Is there a "toxicity" in this fandom?

[IndigoErth]

I'm sensing something akin to a more dictatory form of the kind of being we commonly know as a CyberCube...

[ProphetofGanja]

Originally Posted by RaphaelsIsolation

Nah its cool. I knew my post wouldn't go over well. It's the straight up truth that people don't want to admit.

My opinion is very objective. I supplied lots of things that support what I said. It is not mythical.

It is very assumption based I guess right? But it makes sense. It just does. I'm not here to make people mad or hate people... I'm here to clear the air. My post will stand the test of time.

You might not agree with it, but if you think for a couple seconds. It makes sense. It is several reasons why the TMNT community is testy and toxic at times.

There is literally no such thing as an objective opinion, the two are like, mutually exclusive

[sdp]

In my opinion you're objectively wrong Prophet.

[pferreira]

Originally Posted by plastroncafe

Because it bears repeating, the only common denominator and all of your failed relationships, be them online Forum or in the meats space, is you.

Not sure what applies to me. I'm open minded generally to an extent unless I think it's really bad. Others on the other hand want to control the forums like Trekcore.

Originally Posted by FredWolfLeonardo

I misunderstood you as referring to all failed relationships rather than 1 person with repeated failed relationships.

He posted directly after me. He didn't quote anyone so I thought he meant me which makes no sense considering what I said.

Originally Posted by ProphetofGanja

There is literally no such thing as an objective opinion, the two are like, mutually exclusive

Critical analysis ia always part subjective and objective opinion...but that's just my opinion.

Originally Posted by Powder

There is a whole lotta "toxic" on this page of the thread.

Is it my video link to The Toxic Crusaders intro?

[ProphetofGanja]

Originally Posted by sdp

In my opinion you're objectively wrong Prophet.

Alright, well, enjoy using words incorrectly

[Powder]

Enjoy missing the joke.

[ProphetofGanja]

Let's hope that's what it was. It can be hard to tell on the Drome

[CyberCubed]

[FredWolfLeonardo]

I find it funny though, saying there is no such thing as an objective opinion.

Isn't that in itself an objective claim in it of itself?

[Vegita-San]

Originally Posted by IndigoErth

I'm sensing something akin to a more dictatory form of the kind of being we commonly know as a CyberCube...

I think the all mighty cube will disagree with you and send you to the pit of misery. dilly dilly.

don't worry. i've been in the pit of misery at least ten times this week. you get used to it .

[ProphetofGanja]

Originally Posted by FredWolfLeonardo

I find it funny though, saying there is no such thing as an objective opinion.

Isn't that in itself an objective claim in it of itself?

No, because a fact cannot be an opinion nor vice versa.

I can say "My opinion is that it is raining outside" but that does not make it an opinion, it is a fact (if it is indeed raining outside)

I can say "Chicken pot pie is objectively good" but that is not a fact it is still just an opinion, because some people still may not feel the same

[RaphaelsIsolation]

Ehh...

Don't twist it around. Millennials are people born around the millennium. Hence the name.

It isn't anyone born before or grew up.

It is pretty clear. Don't twist it around far left friend.

Powder. Yes it is. We've never really seen eye to eye, but I always have loved your work man.

I guess in reality... it is my objective opinion based on evidence from life experiences and some factual evidence.

I mean don't be so squirrelly about it.

[Candy Kappa]

Originally Posted by RaphaelsIsolation

Ehh...

Don't twist it around. Millennials are people born around the millennium. Hence the name.

It isn't anyone born before or grew up.

It is pretty clear. Don't twist it around far left friend.

Powder. Yes it is. We've never really seen eye to eye, but I always have loved your work man.

I guess in reality... it is my objective opinion based on evidence from life experiences and some factual evidence.

I mean don't be so squirrelly about it.

Maybe you should read up on the topic beforehand
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials

[CyberCubed]

To be fair millennials should be named for kids born in 2000 or later. No idea why it's used for 80's/90's kids.

[Utrommaniac]

It has nothing to do when you were born, but when you grew up.

I think of it this way:
If you were a young child at the turn of the Millennium and have enough memory or comprehension to recall it, you're a Millennial. It's when a person's formative years were, and for me, as an example, that was more in the early 2000's than the 90's.

[FredWolfLeonardo]

Originally Posted by ProphetofGanja

No, because a fact cannot be an opinion nor vice versa.

I can say "My opinion is that it is raining outside" but that does not make it an opinion, it is a fact (if it is indeed raining outside)

I can say "Chicken pot pie is objectively good" but that is not a fact it is still just an opinion, because some people still may not feel the same

Well people can still have opinions about facts, those would be factually based opinions.

Even if it is raining outside, someone can still have have an opinion about it.

Facts aren't opinions I agree, but opinions can be based in fact. Those are what I refer to when I say "Objective opinions"

[plastroncafe]

However that is a factually incorrect statement. Because opinions by definition are subjective.

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by RaphaelsIsolation

Ehh...

Don't twist it around. Millennials are people born around the millennium. Hence the name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials

Anywhere from 1983 onward.

[FredWolfLeonardo]

Originally Posted by plastroncafe

However that is a factually incorrect statement. Because opinions by definition are subjective.

You can subjectively have an opinion about something objective.

[ProphetofGanja]

Originally Posted by FredWolfLeonardo

Well people can still have opinions about facts, those would be factually based opinions.

Well, no, that would still just be an opinion about a fact, not an opinion based in fact.

Facts are things that are irrefutably true (for the purpose of this conversation we're referring to scientific facts, not facts in the sense of spiritual truths or anything like that). Facts are backed-up by evidence.

It is a fact that humans can only see a small fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum, the portion in between infrared and ultraviolet known as "visible light". My opinion is that it would be cool if we could perceive beyond that, but that does not make it a fact-based opinion. It is just my personal, subjective feeling because I think it would be cool. "Cool" is always a matter of opinion

Originally Posted by FredWolfLeonardo

Even if it is raining outside, someone can still have have an opinion about it.

Facts aren't opinions I agree, but opinions can be based in fact. Those are what I refer to when I say "Objective opinions"

Again, "objective opinions" is an oxymoronic nonsense phrase, like "alternative facts"

Originally Posted by FredWolfLeonardo

You can subjectively have an opinion about something objective.

Could you provide an example?