08-03-2021, 01:41 AM | #61 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,393
|
I remember reading that the idea for the first Star Trek movie came because of the success of Star Wars, not sure if it was entirely that.
|
08-03-2021, 01:45 AM | #62 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,274
|
I think it was 2001: A Space Odyssey if anything. Though maybe the success of Star Wars moved the money along a little faster.
__________________
|
08-03-2021, 06:17 AM | #63 |
I Married a Duck!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The bowels of Hell, Texas(otherwise known as Decatur)
Posts: 8,772
|
When I can run into Klingons at a Ren faire, but never a Ninja Turtle, PRETTY sure Trek tops TMNT in popularity. And these were full makeup, costume, batleth and all Klingons.
__________________
"You IDIOTS! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -from "Spaceballs" "Where Science ends, magic begins." -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491 My various stories and fan-fics are now here- https://m.fanfiction.net/u/4770494/#end |
08-03-2021, 07:02 AM | #64 |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,050
|
The only way I can people not being aware how huge Star Trek is:
1. You grew up in a foreign country that didn't have Star Trek aired on TV 2. You're a zoomer who grew up in the mid-2000's (and that's not anyone here, since almost everyone here is around 30 years old or older), long after the peak of the series and after Enterprise ended. Kirk and Spock are literally pop culture icons. |
08-03-2021, 07:38 AM | #65 |
Mad Scientist
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,393
|
I remember loosing an argument once with someone over who between Kirk and Spock stood out more to non-Trek fans, I thought it would be Spock (though really looking back I might not think the same, pretty joint though) Anyway I went into to work and asked the office 'those who don't care about Star Trek, when I say Star Trek what's the first thing (besides some insulting choice words) that comes to mind' They all said Captain Kirk, don't remember if I went back and told the person they were right
So far as the title of the thread, I mean if we are comparing with the number of people everywhere who don't care about it then yeah fans will be the the smaller number but given all the content and amount of conventions obviously a lot of people like it. Not sure how it sits with the youngest generation or how Discovery is doing though. (still not watched that myself) Last edited by newfan; 08-03-2021 at 07:50 AM. |
08-03-2021, 08:32 AM | #66 | |||
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
I'm not saying Star Trek isn't big, it just isn't as well known as other franchises or as recognizable as others and not that relevant worldwide.
Tarzan was a huge property, people will know who he is, but is he bigger than TMNT? Certainly in being recognizable but at this stage most people know him because of parodies and Tarzan isn't doing the same amount of money as TMNT. It's a relic of the past. Yeah, star trek has shows, so there's money to be made there and a dedicated audience. but I don't think it's that big, hell this topic exists because of that very reason. "Not that many people like star trek..." and I agree. Quote:
DO we know how much they've made in licensing from star trek? I'm sure it's plenty but is it TMNT fad big? It doesn't require a lot to keep a franchise from making books and model kits, different business model than mass retail. I mean perhaps Star Trek does make more from licensing, I don't know the numbers but I somehow doubt it. Quote:
Quote:
I grew up in the 90s and knew of Star Trek's existence but it certainly wasn't a thing that appealed to me or any of my friends of elementary school age. It wasn't until high school that I knew of a "trekkie", granted I lived in a relatively small city in the midwest but there's no problems with most other franchises. Yeah, people might know what Star Trek is, that's different from being fans of the franchise. I know who the monster of the black lagoon is, he is an icon but i've never seen a movie and i doubt people are making much money on that despite how iconic it may be, it's not bigger or profitable TMNT which was my original quote, despite perhaps more people recognizing that face. Besides isn't star trek just running on fumes based off Star Trek and TNG and keep rehashing that same idea. The air bud series of movies had 14 movies, does that make it a huge franchise? If zoomers can't recognize Star Trek much then perhaps it's for a reason, it hasn't been able to stay relevant. |
|||
08-03-2021, 09:20 AM | #67 |
The Franchise
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,696
|
You literally only exist to post provably-wrong things.
The TMNT franchise would need a rocket up its metaphorical ass to come anywhere close to matching Star Trek's fanbase in either number or passion. Star Trek fans at their most dedicated make countless fan films and shows. TMNT fans, at their most dedicated, write slash fiction. It's not even a contest.
__________________
"I left some words quite far from here to be a short reminder... I laid them out in stone, in case they need to last forever..." "But hey... I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know." nWo Tech: The Official Thread Poison of the Technodrome Forums https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxr...awnHgDz1ceDcfA https://theroxxshow.blogspot.com/ |
08-03-2021, 10:54 AM | #68 |
Overlord
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,009
|
Come to think of it, I don't remember seeing or hearing much about Star Trek back when I lived in Mexico. I think I caught episodes of Deep Space Nine (idk if that's one, the one with the female Captain where they're lost in space somewhere and are trying to get back?) on the American channels, which don't count lol. I seem to recall seeing the Generations movie too.
Idk I'm sure the new movies made it down there but I'm not sure about the actual series.
__________________
"I was down with TMNT once, but then they changed what TMNT was. Now what I was down with is no longer TMNT and what TMNT now is seems weird and scary. And it'll happen to YOU." Check out my blog for Comic Reviews and other things. https://markepicblogofrandomness.blogspot.com/ I also started The AEW Crew, the All Elite Wrestling Fan Club! https://www.facebook.com/groups/637508120044168/ |
08-03-2021, 11:02 AM | #69 |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,050
|
I guess Star Trek isn't big in the Latin American countries? I wonder why hispanics don't like it, as far as I can tell they like Star Wars, anime, and DC/Marvel movies. Maybe the plots are too scientific for people?
It's weird you go south of the border and all of a sudden interests change, when those same people could live in the U.S. and it'd be no difference. |
08-03-2021, 11:15 AM | #70 |
Emperor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 6,991
|
|
08-03-2021, 12:04 PM | #71 | |
Overlord
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,009
|
Quote:
__________________
"I was down with TMNT once, but then they changed what TMNT was. Now what I was down with is no longer TMNT and what TMNT now is seems weird and scary. And it'll happen to YOU." Check out my blog for Comic Reviews and other things. https://markepicblogofrandomness.blogspot.com/ I also started The AEW Crew, the All Elite Wrestling Fan Club! https://www.facebook.com/groups/637508120044168/ |
|
08-03-2021, 01:05 PM | #72 |
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
Ok, Europe and Latinamerica and the midwest, so that's a good chunk of the world then.
Again I'm not saying Star Trek isn't big, or people don't know what star trek is. I asked in what way Star Trek was bigger than TMNT. Pop culture and worldwide recognition? More people recognize the name Ninja Turtles, I'd definitely argue that, it's been more than 30 years, the kids who grew up with it all know what it is and the original parents who bought it for their kids in the 90s also know, that's a huge chunk of the population. Profitability? I don't have numbers but with the cashcow that TMNT is and all the licensing deals it gets I don't see how it's any more. And I was asking a question, I don't think it is but i've never been into trek and i've never really met people in real life besides one nerd in HS about it. I've lived in 3 different countries, and talked to geeks all the time and only have met trekkies online. Power Rangers has had shows and movies since it came out, that doesn't mean it's a huge brand, it's big and has been bigger the last few years now that it's finally nostalgic cool to like power rangers. |
08-03-2021, 01:31 PM | #73 | |
Emperor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 6,991
|
Quote:
I.P.'s On T.V. Star Trek = 7 Shows Since 1966 | I'm fairly confident all of them aired on primetime T.V. slots TMNT = 5 Shows Since 1987 | I'm fairly confident that either none or one of them aired on primtime T.V. slots I.P.'s On Film Star Trek = 13 Theatrical Films | $2,266,907,732 Franchise Worldwide TMNT = 6 Theatrical Films | $1,149,359,568 Franchise Worldwide Now just from the heuristics involved here, these numbers speak quite a bit. Also note that Star Trek had comic book publication going as far back as Gold Key and spanned I think at least 4 different publishers. TMNT was an obscure publication nearly all the way through it's Mirage days. The toy sales thing would be interesting. Without even looking it up, I'd imagine that Playmates TMNT outsold Playmates Trek, but right there you've got some comparison of sales from Playmates alone. Trek has had several action figure/toy lines and has a huge "high end collector" presence - I'd argue much greater than TMNT's. You are using a metric of "word of mouth" recognition; but I mean.... I've never seen a TMNT-centered convention/show. Never. Trek is present everywhere and has a myriad of it's own convention gatherings worldwide. I think the only place that TMNT has probably ever beat Trek would be specifically on sales of Playmates toys, of which quite frankly TMNT probably deserves the win there. Somebody inclined to argue or to try to look clever might observe something like "well Trek had twice as many movies and by the numbers if TMNT had 6 more movies it would surpass Trek at the Box Office." But see - that's just it - Trek has had 13 movies most which were born of the 80's and 90's. TMNT had three movies born of the 80's and 90's. Trek is simply the bigger franchise, no caveats. Someone could argue that Trek is "only bigger because it came first", which... doesn't matter, it's still bigger. Also, I have no real stake in this. So replies building an argument against this as if I've woven an attack on TMNT? Please just go and do that idiot-savant $#!( somewhere else. Any other replies in discussion, absolutely invited. Last edited by IMJ; 08-03-2021 at 01:40 PM. |
|
08-03-2021, 01:44 PM | #74 | |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,274
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
08-03-2021, 09:58 PM | #75 | |
I Married a Duck!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The bowels of Hell, Texas(otherwise known as Decatur)
Posts: 8,772
|
Quote:
Dude, do you even KNOW how much merchandising and licensing Star Trek as a franchise HAS? There is literally Trek merch for EVERYTHING. Watches, costumes, face masks, cookbooks, figures, the list is endless. And fanbase? There are Star Trek conventions FOR A REASON. It is literally known and loved WORLDWIDE! The actors are celebrity icons! To the point that many went on to careers in acting in other movies and tv series BECAUSE of Star Trek. (Heck, there are probably very FEW people who HAVEN'T heard of Kirk, Spock, and probably Picard and Data AT LEAST, if one were to judge by the sheer number of memes alone!) And I'm sorry, but even zoomers know what Trek is, thanks to the reboot movies and Discovery, Picard, and other new material. Many have probably seen at least ONE of the older series on any number of broadcast cast channels that air them even now, or on multiple streaming services. As with the movies, as well. This is not a franchise "running on fumes". It has an actual exhibit in THE SMITHSONIAN! A cultural phenomenon that lasted decades, rather than just a few short years, as TMNT at its peak did. It has its own languages, culinary and cultural development, history and even coined the idea of the "Mirror-verse" that has since become a sci-fi trope. There is literally NO CONTEST when it comes to which is more popular or well known. It's still just as relevant now- with three new movies and two new series released within the last six years, as it's ever been. TMNT has NEVER had that kind of relevance, save for the brief point in it's prime in the beginning of the 90s.
__________________
"You IDIOTS! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -from "Spaceballs" "Where Science ends, magic begins." -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491 My various stories and fan-fics are now here- https://m.fanfiction.net/u/4770494/#end |
|
08-04-2021, 10:15 AM | #76 |
The King of Kings
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 2,931
|
How is this even comparable? Doesn't Star Trek lean more towards the "sweaty 30+ year old basement dwelling virgins" while TMNT is skewed more towards children? They occupy completely different facets of pop culture, so comparing TV slots, movies, and conventions just seems kind of weird. I've personally never met a single Star Trek fan my age nor have I ever really heard it be brought up in day to day conversations by anyone.
Star Trek by far has the more dedicated fanbase as that is pretty much the nature of anything sci-fi, but I don't know if I necessarily believe it's more culturally recognizable or more popular than Ninja Turtles. I feel like Ninja Turtles just has a far wider reach because it falls into the same category as stuff like Marvel and DC and therefore has a more casual and generic appeal across the board instead of one very large passionate group of fans.
__________________
|
08-04-2021, 11:49 AM | #77 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,129
|
Star Trek is a cultural icon, which had an enormous influence on a real world.
TMNT, with all due respect, is a kid's franchise and while being phenomenon in its own right, it is nowhere near close to the popularity and influence of ST. |
08-04-2021, 02:21 PM | #78 | |
I Married a Duck!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The bowels of Hell, Texas(otherwise known as Decatur)
Posts: 8,772
|
Quote:
The fact that Trek IS more of an adult franchise is exactly WHY it's so much bigger. Kids tend to grow out of their fandoms, thus TMNT has had a couple of short-lived flashpoints, as the kids of those generations aged out of it, but Trek is perennially popular. The same people who were fans 20 or 40 years ago, are STILL fans now, casual or not. And it is much more sophisticated story and theme wise (save a few bits here and there in the comics with TMNT) which means that it can be enjoyed by MULTIPLE generations and age groups, and cna and DOES provoke serious discussions and thoughts by fans.
__________________
"You IDIOTS! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -from "Spaceballs" "Where Science ends, magic begins." -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491 My various stories and fan-fics are now here- https://m.fanfiction.net/u/4770494/#end |
|
08-04-2021, 04:31 PM | #79 | |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,949
|
Quote:
Other than that I agree Star Trek is way bigger than TMNT. The franchise exists in an odd cultural space that most people have heard of it but few know much about it. Of those that do some people look at like a legitimate action adventure franchise like something from Marvel or DC whereas as other think of it more like the Muppet Babies. |
|
08-04-2021, 04:45 PM | #80 |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,050
|
Star Trek fans were also like the first big fandom in the west, right? "Trekkies" were huge even before the internet, which is shocking because before the internet it was much harder to discuss your interests with people outside of conventions or whatever.
|
|
|