"A Wrinkle in Time" movie
Has anyone checked this out? Is it any good? It looks like it has "BOMB" written all over it, to me. It seems a little bit telling that variations of the same damn trailer is playing every time I go to the theater, 80% of it talking about how great the crew is, how diverse the cast is, and how wonderful the director is and only about 20% featuring the actual movie... as if they're trying to manufacture another "important" movie. |
The story is not appealing to me, so no I'm not gonna go see it.
|
Quote:
Sounds like a case of another movie that did the book wrong, judging by what I've read. Either way, it's probably much less trying to manufacture anything than the studio realizing they probably had a dud and using the usual tricks to try and get people in opening weekend before reviews and word of mouth killed it off in week two. And the reviews are pretty iffy. Rotten Tomatoes has it pegged at 42%. Apparently it's pretty to look at, but the performances are bleh and it kind of speeds through things, sort of like how The Last Airbender film treated its source material, though probably not to the level of that extreme example. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
I hated it when I read it. Too bad the movie sucks, though.
|
I'm half way through the book now, and I can't say as it's grabbed me yet.
It came highly recommended, but I think it might be the sort of thing that one needs to read at a specific time in one's development to really truly enjoy. Kind of like Catcher in the Rye. It's gotten good reviews from the folks that I know who've seen it. |
Quote:
Quote:
As for Catcher in the Rye, I bought it on a whim at Barnes & Noble when they were having their party for the release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, which I also bought. Catcher is pretty darn good. I was 28 when I bought it and read it, and I'd like to think that I'd enjoy it as a teenager since I find I relate to Holden Caulfield in some ways. |
Quote:
Loved it. It was the first bit of Big L literature that I felt really spoke to me. |
Quote:
This may or may not fall into a category such as Big L, but the way you described the book, that's how I felt about The Outsiders, which I had to read for high school. It was one of four books that was assigned to me for summer reading as an incoming freshman. The others were The Pigman, Eric, and The Pearl. The latter just bored the crud out of me and was a chore to read. |
Quote:
Work of cultural importance. As opposed to say Harry Potter, or Stephen King. When you say Eric, you don't mean the one by Pratchett, do you? Man, I'd have LOVED to have read Pratchett when I was in school. I read The Pearl in Jr High, and it was...weighty. It, like the Scarlet Letter,, and Of Mice and Men, just pissed me off. |
Quote:
|
I think I read Catcher in the Rye in 9th grade. I won 1st place in the district level "Reflections" contest for a short stort I wrote in that vein.
A few years back there was all these reports about unpublished sequels to it that were discovered when the author died. I wonder if we'll ever get to read them. |
I remember reading Catcher in the Rye, The Scarlet Letter, and The Great Gatsby. They are some of worse books I have ever read.
As for this movie, it looks terrible. |
Quote:
|
If it bombs, it will be a shame. I read it as a kid on my own and enjoyed it, but thus far no movie adaptation has ever really done it justice. It's a very difficult story to adapt anyway, and the fact that it is as much about the nature of reality as it is a sci-fi tale makes it hard for some to grasp. I want to see this, but might not get a chance, so I hope it at least does well.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for The Scarlet Letter, I might just stick with Easy A, which is basically a modern version of that book. Quote:
|
Yeah, Easy A, the only good version of the Scarlet Letter.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.