|
I suspect you failed to read my last 4 posts. Im not forcing my opinion to anyone. If someone says Arnold is better actor than Al Pacino or Robert De Niro, Yes I can say his is wrong. Acting is interpreting a written character. AND yes it does matter how much you know about movies, when you do know enough, you will understand what Im talking about. Like I said in my previous post, it's diffrent thing to think Arnold is better actor than say he acts better. He is no a good actor, will never be, but thats not the point. Point is that it is a fact, not opinion that De Niro interprets charcaters better than Schwarznegger. If someone says otherwise, I can easily prove him wrong by telling: watch few of De niros movies and compare them to Arnold Schwarznegger's. Same goes with cheesy writing. It has everything to do how many movies you have seen, Like I have said too many times, you will learn to see the diffrence. I did.
Brilliannt writing is imaginetive, and multidimensional. In SW movies it's flat. And this to can only be recognized after experience. If you like Writing in Star Wars, that is your opinion, but it does not make it brilliant.
About Lucas' directing, Actors themselfs have proved that, enough said.
And About Actor performances, You really need to see the movies I've mentioned to see the diffrence.
This argument leads to no where, as you are unable accept that Good acting or writing is not a question of opinion. Neither is good Dancing for example. If someone constantly falls while dancing, or steps on His Partner's feet, he isn't a good dancer. It's a fact, not opinion. Same goes about writing. When you learn to understand this, you will learn why Some movies get Oscars and some don't.
I have given you more examples, but this is movies we are atliing about, moving pictures. Words can not not prove it, and I understand that. Thats why I have given you the example movies. You need to see them, and compare them to New Star Wars. Thats the only way It can be proved.
|