AM
Dear LORD I hope this is true.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
05-19-2016, 11:04 AM
Dear LORD I hope this is true.
Ditto. I wasn't a Spiderman fan until Civil War, and I've never been able to sit through any of the five previous Spidey films... but this sounds amazing.
I wants it so much.
Spike Spiegel
05-19-2016, 11:10 AM
Potential plot leak
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/rumour-spider-man-homecoming-plot-leaks-online-a141822
It seems very reminiscent of the "Spectacular Spider-Man" TV series, which is a good sign.
Foombamaroom
05-19-2016, 11:13 AM
It seems very reminiscent of the "Spectacular Spider-Man" TV series, which is a good sign.
I thought that, too.
I'm a bigger Spider-Man fan than most people, probably one of the biggest on this forum. And seeing this plot makes me so happy that they're taking Spidey back to his teenage roots.
I can't wait.
TigerClaw
05-19-2016, 11:41 AM
Potential plot leak
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/rumour-spider-man-homecoming-plot-leaks-online-a141822
Keep in mind that this leak comes from 4chan, so take it with a grain of salt.
TurtleTitan97
05-19-2016, 11:43 AM
Keep in mind that this leak comes from 4chan, so take it with a grain of salt.
We already knew that, genius.
ZariusTwo
05-19-2016, 12:31 PM
It seems very reminiscent of the "Spectacular Spider-Man" TV series, which is a good sign.
It's also in line with the Mary Jane comic books of the 2000s, which the producers of the movie have said they did research on for this movie.
ToTheNines
05-19-2016, 05:52 PM
I could dig it. Seems kinda plain and simple, but I'm sure that's not 100 percent accurate anyways.
NinjaPug
05-20-2016, 12:09 PM
Michael Keaton back in as the villain
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/michael-keaton-back-in-the-mix-for-spider-man-homecoming-villain-1201770783/
TurtleTitan97
05-20-2016, 12:11 PM
Michael Keaton back in as the villain
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/michael-keaton-back-in-the-mix-for-spider-man-homecoming-villain-1201770783/
What a twist!
I wonder what brought him back?
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
05-20-2016, 12:18 PM
Michael Keaton back in as the villain
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/michael-keaton-back-in-the-mix-for-spider-man-homecoming-villain-1201770783/
What if he's playing Osborn and not the Vulture?
NinjaPug
05-20-2016, 12:23 PM
Some info on the villains and costumes from JoBlo. These guys have been spot on with their Marvel scoops in the past and were the first to report Hulk was going to be in Ragnarok.
http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-scoop-the-villains-and-costume-of-spider-man-homecoming-204
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
05-20-2016, 12:35 PM
I'd rather see Vulture and Osborn than Vulture and Tinkerer (who?), but the Vulture/Osborn story does sound like a dangerously close retread of the Amazing Spidey duo of films...
Hmmm.
CyberCubed
05-20-2016, 12:45 PM
One good thing is despite all these Spiderman reboots they at least use different villains each time other than Green Goblin. I'm glad we got to see Lizard in a movie for example, and seeing Sandman and Shocker was alright even if the latter was nothing like the character. I also don't even feel the need to see Doc Oct again because Spiderman 2 did him so well.
The only real do-over they need to do is Venom obviously.
TurtleTitan97
05-20-2016, 12:49 PM
Shocker was alright even if the latter was nothing like the character.
Shocker=/=Electro
How can you possibly confuse them as being the same character?
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
05-20-2016, 12:50 PM
One good thing is despite all these Spiderman reboots they at least use different villains each time other than Green Goblin. I'm glad we got to see Lizard in a movie for example, and seeing Sandman and Shocker was alright even if the latter was nothing like the character. I also don't even feel the need to see Doc Oct again because Spiderman 2 did him so well.
The only real do-over they need to do is Venom obviously.
And the Rhino. Rhino needs a do-over... I'm not a Spidey fan and even I know that. :tlol:
CyberCubed
05-20-2016, 01:01 PM
Shocker=/=Electro
How can you possibly confuse them as being the same character?
Electro and Shocker have similar sounding names and powers. Also I am not that big a Spiderman fan so I'm not as familiar with the characters.
TurtleTitan97
05-20-2016, 01:07 PM
Electro and Shocker have similar sounding names and powers.
No, they don't.
Electro has electric powers, hence the name "Electro".
Shocker uses sonic vibrations from a pair of gauntlets he wears.
The Deadman
06-10-2016, 10:01 AM
Kenneth Choi Joins Spider-Man: Homecoming (http://411mania.com/movies/kenneth-choi-joins-spider-man-homecoming/)
Kenneth Choi is set to play the principal of Spider-Man: Homecoming. Deadline reports that the actor, who also played Jim Morita in Captain America: The First Avengers and Agents of SHIELD, will has joined the cast of the upcoming Sony/Marvel film.
The movie also stars Tom Holland, Marisa Tomei, Robert Downey Jr., Michael Keaton, Zendaya, Michael Barbieri, Laura Harrier and Tony Revolori. It being directed by Jon Watts and is set to release on July 7th, 2017.
MikeandRaph87
06-10-2016, 11:22 AM
Keaton is back in? Wondervwhat changed his mind. I am not a fan of the Vulture as an old man with a flying harness is dull to me. Perhaps the film can convince me otherwisr. Mysterio is the one I want to see. Hope the Green Goblin will get a rest.
A few articles have popped up suggesting Kingpin should be included and I lovevthe idea, but don't see it happening.
http://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/spider-man-homecoming-needs-kingpin.html/?ref=YF&yptr=yahoo
NinjaPug
06-14-2016, 12:19 PM
Donald Glover has joined the cast.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/donald-glover-joins-spider-man-902514
TurtleTitan97
06-14-2016, 12:27 PM
Donald Glover has joined the cast.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/donald-glover-joins-spider-man-902514
Oh, the irony.... :lol:
ProphetofGanja
06-14-2016, 12:37 PM
Keaton is back in? Wondervwhat changed his mind. I am not a fan of the Vulture as an old man with a flying harness is dull to me. Perhaps the film can convince me otherwisr. Mysterio is the one I want to see. Hope the Green Goblin will get a rest.
A few articles have popped up suggesting Kingpin should be included and I lovevthe idea, but don't see it happening.
http://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/spider-man-homecoming-needs-kingpin.html/?ref=YF&yptr=yahoo
Yeah, I really wanted to see Mysterio too. I think Keaton would've done a great job.
Oh, the irony.... :lol:
Ha yeah that's pretty funny. If he can't be Miles Morales, at least he's still involved in the film some kind of way
NinjaPug
06-23-2016, 12:25 PM
Bokeem Woodbine has joined the cast. Dude was awesome in Fargo last season. The report says he's a villain.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/spider-man-homecoming-finds-villain-905864
Andrew NDB
06-23-2016, 12:32 PM
Uh oh. Getting kind of villain heavy here.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
06-23-2016, 12:35 PM
Uh oh. Getting kind of villain heavy here.
If the focus remains on Spidey and how he's balancing his lives as superhero and school kid, and they only use some of the villains as one-act or one-scene antagonists (e.g. Zsasz from Batman Begins), you can have more than 2 villains.
MikeandRaph87
06-23-2016, 10:01 PM
The Spider-verse is apparently back on.
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/spider-man-movie-universe-still-203727363.html
TurtleTitan97
06-28-2016, 04:41 PM
Set pics with Holland in costume: http://www.looper.com/17116/exclusive-spider-man-homecoming-set-photos/
THGhost
06-30-2016, 10:01 AM
Apparently Michael Mando is rumoured to be playing Carnage. Not sure how I feel about going straight into a bat**** crazy villain like that right away. I'd be perfectly happy with just Michael Keaton playing Vulture.
Shark_Blade
06-30-2016, 10:10 AM
Vulture is just a balding boring old man in a green bird costume, no appeal in that whatsoever imo.
I'm glad they go with Carnage. Now I'm interested.
GoldMutant
06-30-2016, 10:29 AM
I don't understand how Carnage can be rumored personally. In terms of film, you need Eddie Brock first alongside the symbiote storyline and finally Venom while also sprinkling in Cletus Kassidy. Maybe it's because I'm not a fan of Carnage as a villain outside his design, but I think a sequel should be in order instead of jumping the gun.
Me personally? I'd rather like to have Kraven as a villain or either Mysterio/Chameleon in a sequel. (they both have similar potential, no? Psychological mind games on Peter as Spider-Man?)
thundermaster612
06-30-2016, 10:32 AM
So apparantly the subtitle for the next Spider-Man movie is Homecoming. What? Does the villain attack the high school dance?? :roll:
http://media.comicbook.com/2016/04/spidermanhomecoming-178727.jpg
http://comicbook.com/2016/04/13/spider-man-homecoming-logo-revealed/
I love how the homecoming part of the logo has sparkles flying around the spidey head O.
(EDIT: WOAH WOAH WOAH, THEIR ADDING CARNAGE!?! FINALLY WE GET TO SEE HIM IN A MOVIE!)
THGhost
06-30-2016, 10:33 AM
The Spider-verse is apparently back on.
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/spider-man-movie-universe-still-203727363.html
No use throwing out all those plans I guess.
Vulture is just a balding boring old man in a green bird costume, no appeal in that whatsoever imo.
I'm glad they go with Carnage. Now I'm interested.
Not in every version he's not, and he can be interesting as an elderly man.
I'd love to see Carnage too, but straight away? Really?
WOAH WOAH WOAH, THEIR ADDING CARNAGE!?! FINALLY WE GET TO SEE HIM IN A MOVIE!)
It's just a rumour for now. They haven't announced who Mando is playing yet.
ZariusTwo
06-30-2016, 10:43 AM
Carnage has a pretty compelling book at the moment, Gerry Conway is a great writer. I recommend it.
GoldMutant
06-30-2016, 10:50 AM
Carnage has a pretty compelling book at the moment, Gerry Conway is a great writer. I recommend it.
Getting off topic for a quick moment, but I'll give it a look Zarius. :) (do need to read some comics soon anyways) Do you think you can give me a quick summary of it's plot, spoiler free though?
TurtleTitan97
07-23-2016, 09:27 PM
http://media.comicbook.com/2016/07/slack-imgs-com-191931.jpg
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
07-23-2016, 09:29 PM
http://media.comicbook.com/2016/07/slack-imgs-com-191931.jpg
Sweet. If Vulture's gonna wear a helmet/mask thingy, though, can we get him a proper beak?
drgon78
07-23-2016, 09:37 PM
Sweet, it's about time they got to use Vulture.
Splinter the boss
07-24-2016, 05:26 PM
Sweet. If Vulture's gonna wear a helmet/mask thingy, though, can we get him a proper beak?
Funny the way you phrased it.
retr0pia75
07-24-2016, 10:04 PM
The Amazing films were both awful (though TASM 2 was slightly less so), but this looks like it could easily wash out the bad taste they left. Between this and the upcoming PS4 game, Spidey's future is looking brighter than ever.
CyberCubed
07-24-2016, 10:07 PM
Too bad we still don't have a great Spiderman cartoon to watch.
retr0pia75
07-24-2016, 10:12 PM
Too bad we still don't have a great Spiderman cartoon to watch.
What about the 1994 cartoon and Spectacular Spider-Man? Those were great.
ZariusTwo
07-25-2016, 02:30 AM
What about the 1994 cartoon and Spectacular Spider-Man? Those were great.
Unfortunately, both end on cliffhangers (though the '94 cartoon is finally getting an unofficial conclusion)
Splinter the boss
07-25-2016, 05:59 AM
What about Marvel's ultimate Spiderman on Disney XD?
I am quite enjoying it.
TurtleTitan97
07-25-2016, 10:11 AM
The Ultimate Spider-Man tv series is far from what most would call "great". Compared to Spectacular, it's weak.
ZariusTwo
07-25-2016, 10:31 AM
What about Marvel's ultimate Spiderman on Disney XD?
Cancer of the highest order.
ToTheNines
07-25-2016, 05:05 PM
Just read this flick now has 6 total screenwriters, including Watts himself. Not a good sign.
NinjaPug
07-25-2016, 05:20 PM
Just read this flick now has 6 total screenwriters, including Watts himself. Not a good sign.
This actually gives me more confidence assuming the latter drafts aren't coming from Goldstein and Daly. The further they get from their input the better.
Foombamaroom
07-25-2016, 05:53 PM
Just read this flick now has 6 total screenwriters, including Watts himself. Not a good sign.
Where'd you read that?
ToTheNines
07-25-2016, 06:04 PM
This actually gives me more confidence assuming the latter drafts aren't coming from Goldstein and Daly. The further they get from their input the better.
Good point. I'm not actually worried, but normally that many writers leads to turds.
Where'd you read that?
CBM
NinjaPug
07-25-2016, 06:05 PM
Where'd you read that?
http://marvel.com/news/movies/26510/sdcc_2016_spider-man_homecoming_introduces_its_villain
Spike Spiegel
07-25-2016, 06:29 PM
http://marvel.com/news/movies/26510/sdcc_2016_spider-man_homecoming_introduces_its_villain
Looks like Donald Glover is in this--if he is playing the character I think he's playing, then a Spider-Verse movie might not be so far fetched.
NinjaPug
07-25-2016, 06:33 PM
Who do you think he is playing?
Spike Spiegel
07-25-2016, 06:39 PM
Who do you think he is playing?
Either Miles Morales or the black Ben Reilly from the Ultmate comics. I know he has voiced Miles in animation.
Then again, I could be excited about nothing and he's just playing Randy Robertson.
NinjaPug
07-25-2016, 06:45 PM
No chance he's Miles Morales.
ToTheNines
07-25-2016, 06:50 PM
What about Abraham Attah?
CyberCubed
07-30-2016, 01:12 PM
http://b-img.cdn.mig.me/i/04b8/e7fda1dbf50931847912faf493751aacd2cb/1463027280333
Etsyturtle2
07-30-2016, 01:37 PM
http://b-img.cdn.mig.me/i/04b8/e7fda1dbf50931847912faf493751aacd2cb/1463027280333
Haha
\Ü/
. ()
/\
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
07-30-2016, 01:44 PM
http://b-img.cdn.mig.me/i/04b8/e7fda1dbf50931847912faf493751aacd2cb/1463027280333
ROFL.
I had no idea Aunt May was so ancient in the first movies...
TheSkeletonMan939
07-30-2016, 01:57 PM
I had no idea Aunt May was so ancient in the first movies...
That's exactly what she looks like in the comics. I wish they'd gone with something similarly comic-accurate for the MCU.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
07-30-2016, 02:00 PM
That's exactly what she looks like in the comics. I wish they'd gone with something similarly comic-accurate for the MCU.
Yeah, but if they want a complete lineup of Spiderman films ala Harry Potter (a brilliant idea, if I say so myself), they need actors and actresses who are going to be around for awhile and can grow up with Peter Parker.
You wanna avoid a Dumbledore recast if possible. :tsmile:
Mayhem
07-30-2016, 05:40 PM
Indeed. Comic accurate as the Maguire films were to the comics, Aunt May given the age she looks, would have to have been quite a bit older than Peter's parents for it to be logically feasible. Sally Fields was at least a bit closer to the more realistic mark age wise.
ZariusTwo
07-31-2016, 02:17 AM
That's exactly what she looks like in the comics. I wish they'd gone with something similarly comic-accurate for the MCU.
Actually, I'm fine with this choice. Common consensus is that at the age she is, Aunt May should have died a long time ago anyway. Her death in Issue 400 of ASM during the Clone Saga is one of the best stories ever written, and then they undid it a couple of years later
Commenter 42
08-08-2016, 05:48 PM
Look, I hate the new black bands and tech line...
BUT I LOVE THE COLORS... finally!!!!!!!!!!!
Look so pretty!!!!!! Jesus. took long enough.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpT0cBhUIAISn-g.jpg
DC could take a cue here.
web shooters should really be under the gloves though...like, come on now...
TigerClaw
08-10-2016, 05:26 PM
Michael Chernus cast as the Tinkerer
http://deadline.com/2016/08/michael-chernus-spider-man-homecoming-villains-1201801646/
TheSkeletonMan939
08-10-2016, 05:35 PM
Man, they're diggin' deep into Spidey's history for that guy.
He was a villain in Amazing Spider-Man #2 or #3.
ToTheNines
08-10-2016, 06:12 PM
Second Orange is the New Black actor to join this one, nice.
MsMarvelDuckie
08-10-2016, 06:23 PM
Tinkerer huh? Interesting. I could see him as a secondary villain. Or maybe Vulture's tech-assist. Pretty obscure for a film-verse though.
ToTheNines
08-17-2016, 08:59 AM
http://i.imgbox.com/TOYFAyRs.jpg
NinjaPug
08-18-2016, 05:43 PM
Zendaya is playing MJ.
http://www.thewrap.com/zendaya-spider-man-homecoming-role-reveal-mary-jane-watson/
drgon78
08-18-2016, 06:17 PM
If she isn't a redhead, she isn't the real MJ.
Krutch
08-18-2016, 06:22 PM
Boooooooo. I'm all for racial diversity but some things shouldn't be changed just for the sake of changing it.
Candy Kappa
08-18-2016, 06:41 PM
I have no knowledge of her. But as long as she can act, have great chemistry with Holland and looks good with red hair, I'm fine with that.
Andrew NDB
08-18-2016, 06:55 PM
http://cdn-img.instyle.com/sites/default/files/styles/684xflex/public/images/2015/08/082815-zendaya-birthday-lead.jpg
Wow. She can play anyone she wants to in Spider-Man: Homecoming, as far as I'm concerned.
Yeah she can. She can get the D.
CyberCubed
08-18-2016, 07:01 PM
Man, the kid who was cast as Peter Parker is going to be quite excited. :lol:
GoldMutant
08-18-2016, 07:09 PM
Wasn't Zendaya originally cast as a character named Michelle? Did something change in the script or something? :ohwell:
Regardless, I'm interested nonetheless. Cue Cube's new fantasy...
Krutch
08-18-2016, 07:12 PM
I have no knowledge of her. But as long as she can act, have great chemistry with Holland and looks good with red hair, I'm fine with that.
What if she can act, has great chemistry with Holland, but keeps her brown hair?
Wow. She can play anyone she wants to in Spider-Man: Homecoming, as far as I'm concerned.Wow, you'd be great at casting a CW show :lol:
ToTheNines
08-18-2016, 07:16 PM
Ok, I figured the "Michele" thing was bull shish.
Just kinda bummed that everything we've learned about her character indicates that she's sort of a huge asshole to Peter. Obviously they're gonna end up together but to me, MJ should start out as slightly aloof, probably too mature for Peter. Not an outright asshole.
But we'll see.
Krutch
08-18-2016, 07:21 PM
Ok, I figured the "Michele" thing was bull shish.
Just kinda bummed that everything we've learned about her character indicates that she's sort of a huge asshole to Peter. Obviously they're gonna end up together but to me, MJ should start out as slightly aloof, probably too mature for Peter. Not an outright asshole.
But we'll see.
Butting heads kind of asshole or antagonizing kind of asshole? I can see it working if its a butt-heads/annoying kind of dynamic(like Lois and Clark were on Smallville) but if she's an outright bitch to Peter, yeah, I can't see that playing out well.
ToTheNines
08-18-2016, 07:29 PM
Butting heads kind of asshole or antagonizing kind of asshole? I can see it working if its a butt-heads/annoying kind of dynamic(like Lois and Clark were on Smallville) but if she's an outright bitch to Peter, yeah, I can't see that playing out well.
Some leaked dialogue, from my memory.
MJ: Where are you always dissappearing to Parker...?
*Peter nervously stammers*
MJ: Like I care
That's not verbatim, but the gist.
Candy Kappa
08-18-2016, 07:35 PM
What if she can act, has great chemistry with Holland, but keeps her brown hair?
Personally, I would be sad that MJ wouldn't have red hair, even fake red hair (like Dunst). But if the movie overall is enjoyable, who knows.
TheSkeletonMan939
08-18-2016, 08:34 PM
Uggggghhhh
I really hope that's a false report.
I want a redhead as MJ! That's her main identifying feature!
By the way, am I the only one who doesn't find this girl attractive in the least?
Splinter the boss
08-18-2016, 08:45 PM
I want a redhead.
ToTheNines
08-18-2016, 09:07 PM
Does her hair color really matter that much? Please expound?
Krutch
08-18-2016, 09:22 PM
By the way, am I the only one who doesn't find this girl attractive in the least?Nope. I'm with ya on that one. She doesn't do anything for me.
Shark_Blade
08-19-2016, 12:51 AM
She's like another duck face girl on Facebook to me.
CyberCubed
08-19-2016, 01:48 AM
She's like another duck face girl on Facebook to me.
http://i.imgur.com/Yixr3jv.gif
ZariusTwo
08-19-2016, 05:30 AM
Some leaked dialogue, from my memory.
MJ: Where are you always dissappearing to Parker...?
*Peter nervously stammers*
MJ: Like I care
That's not verbatim, but the gist.
It sort of makes sense for MJ to be a bit distant if they go with the comics origin...that she has a troubled family life, puts on the party girl/aloof personality to keep people at arm's length, and that she knows Peter is Spider-Man and does'nt want to show she cares in case she gets drawn too much into his world. We know she mellows out in late years and becomes accepting and supportful of Peter enough to marry him and give him kids, so we should probably let the story play out here.
Commenter 42
08-19-2016, 06:17 AM
I don't like this actress. She has too much young hollywood in her. They're starting to f*ck with the formula again...
...
...
She fine tho. Kind of...****, I'm getting old, she looks like a kid.
f*ck.
ToTheNines
08-19-2016, 07:20 AM
It sort of makes sense for MJ to be a bit distant if they go with the comics origin...that she has a troubled family life, puts on the party girl/aloof personality to keep people at arm's length, and that she knows Peter is Spider-Man and does'nt want to show she cares in case she gets drawn too much into his world. We know she mellows out in late years and becomes accepting and supportful of Peter enough to marry him and give him kids, so we should probably let the story play out here.
Agreed.
I don't like this actress. She has too much young hollywood in her. They're starting to f*ck with the formula again...
...
...
She fine tho. Kind of...****, I'm getting old, she looks like a kid.
f*ck.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-rVZCoB9pd8s/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABc/qvNuWqSQ6I8/photo.jpg
She's 19. Trust me, I made sure to check.
CyberCubed
08-19-2016, 11:58 AM
19 year olds look like kids, I'm not surprised. Its amazing how back when we were that age we didn't think we looked young, but now looking back 10 years ago in our late 20's or 30's and you realize how young girls look.
Andrew NDB
08-19-2016, 12:02 PM
http://www.ontheweirdside.com/wp-content/uploads/kinky-jesus-light.jpg
Andrew NDB
08-19-2016, 12:10 PM
And way, way better than who almost was MJ...
https://s13.postimg.io/40c7lo5on/Shailene_Woodley_640x960.jpg
Commenter 42
08-19-2016, 02:15 PM
Lol, the Woodley arguments, seem like just yesterday. For real, she was an ugly ... choice.
Anyway, whatever. I've lost interest. She's a child, so is he. I should be out doing my taxes or getting the mail, or cleaning the tool shed, or what ever it is old ****ers do.
I feel dirty, and old. Thanks Spider-man!
CyberCubed
08-19-2016, 02:27 PM
Anyway, whatever. I've lost interest. She's a child, so is he. I should be out doing my taxes or getting the mail, or cleaning the tool shed, or what ever it is old ****ers do.
I feel dirty, and old. Thanks Spider-man!
Well at least you're not like Bruce Timm whose fantasy is screwing some new 20 year old College student. I commend you for standing your ground.
TurtleTitan97
08-19-2016, 02:29 PM
Let it go, man. :roll: Get a new shtick already.
TheSkeletonMan939
08-19-2016, 02:36 PM
Timm has always been a bit of a perv. Check out "Naughty & Nice: The Good Girl Art of Bruce Timm". :lol:
ToTheNines
08-19-2016, 02:57 PM
Most artists are perverted lol.
Candy Kappa
08-19-2016, 03:01 PM
Timm has always been a bit of a perv. Check out "Naughty & Nice: The Good Girl Art of Bruce Timm". :lol:
Or the collected bondage art book by Joe Shuster.
CyberCubed
08-19-2016, 03:05 PM
Why do so many artists draw porn? I mean even professional artists or people respected in their community. I don't get it, its like nobody can resist drawing smut.
Candy Kappa
08-19-2016, 03:07 PM
What's wrong with drawing porn?
There's big money in it, some of the smut artist on Patreon is making $5000-10000 monthly
Commenter 42
08-19-2016, 03:08 PM
Just realized this movie has "The Shocker"
I can't believe their doing that to a child.
...So, er, I'm going to reveal I don't know as much as i should...
what the hell is the real difference between what the Shocker can do, and what Electro does? They both hurl electricity, right? One organic, one using gloves?
...
boooooooooo
TurtleTitan97
08-19-2016, 03:13 PM
what the hell is the real difference between what the Shocker can do, and what Electro does? They both hurl electricity, right? One organic, one using gloves?
...
boooooooooo
No, there's a vast difference between them.
Electro has electric powers. Shocker uses special gauntlets that can emit sonic vibrations powerful enough to shatter walls and cause internal damage to the body.
Candy Kappa
08-19-2016, 03:17 PM
The Shocker projects air lasts that vibrate with intense frequency, not electricity.
Commenter 42
08-19-2016, 03:19 PM
He fights with, air?
TurtleTitan97
08-19-2016, 03:23 PM
Not "air", sonic vibrations, dude. Powerful enough to shatter bones, buildings, etc.
Candy Kappa
08-19-2016, 03:37 PM
You don't mess around with super sonic vibrations...
Commenter 42
08-19-2016, 04:06 PM
Shocker, it's dumb.
Shouldn't he be called the vibrator then?
Wow, look at that cast. Represent!
http://i.imgbox.com/bqbUO9In.jpg
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
08-19-2016, 04:16 PM
Yeah, "Shocker" is a very misleading name.
I figured he and Electro were like Riddler and Cluemaster... one great, one unheard of and pointless. (Except at least Cluemaster gave us Stephanie Brown.)
Huh. Interesting.
Commenter 42
08-19-2016, 04:30 PM
Spider-man vs the Vibrator, with a surprise Shocker, and a little Mary-Jane.
Krutch
08-20-2016, 12:37 AM
Shocker was always one of my favourite Spidey jobbers. I always wanted to see him in an opening scene to a movie robbing a bank and getting taken out by Spider-Man. Hopefully thats the case here.
Hopefully he's not one of the big bads of a full feature. I mean, I love him, but... it's The Shocker.
TheSkeletonMan939
08-20-2016, 08:15 AM
Hopefully he's not one of the big bads of a full feature. I mean, I love him, but... it's The Shocker.
Dude, Iron Man 3's villain was a guy who was mad at Tony because he didn't come to a meeting. I don't think it's too outlandish for Shocker to be a main antagonist for this film. :P
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
08-20-2016, 11:53 AM
Dude, Iron Man 3's villain was a guy who was mad at Tony because he didn't come to a meeting. I don't think it's too outlandish for Shocker to be a main antagonist for this film. :P
:tlol:
At least we'll have Vulture, right?
But yeah... someday, maybe, a big-screen Marvel story will have a decent villain.
GoldMutant
08-20-2016, 11:59 AM
Shocker? Odd choice, but I'm going to guess he's only in it for the earlier parts of the movie, otherwise it's all on Vulture.
Kraven and Mysterio or Chameleon will be the sequel villains, you heard it here fist. :P please let me be right.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
08-20-2016, 12:01 PM
Shocker? Odd choice, but I'm going to guess he's only in it for the earlier parts of the movie, otherwise it's all on Vulture.
Kraven and Mysterio or Chameleon will be the sequel villains, you heard it here fist. :P please let me be right.
I wouldn't doubt that at all, simply because it seems like a very safe bet that Marvel is going to want to adapt new villains for Spidey for as long as possible.
Although, I'd be willing to bet we get Venom within a movie or two, as well.
MsMarvelDuckie
08-20-2016, 12:20 PM
Of course they will. All of them have been members of the Sinister Six at one point or another. It's obvious they are still gunning for that evenuality.
Krutch
08-20-2016, 12:39 PM
Still hoping for Carnage at some point or another.
After all the crap Marvel got lately because of Dr. Strange I'm guessing they're going to keep race changing characters which is really stupid. Make new characters into different races, don't change pre-existing ones but don't change white characters into other races for sake of diversity. For the most part it's distracting though there have been some times where it worked very well.
Zendaya doesn't look that young, she looks her age. I think most of you see her as very young because you feel or look older. Kind of how people think kids are idiots the older they get.
Still hoping for Carnage at some point or another.
I don't care what anyone says but I like 90s comics and that includes Spider-Man from that era. It's the spider-man I came to know so yeah "angsty extreme" symbiotes are awesome. If we can get a nice Venom I'd love to see Carnage eventually.
Spider-Man and X-Men are so popular that they have more interesting stories than the rest of the Marvel universe together, that's why I never wanted Spider-Man in the MCU or the X-Men since you won't do them justice. Too bad Sony ****ed it up so badly but they could've easily made a Spidey Movie Universe based on all his history like they were planning and how Fox is doing with X-Men.
Commenter 42
08-20-2016, 02:38 PM
Still hoping for Carnage at some point or another.
Yes to this!
Spider-man meets Silence of the lambs.
ToTheNines
08-20-2016, 03:11 PM
He fights with, air?
You know what else has air powers? Queefs.
Krutch
08-20-2016, 03:14 PM
I don't care what anyone says but I like 90s comics and that includes Spider-Man from that era. It's the spider-man I came to know so yeah "angsty extreme" symbiotes are awesome. If we can get a nice Venom I'd love to see Carnage eventually.
Yes to this!
Spider-man meets Silence of the lambs.Haha I'm well aware that Carnage is a one note, crazy, evil baddie but Marvel is full of morally grey villains that it's actually refreshing there's just this insane serial killer with a symbiote running around. Carnage is basically a perfect example of a worst case scenario. It's definitely something for adult Peter to deal with though; maybe movie 5 or 6, even.
TheSkeletonMan939
08-20-2016, 04:18 PM
How could a Carnage film not be R? Would Marvel go into that territory?
GoldMutant
08-20-2016, 05:14 PM
Despite my statements of Carnage before, I'm a little indifferent to him getting his own movie currently. Though an R rated movie is up his alley, I also feel he could work in a very strong PG-13 movie depending on direction.
If anything, if he were to go into a movie, I'd rather Carnage be in animated films rather than live action.
CyberCubed
08-20-2016, 11:57 PM
So there's like 3 villains in this movie or something? Is this a bad sign? Usually these movies overloading with villains is never a good thing.
Foombamaroom
08-21-2016, 12:08 AM
So there's like 3 villains in this movie or something? Is this a bad sign? Usually these movies overloading with villains is never a good thing.
Contrary to what the previous movies showed us, I'm pretty sure Spidey's one of the characters who could work with 2 to 3 villains in a movie, as long as there's a clear cut main antagonist. Comic Spider-Man is usually juggling multiple villains at a time anyway.
Plus, Vulture's gonna be the main antagonist of this movie, so he's going to be the primary fighter. Shocker will probably have a fight or two with Spider-Man, but that's it. Everyone else will probably just be more on the antagonistic side, but just side characters at the end of the day.
Splinter the boss
08-21-2016, 08:04 AM
It's similar to the show. He has multiple villains to take care of, like Juggernaut, Electro, Lizard etc... while the main ones of the show are Doctor Octavius and The Green Goblin.
After all the crap Marvel got lately because of Dr. Strange I'm guessing they're going to keep race changing characters which is really stupid. Make new characters into different races, don't change pre-existing ones but don't change white characters into other races for sake of diversity. For the most part it's distracting though there have been some times where it worked very well.
Well, the issue is that most of these characters were created in the early/mid-'60s when nearly every character was white by default. Culture, and pop culture, have evolved since then, and staying 100% accurate to that outdated cultural environment doesn't represent the world we live in now.
There are some characters where their race is key to who they are -- Black Panther, of course. And the imagery of a blonde, blue-eyed Steve Rogers punching out Hitler is pretty important, IMO. -- but there's no reason Mary Jane or the Shocker need to be white. And if they were created in 2016 instead of 1966, they might never have been.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
08-21-2016, 12:48 PM
Contrary to what the previous movies showed us, I'm pretty sure Spidey's one of the characters who could work with 2 to 3 villains in a movie, as long as there's a clear cut main antagonist. Comic Spider-Man is usually juggling multiple villains at a time anyway.
Plus, Vulture's gonna be the main antagonist of this movie, so he's going to be the primary fighter. Shocker will probably have a fight or two with Spider-Man, but that's it. Everyone else will probably just be more on the antagonistic side, but just side characters at the end of the day.
Agreed. It's like Batman Begins... it had R'as al Ghul, Scarecrow, and Zsasz. We might have preferred more attention given to Scarecrow than he got, but overall, that movie succeeded with three Batman villains. Not all of them have to be "top billing", just so long as they know their place and fit well into the overall narrative.
ToTheNines
08-21-2016, 01:41 PM
Agreed. It's like Batman Begins... it had R'as al Ghul, Scarecrow, and Zsasz. We might have preferred more attention given to Scarecrow than he got, but overall, that movie succeeded with three Batman villains. Not all of them have to be "top billing", just so long as they know their place and fit well into the overall narrative.
The "too many villains" thing is a myth that we can thank filth like Batman & Robin, Spidey 3, ASM2 and the like for.
To say nothing of comics and animation, there are plenty of great superhero movies with lots of baddies. You already said Begins (and I'd throw Falcone in that list too), but TDK had 3.
Cap: WS had 4. Civil War had a ton (I mean, they were actually heroes, but still antagonists per either POV). Guardians technically had 4.
Commenter 42
08-21-2016, 02:38 PM
You know what else has air powers? Queefs.
Queefs can bee silenced by the shocker.
ToTheNines
08-21-2016, 05:01 PM
Queefs can bee silenced by the shocker.
But scissors beat shocker. And queef beats scissors.
Commenter 42
08-21-2016, 09:47 PM
but scissors beat shocker. And queef beats scissors.
...
Gin!
AT-Man
08-29-2016, 05:37 PM
Apparently Vulture looks like this:
http://www.he-man.org/forums/boards/attachment.php?attachmentid=109692&d=1472509306
NinjaPug
09-01-2016, 05:26 PM
Favreau is reprising his Happy Hogan role for Spider-Man: Homecoming
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/jon-favreau-spider-man-homecoming-happy-iron-man-1201850442/
Andrew NDB
09-01-2016, 05:29 PM
Despite my statements of Carnage before, I'm a little indifferent to him getting his own movie currently. Though an R rated movie is up his alley, I also feel he could work in a very strong PG-13 movie depending on direction.
But then... there couldn't be any carnage. I don't see the point.
ToTheNines
09-02-2016, 07:44 AM
Favreau is reprising his Happy Hogan role for Spider-Man: Homecoming
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/jon-favreau-spider-man-homecoming-happy-iron-man-1201850442/
Hell yeah!
Found this pic.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CrT4ZxNWAAAnFW-.jpg
TurtleTitan97
09-05-2016, 02:34 PM
First look at Shocker via set pics:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CrnOQdsUAAEpqJ1.jpg
TheSkeletonMan939
09-05-2016, 02:41 PM
I'm surprised at how faithful they are to the original costume.
TurtleTitan97
09-05-2016, 02:45 PM
I'm surprised at how faithful they are to the original costume.
You and me both.
Maybe if we're lucky, we'll finally get a faithful looking Green Goblin costume down the road.
MikeandRaph87
09-05-2016, 02:56 PM
Shocker is the deputy villain? Awesome! I would not have expected a second villain despite tradition form reports. Its also nice to see Shocker get a little respect and hopefully with Marvel in control there will be no worries of that. With Electro in the previous film even if different continuities I am surprised Shocker was selected due to he often confusion over their powers being allegedly similar.
TheSkeletonMan939
09-05-2016, 04:39 PM
Maybe if we're lucky, we'll finally get a faithful looking Green Goblin costume down the road.
I actually thought the Raimi one was great! The ASM2 one though... :tgrumble:
TurtleTitan97
09-05-2016, 04:56 PM
I actually thought the Raimi one was great! The ASM2 one though... :tgrumble:
To me, the GG costume from the 2002 film looks like something off of Power Rangers. And don't get me started on Harry's Goblin "costume" in Spider-Man 3. :lol:
For years, all I've ever wanted was a close as accurate Green Goblin in the same vein as this at least:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/75/31/46/75314680145e378df5c6dfe899704213.jpg
But yeah, screw the ASM2 take on Green Goblin. I definitely hate that one the most.
TheSkeletonMan939
09-05-2016, 05:01 PM
It's hard because in the comics it's a rubber mask. To pull that off convincingly in live-action... can it be done?
ToTheNines
09-05-2016, 05:09 PM
If you just have it be a high tech disguise mask, like in Mission Impossible 3, I'd believe it.
Hell, the technology already exists in the MCU.
http://kneelbeforeblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/vlcsnap-00497.png
LeotheLateBloomer
09-05-2016, 05:18 PM
I didn't mind GG's armored look in Spider-Man 2002 even if it looks hokey as hell, less said on Harry's suits for both Spider-Man 3 and TASM 2. The latter made him look like a human gremlin.
AT-Man
09-05-2016, 05:20 PM
It's hard because in the comics it's a rubber mask. To pull that off convincingly in live-action... can it be done?
http://static1.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_small/13/132611/4086117-the-mask.jpg
TheSkeletonMan939
09-05-2016, 05:32 PM
:tlol: Okay, I guess it can be done.
Autbot_Benz
11-09-2016, 12:31 PM
Kevin Fiege confirms Micheal Keaton is Vulture
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/marvel-studios-president-kevin-feige-confirms-michael-keatons-role-in-a146645
TurtleTitan97
12-07-2016, 09:43 AM
T9iHU2RHJis
ZariusTwo
12-07-2016, 10:03 AM
Hogan makes me happy
I think Peter's talking to someone on a secure line, not vlogging...bit irresponsible if he were vlogging
TheSkeletonMan939
12-07-2016, 10:06 AM
I wouldn't read too much into the whole 'home video footage' aspect... I think they just want to do something fun and different. Make it stand out a little among all the other trailers you might see in theaters.
I still can hardly believe Spidey is finally in the MCU.
DestronMirage22
12-07-2016, 10:08 AM
T9iHU2RHJis
Ahh, glorious web-pits! :D
LeotheLateBloomer
12-07-2016, 02:24 PM
Not gonna lie, that would be a great feature to add into the new game Insomniac is making. Batman can glide? So can Spiderman!:D
AT-Man
12-07-2016, 03:49 PM
Well heck, this may even be as good as GOTG2.
MsMarvelDuckie
12-07-2016, 07:25 PM
That was IT?! That was barely even a clip! Need to see more to decide if good or not. That was barely even a tease for a teaser.....
NinjaPug
12-07-2016, 07:32 PM
That was IT?! That was barely even a clip! Need to see more to decide if good or not. That was barely even a tease for a teaser.....
That was the teaser for the teaser. Full teaser trailer is tomorrow.
MsMarvelDuckie
12-07-2016, 07:36 PM
Why are they making teasers for teasers? Just give us the dang teaser or better yet a full trailer already. Enough with the coy tease crap!
Splinter the boss
12-07-2016, 07:45 PM
Why are they making teasers for teasers? Just give us the dang teaser or better yet a full trailer already. Enough with the coy tease crap!
I concur with you. I want to see it too, does anyone know when it's scheduled to come out?
NinjaPug
12-07-2016, 07:49 PM
Why are they making teasers for teasers? Just give us the dang teaser or better yet a full trailer already. Enough with the coy tease crap!
It's all about promotion and keeping whatever is being promoted in the news cycle for an additional day.
TheSkeletonMan939
12-07-2016, 07:56 PM
Why are they making teasers for teasers? Just give us the dang teaser or better yet a full trailer already. Enough with the coy tease crap!
It's ridiculous behavior, but it keeps the film on people's Facebook feeds just a little longer.
MsMarvelDuckie
12-07-2016, 07:56 PM
It's just annoying. I'd rather see an actual teaser than a ten second "teaser-teaser" clip. I could wait an extra day for something with some meat to it.
plastroncafe
12-07-2016, 08:07 PM
In a way I prefer the teasers to the actual trailer, in that I get the taste without the added threat of being entirely spoiled for the movie.
ProactiveMan
12-07-2016, 10:48 PM
In a way I prefer the teasers to the actual trailer, in that I get the taste without the added threat of being entirely spoiled for the movie.
I feel the same way.
I don't know about those goof-ball wings. I guess they had to find a way to differentiate the merch from the Andrew Garfield stuff.
Candy Kappa
12-08-2016, 03:56 AM
Web-pits! YES! I love it.
MsMarvelDuckie
12-08-2016, 08:20 AM
I never cared much for the web-wings. Its marginally useful at best, given the often dangerous wind changes between skyscrapers in a big city. It's kind of cool if you prefer the "old-school" costume though.
NinjaPug
12-08-2016, 10:56 PM
_-JnD5Fs8KE
Powder
12-08-2016, 11:13 PM
Looks bretty gud.
Autbot_Benz
12-08-2016, 11:27 PM
http://i.imgur.com/dCFPtTT.jpg
Vicky82
12-08-2016, 11:33 PM
Wow that was awesome. :D
TigerClaw
12-08-2016, 11:40 PM
_-JnD5Fs8KE
It looks really good. :)
CyberCubed
12-08-2016, 11:50 PM
Looks exciting. Who is the Filipino kid that's Peter's friend in the movie?
Raph's Girl
12-08-2016, 11:57 PM
Looks exciting. Who is the Filipino kid that's Peter's friend in the movie?
That's Jacob Batalon as Ned Leeds, Peter's BFF in the film (and Betty Brant's love interest in the comics). He's Hawaiian.
CyberCubed
12-08-2016, 11:59 PM
Interesting, never heard of that character before.
Also Mary Jane is black in this movie? Strange, I don't recall hearing they cast a black actress for MJ in this movie. I would assume that would be something I'd remember.
Raph's Girl
12-09-2016, 12:02 AM
Interesting, never heard of that character before.
Also Mary Jane is black in this movie? Strange, I don't recall hearing they cast a black actress for MJ in this movie. I would assume that would be something I'd remember.
Mary Jane is not in the movie. That's Liz Allen.
ProactiveMan
12-09-2016, 02:44 AM
Looks cool.
I don't like the way they put those five second previews on trailers now. I assume it's something to do with YouTube ads, but it's lame.
CyberCubed
12-09-2016, 02:46 AM
So Pete's love interest is not Mary Jane? Weird.
Candy Kappa
12-09-2016, 04:16 AM
Looks sooooo goood!
ToTheNines
12-09-2016, 04:43 AM
International trailer
GZEgJHpLADw
AT-Man
12-09-2016, 05:28 AM
A lot of Tony Stank in these trailers, hopefully he won't be in it too much. Though it would be neat if Spider-Man has to save Tony in the end, and not some girl.
ZariusTwo
12-09-2016, 07:11 AM
So Pete's love interest is not Mary Jane? Weird.
Did you ever read the Lee/Ditko era comics? Long before Gwen and Mary Jane, Peter was in pursuit of Liz Allen and Betty Brant.
TurtleTitan97
12-09-2016, 08:44 AM
Did you ever read the Lee/Ditko era comics?
:lol: Asking if Cubed's actually read comics, good one.
That aside, if Cubed's watched Spectacular Spider-Man, he should be slightly familiar with Liz Allen since she already appeared there:
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/marvelanimated/images/0/09/Liz_Holds_Peters_Hands_SSM.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20120213072058
As for the trailer, 11/10.
TheSkeletonMan939
12-09-2016, 09:05 AM
Not diggin' this. Not impressed with how Peter's secret identity isn't taken seriously. And not amused by Ned "Where the Twinkies at?" Leeds.
TurtleTitan97
12-09-2016, 09:18 AM
Not diggin' this. Not impressed with how Peter's secret identity isn't taken seriously.
But it's perfectly in line with the comics though.
Think about it. Ever since Peter first became Spider-Man, he has saved countless lives and even the world on some occasions. Yet he's constantly being lambasted by the media and the same public he protects. Even back in the early days, the Marvel superhero community wasn't sure what to make of him. Heroes like the Avengers and the Fantastic Four were constantly praised as heroes, but Spider-Man was always viewed as just a "Masked Menace".
Honestly, if anyone had a legit reason to become a super villain, it's Parker.
DestronMirage22
12-09-2016, 09:38 AM
WOW! It's so Ultimate Comics Spider-Man! I love it! :D
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-09-2016, 10:42 AM
Well damn. I may actually go watch a Spiderman movie.
Questioning my life choices now... how did I get to this point? Thanks a lot, Marvel.
TheSkeletonMan939
12-09-2016, 11:46 AM
But it's perfectly in line with the comics though.
Huh? I'm talking about how Peter is careless enough to let Chubby Checkers realize he's Spidey. Through most of Spider-Man's history, one constant is that he goes to incredible (sometimes ludicrous) lengths to protect his secret identity. Here it's one movie in and he's already got a wacky sidekick.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-09-2016, 12:10 PM
But will the villains suck? This IS a Marvel movie, after all. And from what I hear, Spiderman's last great cinematic villain was Doc Ock way back in 2002.
TheSkeletonMan939
12-09-2016, 12:36 PM
Sandman was pretty good in Spider-Man 3.
CyberCubed
12-09-2016, 12:46 PM
I'm at least glad they keep using different villains in these movies. Despite Spiderman being rebooted twice, we're still seeing different villains on-screen for the first time:
- Spiderman 1: Green Goblin
- Spiderman 2: Doctor Octopus
- Spiderman 3: Harry's Green Goblin, Sandman, Venom (lol)
- Spiderman: Lizard
- Spiderman 2: Shocker, Rhino,
- Spiderman Homecoming: Vulture
TigerClaw
12-09-2016, 12:59 PM
I'm at least glad they keep using different villains in these movies. Despite Spiderman being rebooted twice, we're still seeing different villains on-screen for the first time:
- Spiderman 1: Green Goblin
- Spiderman 2: Doctor Octopus
- Spiderman 3: Harry's Green Goblin, Sandman, Venom (lol)
- Spiderman: Lizard
- Spiderman 2: Shocker, Rhino,
- Spiderman Homecoming: Vulture
That was actually Electro, Shocker is going to appear along with the Vulture in Homecoming.
DarkFell
12-09-2016, 01:16 PM
I'm wondering as to how well Mysterio will get handled, should he ever appear in an future Spider-Man movie. It should be easy for some well-built dude wearing a stretchy green bodysuit and a purple cape, while he's wearing an orb to hide his head, make a few appearances within a Spider-Man movie.
Amirite?
TheSkeletonMan939
12-09-2016, 02:31 PM
Bruce Campbell was actually all set to be Mysterio in a future Raimi film. Alas that never happened...
Bruce Campbell was actually all set to be Mysterio in a future Raimi film. Alas that never happened...
Maybe that's why Bruce Campbell was in all 3 of the Raimi films, it was all a mirage building up to Mysterio lmao.
GoldMutant
12-09-2016, 03:41 PM
I loved this trailer. :cry: Even more hyped than before, just not a huge fan of the Vulture's helmet in the costume. Also, it might seem the leak we saw earlier this year may come true.
Also, as for Mysterio, would it be a good idea for Chameleon and him to team up in a movie as the next villains? They have similar abilities (well, illusions for Mysterio and Chameleon with his disguises) and can work for a psychological edge in the next Spider-Man movie.
I'm at least glad they keep using different villains in these movies. Despite Spiderman being rebooted twice, we're still seeing different villains on-screen for the first time:
- Spiderman 1: Green Goblin
- Spiderman 2: Doctor Octopus
- Spiderman 3: Harry's Green Goblin, Sandman, Venom (lol)
- Spiderman: Lizard
- Spiderman 2: Shocker, Rhino,
- Spiderman Homecoming: Vulture
That was Electro, not Shocker. Shocker is going to be in Homecoming.
snake
12-09-2016, 05:43 PM
I dunno. I'm not a fan of the high school focus or taktikool vulture
TurtleTitan97
12-09-2016, 05:50 PM
Huh? I'm talking about how Peter is careless enough to let Chubby Checkers realize he's Spidey. Through most of Spider-Man's history, one constant is that he goes to incredible (sometimes ludicrous) lengths to protect his secret identity. Here it's one movie in and he's already got a wacky sidekick.
My bad, I misunderstood.
ToTheNines
12-09-2016, 06:54 PM
Hulk easter egg.
https://s24.postimg.org/xhkqqs8ed/Bruce_Banner.jpg
NinjaPug
12-09-2016, 07:30 PM
Sony has already set a date for a sequel to Homecoming. This isn't a shock as Sony has tanked at the box office recently with Spidey being their only legit tentpole. I just hope Marvel is still on board creatively.
EXCLUSIVE: Based on the success of the global trailer launch yesterday for Sony’s Spider-Man: Homecoming, the Culver City studio has announced that its sequel Spider-Man: Homecoming 2 will open on Friday, July 5, 2019.
http://deadline.com/2016/12/spider-man-homecoming-2-bad-boys-4-1201867983/
ToTheNines
12-09-2016, 07:30 PM
Sequel announced for 2019: http://www.cbr.com/spider-man-homecoming-sequel-gets-2019-release-date/
I was expecting it to be one of the three "mystery" movies for 2020, but I'll take this. That means 3 MCU movies per year between 2017-2020.
CyberCubed
12-09-2016, 07:39 PM
2019? This kid will be all grown up by the end of these films. They'll run into the same problem as Tobey where the actor got too old to play Spiderman.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-09-2016, 07:42 PM
2019? This kid will be all grown up by the end of these films. They'll run into the same problem as Tobey where the actor got too old to play Spiderman.
Spiderman doesn't have to stay a kid, Cubed. He just has to start out as one.
NinjaPug
12-09-2016, 07:53 PM
2019? This kid will be all grown up by the end of these films. They'll run into the same problem as Tobey where the actor got too old to play Spiderman.
When did you expect a sequel to a 2017 movie to come out?
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-09-2016, 07:59 PM
When did you expect a sequel to a 2017 movie to come out?
December 2017, obviously.
Spider-Man: Christmas Vacation
Followed by...
Spider-Man: Spring Break
MikeandRaph87
12-09-2016, 08:02 PM
There are still plenty of villains that have been unused and could make an interesting sequel. The likes of Mysterio,Scorpion, Hob Goblin,Carnage among others.
What is this about Ned Leeds being Peter Parker's best friend and Mary Jane may not be involved again this time? The former makes me confused as it is 'different for different sake'. The latter makes it simply unfortunate.
The actor may age but the character can stay the same age. Cubed goes on at how some of us look younger than we are, it would work when applying it to the film series. He can stay in high school for three full movies, 2017, 2019,2021 then graduate between films if there is a fourth one.
DestronMirage22
12-09-2016, 08:04 PM
Spider-Man: Spring Break
Oooh, what'll be the rating on that one? And will any scenes take place in Cancun, Mexico?
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-09-2016, 08:05 PM
Oooh, what'll be the rating on that one? And will any scenes take place in Cancun, Mexico?
PG13, of course... YOU PERVERT.
With a R-rated Extended Ultimate Director's Cut Edition on BluRay, of course.
DestronMirage22
12-09-2016, 08:09 PM
PG13, of course... YOU PERVERT.
With a R-rated Extended Ultimate Director's Cut Edition on BluRay, of course.
Pre-ordered. Hopefully it'll include some of the deleted Tom Cruise uncle Ben scenes. :P
ToTheNines
12-10-2016, 05:41 AM
2019? This kid will be all grown up by the end of these films. They'll run into the same problem as Tobey where the actor got too old to play Spiderman.
*self-harms for engaging troll for the millionth time*
Tobey was 26 when they filmed the first one. At this rate, they could make 4 of these movies before Holland gets that old. Plus he'll never be as creepy or bad at acting as Maguire, so that's a plus.
Alternatively, they could, ya know, actually age the character. The vast majority of the source material at this point features an adult Peter. Oh wait...
ZariusTwo
12-10-2016, 05:50 AM
2019? This kid will be all grown up by the end of these films. They'll run into the same problem as Tobey where the actor got too old to play Spiderman.
The leading Spider-Man title last month was a comic where he is a happily married man and a father.
TheSkeletonMan939
12-10-2016, 10:31 AM
Spider-Man: Spring Break
This was actually going to be a thing.
The team behind The Spectacular Spider-Man were pushing for a DTV movie taking place during spring break after season 2 and before season 3. The show was cancelled before that could happen though.
CyberCubed
12-10-2016, 03:13 PM
Marvel wanted Spidey back in High School again, hence this movie. If they wanted to they could have done something like "Year 3" Spiderman, where he was already established and in College instead in the first movie.
MsMarvelDuckie
12-11-2016, 06:15 PM
Which is where he originally met both M-J and Gwen. I noticed a conspicuous absence of both gals in the trailer. (There was a blonde girl behind the chick he and his buddy were ogling but it's doubtful that was actually Gwen.) So aging him between films might actually work in their favor story-wise. Im interested by the full trailer but not fully convinced to see this. The last two Spidey films burned me badly and so far only his brief appearance in CW has me hopeful for a recovery.
CyberCubed
12-11-2016, 06:29 PM
Its a new series with new writers/directors, however people felt about the last two films has no impact on this one. You're supposed to go in with a clean slate.
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-11-2016, 06:59 PM
Its a new series with new writers/directors, however people felt about the last two films has no impact on this one. You're supposed to go in with a clean slate.
For sure. I have zero interest in previous iterations of Spider... tried the first Amazing film, and HATED Garfield in it.
Then Civil War came along, Tom Holland is killing it, AND he's believable as a high schooler.
In Marvel We Trust, they say. I don't usually go that far, but in this case, I'm a believer.
ToTheNines
12-11-2016, 07:30 PM
For sure. I have zero interest in previous iterations of Spider... tried the first Amazing film, and HATED Garfield in it.
Then Civil War came along, Tom Holland is killing it, AND he's believable as a high schooler.
In Marvel We Trust, they say. I don't usually go that far, but in this case, I'm a believer.
Do you not like Spider-Man in general? Or are you just sane enough to realize that all 5 existing movies suck?
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy
12-11-2016, 07:59 PM
Do you not like Spider-Man in general? Or are you just sane enough to realize that all 5 existing movies suck?
I wouldn't say I DISLIKE Spiderman, I just don't care about him. He's never caught my interest.
I've tried watching the movies, but they do--all five of them--suck. The lead actor was wrong both times, and that's all there was to it for me. The CinemaSins videos are enough to affirm my opinion, and Tom Holland is selling it like a fiend.
Civil War proved I could like Spiderman if done well, and so I am now firmly on board for this movie.
CyberCubed
12-11-2016, 10:24 PM
Spiderman 1-2 still hold up to this day.
MsMarvelDuckie
12-11-2016, 10:31 PM
For sure. I have zero interest in previous iterations of Spider... tried the first Amazing film, and HATED Garfield in it.
Then Civil War came along, Tom Holland is killing it, AND he's believable as a high schooler.
In Marvel We Trust, they say. I don't usually go that far, but in this case, I'm a believer.
THANK you. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who disliked him. I found his portrayal of my fave hero to be- too much of a "underestimated pretty mama's boy" type rather than everyman nerd looking out for the little guy. He was utterly unconvincing as Peter to me.
I wouldn't say I DISLIKE Spiderman, I just don't care about him. He's never caught my interest.
I've tried watching the movies, but they do--all five of them--suck. The lead actor was wrong both times, and that's all there was to it for me. The CinemaSins videos are enough to affirm my opinion, and Tom Holland is selling it like a fiend.
Civil War proved I could like Spiderman if done well, and so I am now firmly on board for this movie.
To be fair, the first two Spidey flicks were pretty dang good. Three blew it with Venom (Brock never once says "we" when referring to his symbiote self) though it did a good job with Sandman. Emo-jerk Spidey was- a BIT much, but thankfully brief. But Ock and Norman were outstanding, and even Toby did a respectable job up til the third movie. He at least got the conflict beteween his two lives part right. Garfield couldn't even do THAT.
I AM glad that they seem to be on the right track with Peter now, and I credit that with having Marvel actually involved in his films now.
TurtleTitan97
03-24-2017, 01:07 PM
New poster
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17352250_1278087172267190_4819312716433718489_n.jp g?oh=77745d4b6aee84d4207337374ab1497f&oe=595B379C
CyberCubed
03-24-2017, 01:29 PM
That looks like it's aimed at today's kids who go on twitter and tumblr.
TheSkeletonMan939
03-24-2017, 01:41 PM
That looks like it's aimed at today's kids who go on twitter and tumblr.
Yeah, Spider-Man acting like an actual teenager.... shocking.
ProphetofGanja
03-24-2017, 02:18 PM
I'm mainly a fan of the old school, early Spider-Man comics with Stan Lee and Steve Ditko. I read the current Spider-Man/Deadpool series mainly for Deadpool, the current modern Spider-Man is kinda weird to me.
Tom Holland did a great job in Civil War though and I think these movies could be Spider-Man finally done right cinematically
Splinter the boss
03-24-2017, 02:41 PM
I just hope the movie turns out great because he's one of my favorites.
AquaParade
03-24-2017, 02:48 PM
As a die-hard Spider-Man fan, I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised by this one.
While I loved his appearance in Civil War, I just don't find myself being excited about this movie, as of now. It could be Spidey-fatigue, but I think it may actually have more to do with my impressions from the trailer.
Perhaps it's a combination of both, because my fear is that we won't get a movie we haven't basically seen before.
CyberCubed
03-24-2017, 03:35 PM
Constantly putting Peter Parker back in High School is where all the repetition stems from, even if the rest of the movie is all new.
There's only so many times you can see the, "geeky or nerdy kid who is bullied and has to hide his powers from his love interest and bullies and fight crime outside of that and keep it a secret from Aunt May," that you can do.
At least the villains are all new every series. I'm glad that aside from Green Goblin, we continue to get new villains every movie despite reboots. We're seeing The Vulture now, whereas in the last few movies we got The Lizard, Electro, Sandman, Rhino, Doctor Octopus, etc.
Constantly putting Peter Parker back in High School is where all the repetition stems from, even if the rest of the movie is all new.
There's only so many times you can see the, "geeky or nerdy kid who is bullied and has to hide his powers from his love interest and bullies and fight crime outside of that and keep it a secret from Aunt May," that you can do.
At least the villains are all new every series. I'm glad that aside from Green Goblin, we continue to get new villains every movie despite reboots. We're seeing The Vulture now, whereas in the last few movies we got The Lizard, Electro, Sandman, Rhino, Doctor Octopus, etc.
The first two films haven't done the high school Peter Parker angle accurately. It's also the Peter Parker that the general movie-going audience is more familiar with, it makes sense to start with high school Peter Parker, have him grow with the cinematic universe, he could get married. Just like in the comics, we can see Spider-Man growing from a reckless teenager with spider powers to an adult who has loved, lost and battled many different opponents through the years. I think that's the part I'll like most. And Tom Holland has the high schooler look, perfect for Peter Parker.
I do appreciate the villains changing every movie as well. Though eventually we'll need the Green Goblin to reappear on the big screen, it's been a long time, and he's arguably Spidey's biggest villain.
CyberCubed
03-24-2017, 04:04 PM
Next villains should be Scorpion or Mysterio or Shocker, etc.
There's no reason to rehash villains from the old movies yet. People get more excited seeing new villains never on movie screens before and it shows. Only one they really need to do over again is Venom for obvious reasons, but that's going to happen anyway.
Next villains should be Scorpion or Mysterio or Shocker, etc.
There's no reason to rehash villains from the old movies yet. People get more excited seeing new villains never on movie screens before and it shows. Only one they really need to do over again is Venom for obvious reasons, but that's going to happen anyway.
Shocker is in Homecoming. Norman Osborn is a very important character towards Peter Parker and Spider-Man. It's important to see him appear again. Venom does need to be done as well, I do agree, after Infinity War would make sense for Venom. Rhino should be redone again as well, he was barely in ASM2.
MsMarvelDuckie
03-24-2017, 05:29 PM
I'm still waiting to see Morlun.... Which would kind of neccessitate bringing in Ezekiel too, and I could dig that.
ToTheNines
03-24-2017, 08:10 PM
http://cbr3.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Spider-Man-Homecoming-Poster-2.jpg?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=450&h=666&fit=crop&dpr=1.5
ProphetofGanja
03-24-2017, 08:35 PM
http://cbr3.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Spider-Man-Homecoming-Poster-2.jpg?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=450&h=666&fit=crop&dpr=1.5
Makes me wonder if Tony is gonna mention his ex-Avenger buddies, and if so what he'll say
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.