08-17-2021, 02:42 PM | #1 |
Thug
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 74
|
April O'Neil comes out as pansexual.
At least her actress does anyways. But I can see the character identifying as such as well. I can see her being able to fall in love with all genders... and certain purple bandanad turtles.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...140740777.html |
08-17-2021, 02:56 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,129
|
Old joke, but I don't know what is so interesting about sex with kitchen utensils.
|
08-17-2021, 02:57 PM | #3 | |
Mutant Tiger
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hialeah, Florida, USA
Posts: 13,820
|
Quote:
|
|
08-17-2021, 03:27 PM | #4 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,278
|
"Pansexual" is really a strange thing. Since they're not bisexual (which they can't be, right? since whether we bring transgender people into the equation, we're supposed to look at them as one gender or the other, right?) the general definition seems to be "they're sexually attracted to/will f*** anything."
So... yeesh. Animals and small children, too? Where is the line, exactly?
__________________
|
08-17-2021, 03:48 PM | #5 | |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,056
|
Here's the definition:
Quote:
|
|
08-17-2021, 04:18 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,619
|
Mae Whitman.
No one needs to click the link now. |
08-17-2021, 04:26 PM | #7 |
Team Blue Boy
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: U.S., East Coast
Posts: 15,242
|
|
08-17-2021, 04:27 PM | #8 | |||
Emperor
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 9,460
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
... How about this:
In practice there is no difference between a bisexual and a pansexual but the underlying psychology is different. |
|||
08-17-2021, 05:12 PM | #9 |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,056
|
Technically aren't bisexuals also only female? I've never heard of a male bisexual. If a man has sex with another man, he's gay for life. There's no going back.
|
08-17-2021, 05:18 PM | #10 |
Emperor
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 9,460
|
Are you talking about social perception here or is that something you really believe?
|
08-17-2021, 05:28 PM | #11 |
Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 41,056
|
I mean a man can sleep with both a woman and another man, but once he "goes gay" it's pretty obvious he's gay. Even if he dates another woman after. Then the bisexual aspect disappears and it becomes a gay man.
|
08-17-2021, 05:33 PM | #12 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,278
|
"Being pansexual myself, I wish I had such incredible characters like Amity and Luz in my life when I was growing up." - Mae Whitman.
But... why?
__________________
|
08-17-2021, 06:29 PM | #13 | |
Foot Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,990
|
Quote:
You really are sheltered, jesus christ.
__________________
Last Movie Watched: Hell House LLC (2015). Last TV Show Watched: Adventures of Sonic The Hedgehog (S1:E29). |
|
08-17-2021, 06:38 PM | #14 | |
Emperor
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 9,460
|
Quote:
The show can look nice and has decent voice acting but the character development and world building is nothing but contradictory garbage. |
|
08-17-2021, 06:41 PM | #15 |
Weed Whacker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 29,278
|
He might be.
__________________
|
08-17-2021, 07:12 PM | #16 |
Megan Fox = April
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 9,999
|
I think you guys are missing the bigger picture here, does this make Donnie x April canon now?
People always shrugged this scene off as being non-canon but I think this make sit canon. She wouldn't be the first either, the adult Ninja Turtles movie April is also pansexual |
08-18-2021, 02:22 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,129
|
Two minutes of being serious about retarded queer crap:
"Pansexual" is a meaningless term, since it mixes gender presentation and sexuality, which are not connected (i.e. tomboyish / butch woman is not necessarily Lesbian, effeminate man not necessarily Gay). It means that you are attracted to people regardless of their sex and presentation, but the thing is, there is already a term for it "Bisexuality", which perfectly, and most importantly, without relying on stereotypes explains such attractions. Especially since nothing in "Bisexuality" specifically says anything about gender presentation. Also, term itself, "Pansexual", hints that it ties to sexuality not a gender stereotypes. Thus it is inherently confusing in itself and contradicts its meaning. Its basically another fictional term to confuse people and brainwash them into believing that queer stuff is real, when most of those terms and ideas are just obtuse and redundant terms, not based on reality, but on some "queer science experiments", which are as factual as studies about possible green people on Mars. |
08-18-2021, 09:50 AM | #18 |
The Franchise
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,696
|
Yeah, I'unno, to me "pansexual" just comes off as "Bisexual is old-fashioned and we need a newer, hipper label for it."
I mean maybe neatoman's onto something with the "underlying psychology" thing, but I'unno. To me it's still the same thing in practice. If you have sex with both chicks and dudes, the "why" isn't especially relevant. So I'm not sure why we need additional labels. Except for attention, of course. I also agree with someone in the Comments section of that article: What would REALLY be "news" nowadays would be a person - especially a celebrity - "coming out" as Straight. Because THAT is something you just plain don't see or hear about anymore. -------- Also, even though Cubed is just doing his usual sh*t-stirring gimmick, I did have to think about it for a minute, and y'know... just anecdotally, I am forced to admit that in my personal circle, most of the "bisexual" people I know are in fact women, whereas most of the guys who aren't straight tend to be "just Gay". I know a very small number of guys who would say they were bisexual (or "pansexual", I guess), but if you didn't know them and just met them for the first time, you'd just assume they were totally "gay" based on how they present themselves; you wouldn't know that they also liked girls unless you got into a conversation with them about it. I don't personally know any guys, I don't think, who are "quietly" bisexual, only "Flamboyant to the point where you'd assume they were Gay until proven otherwise." Whereas plenty of the girls I know who are bi don't exactly project it (although some do). Very strange. I admit, this is entirely anecdotal, but it is something I realized the longer I thought about it. I don't know. Cubed's assertation of "men can't be bisexual" is Obvious Bullsh*t, BUT, there's an asterisk next to it. Men seem to adhere more strictly to labels than women do, so maybe that's part of it. Like they tend to see things in more black-or-white terms just in general, so perhaps it's simply that more men don't consider going both ways as an option and prefer the "simplicity" of either being one or the other. Things are very confusing nowadays.
__________________
"I left some words quite far from here to be a short reminder... I laid them out in stone, in case they need to last forever..." "But hey... I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know." nWo Tech: The Official Thread Poison of the Technodrome Forums https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxr...awnHgDz1ceDcfA https://theroxxshow.blogspot.com/ Last edited by Leo656; 08-18-2021 at 10:01 AM. |
08-18-2021, 10:14 AM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,619
|
Quote:
|
|
08-18-2021, 10:58 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,831
|
So I actually kind of agree with Cubed on this one. Girls are far more likely to go through experimental phases like in college, where they might date a girl. However, said girl isn't really gay. Just going through an experimental phase. Yet a guy is only gonna have sex with another man if he is definitively, unquestionably gay.
|
|
|