The Technodrome Forums

Go Back   The Technodrome Forums > TMNT Universes > TMNT Comic Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2012, 10:39 AM   #21
Cowabunga Carl
Mad Scientist
 
Cowabunga Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,384
But see that is exactly why they could work as new characters in the series. There is no one who would complain if major changes were done to them. I'm not talking about DL showing up soon but eventually Shredder/Krang will have to take a back seat. DL could be a villain to confront after.
Cowabunga Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 11:40 AM   #22
CyberCubed
Overlord
 
CyberCubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,817
Why choose obscure unpopular characters over at least well received ones?

We're far more likely to see 4kids villains like Hun or Bishop than anyone from Next Mutation.
CyberCubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 11:48 AM   #23
Cowabunga Carl
Mad Scientist
 
Cowabunga Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,384
I'm just saying that even though a lot of people seem against the idea, giving some of these characters overhauls couldn't be any worse then they already are. Anything they do with a lot of those characters would be an improvement on them.

I guess in a round about way what I'm really saying is people say that the Turtles don't have a strong rouges gallery and that's why Shredder has to stick around. They actually have a pretty big gallery if people wouldn't be scared to pull from all the different interpretations of TMNT.

I mean we have the Mirage, Image, OT, TNM, Movies, and 4kids. There are a lot of villains and stories that could be told without having to have Shredder and or Krang as the recurring baddie every other arc.
Cowabunga Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:19 PM   #24
Andrew NDB
Weed Whacker
 
Andrew NDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Hob View Post
I'm just saying that even though a lot of people seem against the idea, giving some of these characters overhauls couldn't be any worse then they already are. Anything they do with a lot of those characters would be an improvement on them.

I guess in a round about way what I'm really saying is people say that the Turtles don't have a strong rouges gallery and that's why Shredder has to stick around. They actually have a pretty big gallery if people wouldn't be scared to pull from all the different interpretations of TMNT.

I mean we have the Mirage, Image, OT, TNM, Movies, and 4kids. There are a lot of villains and stories that could be told without having to have Shredder and or Krang as the recurring baddie every other arc.
Even if that were true and not open to debate about the Turtles having a lack of a solid rogues gallery... I'm not so sure going back and digging through their old garbage bins to try and polish turds is the right way to go about it.

I'd rather see what new villains Tom and company can create and bring to the table.
Andrew NDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 02:56 PM   #25
CyberCubed
Overlord
 
CyberCubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,817
I agree, at this point the only other old villains I'd like to see are the staples like Rat King, Leatherhead, Karai and eventually the Triceratons.

Other than maybe Slash, I don't think we should see many other old characters.
CyberCubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 11:17 PM   #26
DonatelloFan
"The Pixel Dad"
 
DonatelloFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,764
I would love to see Shredder and Krang, Bebop and Rocksteady, Slash, etc as villains, but like others have said, if they do it right, they can all be spread out enough to where you don't get tired of them, yet you yearn to see them sometime soon because their badass.

I wasn't a fan of the 2003 series, so I really hope Baxter doesn't go all android or whatever the hell he was. Hell, he's doing good as a human right now. Don't rush things.

Since I haven't read the first, second, and the fourth issues, I'm not seeing what's so great about 'Old Hob', but maybe I'll change my tune when I read those issues.

I never thought I would say this, but yeah, Baxter seems legitimate, and when they bring in Shredder and his goons, as long as they do them right, they'll be some favorites of mine.
__________________
My Pixel Paintings:

On this forum
On Facebook

Samples:

DonatelloFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 11:09 AM   #27
CyberCubed
Overlord
 
CyberCubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonatelloFan View Post
I wasn't a fan of the 2003 series, so I really hope Baxter doesn't go all android or whatever the hell he was. Hell, he's doing good as a human right now. Don't rush things.
Baxter being a cyborg was taken from the Mirage comics, Volume 2. And its too bad you weren't a fan of the 2003 series, it was probably the best cartoon TMNT will ever get compared to the original series or the Nick show.

Quote:
I never thought I would say this, but yeah, Baxter seems legitimate, andwhen they bring in Shredder and his goons, as long as they do them right, they'll be some favorites of mine.
Baxter isn't working for Shredder, at least not now anyway.
CyberCubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 01:06 PM   #28
ToTheNines
Col. Stinkmeaner
 
ToTheNines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberCubed View Post
Baxter isn't working for Shredder, at least not now anyway.
I think he actually is. Just hasn't been revealed yet. I'm banking on #8 to sway me one way or the other on it.
ToTheNines is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.