Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumac
I don't what you mean and I don't know what do you prefer, because, so far it looks like you'd prefer anything thrown your way.
|
Sure you do. I’ve clearly stated it. Even before this.
Quote:
Also, I am complaining about CGI, because, as the time went, from mere tool, which was supposed to support story, it has become a main attraction, supplanting actor performance and good storytelling. Which is the case for most blockbusters.
I don't care about whether effects CGI or not, I care about story being good and CGI being a tool, not the main attraction.
|
Then you’re just assuming it’s that way.
Whether or not it’s terminator. If a story requires scenes/characters that could not be properly made with practical effects then more use of cgi is required.
I guess you could purposely write a movie around practical effects but just for the sake of not using cgi would be a really dumb reason. No need for unnecessary limitations when modern day cgi exists.