![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Were the errors acceptable? (Ignoring wheter or not you found them amusing) | |||
| Yes |
|
15 | 68.18% |
| No |
|
7 | 31.82% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,062
|
Were the production errors actually accceptable?
So we all know the Fred Wolf cartoon had quite a lot of production errors, missing animation, coloring mistakes, layer errors, sound mixing errors, continuity errors within the episodes themselves, etc.
The question is, was this actually acceptable? I'm not talking about wheter or not you found the errors unintentionally amusing, that's just you finding enjoyment in something that ended up in the show and if you find it enjoyable even if it was not intended to be there then that's fine. I'm talking about quality standards here, did the production uphold a decent quality standard? With constant errors I would say not. I have watched through a lot of 80's-90's cartoons and it's kind of scary how many errors many of them contain, so TMNT was not alone in that area and it's actually not quite as bad as it could have been, but even if I know they are old and had a very low budget it's clear to me that such a level of errors can't uphold a decent standard. Because if errors like this: Spoiler:
Can easily be fixed by cutting out a second of footage, yet it's left untouched and thus technically deemed acceptable for broadcast, then that's not a good standard, not even back then. Reminder here, this is not about if you found it unintentionally funny, this about production standards. |
|
|
|
| Tags |
| animation errors, fred wolf |
|
|