[Sumac]

Originally Posted by IndigoErth

You're the weird one who confusingly decided on the Batman angle for some odd reason, as if your leader is somehow immortal and unable to be defeated by real life mortal humans, but sure, okay.

It is totally not weird suggesting some dumb scenarios like "bunch of James Bonds takes out a villain". Just WTF?
Do you have an ability and knowledge to refer to something that is not action movies or comic books?

Originally Posted by IndigoErth

So what are you doing to stop it then? Because what's happening to Ukraine is horrible. Why have people in your nation allowed Putin to even stay in power this long instead of doing whatever was needed to oust him.

I am gonna do nothing, because, I value my life and don't want to end up in jail or in the grave.

But, if you was as brave and decisive, as you pretend to be, I am sure you would come here and tried to stage a protest. After all it is very easy to do, when your enemy exists solely in your head, like those Trump Death Squads, or when when you are sitting in a comfort of your own room on another end of the world.

Sure, show us by example, how to do it. If you dare.

People in my nation are scared of consequences. I do blame them, but I understand why they are afraid. Something seemingly you can't comprehend, which means you either have no-one to care about or just don't care about meaning of your own words.

Originally Posted by Galactus

Other than blind partisan-ship I don't see how anyone could reasonably think this wouldn't have happened under Trump.

Last time, when Russians attempted to do so something funny in Syria, Trump gave an order and those funny Russian mercenaries turned into 200 dead mercenaries. Which is enough of an answer, why Putin hadn't try anything like it, during Trump's rule.

Of course, you conveniently ignore this, because, that's the only thing weaklings like you can do, to no ruin your precious fake ****ing picture of your imbecilic world.

Originally Posted by Galactus

The political right in the US has a multitude of horrible tactics but the ability to distract from big issues by deflecting to culture wars ones has got to be their worst. There's been a sharp rise in white nationalism, a deadly virus has swept across the globe and a bunch of people who thought the former president was communicating with them on a board for anime tried to launch a violent coup on the nations capital that resulted in people dying...and right wing pundits insist the things you should really be mad at are gender pronouns, football players kneeling and whether the green M&M is sexy enough.

Yaaaas, Queeeeeeenn!

Its not like Left constantly make mountains out of molehills, with "what is your identity today - boy, girl or a deer" or "how to chop off your dick, so everyone would think you are a woman" or "why creators should not have right to write Black characters without being Black" or "when its healthy to buy little kids their first dildo"....yeah, very IMPORTANT issues, which concern everyone in the world!!

I wonder why White Nationalism is rising...could it be, because, Left politics make White people felt like citizens of the second class, who should forget their own culture and achievements, just to feel permanently guilty, because, of some **** that had happened few generations ago?

Could it be, because, whenever, someone insists that immigrants should learn local languages and customs and live by the laws of the country they are trying to settle in, Left trash screams that it is "Nazism!!!!1111!".

Could it be, that Left doesn't spend enough on acclimatizing of immigrants and when they become criminals, they blame "nazzzzzzzisms!!!" as the reason why people dare to don't like those poor poor people?

Yes, it is worthy to be mad at "gender pronounce", because, it is insanity, which directly affects kids and weak minded people. And, yes, kneeling in front of anyone, except the queen, is a humiliation. **** that ****.

Originally Posted by Galactus

You don't have to be a raving SJW to realise and understand that the Christian Broadcasting Network might have a very skewed view on this issue. I don't watch much children's television but I'm sure there is an agenda but I don't see that as a bad thing. As acceptance of LGBTQ people slowly happens kids will naturally see more of it in their everyday lives. Their friend with two moms or their teacher who is trans plus some of these kids will grow up and realise they are queer or trans themselves so it's good to have media that so it's a good thing to have programming that says these are things that exist and it's okay. The people getting mad about this were decades ago getting mad at the purple teletubby. We look back and think that was ridiculous as I'm sure people ten years from now will think the criticism of today's kids shows was stupid.

Except it won't change the fact that most queer people are just attention whores and most trans are rapey mentally ill deviants and abusers, who belong to mental asylum. Also, men can't become women. And never will be, so trans won't ever be normal. Good day, sir!

Of course, those cases, where "poor oppressed trans and queers do something bad-bad" won't be widely published, but when this shitshow and pandering will be over, people will see this mountain of **** for what it really is and will be horrified how they could even think about normalizing trans and queer.

But go on, pretend that abusive insanity is normal.

Originally Posted by Leo656

Four year old kids don't need to be told about some stuff. Let them find out about it at a more age-appropriate time.

Spoiler:

This is why we suddenly have a swarm of kids who are so young they need to be reminded not to sh*t their pants declaring themselves to be "LGBTQ" when they couldn't even tell you what it means. Kids that young are only barely capable of independent thought, they mostly parrot what they hear other people say. And if they hear people say, "It's okay for boys to wear dresses and girls to have dicks," they'll repeat that. And again, they don't even know what it means yet. BUT, we're supposed to indulge them and allow them to take experimental hormones and undergo elective surgeries anyway. Which to me is "programming". Which isn't right.

Also, schools think it's MORE important, at present, to teach That Stuff to kids - along with a hefty dose of "Whitey Is The Devil" - instead of things like basic reading, math, and science skills. Kids are graduating high school who can't even read BUT they can tell you the entire history of the LGBTQ "struggle" in detail over the last hundred years. Priorities, at present, are completely skewed, and it starts with what we present to kids.

When kids get closer to puberty, they can start learning about it Then at the same time they start learning about everything else relating to sexuality because that's when it becomes relevant to them. Not at an age when they should still be playing with Legos and sh*t.

Should we just start letting kids as young as three or four watch hardcore porn, "since they're gonna learn about it anyway and there's really nothing wrong with it in the first place, so we may as well normalize it"? Most people would say "No, don't be ridiculous". But it's really not very far away from what people are already pushing for.

Again, people who lean more left have a VERY hard time recognizing that most peoples' points of view aren't black-and-white but rather have many degrees and lots of nuance. Most people who don't want children's programming inundated with Gay Stuff don't have any problem with gay people. They just think it's not appropriate for kids. Just like some of the books that are so controversial in schools at the moment. SOME people want them eliminated altogether, but not MOST people. MOST people simply don't think those books are appropriate for a school library, specifically, especially certain topics which may be put in the hands of people too young for the material. In theory, most of the people protesting said books wouldn't have an issue with them being in a regular public library, they just don't want it in a SCHOOL setting, because in that setting those materials are not appropriate. Just like you wouldn't stock copies of Hustler at your local school library, either.

But again. "Liberals" and "Nuance" are not great bedfellows. You're either "accept everything" or "You're a Bigot".

I can assure you, nobody has less of a problem with gay people than I do. I keep saying this. I just don't think certain things are appropriate for young kids. That doesn't make me or anyone who feels that way a bad person. The fact is, it's how MOST parents feel but they're too scared to say so out loud because of the current social climate. I myself am not a parent, but plenty of people I know are. Including one of my gay friends who has a kid. And HE even thinks this "social programming" stuff is completely bananas and that they shouldn't push it on young kids. Again, he's a gay man in a relationship who's raising a child. In his opinion, some things are not age appropriate for very young children.

I'd love to see someone call him a misguided, closed-minded bigot. He's about 6'4, 275lbs of solid muscle and I can attest from experience that he can throw the average person pretty far. Again, I would LOVE for someone to tell that guy he has the wrong idea about this kind of thing. It'd be fun to watch that "conversation".

100% This.