|
12-04-2017, 07:49 PM | #1 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,256
|
Quentin Tarantino's Star Trek XIV?
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/he...-movie-1064206 And here's an older article from a couple of months ago where he talks about his wish to take "City on the Edge of Forever" and make it feature length, within the Abramsverse (yet remarking that TNG's "Yesterday's Enterprise" is his favorite so ever) : https://www.cinemablend.com/news/170...d-like-to-make I dunno... and Abrams still aboard as producer? Why?
__________________
Last edited by Andrew NDB; 12-04-2017 at 07:56 PM. |
12-04-2017, 07:51 PM | #2 |
Y'all need Jesus
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,938
|
I just want another one of those movies. I love them so much.
|
12-04-2017, 07:56 PM | #3 |
Mutant Tiger
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hialeah, Florida, USA
Posts: 13,816
|
Weren't they gonna do the 4th Star Trek movie, with Kirk meeting his father? who was played by Chris Hemsworth in the first one.
|
12-04-2017, 07:57 PM | #4 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,256
|
That was before Beyond bombed. It was always just talk, probably to tantalize people into getting that "treat" if they turned up to see Beyond... they didn't.
__________________
|
12-04-2017, 08:20 PM | #5 |
Mutant Tiger
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hialeah, Florida, USA
Posts: 13,816
|
I wonder what Quentin Tarantino pitched for the new Star Trek movie, he normally doesn't do these type of movies, he's always done his own stuff, so far he's done two Westerns, and we never seen him tackle Scifi movies, but this would be a first if he does.
|
12-04-2017, 08:52 PM | #6 | |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,256
|
Quote:
Here's where I am on this, I think. Pros: * It will almost undoubtedly be a great movie and highly witty and entertaining. * Tarantino is a huge Trek fan, and of the right kind of Trek. His favorite episode of Trek is TNG's "Yesterday's Enterprise." * It would probably be -- storytelling-wise -- a great bit of course correction from the Abrams flavor of storytelling (explosions! more action! more explosions!). It would show that Trek can work on the big screen in ways other than the Abrams movies. Cons: * From an interview two months ago it sounds like Tarantino wants to pitch a feature-length "City on the Edge of Forever" set in the Abramsverse. In other words... another remake/prequel. * It'll probably be the Abramsverse. * If it's Abramsverse, further cementing that as "modern day Trek," that makes it even less likely that non-Abramsverse/prequel/connections-to-Kirk-and-Spock TV shows will be greenlit. So get ready for a lot more stuff like STD. * While it may be a great done-in-one kind of film, I'm not sure we can put a lot of faith in whoever/whatever follows it will follow suit in kind or do any kind of quality control after Tarantino drops the mic and is done with the film. I mean, he's not going to do the sequel, or helm a TV show afterward. It'll just fall back to Abrams and his cronies.
__________________
Last edited by Andrew NDB; 12-04-2017 at 10:38 PM. |
|
07-02-2018, 08:16 AM | #7 |
Y'all need Jesus
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,938
|
Aw, gay. I thought the movie he was working was the fourth one of the new ones. Sucks if it's a different thing.
|
07-02-2018, 08:19 AM | #8 |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,389
|
The cast is the best part of the Abrams movies so I'm cool with QT using them for his ST movie.....although I think there is less than a 10% chance he ends up doing this movie at all.
|
07-02-2018, 10:18 AM | #9 | |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,256
|
Quote:
The current news is that the Tarantino movie was "presented" as involving all of the Abramsverse cast. So basically Star Trek 4 and 5 of the Abramsverse are being made, with Tarantino doing part 5. Lame! I'd give it 90% odds it happens. Tarantino hasn't ever lobbied to do a franchise movie ever until now. Must mean he's serious.
__________________
Last edited by Andrew NDB; 07-02-2018 at 11:06 AM. |
|
07-02-2018, 10:35 AM | #10 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,393
|
I wonder if it would be best to do one first and see how it goes seen as they are going down this route. I like this cast so I'd take another movie with them but I was happy to also have something separate also, as prev planned.
Can I ask, did discovery flop? I know people on here didn't like it but was that a wide spread thing? Just wondering why they might be apprehensive for something different? Last edited by newfan; 07-02-2018 at 11:01 AM. |
07-02-2018, 11:03 AM | #11 | |
Annalist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
Quote:
But Kurtzmann's contract has been expanded into, like, up to five different Star Trek series. And Stewart's showing interest. And Discovery's getting a second season. Not sure yet if CBS All Access will be a success, but they're damn sure gonna go big or go home... IF all of this materializes.
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
07-02-2018, 11:06 AM | #12 | |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,389
|
Quote:
Has QT even ever directed anything he hasn't also written? |
|
07-30-2018, 04:25 PM | #13 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,256
|
Said to "probably not happen for five or six years" because he's doing Once Upon a Time in Hollywood now.
http://www.darkhorizons.com/tarantin...ll-years-away/ Which doesn't make any sense. That movie will already be released less than a year from now... why would he be occupied for another 4 or 5 years on top of that because of it?
__________________
|
07-31-2018, 02:38 AM | #14 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,393
|
What? Not that eager to do it then.
Might it also be because the other movie is coming first? If that one is still happening that is. |
|
|