Nostalgia is killing the TMNT?

[D-ray]

I know it's something against the rules of the forum to bash "hate" on the 1987 serie, but it's discussion and as long as we remain polite to eachother, I think it isn't a bad thing.

By the way, what do I mean with the title? I think that the immensive popularity of the original 1987 adaptation is suffocating the others.
The childish, yet famous, aura around it makes the others look just like the same. And sadly, for a lot of people, impression is way more important than expression, so who wants to look like a kid these days?

Outside of kids, being the classic 80's nostalgic as become a horrible trend these years. Just look in the r/TMNT of Reddit. Tons and tons of people who doesn't do anything but posting pictures of the 1987 adamptation's action figures and various collections.

I'm not saying that the entire TMNT community should hate the 1987 adaptation or not be a fan of it, but since isn't the newest (and personally the best written) people should atleast try something new.
For example, I've been watching the 2012 adampation recently and it as alot of pros and cons. There is no perfect TMNT adampation, that's why people should open on more version instead of concetrating only on that classic one.

Just asking you guys what do you think about it. I'll patiently wait for your detailed answers!

[CyberCubed]

There has been a few threads on this already. Overall it doesn’t matter too much as the only source material is Mirage and outside of some serious Netflix show there’s nothing else that will be made based on it.

Also most of the people you mention are casual fans who barely know anything TMNT after their childhood. It’s very similar to Pokémon fans who only like Gen 1 and the original 151 Pokémon and nothing afterward because they only remember what they liked when they were kids.

[D-ray]

There has been a few threads on this already. Overall it doesn’t matter too much as the only source material is Mirage and outside of some serious Netflix show there’s nothing else that will be made based on it.

Also most of the people you mention are casual fans who barely know anything TMNT after their childhood. It’s very similar to Pokémon fans who only like Gen 1 and the original 151 Pokémon and nothing afterward because they only remember what they liked when they were kids.
Yes but that kind of "casual" fan looks more than the 60% of the entire community (talking of TMNT).
Pokémon's Gennwunners (as they are called) are usually picked on and downgraded because of their lack of critisism and stuff.
Also, if you have a link of those discussions I'd like to read them.

[neatoman]

Yes, it's technically against the rules to "bash" that show, but the rules were written in 1999. That is to say when TMNT consisted of hard to come by comics, a toyline, more accessible (though worse) comics intended to market said toyline, one OK movie, two obviously bad movies, a nightmarishly awful live-action show, some video games and of course that cartoon. At the time, the Fred Wolf cartoon really was the majority of what TMNT was, and most of the other stuff was either a tie-in or the show was intended to market it. So at the time it might have made sense to consider "bashing" it little more than a reason to cause flame wars. Of course now it's 21 years later and the Fred Wolf cartoon and its direct tie-ins no longer make up the majority of the franchise, and given the higher quality standards the flaws of the show have become more evident. It's also a bit unclear what constitutes "bashing", but it can't be the same thing as pointing out the flaws of the show or admitting that you dislike it, such a rule would be insane and is obviously not how it's enforced. I've only ever seen one person claim that it should be enforced, and he only seems to do so because he's unable to defend the show without resorting to appeal to popularity, the subjectivity argument, what-about-isms, personal attacks, etc. Basically, the rule is defended by someone who can't argue in favor of show properly, which I take as a sign that the rule could only be enforced frequently if it was to shield a bad TV show from legitimate criticism, which is straight up silly.

Anyway, TL;DR. The rule is vaugely worded and was clearly written under circumstances that are no longer relevant, which is probably why it's not really enforced.

Anyway, with that out of the way, is nostalgia "killing" TMNT? If you mean that hinders economic success, then I don't know. The 2012 TMNT cartoon did represent a partial return to old ideas (mostly in the form of characters and some concepts) and was (allegedly) a huge success, but did overall have very little in common with nostalgic versions beyond the superficial, the success might have come from its own ideas? The second Platinum Dunes movie, although carrying over some of the bad ideas from the previous movie, did mostly try to emulate the Fred Wolf cartoon but was a total flop. And we shouldn't really forget that the 2003 cartoon was intentionally getting away from the Fred Wolf cartoon and still ended up on the air for six years. So if I had to come up with a conclusion as to wheter or not marketing TMNT with ties to the Fred Wolf cartoon works in its favour, I'd say there's a neutral effect. You could do that but it doesn't seem to have an effect. It's probably just better to try and make a good product, then let brand name recognition and word of mouth take care of it.

Creatively... Well, it does seem to stifle the creativity a bit, not gonna lie about that. If the franchise just keeps bringing back the "Krang tries to take over the earth with a Technodrome" bit along with other things simply because they're "recognisable", then we're basically just getting the same thing over and over again. And they're not even good bits. It's probably better in the long run to come up with new material or digging up (quite frankly) better parts of the old stuff. And if you're going to reuse the bad stuff just because people recognise it, then at least rework it into something legitmately good.

[D-ray]

Yes, it's technically against the rules to "bash" that show, but the rules were written in 1999. That is to say when TMNT consisted of hard to come by comics, a toyline, more accessible (though worse) comics intended to market said toyline, one OK movie, two obviously bad movies, a nightmarishly awful live-action show, some video games and of course that cartoon. At the time, the Fred Wolf cartoon really was the majority of what TMNT was, and most of the other stuff was either a tie-in or the show was intended to market it. So at the time it might have made sense to consider "bashing" it little more than a reason to cause flame wars. Of course now it's 21 years later and the Fred Wolf cartoon and its direct tie-ins no longer make up the majority of the franchise, and given the higher quality standards the flaws of the show have become more evident. It's also a bit unclear what constitutes "bashing", but it can't be the same thing as pointing out the flaws of the show or admitting that you dislike it, such a rule would be insane and is obviously not how it's enforced. I've only ever seen one person claim that it should be enforced, and he only seems to do so because he's unable to defend the show without resorting to appeal to popularity, the subjectivity argument, what-about-isms, personal attacks, etc. Basically, the rule is defended by someone who can't argue in favor of show properly, which I take as a sign that the rule could only be enforced frequently if it was to shield a bad TV show from legitimate criticism, which is straight up silly.

Anyway, TL;DR. The rule is vaugely worded and was clearly written under circumstances that are no longer relevant, which is probably why it's not really enforced.

Anyway, with that out of the way, is nostalgia "killing" TMNT? If you mean that hinders economic success, then I don't know. The 2012 TMNT cartoon did represent a partial return to old ideas (mostly in the form of characters and some concepts) and was (allegedly) a huge success, but did overall have very little in common with nostalgic versions beyond the superficial, the success might have come from its own ideas? The second Platinum Dunes movie, although carrying over some of the bad ideas from the previous movie, did mostly try to emulate the Fred Wolf cartoon but was a total flop. And we shouldn't really forget that the 2003 cartoon was intentionally getting away from the Fred Wolf cartoon and still ended up on the air for six years. So if I had to come up with a conclusion as to wheter or not marketing TMNT with ties to the Fred Wolf cartoon works in its favour, I'd say there's a neutral effect. You could do that but it doesn't seem to have an effect. It's probably just better to try and make a good product, then let brand name recognition and word of mouth take care of it.

Creatively... Well, it does seem to stifle the creativity a bit, not gonna lie about that. If the franchise just keeps bringing back the "Krang tries to take over the earth with a Technodrome" bit along with other things simply because they're "recognisable", then we're basically just getting the same thing over and over again. And they're not even good bits. It's probably better in the long run to come up with new material or digging up (quite frankly) better parts of the old stuff. And if you're going to reuse the bad stuff just because people recognise it, then at least rework it into something legitmately good.
As long as they don't ban me, I'm fine.

Economically no. TMNT seems an average franchise, not a "dying" one. For "killing" I meant the community as a whole.

The community, as I said, is full nostalgic people, who just can't get over the 1987 serie. And being the most popular, it takes away possible new fans due to the social impact that could have to them. Yeah it's stupid, but it seems like that.

About lack of creativity: it could actually make the show very repetitive, but too much creativity can bring something like the newest show. Disapponting because too different (I'd like to watch the show so badly, but my country didn't broadcasted it).

I think that the nice example of "rework" is the 4kids show, due to the fact that have alot of old characters from the 1987 one, but with a different role and maybe even character. That's why nobody got disappointed.
It's like having a box full of action figures, creating each time a different story or different way to tell it.

By the way, I'm going any further with this thread; because it just looks pointless for me now. Not because of you eh. I just think it was rushed and useless.

[FredWolfLeonardo]

I wouldn't blame the 1987 cartoon itself.

Rather, a huge chunk of people who watched the cartoon in their childhood (and barely remember any of it by the way), are now refusing to check out new versions because tmnt is a kids-only fad in their eyes.

And with so many new franchises to compete with, especially in the Internet age with so many options, its gonna be a challenge for any new tmnt version to stand out and make a huge profit among the new generation of kids.

I think it was the difficulty with having a consistent kid audience that led to the higher ups aiming for older fans by trying to bank on Fred Wolf Nostalgia in the IDW comics, Nick cartoon and the Second Platinum Dunes film (to varying levels of success).

[D-ray]

I wouldn't blame the 1987 cartoon itself.

Rather, a huge chunk of people who watched the cartoon in their childhood (and barely remember any of it by the way), are now refusing to check out new versions because tmnt is a kids-only fad in their eyes.

And with so many new franchises to compete with, especially in the Internet age with so many options, its gonna be a challenge for any new tmnt version to stand out and make a huge profit among the new generation of kids.

I think it was the difficulty with having a consistent kid audience that led to the higher ups aiming for older fans by trying to bank on Fred Wolf Nostalgia in the IDW comics, Nick cartoon and the Second Platinum Dunes film (to varying levels of success).
Yeah sorry, I didn't mean to blame the show.
My complain was mostly directed on the "community" itself, as you better explained.

About the marketing and competition thing, I was thinking of the same before writing the last post. I just felt guilty for blaming the choices of the directors.

[IMJ]

This is a good thread, but there has been plenty of TMNT that has had it's own identity but also been well received by the fanbase. The '00 show, TMNT '12 are perfect examples that had their own identity even if they paid homage or crossed over with Fred Wolf.

And I know I'm in the minority on this part, but I thought that the TMNT CGI cartoon/movie thingy was pretty good.

And there was enough reinvention in those three examples that FW didn't choke them out. I think the real problem is that many of the other examples are truly poor takes on the franchise. Rise, the Bay flicks.... not good by any comparison.

[D-ray]

This is a good thread, but there has been plenty of TMNT that has had it's own identity but also been well received by the fanbase. The '00 show, TMNT '12 are perfect examples that had their own identity even if they paid homage or crossed over with Fred Wolf.

And I know I'm in the minority on this part, but I thought that the TMNT CGI cartoon/movie thingy was pretty good.

And there was enough reinvention in those three examples that FW didn't choke them out. I think the real problem is that many of the other examples are truly poor takes on the franchise. Rise, the Bay flicks.... not good by any comparison.
Reading of a veteran of the forum saying that my thread is good, makes me so proud (I'm dumb).

Anyway, the problem isn't for us, already in the TMNT world, but for who tries to approach it.
Even if the 2003 and 2012 show are well received, nobody gives two shells about them.
And newcomers just probably give up, thinking that the only turtle show in existence is that goofy 1987 version.

[pferreira]

Yes, it's technically against the rules to "bash" that show, but the rules were written in 1999.Then do you not think the mods should change the rules, I mean change it to anything else?
I say this because I'm really getting frustrated with the FW series being used to be jumped on:

Since this site is based on the original TMNT cartoon (1987-1996), original cartoon bashing of any kind is not allowed.

I mean if the mods are okay with neatoman and others taking a dump on the cartoon should it not be changed to:

Since this site is based on the original TMNT cartoon (1987-1996), original cartoon bashing of any kind is allowed.

Not trying to be clever here but I'm frustrated with the indifference this site takes towards the forum rules they set up. All I want is there not to be any confusion as to what is allowed and what isn't in regards to the 80's cartoon series. :-?

It's also a bit unclear what constitutes "bashing",Calling the writers lazy and hacks? Making out a writer is worthless just after they've died? A poor taste April Fools joke done out of spite?

I've only ever seen one person claim that it should be enforced, and he only seems to do so because he's unable to defend the show without resorting to appeal to popularity, the subjectivity argument, what-about-isms, personal attacks, etc. Basically, the rule is defended by someone who can't argue in favor of show properly, which I take as a sign that the rule could only be enforced frequently if it was to shield a bad TV show from legitimate criticism, which is straight up silly.Or...you're own personal bias and values are the issues.;)

I know it's something against the rules of the forum to bash "hate" on the 1987 serie,Oh no go ahead, people love using this series as a punchbag. :roll:

I agree to an extent nostalgia is somewhat to blame. Either give us new Fred Wolf TMNT or don't. Stop tip toeing with cameos and references. Neatman will say my opinion doesn't matter because I like 80's cartoons and that this one especially holds no value other to laugh at. He of course doesn't realise the IDW series he's obsessed with is built from elements of the FW series. How's that for not having an argument?

IDW and the franchise as a whole needs to stop relying on pushing any TMNT nostalgia unless it wants to return faithfully to that world. It needs to create new material without relying on previous iterations. I assume that is something everyone can agree on. :)

[Powder]

He of course doesn't realise the IDW series he's obsessed with is built from elements of the FW series. How's that for not having an argument?

Why are you still fixated on the idea that he favors IDW when that literally has never been stated? Watching you desperately try & throw stones at what you assume is his favorite iteration is both petty & sad. Why are you posting on Tuesday? Did you sneak into the ward's rec-room?

[FredWolfLeonardo]

A poor taste April Fools joke done out of spite?

To be fair, I found the FW tmnt on Blu Ray April Fools joke to be pretty funny, since I fell for it.

[D-ray]

Oh no go ahead, people love using this series as a punchbag. :roll:

Please dude, don't use sarcasm...
It's confusing to understand on written threads.

[victory_angel]

I don't think Nostalgia for the OT is killing this series, but it is the series that caused them to fall in love with the series. However, what is sort of smothering the franchise is people wanting to see references to previous incarnations.

References and Easter eggs are good and all as it does help keep the attention of the older fans. Still, if all you want are focused on is the references and easter eggs, you will fail to appreciate the story and what things they are trying with a newer incarnation.

Too many references and homages to other versions or other franchises can ruin the story.

Take the farmhouse arc for example. The first time the Turtles go to the farmhouse it is when they have suffered their first major defeat and they need a space to lick their wounds, regroup, and recover. With the 2012 incarnation that could have been a slew of the turtles and family dealing with existential issues with themselves and with each other.

But instead, they use it as an excuse to say "Oh we're going to bring a reference to this, and to this, and this, and oh we have pay homage to this."

And that just made that arc feel like a slog.


It's like watching a Harry Potter film and then instead of appreciating the effort that went into the movie and how they were able to translate the story to film, you do long diatribes about how the film sucks because it didn't make everything accurate to the book.

Every version of this franchise will be different, and that is okay. April doesn't need to be a grown woman with a job in every version. The Shredder doesn't need be in the first season of every version. Heck, the Turtles don't even need to be teenagers in every version.

You can have incarnations where they are little kids (without having to go into muppet baby situations) and it can still be entertaining.


You can also have incarnations where they are adults and facing what that means for them now that their childhood has ended.

By insisting a version needs to be like the previous version is not letting people who have the rights to the series explore and experiment with what could be done with this series. It won't always make sense and it may not be what you feel it should be. But that doesn't mean the franchise is ruined, there is still 30+ years of other material to enjoy until the next version. Or just planning out your own version in the mean time.

[D-ray]

I don't think Nostalgia for the OT is killing this series, but it is the series that caused them to fall in love with the series.

My title was a bit exaggerated, and I admit it. But I also have to say that the old serie never really attracted me, due to the influence of the 2003 serie, so I'm not certain about the last sentence. Each version could make you fall in love with the turtles.

By insisting a version needs to be like the previous version is not letting people who have the rights to the series explore and experiment with what could be done with this series. It won't always make sense and it may not be what you feel it should be. But that doesn't mean the franchise is ruined, there is still 30+ years of other material to enjoy until the next version. Or just planning out your own version in the mean time.

I'm totally into this quote. But the use of nostalgic/referencial elements, 70% of the times, gives guaranteed profit (just look at Nintendo), so is not that weird that such big company like Nickelodeon (that needs guaranted profit) tried to referene both of the older series. In fact, alot of 2012 original elements are just "wut?".

Your idea is perfect, but I would add the progressive change of plot, just like in the 2003 and 2012 adaptations. I mean at first is more concentrated on the characters, making them look funny or easily distinguishable, and as the story goes on, concentrate more on interesting and "serious" episode plots.

[D-ray]

Sorry, my connection lagged and made two posts.

[triplexxx]

I think constantly revamping the character designs is making a good contribution to killing it, some later adaptions have worked, but many go too far. You can play with stories, levels of seriousness kid-level or adult-level, voices, and whatever else, but when it comes to cartoons/comics, in spite of the saying books shouldn't be judged by cover, appearance is definitely, how do you say, "9/10 of the law".

[D-ray]

I think constantly revamping the character designs is making a good contribution to killing it, some later adaptions have worked, but many go too far. You can play with stories, levels of seriousness kid-level or adult-level, voices, and whatever else, but when it comes to cartoons/comics, in spite of the saying books shouldn't be judged by cover, appearance is definitely, how do you say, "9/10 of the law".
If you mean character design esthetically, I'm ok with that.
But except the Bay turtles nothing as really come close to a bad or exaggerated design.
Yeah maybe ripped Raffaello (Raphael) of Rise of the TMNT looks abit weird, but is not THAT bad.

If you mean character design psychologically , I do not agree.
The best way to revamp a TMNT character is trought that. Just look at Casey Jones, Karai and Splinter trought the series.

[neatoman]

I think constantly revamping the character designs is making a good contribution to killing it, some later adaptions have worked, but many go too far. You can play with stories, levels of seriousness kid-level or adult-level, voices, and whatever else, but when it comes to cartoons/comics, in spite of the saying books shouldn't be judged by cover, appearance is definitely, how do you say, "9/10 of the law".

I'd agree that Platinum Dunes and Rise went too far in redesigning the characters, but I can't say the original design choice of "four identical guys with different weapons" was perfectly fine either, and making the masks different colors was about the lowest effort to fix it.

We obviously don't need Donatello to have an oversized head, and goggles, and thick glasses, and wrist gadgets, and a tech staff, and some proton pack all at the same just to tell him apart from his brothers. At that point, there's almost reason for the purple mask anymore, other than tradition I guess. But while it is certainly overcompensating for a bad design choice in the past, that doesn't mean they don't have the right idea.

If we stick to Don as an example, what can we do to make him look different from brothers but not call it a day with a different mask color or going bananas?

[triplexxx]

Personally I believe keeping the boys looking alike, save potential color difference in clothing and skin, has contributed well to keeping the limelight going for the franchise. Some things you can change, but some traditions you don't want to stray away from, some things shouldn't have too much effort put into them or try to be improved upon.

[Wesley]

This is a good thread, but there has been plenty of TMNT that has had it's own identity but also been well received by the fanbase. The '00 show, TMNT '12 are perfect examples that had their own identity even if they paid homage or crossed over with Fred Wolf.

And I know I'm in the minority on this part, but I thought that the TMNT CGI cartoon/movie thingy was pretty good.

And there was enough reinvention in those three examples that FW didn't choke them out. I think the real problem is that many of the other examples are truly poor takes on the franchise. Rise, the Bay flicks.... not good by any comparison.

Agreed. To be fair, it can be hard for people used to one version to get into a new version of something. It took me a while to get into the 2003 series, for example.

[pferreira]

Why are you still fixated on the idea that he favors IDW when that literally has never been stated? Watching you desperately try & throw stones at what you assume is his favorite iteration is both petty & sad. Why are you posting on Tuesday? Did you sneak into the ward's rec-room?Reported! ;)

[D-ray]

We obviously don't need Donatello to have an oversized head, and goggles, and thick glasses, and wrist gadgets, and a tech staff, and some proton pack all at the same just to tell him apart from his brothers. At that point, there's almost reason for the purple mask anymore, other than tradition I guess.

Nice thought, never seen it from this point of view.
Let's add Rise of TMNT Donatello to the exaggerated designs.

[Leo656]

Reported! ;)

Perhaps this simply isn't the place for you. Ever consider that?

If every single person you meet is an asshole, it's usually you yourself who's in the wrong. Food for thought.

[Voltron]

I love the old series. I was watching Turtle Tracks yesterday. It was goofy and fun in that 80's-90's SatAM way.

I also caught a clip of Shredder attacking Rat King and it was pretty funny.

I dunno. I think the FW series should be respected for what it is. It gave a lot of people their intro to the TMNT. It also added to the lore.

If there's an iteration that you prefer more, great! Enjoy it. But "hate" for the FW series seems a bit extreme to me.

[D-ray]

I love the old series. I was watching Turtle Tracks yesterday. It was goofy and fun in that 80's-90's SatAM way.

I also caught a clip of Shredder attacking Rat King and it was pretty funny.

I dunno. I think the FW series should be respected for what it is. It gave a lot of people their intro to the TMNT. It also added to the lore.

If there's an iteration that you prefer more, great! Enjoy it. But "hate" for the FW series seems a bit extreme to me.
I never said that I hate it.
I just wanted to open a thread about how much of an influence has been to the turtles in general.

[Andrew NDB]

If every single person you meet is an asshole, it's usually you yourself who's in the wrong. Food for thought.

Oh, pferreira. And just when I thought he and I were getting along. Yes, it's a bit like the guy or girl who talks about their many exes who were all psychotic monsters. At a certain point... it's you.

Unless he meant "Reported" with the winky face like he meant to say, "Reported... just kidding!"

[Leo656]

I've been an eye-rolling observer for many years now. It just isn't cute anymore.

I'm a fan of my share of things that aren't beloved by consensus, so I do get it. But on one hand, there's something to be said for picking one's battles, or at the very least knowing well enough when to put the drum down. And furthermore, when someone is saying something that's factually provable, then you have no argument in that case just because you disagree or it hurts your feelings or whatever. "Opinions" don't weigh anything next to Facts; if you're putting them on a scale, Facts are bricks and Opinions are feathers. You can't override the former by shouting the latter over and over again, no matter how strongly you feel about it.

At the end of the day, such pathological defense of a kids' cartoon that's 25 years dead and buried is unhealthy, and derails any actual debate and conversation that anyone tries to have. People can't talk when some hyperactive kid is running around yelling "Nuh-UH! That's YOU!" every time someone says something they don't like.

I'unno. Not in a great mood lately and my patience for nonsense is at its absolute nadir. I've held my tongue in the past but I'm kinda tired of this sh*t from that guy. Most people here can seemingly have a conversation or debate and at least pretend to remain objective even if they admit to a personal bias. That one, not so much. Tiresome.

"What's 'tiresome' is when people here go out of their way to trash the OT despite forum rules and people love it and it shaped my childhood and blah blah!" Okay, whatever. We've all heard it by now and nobody caaaaares. Nobody's even "trashing" anything. It's silly.

[Original TMNT Cartoon Fan]

Childhood nostaliga obsession is a problem affecting far more topics than just TMNT.

[pferreira]

If every single person you meet is an asshole, it's usually you yourself who's in the wrong. Food for thought.Difference between being an asshole and being you which is an elitist asshole. ;)

At the end of the day, such pathological defense of a kids' cartoon that's 25 years dead and buried is unhealthy,So we can only respect Rise of TMNT and the IDW comic since those are current. Yikes that's kind of shallow. :o

If there's an iteration that you prefer more, great! Enjoy it. But "hate" for the FW series seems a bit extreme to me.Why do I get the feeling neatoman and Leo656 forget what this website was built on? I had to ask Michelle Ivey over on Facebook to confirm you're allowed to have civilised discussions about this series. :-?

[Leo656]

You're exhausting. Go away.

[80gmrp]

Childhood nostaliga obsession is a problem affecting far more topics than just TMNT.

While I personally thrive in nostalgia, I would say I’d agree with this post in that this particular franchise is not unique when it comes to people wanting the old over the new.

By the same token, while I’m trying my hardest not to make mention of the drama also going on in this thread, I will say that I see both sides of the issue. While the apparent consensus that most are only familiar with the 87 cartoon is probably true, those who are familiar with the other eras seem to usually care only about what’s current (even if that’s another problem not unique to this franchise). Those skeptical of this observation of mine need only see how inactive the subforums of the 2003 cartoon and especially the 2012 cartoon are, even despite I personally prefer both of them over what’s current.

Also, for the record: surprisingly, as much as I love older stuff, my interest in the original cartoon was short lived, and I was a kid when the interest was present.

[Dejablue]

I don't understand why this is so hard. People love Zelda. LoZ is literally the same story over and over and over and over just remixed a bit.

Ocarina of Time probably don't get as much hate on a Zelda fan forum as 87 TMNT gets hate on this forum. Do people even really talk about 87 TMNT that much on here? I don't think so.

[Original TMNT Cartoon Fan]

inactive the subforums of the 2003 cartoon and especially the 2012 cartoon are

Some people like bashing and hating more than appreciating.

[D-ray]

Childhood nostaliga obsession is a problem affecting far more topics than just TMNT.
Yeah sure, but since this is a TMNT forum.
I could talk about the childish Pokémon community, for instance.

Some people like bashing and hating more than appreciating.
Most of the times yes, but I think that can even just be lack of interest.

By the same token, while I’m trying my hardest not to make mention of the drama also going on in this thread, I will say that I see both sides of the issue. While the apparent consensus that most are only familiar with the 87 cartoon is probably true, those who are familiar with the other eras seem to usually care only about what’s current (even if that’s another problem not unique to this franchise). Those skeptical of this observation of mine need only see how inactive the subforums of the 2003 cartoon and especially the 2012 cartoon are, even despite I personally prefer both of them over what’s current.
True, true. I have to pray to get an answer to one of the various 2003 threads, for instance.

[D-ray]

I don't understand why this is so hard. People love Zelda. LoZ is literally the same story over and over and over and over just remixed a bit.

Ocarina of Time probably don't get as much hate on a Zelda fan forum as 87 TMNT gets hate on this forum. Do people even really talk about 87 TMNT that much on here? I don't think so.
I've never seen pure HATE on the 1987 series, and I especially never HATED the 1987.
Heck, my profile picture is based off a scene from that cartoon!
I just don't really like it because it's abit too childish, but who cares actually? Every adamptation has it's pros and cons.

The point here is that the 1987 gets too much attention, and newer things that deserve to be atleast in the spotlight of real critics, are not.

Also, the forum is generally pretty quiet, nothing exaggerated. But if you watch closely, there are more posts on the 1987 adamptation instead of the "newer", just as 80gmrp said.

[ZariusTwo]

Also, the forum is generally pretty quiet, nothing exaggerated. But if you watch closely, there are more posts on the 1987 adamptation instead of the "newer", just as 80gmrp said.

The site beginning life as a shrine to the 87 TMNT series has everything to do with that. Although we've had many eras of the franchise since, The Technodrome has never exactly 'evolved' past it's present purpose: To be a community for fans who grew up on the classic series, hence why a vocal minority of purists here get annoyed that conversation doesn't exactly grow beyond the love for that show.

[raph27]

I don't understand why this is so hard. People love Zelda. LoZ is literally the same story over and over and over and over just remixed a bit.

Ocarina of Time probably don't get as much hate on a Zelda fan forum as 87 TMNT gets hate on this forum. Do people even really talk about 87 TMNT that much on here? I don't think so.

To expand on this example, I don't really think that the two franchises are the same, and I would even go as far as to say that Zelda is an example of the opposite.

Yes, people still love Ocarina of Time, along with Link to the Past and Majora's Mask, which seem to me to be the games that are most referred back to. However, the franchise and the fanbase also adapt to new games. Wind Waker, Twilight Princess, all the way up to current times with Breath of the Wild, the series has expanded to include many different interpretations that are mostly beloved and all have their fair share of fan art/merch/discussion and whatnot.

Unfortunately, that just seems like it isn't the case with this franchise. The idea of TMNT is dominated by the 1987 show. Almost every time the franchise is seen represented, it's based off of that specific interpretation. (I could go off onto a separate tangent about all the bland merchandise using the same stock art that's not even accurate to the show or original Turtle Mania designs - but that's for another time.) Outside of this forum, I barely ever see anything related to the 2003 or 2012 shows. Even Rise doesn't seem to have much of a presence. If it wasn't for the occasional time I am on these forums, I would barely have any idea it was still on. (is it still on? Did it get cancelled? I honestly have no idea...) And the comics, whether it be Mirage, IDW, or the others, are the most obscure of them all.

To use a different franchise as an example, imagine if the Batman franchise was pretty much only known by the 1966 show with Adam West, and everything else just passed by. The Nolan trilogy, B:TAS, the Arkham games, the original 90s movies, the recent Affleck portrayal... all just forgotten soon after they released. Just constant references to climbing up buildings and throwing giant bombs for most of the public knowledge of Batman. That is a similar situation to what I am seeing from the TMNT franchise now.

One of the things that made me happy recently was seeing the love that people showed to the 1990 movie last week as it seemed to go against this trend, so I won't say that things are impossible to turn around. It just seems like without something major, like a new movie that's actually good/great, most people won't let go of the grip on the 1987 show, or even the image of it.

[D-ray]

Unfortunately, that just seems like it isn't the case with this franchise. The idea of TMNT is dominated by the 1987 show. Almost every time the franchise is seen represented, it's based off of that specific interpretation. (I could go off onto a separate tangent about all the bland merchandise using the same stock art that's not even accurate to the show or original Turtle Mania designs - but that's for another time.) Outside of this forum, I barely ever see anything related to the 2003 or 2012 shows. Even Rise doesn't seem to have much of a presence. If it wasn't for the occasional time I am on these forums, I would barely have any idea it was still on. (is it still on? Did it get cancelled? I honestly have no idea...) And the comics, whether it be Mirage, IDW, or the others, are the most obscure of them all.

To use a different franchise as an example, imagine if the Batman franchise was pretty much only known by the 1966 show with Adam West, and everything else just passed by. The Nolan trilogy, B:TAS, the Arkham games, the original 90s movies, the recent Affleck portrayal... all just forgotten soon after they released. Just constant references to climbing up buildings and throwing giant bombs for most of the public knowledge of Batman. That is a similar situation to what I am seeing from the TMNT franchise now.

One of the things that made me happy recently was seeing the love that people showed to the 1990 movie last week as it seemed to go against this trend, so I won't say that things are impossible to turn around. It just seems like without something major, like a new movie that's actually good/great, most people won't let go of the grip on the 1987 show, or even the image of it.
I couldn't agree more.

[FredWolfLeonardo]

The Technodrome has never exactly 'evolved' past it's present purpose: To be a community for fans who grew up on the classic series

Uh, that's not even remotely true.

While the site is based upon the Original Cartoon, it is by no mean just a community for those people who grew up with that show, especially in the year 2020.

We have people here who grew up with other versions, and even people who embrace the franchise as adults.

[Original TMNT Cartoon Fan]

I wish Krang and Shredder showed up regularly and not just between circa 25 October–5 November for the anniversaries.

[The-Shredder]

True, true. I have to pray to get an answer to one of the various 2003 threads, for instance.

It's really unfortunate that the 2003 fanbase isn't very active on the forum, but a lot of that has to do with the fact that most of this generation is more accustomed to platforms like Tumblr, Twitter, and YouTube where you will surprisingly find pages dedicated to the show. It also is (or was) popular on DeviantArt, for better or worse. Recently, it has been getting more love on the official social media pages, even if there's no new merchandise coming out. From what I've seen, the show seems to have a strong fanbase outside the U.S., especially Russia. They even got Back to the Sewer trading cards that we never got in the U.S.

It's easy to be frustrated, but keep in mind that from 1984-2009, TMNT was an independent property that despite Turtlemania in the early 90s didn't have the same pull as those with a larger corporate backing like Batman, Star Wars, or Transformers. That's why it was easier to keep the momentum going when those properties went through dramatic changes with the Tim Burton movies, the Prequel Trilogy, and the Michael Bay movies.

It didn't help that the 2003 cartoon aired on the dubbed anime oriented FoxBox/4Kids TV/CW 4Kids on Saturday mornings, when Kids WB, Cartoon Network, and Nickelodeon were where it was at. The show was briefly on Cartoon Network's Miguzi block with Teen Titans, but it didn't last long. However, it did air on Fox Kids/Jetix outside the U.S., which probably explains why it has a more passionate fanbase there.

If anything, I am mostly concerned about preserving the The Next Mutation episodes as they originally aired on Fox Kids, because the UK and Shout! Factory releases are significantly altered. The show gets a bad rep, but it doesn't deserve to be lost to time. I've never watched the entire show in full before, and I have no idea where to find the originals.

I used to upload 2003 promos and bumpers on YouTube every week and share them here, but I've been dealing with some personal stuff recently that hasn't allowed me to focus on it. Once I'm back in the right headspace, I will continue where I left off.

[HamsterAndTurtleSoup]

Kinda agree with the OP. I tend to find stuff in every iteration to like, and I don't feel that the fandom does itself any favours with its insistence that there is a 'right' and 'wrong' way to do it, or that we should just keep on harking back to the most well-known versions. Especially when there's so much dissent over which version is the 'best' (it's 2003 ;) ).

I do think the core components of TMNT lend themselves well to reimaginings and retailoring for different audiences, to the extent that I think the franchise is a little wasted in the hands of a 'one-version-at-a-time-kids-toy-vehicle' owner. TMNT works well as a kids cartoon. It'd also work well as a gritty adult animation that runs truer to the Mirage comics, something I feel the adult fanbase have been clamouring for in ages. And I'd love to see other independent creators take a crack at it in various guises and 'AU' versions for various audiences, too. It needs a flexible IP owner willing to take a few more risks and be as diverse in its licensed outputs as the fanbase actually is.

Not all turtleverses are gonna be for everyone, but does it matter? There'll always be one for you out there, somewhere!

[D-ray]

From what I've seen, the show seems to have a strong fanbase outside the U.S., especially Russia.

Omg it's so true! Most of the times I get 2003 TMNT Russian videos in my suggestions for some reasons! And I started to think:"Wait, are Russians actually big fan of this show?"

[D-ray]

I don't want to sound rude, but I think that the 2003 seem to have a solid base on why the show is really good, outside of nostalgia.

To all the 1987 series fans, could you explain to me what makes that show so great for you? Serious question, I'm not bashing.

[FredWolfLeonardo]

To all the 1987 series fans, could you explain to me what makes that show so great for you? Serious question, I'm not bashing.

1. Amazing soundtrack

2. Great humour

3. Memorable voice performances for most of the cast which showcase the chemistry in between the characters.

4. Good action scenes at times (for e.g. Season 1, 7 and the Red Sky seasons), and the ability of the show to be heavily comedic while still having real stakes.

5. A fun cast of main and side characters (e.g. The turtles, Shredder, Krang, Leatherhead, Rat King, April, Irma etc.)

6. Interesting concepts Introduced to the tmnt lore such as the Technodrome, rock warriors, neutrinos, Turtle van, Turtle Blimp, Dimension X etc.

7. The flaws (such as animation errors, many terrible looking episodes and voice actor swaps), which are extremely cheesy but add to the shows fun factor.

[Wesley]

1. Amazing soundtrack

2. Great humour

3. Memorable voice performances for most of the cast which showcase the chemistry in between the characters.

4. Good action scenes at times (for e.g. Season 1, 7 and the Red Sky seasons), and the ability of the show to be heavily comedic while still having real stakes.

5. A fun cast of main and side characters (e.g. The turtles, Shredder, Krang, Leatherhead, Rat King, April, Irma etc.)

6. Interesting concepts Introduced to the tmnt lore such as the Technodrome, rock warriors, neutrinos, Turtle van, Turtle Blimp, Dimension X etc.

7. The flaws (such as animation errors, many terrible looking episodes and voice actor swaps), which are extremely cheesy but add to the shows fun factor.

Pretty much why I still kinda like this series, though I prefer the 2003 one.

[D-ray]

1. Amazing soundtrack

2. Great humour

3. Memorable voice performances for most of the cast which showcase the chemistry in between the characters.

4. Good action scenes at times (for e.g. Season 1, 7 and the Red Sky seasons), and the ability of the show to be heavily comedic while still having real stakes.

5. A fun cast of main and side characters (e.g. The turtles, Shredder, Krang, Leatherhead, Rat King, April, Irma etc.)

6. Interesting concepts Introduced to the tmnt lore such as the Technodrome, rock warriors, neutrinos, Turtle van, Turtle Blimp, Dimension X etc.

7. The flaws (such as animation errors, many terrible looking episodes and voice actor swaps), which are extremely cheesy but add to the shows fun factor.
Interesting.
How about the plot? How you guys criticize it?
Yeah I know you said many terrible episodes, but that doesn't seem convicing. Gimme a reason.

[Original TMNT Cartoon Fan]

Star Wars

Wasn't Star Wars almost dead by the early 1990's?

[Wesley]

Interesting.
How about the plot? How you guys criticize it?
Yeah I know you said many terrible episodes, but that doesn't seem convicing. Gimme a reason.

Off the top of my head:

1. Strictly Formula, though to be fair, most cartoons and live-action shows were like that until the mid 2000s.
2. Too many pizza jokes and irritating catchphrases.
3. Too many episodes made.

[D-ray]

Off the top of my head:

1. Strictly Formula, though to be fair, most cartoons and live-action shows were like that until the mid 2000s.
2. Too many pizza jokes and irritating catchphrases.
3. Too many episodes made.
Mmmhh, pretty much what I would have said. I noticed a serious amount of "logic" flaws too but, due to the cartoon's nature, I don't think it's relevant.
What about the 2003 series? You, Wesley, said that you like that adamptation more.
Why?

[Wesley]

Mmmhh, pretty much what I would have said. I noticed a serious amount of "logic" flaws too but, due to the cartoon's nature, I don't think it's relevant.
What about the 2003 series? You, Wesley, said that you like that adamptation more.
Why?

I prefer the 2003 series because a) The characters are more complex and interesting b) Great story arcs and standalone episodes c) Good balance of action, drama and humor d) Writing is less kiddish and e) I can watch it no matter what mood I’m in. Have to be in the mood for watching the 1987 series.

[D-ray]

Ok, it looks like I was wrong saying that the 1987 love was only lead by nostalgia, (atleast) for you.
I think that the "civil war" between the two factions is because the shows have a different kind of age target. It's like bashing on Peppa Pig, just because it doesn't have a solid plot or logical explanations on what happens.
Considering what I just said, there can't be a real argument saying which is the best, since they seem like two different things, and so, there is no reason to hate it.
So, to anyone to said it, stop saying that there is HATE on the 1987 series.

The "hate", as people sees it, is more of a will to critique for me, since I think that the the 1987 is not seen in a bad spotlight by me now because "huehuehuehue pizza time, what the hell, childish", no. It's just because it's 70% of the times overrated.

The problem is not the show, is the fandom.
Loving the series is no shame, and reason to be hated, but being too attached to it makes you closeminded. You are not a TMNT fan in this case, you just like one cartoon.
This "closeminded" problem is not only in the 1987 fandom eh, and is not considered that EVERYONE is like that. Even the 2012 and 2003 fandoms have their closeminded members, but being way less than the 1987 ones, they don't come up easily.

It's actually impossible to ask everybody to just not exaggerately stan the 1987 version, but for those who are here (were I think the real TMNT fans are) just try to open yourself on more versions!

[Original TMNT Cartoon Fan]

I think that the "civil war" between the two factions is because the shows have a different kind of age target.

As far as I know, all three main cartoons (Fred Wolf, 4 Kids and Nickelodeon 2012) had the same main audience target (children aged 6–13 something).

[D-ray]

As far as I know, all three main cartoons (Fred Wolf, 4 Kids and Nickelodeon 2012) had the same main audience target (children aged 6–13 something).
Technically, yes, all of the three shows were meant to be cartoons for young viewers. But seeing the plots and the concepts behind the stories, I think that they are very different on this point of view.

- Fred Wolf TMNT is extremely pure, it never goes on heavy arguments. Is usually goofy and fun. I heard some people that completely stopped following it reaching the age of 8/9, so I think it was meant for REALLY young viewers.

- 4Kids TMNT is probably the most mature of all. It starts funny and light, but the chracters are way more seriuous, and the stories as well as their meaning can be pretty deep. I can easily watch it, and re-watch it even now that I'm 19 years old.

- Nickelodeon TMNT is in the middle. It tries to emulate the serious and goofy essence of the Fred Wolf and 4Kids adaptations. Yes, it too touches various arguments, but it does it in a very light way (there are some exceptions tho). This version could easily be seen by 10 or more years old kids.

[Original TMNT Cartoon Fan]

Technically, yes, all of the three shows were meant to be cartoons for young viewers. But seeing the plots and the concepts behind the stories, I think that they are very different on this point of view.

That's another problem. Most attempts to go darker have failed.

The Fred Wolf Cartoon suffered the most from parents complaining over violence during the popularity peak (Seasons 3–7).

Toy companies probably pushed the 4 Kids Cartoon into the sillier Fast Forward and Back to the Sewer direction.

The 2012 Nickelodeon Cartoon went darker as the series progressed, only to end up cancelled and replaced with Rise of the TMNT.

[pferreira]

Ocarina of Time probably don't get as much hate on a Zelda fan forum as 87 TMNT gets hate on this forum. Do people even really talk about 87 TMNT that much on here? I don't think so.Look at the replies to me by Leo656 and neatoman. There's no love towards that series, only saying how rubbish the show is.

By the same token, while I’m trying my hardest not to make mention of the drama also going on in this thread, I will say that I see both sides of the issue. While the apparent consensus that most are only familiar with the 87 cartoon is probably true, those who are familiar with the other eras seem to usually care only about what’s current (even if that’s another problem not unique to this franchise). Those skeptical of this observation of mine need only see how inactive the subforums of the 2003 cartoon and especially the 2012 cartoon are, even despite I personally prefer both of them over what’s current.I have nothing against people liking other iterations of TMNT. That's the difference between me and others here. If I see a thread pop up on the 4Kids series unless I have something to say I care about I avoid the thread as to show respect. No arguments or bashing of TV shows required. Simples. ;)

Some people like bashing and hating more than appreciating.I know some people also support people who bash and complain about something. Not referencing you but others here. It's quite disturbing.

To all the 1987 series fans, could you explain to me what makes that show so great for you? Serious question, I'm not bashing.It feeds into my creativity and imagination but does it with good morals and good humour.

I think that the "civil war" between the two factions is because the shows have a different kind of age target. It's quite simple really: the 4Kids series allows more complex plots but for me the FW series is more enjoyable in animation, humour and plots than the 4Kids series. Doesn't make it better, doesn't make it worse. ;)

[pferreira]

It just seems like without something major, like a new movie that's actually good/great, most people won't let go of the grip on the 1987 show, or even the image of it.But isn't that the same with Star Trek? Every time the media mentions Star Trek they think Captain Kirk. It happens with every major franchise, nobody should feel left out, I don't like films or TV shows a lot of people like or hold as valuable. Just me.

Wasn't Star Wars almost dead by the early 1990's?Late 80's. In the early 90's Heir to the Empire came out and then all the Star Wars video games so that's where the interest came back.

The site beginning life as a shrine to the 87 TMNT series has everything to do with that. Although we've had many eras of the franchise since, The Technodrome has never exactly 'evolved' past it's present purpose: To be a community for fans who grew up on the classic series, hence why a vocal minority of purists here get annoyed that conversation doesn't exactly grow beyond the love for that show.Y'know there's nothing wrong with that. I fully agree we shouldn't just be stuck to talking about the 80's series. Who would want to? Forums should be set up for every TMNT iteration. Ironically the FW series doesn't have a dedicated thread even though the complaints are it gets too much attention but anyway as I said every iteration should get their own spotlight. :)

[LeotheLateBloomer]

In reference to FW, it's the over-reliance of aspects, easter eggs, materials, and merchandise that leaves me feeling severely fatigued from it. It's not so much the quality of the show but more so people associating the entire brand with just that one version.

[D-ray]

In reference to FW, it's the over-reliance of aspects, easter eggs, materials, and merchandise that leaves me feeling severely fatigued from it. It's not so much the quality of the show but more so people associating the entire brand with just that one version.
That was the whole point of my thread.