Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowabung-Gal
Normal people don’t threaten your life after you suspend their Twitter accounts.
If Elon froze their bank accounts or had them evicted from their apartments because of what they tweeted, then yeah, I’d get why they’d threaten him with physical retaliation. But they can survive without Twitter and they can always find other platforms. Before Elon took over, other people have been banned for way less, and to my knowledge, the only thing they threatened Twitter with was a lawsuit, if they felt it was even worth the effort.
But of course we’re talking about ANTIFA here; they feel so threatened by old ladies with walkers that they’ll block them from crossing the street and scream right in their faces (which actually happened in Canada). And threatening to do physical harm to Elon isn’t exactly helping their case, is it?
|
See, you are trying to meet the opinion as it was delivered to you.
The real foundational truth is that people like Indigo and other leftist at large simply assign their own miscalculated mental algebra creating the sum of "violence and threats" simply where it suits them.
But it's simple - threats of violence without room for interpretation can receive private-sector punitive response. However, perceived threats of violence because some is made "uncomfortable" should not receive a punitive response because that is too easily weaponized by people like Indigo or other leftists.
If people continue to meet the conversation on the level that the deranged leftist present it, then everyone is swimming in the pool of interpretation and no one is swimming in the pool of reality.