Honest Trailers ghostbusters 2016

[Autbot_Benz]

since the original thread got closed thought id post this here. Its one of the best honest trailers to date
_4LDlBCkA2g

[CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy]

since the original thread got closed thought id post this here. Its one of the best honest trailers to date
_4LDlBCkA2g

And this needed reposting why, exactly?

[Cure]

People can't help but **** on the things they dislike at every opportunity.

[Andrew NDB]

Hey, a new Ghostbusters remake thread.

[TurtleTitan97]

And this needed reposting why, exactly?

^ This.

Seriously Autobot, this thread was not need. Can we please get a mod to close this and just move on from this movie already? I'm so sick of talking about it.

[Powder]

Gotta say I agree with everyone else, no need to rip the band-aid offa this one...

[Andrew NDB]

Nobody wants to talk about the special extended edition with all the added laughs?

[plastroncafe]

Aaaaand flagged for trolling.

[snake]

You're triggering me by bringing it up

[Allio]

I'm kind of iffy on Honest trailers since they played the "defense force" regarding TMNT 2014

[TigerClaw]

I'm kind of iffy on Honest trailers since they played the "defense force" regarding TMNT 2014
Yeah, all Honest Trailers does is trash every movie, good, bad or indifferent.

[ssjup81]

I didn't know the other thread was locked. Anyway, nice Honest Trailer. Liked the part about how they said it's trying to be its own thing and how it's reminding you of the original throughout the film...oh and the part about, "If you don't like that style comedy, don't watch it." People seriously overreacted to this film.

[snake]

Yeah, all Honest Trailers does is trash every movie, good, bad or indifferent.

Once again, the robot ignores the context of the post he's "agreeing" with

[TheSkeletonMan939]

Yeah, all Honest Trailers does is trash every movie, good, bad or indifferent.

It's their gig, Tigger. The only film I think Honest Trailers hasn't heartily disparaged is The Winter Soldier. Unlike you they don't love a movie because it exists.

[TigerClaw]

It's their gig, Tigger. The only film I think Honest Trailers hasn't heartily disparaged is The Winter Soldier. Unlike you they don't love a movie because it exists.
They were pretty kind to Zootopia, even though they were making fun of the Furries, which was to be expected.

[Allio]

I didn't know the other thread was locked. Anyway, nice Honest Trailer. Liked the part about how they said it's trying to be its own thing and how it's reminding you of the original throughout the film...oh and the part about, "If you don't like that style comedy, don't watch it." People seriously overreacted to this film.

Then people overreacted to the overreaction, which then again caused a more overreaction...

truely a horrible cycle.

[Powder]

Yeah, all Honest Trailers does is trash every movie, good, bad or indifferent.

Hey, little buddy, they're on the complete opposite side of your opinion. They don't like HT because they didn't trash TMNT 2014.

Once again, the robot ignores the context of the post he's "agreeing" with

Yeah, he says he's gonna have margarine, but always ends up using butter.

Kinda like that, eh? :tlol:

[TigerClaw]

Then people overreacted to the overreaction, which then again caused a more overreaction...

truely a horrible cycle.
Yeah and people overreact to those overreacting to overreacting to overreacting, rinse and repeat.

[Vegita-San]

i await this thread being locked in two pages because people can't agree that it was either good, or it sucked like adults.

i mean, seriously, the amount of viscous personal dredgery that gets brought up at these threads (mostly against 'haters) baffles me beyond belief. for some reason this film hits a nerve with people like no other. and not just because it's pretending to be ghostbusters.


that being said.. i laugh at how websites claim this review was 'brutal'. probably websites that where for the movie at the start.

they went rather easy on them. but i applaud them for even doing it at all. it's sad people are afraid to tell the world what they think about this movie, i.e. their truth, because they've seen how others get lambasted for doing so. women especially are afraid of being torn to shreds...
who wants to come with me to mars? :)

[Vegita-San]

Then people overreacted to the overreaction, which then again caused a more overreaction...

truely a horrible cycle.

Not to start the endless cycle over again (I have post traumatic stress from the last mess ;o))...as it truly IS horrible..

but the reason we 'over reacted' is cause we got insulted at every turn after keeping the franchise alive in our hearts for 20 years. it's hard NOT to take it personally. oh, and the people who where happy to let ghostbusters die with the video game got lambasted by defenders at every turn ;o).


So long as it's done in a friendly place where the majority agrees it was terrible, i will never get tired of feigbuster bashing. this more than TMNT, IMHO, deserves it till the end of time. What I got tired of was trying to explain my position and then having the topic deflected to nonsensical areas...not being able to have fun trashing it was more draining than anything.

thus is born the anti fan.

[Cure]

Jesus, people take things way too seriously.

[AT-Man]

Ghostbusters (2016) is better than The Force Awakens.

[Allio]

Ghostbusters, better than Star Wars. That's a laugh riot.

[AT-Man]

It's just my honest opinion.

[ZariusTwo]

A lot of movies are better than The Sue Awakens.

[Vegita-San]

Ghostbusters, better than Star Wars. That's a laugh riot.

Considering the problems i have with star wars..

a jedi (woman in this case) learning things far faster than luke or Ezra ever did, just to speed the plot along. (we get it femenists. women are superior to men. give it a rest. smh)

ANOTHER retelling of Episode 4's end battle (first was in Phantom Menace)....

Characters in the exact same place they where when they left. No Jedi Acadamy to wow us. No Jedi Twins of the Solos.

A Whiny, Millenial like wimp of a villain that couldn't even beat someone who didn't even know what the force WAS not more than an hour ago...Also has a major horse face with a nose longer than his index finger..

it was still a better movie than we could have hoped for.

Not so much with FeigBusters. It doesn't even deserve to be called ghostbusters.....especially considered it was designed soley by two femenists who tried to push out the creators of the franchise (and eventually did, apparently if rights negotiating issues are true)..

[Shark_Blade]

So I got the blu ray and ... I honestly think the theatrical edition is better than the extended edition.

The extended edition has A LOT of changes/improvisation to the script and added scenes, but I think most of them just didn't work out and dragged out too long.
1. For example like the scene when the team was waiting for Holtzman to bring the hearse car, Erin went to talk to her boyfriend(?) Phil. Just boring long winded talk. Though Abby and Patty provided funny commentary.
2. Abby and Erin awkward long dancing segment in front of Holtzman and Patty. Just ugh, God why.
3. Holtzman purple big wig scene was funny in the theatrical edition where she was smiling and joking. In this one she's too serious and a bit annoyed.
4. The cringeworthy and wacky US Govt secret duo ("We're the big dogs. We're watching you!"). I just wanna hit that mustached guy's face with a shovel.
5. Kevin stepped on acid with his fluffy slippers and got some of the acid fumes in his eyes. Seriously? I know he's dimwitted but...
6. Abby possession scene. Now they added oozing green slime coming out of her ear holes, her nostrils.. Oh and she was heavily projectile vomitting those green slime too. Lovely.

I'm glad all the above was cut out from theatrical edition, which is the version I'm gonna stick with on rewatchings. Regardless, I think this film is pretty stunning visually. Such rich colors and bright pallette to behold. :tgrin:

I gotta say the treatment of their secretary is pretty sexist in the original movie. Janine though very competent but got her hands full were taken for granted -heck Venkman even looked down on her importance suggesting that she can quit because of her low qualifications... but the girls ghostbusters here, they treat Kevin very kindly despite of his HUGE shortcomings (he can't even answer the phone right). Women treat their male subordinates better I suppose? I like them for that.

[Vegita-San]

I find it funny how people think the treatment of janine was sexist. I guess it's just a generational thing...

You'll notice SHE was the aggressor in most of her shots. she fired back at her new bosses like she was a long time employee. she constantly hit on one of them despite rejection. she had sass, strength of will and smarts.

If anything, the guys treated her like one of the guys most of the time cause they knew she could handle them.

Kevin, on the other hand.. is hired ONLY for his looks, and while they may try to be nice to him to his face, they back stab him in quiet and are treating him like the invalid he is. the minute he'd walk through any other establishment, he'd either be hired due to 'equal opportunity' and fired soon after or laughed out of the office out right.

The original is not sexist. the new one clearly is. that's all feig does. he's got to learn sooner or later that men have evolved since t he 50s.

[plastroncafe]

That's the trope though. The shrew who wants to be wanted, vs the attractive woman who plays hard to get.

Janine : Irma :: Dana : April.

And yes, that is a sexist trope.

[Vegita-San]

sigh..everyone has to see something as something these days....can't not put a label on someone.

April wasn't playing hard to get with anyone. if anything, she never showed an interest in men. just married to the job even after she got fired.

Neither did Dana. she ignored louis, and down right hated venkman.. at least until he got famous.

Poor Irma and louis just tried too hard cause no one was ever interested in 'em. if the universes ever crossed, Irma would probably ignore louis cause she saw too much of herself in him! poor guy.

[Allio]

That's the trope though. The shrew who wants to be wanted, vs the attractive woman who plays hard to get.

Janine : Irma :: Dana : April.

And yes, that is a sexist trope.

are you one of those people that tries to find something offensive in everything? here it seems like you are trying too hard.

[plastroncafe]

are you one of those people that tries to find something offensive in everything? here it seems like you are trying too hard.

No, I'm one of those people who likes to think critically about the media they consume and often times enjoy the act of deconstructing it.

[TheSkeletonMan939]

There's a difference between deconstructing media and forcing in your own meanings.

[plastroncafe]

There's a difference between deconstructing media and forcing in your own meanings.

Okay. Sure.

[Vegita-San]

are you one of those people that tries to find something offensive in everything? here it seems like you are trying too hard.

Nice way of putting it.

one reason why the internet is becoming so tiresome.

you have people looking to see stuff where it isn't there

[Allio]

No, I'm one of those people who likes to think critically about the media they consume and often times enjoy the act of deconstructing it.

As do I (I literally find way to cause tragedy/despair in shows, like Ever After High)

but sometimes if feels like you are overreaching in places where it doesn't exist.

[plastroncafe]

As do I (I literally find way to cause tragedy/despair in shows, like Ever After High)

but sometimes if feels like you are overreaching in places where it doesn't exist.

Okay.
Do you find my arguments lacking in supportive evidence?
Or do you just dislike my arguments because they deal with aspects of a given media that you don't believe are worthy "hills to die on," so to speak.

Because I get the feeling it's more the latter than the former, which I can't really help you with.

I don't believe that Erin (2016) treats her romantic interests any differently than Venkman (1984) does.

In the beginning of the 1984 movie Venkman is conducting an ESP test on a man and a woman. The woman, who Venkman finds attractive yet has no ESP abilities to speak of, is treated far better than the man who does.

I find this behavior similar to Erin wanting to keep Kevin around because she finds him attractive, even though he's utterly ill-suited to the job he's interviewing for.

Both Erin and Venkman are acting unethically, both are in positions of power and stringing along subordinates for their own personal gain.

Granted the woman from the beginning of the 1984 movie doesn't get nearly as much screen time as Kevin does, but the 2016 movie also doesn't have "Dana" for Erin to harangue, as Venkman does the rest of his respective movie.

I do feel that Janine falls into the nerdy, conventionally unattractive, unlucky-in-love girl trope. And I do find that trope sexist.
Is it sexist enough to ruin the movie for me? No, not in the slightest.

[Allio]

Okay.
Do you find my arguments lacking in supportive evidence?
Or do you just dislike my arguments because they deal with aspects of a given media that you don't believe are worthy "hills to die on," so to speak.


nah, it's one of those cases like when people say it's "racist" in Power Rangers where the black ranger was black and the yellow ranger was asian in something where there is clearly no intention of it being "racist" in the first place.

With Ghostbusters 2016, my major reason for not seeing it was that often times, Paul Feig himself regarding the film and it's "reactions" did not approach the film in a calm and mature way instead he made some sketch/dumbass thing that essentially saying stuff like "Men only like crude dick jokes" and then it's hilarious because of him doing pretty much that with a "queef joke," like can you say "hypocrite" much?

With the stupid behind the scenes junk, I don't think there was ever a possibility I was ever going to like it.

[plastroncafe]

nah, it's one of those cases like when people say it's "racist" in Power Rangers where the black ranger was black and the yellow ranger was asian in something where there is clearly no intention of it being "racist" in the first place.


Is there a reason why it can't be both?
Feig may not have intended to be offensive when he generalized, so...maybe you're just looking for a reason to be upset.

[Allio]

Is there a reason why it can't be both?
Feig may not have intended to be offensive when he generalized, so...maybe you're just looking for a reason to be upset.

and that's why I don't make a big deal about it.

granted, I don't see how you can misunderstand something "Geek culture is home to some of the biggest assholes I've ever met in my life," which, no matter how you look at it, isn't a mature thing to say; while it may be true, it isn't the wisest to go around and insulting the very people that determine if your movie succeeds or flops.

[plastroncafe]

and that's why I don't make a big deal about it.

granted, I don't see how you can misunderstand something "Geek culture is home to some of the biggest assholes I've ever met in my life," which, no matter how you look at it, isn't a mature thing to say; while it may be true, it isn't the wisest to go around and insulting the very people that determine if your movie succeeds or flops.

Only the assholes got buttmad at that.
Most people just went: Yeah, that's true. I'm not one of them.

Maybe the assholes need a safe space.

[Vegita-San]

and that's why I don't make a big deal about it.

granted, I don't see how you can misunderstand something "Geek culture is home to some of the biggest assholes I've ever met in my life," which, no matter how you look at it, isn't a mature thing to say; while it may be true, it isn't the wisest to go around and insulting the very people that determine if your movie succeeds or flops.

Reasons like that, and other immature reactions from cast, crew and even dan aykroyd of all people are one reason why I will have NO problem at rubbing this complete and utter failure in their faces until the day i die.

If they handled it with grace and dignitiy, rather than treat it like a crusade for womens last stand, i would have left them alone and forgotten it as soon as it came out.

but then, they wouldn't have gotten all that 'free advertising' would they?

they made their bed. it's time to reap the consequences of pissing off your audience of both men AND women..

[justforapic]

I watched the Honest Trailer. Looks like what I expected, nothing good.

[MontanaMax1982]

I'm glad this movie flopped big time and no sequels or spin-offs as it's time to let this series die.


Some should face the truth and that truth will destroy anyone's truth until they accept the truth of why some franchises should just be dead as this franchise since this movie flopped in theaters even killed the franchise, sometimes it's better to kill something then let it suffer which has has been a wounded half-dead animal for the last 25 years since the Real GBs ended nothing else good has came out in the last 25 years with the exception of the 2009 video game and the merchandise and comics by IDW, no movies since then and other games during the years have sucked and Extreme GBs was ok show and this remake flopped at the box-office, sometimes it's better to kill something then let it suffer. Even Terminator and Die Hard franchises need to be left the hell alone and let Hollywood move on.

Creed was an exceptional spin-off of Rocky i gotta say, i thought this GB remake was unwelcomed and un-needed as you just can't recapture the same lightning in a bottle like the original as the original focused on a brilliant mature intelligent script and reminded how well crafted it is - it functions as a supernatural fantasy comedy adventure with horror trimmings, but tops the cake with a cast of talented comedy actors who are given just enough space to subtly dick around without undermining the world of the story. The world looks realistic and gritty and has an edge to it in the original as the original is what i call great filmmaking.

The new corporate cash-in version sledgehammers some viewers with painfully forced juvenile Adam Sandler (modern Sandler mind you)-esque humor, there's none of the restraint that allows space for wit, a poorly written unfunny ****** script, poor pacing, tasteless quiff jokes, overlong and the world seems utterly artificial plus no passion but money grab is what it is.

The Peter-Dana love story that had a tenderness and made things personal when she gets possessed is replaced with a screaming black woman yelling pop-culture references while beating her friend about the face plus none of the edge/grit of the original movie and a lame villain who lacks the menace of Gozer and Viggo. It's closer to The Real Ghostbusters 80's early 90s cartoon (though not as good or well written like that show). This whole thing seems to perfectly showcase what 80's and 90's comedy did right, and what modern comedy is doing wrong. Not to mention shooting the logo in the dick as a bad guy which is an insult to the franchise and there is no passion in this remake and just a cash-grab made by Sony and Tom Rothman who is Hollywood's worst prick and awful enemy to cinema who is greedy and cares nothing but money than artistic quality of film as i hope Sony fires him as Sony has made some crap in the last 4 years even Sandler's crap.

I have female friends who even find the tokenism of doing a 'women's version' of a successful franchise to be irritating and demeaning as a few of them thought this remake was poorly written, misygostic towards men as one of my lady friends said it's a shame to women with such man hating agenda even the logo being the villain to have it's balls blasted and well i enjoyed a few of Feig's movies, i felt he was the wrong guy for this project and even he didn't want to do it at first but he had to for the paycheck and he felt out of his comfort zone as R-rated films is what he is good at and not big budget tentpole PG-13 films as after this flopped, he should go back to original stuff instead of other people's properties. Even the cameos didn't help which made the film feel awkward you know as Ackroyd didn't felt comfortable doing this movie neither did Bill Murray who wanted his character to be killed off which he got his wish but not as Venkman but a different person.

Hollywood needs to focus on making good films and focus on the new franchises like Jack Reacher or Marvel or Bourne or John Wick etc., not digging up old favorites and desperately mangling the corpses into some focus-group approved poorly written abortion. Ghostbusters is best left alone. If Ramis was still with us then a third film might have been worthwhile, but they should have made it years ago, and now that he's gone so has Ghostbusters. A TV series about ghost-busters could work, but it shouldn't use the name of this series. Stealing the names of beloved properties just encourages creative laziness, studios need to rediscover the creative spirit that birthed great films/series, not keep recycling past glories.

I hope some people here will understand what i am saying as the world has moved on and some franchises need to be dead and left alone only for the memory of the original to be seen/loved/watched by everyone for years to come on what quality filmmaking is all about and i care about good filmmaking and that i am right with my truth about why some series should be left alone as some would and not to recycle some past glories as we moved on and need some fresh new things for current film.

Like Jud Crandall in Pet Sematary (novel and movie) would say "Sony! let this franchise go! let it die! sometimes dead is better, some intelligent movie goers who are smart know that especially since Harold Ramis died and the franchise died years ago yet the only good thing during the last years were the merchandise and blu-ray re-issues even to some fans of comics being comics. They stopped going to this movie or not seeing it as the franchise's ground went sour, don't think about sequels Sony or any spin-off movies for you are not Marvel especially you Dan Ackroyd who has been nothing but an old sold out for the last years as that Crystal Skull vodka got to his head when he should leave well enough alone as he's trying to be like Marvel and he should understand that not everything is Marvel with a universe which is a lesson Hollywood something often learns wrong lessons like what they think they do with successful ideas and franchises. Sometimes dead is better and better left in the ground only for the memories to be honored/cherished for years to come otherwise a Wendigo called Hollywood cash would reanimated that corpse into a demon abomination and it's better to kill that demon. Hollywood should focus on new franchises like the ones i mentioned like Marvel Studios series or John Wick or Jack Reacher or Equalizer or Bourne, but Sony you are evil like the ground you buried somethings in, sometimes dead is better...sometimes dead is better.

[TurtleTitan97]

Good grief that's a huge amount of text.

[MontanaMax1982]

Good grief that's a huge amount of text.

But it's a nice speech about why this deserved to flop and why GBs should be left alone only for the memory of the original to be loved/cherished for years to come and the remake to be forgotten in a year.

Plus Jud Crandall is right eh?

[plastroncafe]

yeah...that's a teal deer if ever i've seen one.
http://img15.deviantart.net/a15a/i/2010/087/0/3/teal_deer_ii_by_arabidopsis.png

[Shark_Blade]

Are we sure there's no sequel? I thought they would do it anyway despite some of the negative response.

[TheSkeletonMan939]

It crashed and burned at the box office. There won't be another. Sony is having enough bombs as it is without making a sequel for the three people who enjoyed this flick.

[TurtleTitan97]

Are we sure there's no sequel? I thought they would do it anyway despite some of the negative response.

It's considered to be a box office flop: http://entertainment.ie/cinema/news/Ghostbusters-facing-70-million-loss-sequel-now-unlikely/384010.html

So yeah, no sequel.

[MontanaMax1982]

yeah...that's a teal deer if ever i've seen one.
http://img15.deviantart.net/a15a/i/2010/087/0/3/teal_deer_ii_by_arabidopsis.png


So you agree this franchise has been a wounded half dead animal for the last 25 years and the only good things about GBs for the last 25 years has been merchandise, comics, 2009 video game and blu-ray re-issues? plus that this killed the franchise and it's better to kill that wounded half dead animal than let it suffer?

[plastroncafe]

Nope.
Sorry.

Maybe it's the fangirl in me, but I find thinking of my favorite media in business terms doesn't work for me. If I like a thing, I'm going to like it whether or not it does well at the box office. (I'm looking at you Scott Pilgrim).

And if a movie doesn't get a sequel? Or maybe the book zigs when I wish it'd zagged? Well...that's what fanfic is for.

[TurtleTitan97]

But it's a nice speech about why this deserved to flop and why GBs should be left alone only for the memory of the original to be loved/cherished for years to come and the remake to be forgotten in a year.


A simple sentence would've been sufficed, don't ya think?

[MontanaMax1982]

A simple sentence would've been sufficed, don't ya think?

It's just that i'd rather have this franchise be left alone now that Harold has died and the franchise died with him, it's time for Hollywood to move on and to do new franchises

[Powder]

Good grief that's a huge amount of text.

Expect nothing less than wackiness from Jakesully.

[snake]

Expect nothing less than wackiness from Jakesully.

Nothing beats the time he listed every movie he's seen in his life and iirc the years he saw them.



every. single. movie.

[TurtleTitan97]

Expect nothing less than wackiness from Jakesully.

:o

Real talk Powder, are you like some kinda 21st Century Sherlock Holmes? Because you always manage to tell who users like Goku or JakeSully from a mile away.

Seriously man, what's your secret???

[TheSkeletonMan939]

Nothing beats the time he listed every movie he's seen in his life and iirc the years he saw them.
every. single. movie.

That one actually scared me.


Real talk Powder, are you like some kinda 21st Century Sherlock Holmes? Because you always manage to tell who users like Goku or JakeSully from a mile away.

Even Goku is impressed. He once asked Powder whether he was legit spying on him.

[CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy]

Expect nothing less than wackiness from Jakesully.

:o

Real talk Powder, are you like some kinda 21st Century Sherlock Holmes? Because you always manage to tell who users like Goku or JakeSully from a mile away.

Seriously man, what's your secret???

Powder needs a sidekick to play Watson for him. We're all just a bunch of Lestrade and Gregson wannabes watching in awe. :tlol:

That one actually scared me.

Even Goku is impressed. He once asked Powder whether he was legit spying on him.

Jakesully was a sad strange little man. But we didn't pity him.

[snake]

I'm sending in my Watson application as I type

[TurtleTitan97]

Not if I send mine first!

[CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy]

Screw both you guys, I'm applying for the job of Mycroft. :tlol:

[Powder]

:o

Real talk Powder, are you like some kinda 21st Century Sherlock Holmes? Because you always manage to tell who users like Goku or JakeSully from a mile away.

Seriously man, what's your secret???

Would you believe me if I said I had psychic powers? I didn't pick this name for nothing, you know.

I'm sending in my Watson application as I type

You're in!

[TheSkeletonMan939]

Mrs. Hudson comin' through here!

[CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy]

Mrs. Hudson comin' through here!

:tlol:

I'd have said Irene Adler, but Rachel McAdams is a tad bit sexier than me.

Just a wee bit.

Practically neck and neck.

[TurtleTitan97]

Would you believe me if I said I had psychic powers? I didn't pick this name for nothing, you know.


So you're like Professor Xavier? :D

[plastroncafe]

So you're like Professor Xavier? :D

Sort of...
http://www.clearplay.com/MovieBattle/images/tt0114168-1.jpg

[CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy]

So you're like Professor Xavier? :D

Pretty sure Powder can walk.

And has hair.

[Allio]

ashame, you never figured out the real mystery; for who I am.

[Allio]

since the original thread was closed.

Ghostbusters 2016 is coming back, this time IDW will be doing a crossover of their line and the 2016 movie.

http://www.ghostbustersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/gb_crossover_01-768x1165.jpg

in IDW we trust

[plastroncafe]

Cannot wait!

[ZariusTwo]

Still trying to make this s*it stain a thing are they?:roll:

[Candy Kappa]

Looking forward to GB 101

[ToTheNines]

Here's the regular cover for #1.


http://cdn.bleedingcool.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/STL036521-1.jpg

[Vegita-San]

i really hope sony is forcing idw to do this.

they've avowed it for so long.

[Spike Spiegel]

http://www.newsarama.com/32477-ghostbusters-to-meet-1984-originals-in-ghostbusters-101.html

Shortly after the classic Ghostbusters decide to get back to their roots of teaching the next generation of ‘busters, an inter-dimensional mishap merges together their universe with that of the new crew of paranormal police. Now, with the fate of two dimensions in the balance (maybe more?!), can these distinctly different teams come together to repel the greatest supernatural challenge any of them have ever faced?

I have to wonder if the college-age kids who do this are the IDW universe's variants of the Extreme Ghostbusters.