Then there's also the matter of motive. The first one barely made enough money to justify a sequel, so the whole thing feels like an attempt to adress the most shallow criticism that was the easiest to fix.
There's really no point in denying that shoving all that **** (80% of which was created for the Turtlemania era) into the movie without proper set-up or payoff was nostalgia baiting, accurate or not, making it retroactively seem more like the cartoon was the point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krutch
It's pretty amazing how atrocious that first film was. I'm legitimately still in awe about it. So many bad decisions were made... I get the feeling you could make a movie akin to The Disaster Artist about the making of that film.
|
It's bad but it's still the better of the two where it counts.