02-07-2017, 08:42 AM | #61 | |
Thug
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
Reminds me of when someone edited Bee movie to remove bees. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eagjpMz2hHU |
|
02-08-2017, 12:02 AM | #62 |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,255
|
I'm guessing it probably should be. They have Shredder's helmet, Time Scepter and broken canister. I wouldn't call them easter eggs. They're very obviously shown to be trophies along with the new stuff.
Reading through the comments some think it's too different of a movie itself but it could take place a long time after the 90s movies. Things just changed and this is what's happening now. Whether it was officially meant to be doesn't really matter. It works either way.
__________________
Nothing can survive the will to stay alive, cause if you try, you can do anything. |
02-08-2017, 09:00 AM | #63 |
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 392
|
It's CGI. It doesn't belong next to the live action movies.
There's the Original cartoon fro 87-96, 2003 4kids, the 2012 nick toon, and the 2007 movie goes in with those. |
02-08-2017, 10:03 AM | #64 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,279
|
This thread remains pretty dumb. TMNT (2007) was widely lauded as a continuation of at least TMNT I and II by the writer/director when it came out, and then we saw the movie and it even had TMNT III stuff in there, too. Period. Non-issue.
"B-but maybe it can take place in the 2K3 TMNT ser -- " No. "B-but there was stuff in the Mirage prequel comics tha -- " No. "B-but it's CGI so it can't possibly be a sequel to -- " No. Stop it. It's TMNT 4, not just for all intents and purposes but going off of every press release, every interview with Munroe on the matter.
__________________
|
02-08-2017, 10:29 AM | #65 | |
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
__________________
"Einstein did his best stuff when he was working as a patent clerk!" - Dr. Peter Venkman, Ghostbusters |
|
02-08-2017, 11:15 AM | #66 | |
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 392
|
Quote:
BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ No dude, a CGI movie is separate from the live actions. You can twist it around however you see fit, it just doesn't make any sense. It isn't really in line with anything else. Yeah it was a movie, but when its CGI and not live actions like the rest of the "movies" to me, it's just a really long cartoon episode. You can't have 5 live actions movies then have 1 CGI movie and consider them in the same group. You just can't. What? What? |
|
02-08-2017, 11:25 AM | #67 | |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,279
|
Quote:
You're a moron.
__________________
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:51 AM | #68 |
The Agenda of Existing
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vikingland
Posts: 14,596
|
So a different medium is what makes it noncanon? That's some of the dumbest stuff I've read on the 'Drome, and I've seen some **** in this place
|
02-08-2017, 12:07 PM | #69 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,831
|
I guess when I watch the CGI TMNT movie, I don't feel like I'm watching a sequel to the first three movies. The stuff in the trophy room just seems like nods to the three live movies. I'm not saying the movie is or is not a sequel to the other three. I'm just saying it's not the impression that I get when I watch the movie.
|
02-08-2017, 12:15 PM | #70 | |
Annalist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
Quote:
Medium means jack; writer/creator intent means EVERYTHING.
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
02-08-2017, 12:21 PM | #71 |
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 392
|
Seriously? I never said it was non-canon.
It is canon... but it can't be grouped in with the live action movies... because it i s n ' t a live a c t i o n movie.. moron what? I never said it was non-canon. Sounds like a bunch of liberals flooding things into other's mouths. I never said the storyline didn't include anything from the 1st 3 movies. I never said that. I never said the director was lying. I never said any of that. What I did say t00lboy is that a CGI film shouldn't be grouped with the 1st 3 live actions movies... it is too different. You're abrasive tone Andrew got you smacked in my post. Glad I got the "you're a moron" reply. Proves my point... salt just sprinkled from your mouth |
02-08-2017, 12:33 PM | #72 |
The Iron Dinosaur
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Studio Snowlion HQ
Posts: 3,021
|
So, what does "grouped" mean in this context then, and what does being "liberal" have to do with any of this (does EVERYTHING have to be about politics now)?
I don't think we should be calling each other "morons", but I have to disagree with you on this. |
02-08-2017, 12:37 PM | #73 | ||
The Agenda of Existing
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vikingland
Posts: 14,596
|
That is what you are implying when you are writing this:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-08-2017, 12:40 PM | #74 |
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 392
|
LoL
Talk about twisting someone's words around. A CGI movie that came out like 14 years after the previous film that isn't live action like the previous 3 is a standalone. It's canon sure. Of course it is, but it isn't TMNT #4. |
02-08-2017, 12:45 PM | #75 |
Big Blue Boy Scout
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 4,484
|
Turtles Forever saw them as seperate universes
|
02-08-2017, 12:49 PM | #76 |
The Agenda of Existing
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vikingland
Posts: 14,596
|
TF also showed artworks from the same universe as "separate universes" so that's not really all that substantial.
|
02-08-2017, 12:54 PM | #77 |
Big Blue Boy Scout
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 4,484
|
I personally enjoy having them both be in the same universe, as it gives the 2007 turtles backstory and depth. Its cool thinking they were the same ones who fought Shredder in the 1990 film, or the ones who fought Razhar and Tokka in the secret of the Ooze. Same goes for the 80s series and the 2 part OVA in Japan.
|
02-08-2017, 01:47 PM | #78 | ||
[sic]
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,098
|
You don't need to gang up on him. He's obviously having trouble understanding.
First of all, RaphaelsIsolation, I agree that it is not a sequel to the trilogy. But saying it's because of the CGI is a fallacy. The 2007 movie has prequels that are black and white comic books... different medium, same continuity. Quote:
Yes, that counts for something. (Personally I think it was his lazy way of saying that these turtles have a past and you need a mild working knowledge of TMNT going in). You can file the director's saying so in the "for" side of the "for and against list". But let's talk about the "against": - Not a single returning voice actor or attempt to mimic live action cast. - Not a single familiar musical cue. - Completely different aesthetic design. - Not a single returning original character from the trilogy (Penningtons, Stern, Keno, Tatsu) - Not titled TMNT 4. - Clearly takes place in the mid-2000's, yet only 2-3 years have passed since the early 90's? - Splinter has both ears. All that right there speaks WAY more to the "writer/creator intent" than any bullcrap answer given to some IGN interviewer. Quote:
|
||
02-08-2017, 02:56 PM | #79 |
Hench Mutant
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 392
|
Wait? What?
I'm saying that TMNT 2007 is canon. They were trying to twist it around that I was saying that it wasn't canon. I mean who thinks TMNT 2007 isn't canon? I don't. I guess TO The NInes thinks it is non-canon in the TMNT universe. That's cool |
02-08-2017, 03:07 PM | #80 | |||||||
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,279
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And I'm not sure they could have included Danny, or Tatsu, or Pennington any more than IDW or Nick can even if they wanted to (i.e., they legally can't). Last I heard those character rights were tied up with Golden Harvest or whatever. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Andrew NDB; 02-08-2017 at 03:21 PM. |
|||||||
Tags |
tmnt 2007 |
|
|