PDA

View Full Version : Leonardo Life/Death question!


Spacefille
06-24-2007, 11:02 PM
Hi guys, I'm here with a question I've already asked people on my lj community but I got a wide range of replies and am curious to know what the rest of the TMNT fan community had to say!

Anyway the question is this... in a hypothetical situation of your making Leonardo is faced with a life and death choice. All three of his brothers are about to die and he can only save ONE of the three in time.

Which brother would Leonardo choose to save?

Courk
06-24-2007, 11:17 PM
What a heartbreaking situation! Whatever choice he made, it'd rip him up.

I don't think Raph would let Leo save him. Raph protects his brothers and I think would rather die than get himself rescued at the others' expense.

So between Donnie and Mikey... I'm really not experienced enough with the turtles in general universes to make the soundest of judgments here. If I can assume that Mikey is seen as the innocent one in most incarnations, I'd say Mikey would be saved.

I can picture Donnie saying something like, "No, I'm hurt too badly. The others are more likely to survive, save them" but my interpretation of the question is that they're all equally likely to survive, so Donnie would have no truthful basis to say this. He could lie, though.

Revan
06-25-2007, 12:11 AM
:(
Good question. I think Leo feels the deepest affection for Raphael. I think Leo would feel pulled toward saving Raph due to their special bond. If it's purely a decision Leo must make I say he chooses Raph. However, if Raph had anything to say about it, he would make Leo choose again like Courk said.

I think Raph and Don would be the two turtles to give up their lives to save their brothers.

Courk
06-25-2007, 12:40 AM
I think Raph and Don would be the two turtles to give up their lives to save their brothers.
I was thinking along those lines, too, but it didn't sit right with me. I think Mikey would do anything to save his brothers, too, I just don't know if he's ever really thought about it. I can imagine the other 3 thinking about it in private and deciding that, yes, they would die for their family. I don't see Mikey having those thoughts. When a situation like this presented itself, he'd have to think about it for even the most fleeting of moments merely because he hadn't thought about it before. In that time, the others would have already given up their lives because they had spent the time thinking about it long beforehand. I think it's fairer to say that Raph and Donnie have probably prepared themselves more to give up their lives for their brothers than Mikey has, but that Mikey would reach the same conclusion if he ever spent the time considering it.

Leo's decision depends a bit on how much time he has to think. Rescuing someone from a burning building leaves less time for thought than planning a rescue from captivity that can only succeed for one. Without being able to communicate with his brothers and having to make a quick decision, I agree that Leo would be more likely to choose Raph. However, if he even had a few minutes to think, I think he'd at least try to consider what all his brothers would wish, and I think he could come to the conclusion that Raph and Donnie are more prepared to die.

I wanted to point out that Leo has another option, too. He could join his brothers in death. However, given that he can save one, I don't think he'd be selfish enough to genuinely consider it. As much as it would hurt him to have to choose like that, I think he'd rather live with that pain knowing he did manage to save one brother than knowing he let them all die because he was afraid to lose some of them.

Revan
06-25-2007, 12:48 AM
I was thinking along those lines, too, but it didn't sit right with me. I think Mikey would do anything to save his brothers, too, I just don't know if he's ever really thought about it. I can imagine the other 3 thinking about it in private and deciding that, yes, they would die for their family. I don't see Mikey having those thoughts. When a situation like this presented itself, he'd have to think about it for even the most fleeting of moments merely because he hadn't thought about it before.

Way to cover yourself:lol: I agree, it's hard to imagine any of the turtles not willing to give their life for their family because we have been shown how much they all love each other. aww:roll: But yeah.

I wanted to point out that Leo has another option, too. He could join his brothers in death. However, given that he can save one, I don't think he'd be selfish enough to genuinely consider it. As much as it would hurt him to have to choose like that, I think he'd rather live with that pain knowing he did manage to save one brother than knowing he let them die because he was afraid to lose them.
I hate to pull from SAINW because it just doesn't seem real to me but in that ep, Leo tells Raph that he had to make a choice... Save splinter, or save his brothers. And Leo doesn't seem to regret his decision. Raph tries to tell Leo that Leo made the wrong choice, but Leo can live with his decision. I think Leo realizes that it's not his fault that $h*t happens. He knows when life messes with you, you have to do the best you can and in SAINW Leo did that. Leo seemed ok with himself, he doesn't yeild to Raph's speculation. He sticks behind his decision. I suppose I'm just trying to say, that Leo can live with the outcome of his decision if he had to choose a brother to save.

Spacefille
06-25-2007, 01:57 AM
I hate to pull from SAINW because it just doesn't seem real to me but in that ep, Leo tells Raph that he had to make a choice... Save splinter, or save his brothers. And Leo doesn't seem to regret his decision. Raph tries to tell Leo that Leo made the wrong choice, but Leo can live with his decision. I think Leo realizes that it's not his fault that $h*t happens. He knows when life messes with you, you have to do the best you can and in SAINW Leo did that. Leo seemed ok with himself, he doesn't yeild to Raph's speculation. He sticks behind his decision. I suppose I'm just trying to say, that Leo can live with the outcome of his decision if he had to choose a brother to save.

Hey there. I haven't really been throwing my two cents into this one because reading people's takes on the question is very interesting, but since we're talking 2k3 toon... they spent 4 episodes on him being upset over the fact that his brothers MIGHT have been killed during the Shredder fight. I think it would take him quite a long time for him to be able to get over the fact that he made a decision to save one brother over another even if he couldn't save them both. My take on it of course... ^^

Scandia
06-25-2007, 05:54 AM
Wow, what a hard question.

Personally, I don't think any of his 3 brothers would let him choose him over the other two.

So it may have to boil down to whomever is in better shape of the trio. That way they may even be able to save a third brother.

EDIT- Thinking about it, I have realized that if this situation were to happen, both Donatello AND Raphael would insist that Leonardo saves Michelangelo. While Mikey may ask Leo to save someone else as well, the fact that both Donnie and Raph would agree to save Mikey because he's the youngest would probably lead Leo to save Mikey indeed.

The Shelf
06-25-2007, 08:43 AM
I'm gonna have to go with Mike as well simply because Raph would refuse to be saved with such a heated passion that Leo would have to pass him by, and Don would give Leo a perfectly logical reason why Mike or Raph would be the better choice to save. Mike wouldn't really be able to provide a reason why he shouldn't be saved, but I think he'd become astronomically more serious after the fact. He wouldn't be his innocent, happy self for a very long time, and Leo would just go all loner on everyone and meditate off in a jungle somewhere.

I think the real question here is, would any of the dying turtles deliberately kill themselves so that Leo wouldn't have to make a choice? Eh, eh? I think Raph would. Don might, knowing how much Leo would beat himself up over having to choose which brother to save. I just can't see Mike doing something like that, though. Honestly, it's hard to judge what Mike would say or do at all since so many versions of him are the happy, innocent type, and I'm not familiar enough with his Mirage/Image incarnations to determine exactly what he would do.

Ava Collier
06-25-2007, 09:01 AM
You...broke my feelings.

Scandia
06-25-2007, 09:04 AM
Absolutely NOT. That would only make things worse. That would make Leo feel even guiltier. It's with all 4 Turtles and Splinter surviving and Leo has this shell shock and guilt in the NT- imagine if another Turtle did commit suicide. They do not use the euphemism "doing something irrational" arbitrarily- there is a reason for it.

If another Turtle did risk his life to save that of another, and thus end up losing his life as a result, it is another story.

Buslady
06-25-2007, 09:13 AM
I think no matter what the case, Leo would attempt to save them all or die trying. Cos his brothers(&sensei) are the most important people in his life. He would die rescuing them all. Who would he reach for first, that depends on the situation.

The Shelf
06-25-2007, 10:58 AM
You...broke my feelings.

I'm sorry. :cry:

Absolutely NOT. That would only make things worse. That would make Leo feel even guiltier.

It would only make him feel guiltier if he knew that they sacrificed themselves to aid his decision. If they made it appear accidental, then it would be no worse than if he simply failed to save them in time. For instance, if they're all hanging from a ledge and too battered to help themselves up, all they'd have to do is let go, but it would appear that they couldn't hold on any longer or slipped.

On the other hand, don't they all follow Bushido, the samurai code, and all that jazz? The OT turtles probably wouldn't commit suicide for Leo's sake, but the Mirage/2k3 turtles wouldn't have the same objections to suicide that our Christian moral system has. They'd see seppuku as honorable, and I think Leo would understand and feel less guilty if they died willingly rather than by his own incompetence.

I think no matter what the case, Leo would attempt to save them all or die trying. Cos his brothers(&sensei) are the most important people in his life. He would die rescuing them all. Who would he reach for first, that depends on the situation.

I think he'd reach for whoever had the best chance to help him save the others. If none of them were in a position to help him save the others, he'd go for the one who might die first. If they'd all die at the same time, then he'd go for whoever was closest and move as quickly as possible while doing so.

jenna
06-25-2007, 01:56 PM
This is a really hard question. There's no doubt that all 4 would be willing to give up their lives to save others / each other. We saw their willing in Exodus, and in FF Fly me to the Moon.

I don't think Leo would ever "choose" one of this brothers to die, and I think they would make the decision for him. They would carry the burden and I would imagine that it would result in Raph throwing himself into the line of fire to save Leo having to make the decision - him because he wouldn't think about it - he would just rashly dive in. leo, Don and Mike would give the matter too much thought but Raph wouldn't think. And he wouldn't care about leaving anyone with any guilt. Leo, Don and Mike would all take survivor's guilt into consideration but Raph wouldn't. I think Raph can be quite primitve, emotionally: he probably wouldn't even think about the consequences of such actions, wouldn't consider that the consciousness of others would continue after his was extinguished; only to know that his brothers were spared.

MoreCowbell5263
06-25-2007, 02:47 PM
Hmmm, I'm not as much of an expert on the subject as most of you are, but I guess I'll throw my hat into the ring.

Raph would definitely sacrifice himself, I wouldn't doubt that. Don, being a pacifist, would want as little conflict as possible, so if Raph were to take a dive, I'd assume Don would then rather have Mike survive than himself. I can imagine Don sacrificing himself, but I wouldn't doubt that Raph would be the first to do so, and then Don would probably feel bad if he couldn't save his little brother. I think Mike would be left, but not by his own will, only after Raph and Don took a dive.

But of course, I can't imagine Leo making the choice. He'd either attempt at saving all of them, or Raph and Don would take their own lives before Leo made a choice, leaving Mike to live.

ToTheNines
06-25-2007, 03:19 PM
As long as he leaves Venus to die, all is well.

Ava Collier
06-25-2007, 03:42 PM
*snuzzles The Shelf* I was referring to the originally poster actually. I can't even answer this question. It wounds me.

Kendamu
06-25-2007, 03:55 PM
I think no matter what the case, Leo would attempt to save them all or die trying. Cos his brothers(&sensei) are the most important people in his life. He would die rescuing them all. Who would he reach for first, that depends on the situation.
That's what I was looking to say, but I didn't know how to say it.

The Shelf
06-25-2007, 04:01 PM
As long as he leaves Venus to die, all is well.

So, so cruel; yet so, so funny. :embarass:

Leonardo Mystic
06-25-2007, 07:34 PM
I think no matter what the case, Leo would attempt to save them all or die trying. Cos his brothers(&sensei) are the most important people in his life. He would die rescuing them all. Who would he reach for first, that depends on the situation.

I second that. Leo is not the type of person to just choose one over the other. It's all or nothing for him.

Coola Yagami
06-25-2007, 07:41 PM
True, it's all or nothing for him. Honestly, he loves them all the same so if it had to come down to the choice, he'd most likely go for the turtle that was the closest and easiest to save at that given time, regardless of who it was.

Time Mistress
06-26-2007, 12:11 AM
Tough question. I agree it's all or nothing. But just playing what if for a moment. Leo's proxemity to his bros would have to be a factor. If there is only time to reach one and one happens to be colser than the other two then that bro might get rescued by default.

As for Mike and his level of sacrifice, I could see Mike sacrificing himself, but I agree than he probably never would have given the matter much thought before. Mike probably wouldn't commit sepuku but try some impulsive Raphael like stunt that would be some suicide move like jumping out of the building if it was or fire even though he would die hitting the bottom or attack a more powerful enemy knowing he would be imediately cut down. As for why Mike might sacrifice himself at all, he'd probably see himself as the weak link and think that Don or Raph was more valuable to keep alive, especially Don I think since Mike would know Raph would probably be the first of the two to off himself. So Mike would probaly tell Leo to save Don. Not to mention, in the time it might take Don or Raph to still be arguing with Leo to go save Mike instead, Mike upon hearing Don or Raph choose him might take it upon himself to take that decision out of Leo's hands and sacrifice himself to give Don or Raph a chance instead. Just a thought.

Coola Yagami
06-26-2007, 12:49 AM
I honestly do not see Mikey sacrificing his life at all, unless if it was like, jumping in the way of a bullet or swordstrike to save one of his brothers, Splinter or April.

Sage Ninja
06-26-2007, 01:20 AM
I was thinking along those lines, too, but it didn't sit right with me. I think Mikey would do anything to save his brothers, too, I just don't know if he's ever really thought about it. I can imagine the other 3 thinking about it in private and deciding that, yes, they would die for their family. I don't see Mikey having those thoughts. When a situation like this presented itself, he'd have to think about it for even the most fleeting of moments merely because he hadn't thought about it before. In that time, the others would have already given up their lives because they had spent the time thinking about it long beforehand. I think it's fairer to say that Raph and Donnie have probably prepared themselves more to give up their lives for their brothers than Mikey has, but that Mikey would reach the same conclusion if he ever spent the time considering it

I think Mikey has thought about things like this before just as much as his bropthers probably have. Actually on some levels I think maybe Mikey is the most aware or worried about a situation like this any of the other his brothers. I think what Mikey fears most is losing his family or one of his brothers in battle. So I have a very strong feeling that this sort of situation has entered his mind, and I think he would be just as willing to let him self die to allow his other brothers to live if ever in the situation. Mikey's feelings and emotions on these types of morbid subjects is the most mysterious since he doesn't show his serious side as much as the others do but time and again he has shown how intuned and aware he is on these sorts of subjects and how mature and long sighted he can be.

Buslady
06-26-2007, 10:11 AM
I really hate to agree about Raph sacrificing himself. He would lay his life down for his family without a thought, he'd leap in front of a bullet, he'd take a hit, if he could help it he'd prevent one of them from dying. But that's Raph, he loves them so much he'd die for them.

jenna
06-26-2007, 03:49 PM
I really hate to agree about Raph sacrificing himself. He would lay his life down for his family without a thought, he'd leap in front of a bullet, he'd take a hit, if he could help it he'd prevent one of them from dying. But that's Raph, he loves them so much he'd die for them.

You've hit the nail on the head. It's part of what makes him such an endearing character. Sometimes he comes across as just downright nasty, but at the very soul of it is nothing but love and as you say a self-sacrificing love at that. That's Raph.

Time Mistress
06-26-2007, 09:26 PM
I think Mike is aware of the situation, he just would be the type to dwell on it at least not openly, maybe in his diary though.

Yup, Buslady that pins down what I love about Raph.

Warhorse
08-20-2007, 09:47 PM
I didn't know where else to put this, but someone on the IMDb boards pointed out something interesting about the contradicting, but alike personalites of Leo and Raph. They asked

..............the MAIN character (Turtle) in this film easily, and i also believe that he was hurt even more deeply than the others that splinter was taken.

well, why then if that's the case, did the writers make him like donnie and mikie being in the shadow of leonardo towards the end of this film? i know leo's the leader, but i thought even, that leo had taken over as main character in like one scene. i would've thought that raph would've gone more apesh*t on shedder than leo, seeing it seemedto be more painful to him than the others about splinter. in the other 2 filmsit's the same way. that kinda pissed me off. probobly because raph's always been my favorite of the turtles, but still...

But it's an interesting question, and one that has me wonder about these two. Raphael does indeed show great stress and grief over the absence/death of Splinter in many a medium. Hell, in Same as it Never Was, he and Leo had grown far apart from their opposing views on Splinters death.

I also wonder, in the cartoon version of City At War, it was Leo who wanted to fight, and Raph telling him it was not their fight, but I always thought Raph loved finding reasons to fight? What' s with the switch in personalities?

Spitfire
08-20-2007, 09:59 PM
Psh Leo would find a way to save all 3 some how, or Splinter would come out of nowhere and save them.

Haha but in the chance that this was more realistic and that happened? I think Leo would let himself die as well. He seems like a one goes down we all go down sorta guy. But out of all the turtles I think he'd save Mikey because he's the youngest.

ToTheNines
08-20-2007, 10:54 PM
Yeah, Leonardo dosen't seem like the type to fear death. I say he'd kill him self or let him self be killed (in a realistic scenario, or a radical ending to the comics)

Spawn Guy
08-20-2007, 11:22 PM
He'd probably offer himself up on the condition that his brothers were released,or at least one; Raph. Mid transfer, they raise some hell and make a break for it. Or, y'know, it might not be Raph. But he'd choose the one most likely to help change the situation, because willingly letting someone die is not an option here. Never for Leo.

triplexxx
08-21-2007, 02:00 AM
God-forbid this whole thing, the way I see it: the others would refuse to let Leonardo choose only one of them and just leave them all, and Leonardo would just stay behind and choose to perish with them knowing he could never live with himself no matter what happens, and if one of them did let Leonardo choose him, whichever turtle it is, he couldn't live with himself either. They'd all decide to just die together since that's the best way to do so and something they'd all be agreeable to.

Scandia
08-21-2007, 05:54 AM
Raph may love to fight, but I can also see him having a lazy streak (not as big as Mikey's, though). And he does not have the "save the world and always do the right thing" attitude that Leo has. Raph is more of a "picking fights" dude. And who knows if Raph was being cautious or possibly even phobic about gangs fighting- he could imagine them full of belligerent quarrelsome people like him. Leo on the other hand wanted to be a paladin.

I think any of the Turtles would be willing to give up his life for his brothers. Not just Leo.

But if Leo had to absolutely save only one and just one, Raph and Donnie would definitely insist that he save Mikey.

triplexxx
08-21-2007, 12:36 PM
Raph may love to fight, but I can also see him having a lazy streak (not as big as Mikey's, though). And he does not have the "save the world and always do the right thing" attitude that Leo has.
Well, they were all raised to have that type of attitude, and they do have it.

Revan
08-21-2007, 01:41 PM
I didn't know where else to put this, but someone on the IMDb boards pointed out something interesting about the contradicting, but alike personalites of Leo and Raph. They asked

..............the MAIN character (Turtle) in this film easily, and i also believe that he was hurt even more deeply than the others that splinter was taken.

well, why then if that's the case, did the writers make him like donnie and mikie being in the shadow of leonardo towards the end of this film? i know leo's the leader, but i thought even, that leo had taken over as main character in like one scene. i would've thought that raph would've gone more apesh*t on shedder than leo, seeing it seemedto be more painful to him than the others about splinter. in the other 2 filmsit's the same way. that kinda pissed me off. probobly because raph's always been my favorite of the turtles, but still...

But it's an interesting question, and one that has me wonder about these two. Raphael does indeed show great stress and grief over the absence/death of Splinter in many a medium. Hell, in Same as it Never Was, he and Leo had grown far apart from their opposing views on Splinters death.

I also wonder, in the cartoon version of City At War, it was Leo who wanted to fight, and Raph telling him it was not their fight, but I always thought Raph loved finding reasons to fight? What' s with the switch in personalities?

I may just be brain dead but I don't understand if you are asking a question here, warhorse. Are saying Leo took Splinter's abduction the hardest or that Raph did?

Scandia
08-21-2007, 03:13 PM
I think they all took it equally hard on the first movie. But they may have thought it was Raph who took it hardest because it was his voice that screamed "SPLINTER!!!!!" on the rooftop.

MoreCowbell5263
08-21-2007, 04:53 PM
Warhorse's reference to that imdb question is pretty much someone having the same feeling that I had regarding the "fans of one turtle usually dislike another" thread. I always wondered why Leo fans didn't like Raph and Raph fans didn't like Leo. Their characters have a lot of conflicts but they're not exactly polar opposites. I always thought Raph fans would dislike Don, vice versa (sp?), Leo fans would dislike Mike, and vice versa (again, sp?) on that pair, too.

Well, I think Raph, at least shown in the movie, seemed to have arguably the next-closest relationship with Splinter. Leo was shown as the studious, attentive one who respected him, but Raph's emotions were also explored. The movie did make it seem like Raph took it the worst, but what I think happened is that the movie just plain focused on Raph mostly. April talked about how the others took the loss of Splinter, Leo watching over Raph and Don depending on Casey Jones for some light-hearted and happier things to talk about while they worked on the truck. Mike was shown with the punching bag, but that was about it (not including the rooftop bit, seeing is how techically it's Raph yelling Splinter's name). Around the campfire, Raph was obviously happy, which he wasn't throughout most of the movie, which says a lot. Mike was crying from his happiness, Don was comforting him. Leo at the time seemed...well...to himself after Splinter left, but any turtle fan already knows how close Leo is with his master. I can see all 4 of them going ballistic had someone killed Splinter, not just Leo or Raph, but Leo and Raph are typically the first to come to mind when that topic comes up.

Leo and Raph do have a lot of similarities, but I agree that Leo and Raph kinda switched personalities during the City at War episode.

Warhorse
08-21-2007, 07:31 PM
I may just be brain dead but I don't understand if you are asking a question here, warhorse. Are saying Leo took Splinter's abduction the hardest or that Raph did?

Sorry, I was posting a quote I saw on IMDb, and it didn't all come out.

The original poster was commenting how Raph was the main character in the first Teenage mutant Ninja Turtles. He was visibly the most shaken out of all the Turtles for Splinter being kidnapped. It was his anger about sitting around April's apartment, and also not liking the idea of using her as bait to find Splinter, and he and Leo got into that spat, that resulted in Raph going up to the top and getting his shell kicked.

But at the end of the movie, when Shredder told the Turtles that Splinter was dead, it was Leo who went bonkers, lost his cool and composure, and very nearly lost his life to the Shredder. The original poster was asking why did the writers have a sudden change in personalities between Raph and Leo?

The only thing I can think of, is that Leo could have taken all that he could for his age. He witnessed his father being kidnapped, he has the shock of meeting two human friends, and shortly after, the one human friend who had taken them in after his homewas deatroyed, had her home, and her history destroyed by Leo's enemies, not to mention he had that awful feeling if Raph would pull through his coma or not. Alot for a 15ish, 16ish teenage mutant turtle to digest in short amount of time. The thought that SHredder killed his father was enough to send him over the edge.

Sorry for confusing everyone. I ended up figuring things out for myself! ;)

But who knows, maybe you all have other ideas or thoughts of what goes on in the minds of these complex turtles!

BigApple3AM
08-21-2007, 08:04 PM
Regarding the first movie I think Leo showed a lot of concern for splinter too. The whole meditating thing, campfire thing, etc...

It's just Leo's was more focused inward and Raph's more outward. The rooftop scene could have went either way. Maybe Leo's keeping it all inward was taking its toll on him and he became irrational whereas Raph already had several times to express his anger. Leo is so close to splinter that it isn't odd he would charge in one sense, but yeah it does go against his usual personality.


Anyway regarding Leo's saving a turtle, I think you guys answered it well enough. In the end it all depends on the scenario.

triplexxx
08-21-2007, 08:08 PM
The thing is, how close each of the turtles are to Splinter, and how much they care about him are really two completely different things. In the first thing they differ a little, but in the second they don't differ at all...how they choose to express it, inward or outward, doesn't change that.

Scandia
08-21-2007, 08:17 PM
Now if it were alternate scenarios where it would be another Turtle or Splinter having to save just one of the Turtles:

Donatello- again, Leo and Raph would convince him to save Mikey.

Raphael- ditto, Leo and Donnie convince him to save Mikey.

Michelangelo- this one is tougher. Raphael is second youngest, so it is possible that Leo and Donnie may try to convince Mikey to save Raph. But this one is likelier to boil down to specific scenario.

Splinter saving just one Turtle- this one would be the most different. Donnie, Raph, and Mikey would try to convince Splinter to save Leonardo, since Leo is the top student and ninja of the bunch, the one closest to Splinter, and according to a lot of people, Splinter's favorite.

triplexxx
08-21-2007, 08:38 PM
For any alternate scenarios, my belief is the same as for the first one: no one would want to be chosen and the free one wouldn't save himself.

Rooish
08-21-2007, 08:46 PM
Well, let's say that none of the Turtles could talk to Leo and try to convince him of who to save--although I agree that Donny and Raph would both tell him to save Mikey, if they could communicate with him.

I think Leo would have the most difficulty with the decision, because any choice he makes, he fails his family (by killing two of them). I don't know if he would automatically choose the youngest. He might choose Raph, just to warm the bitter guy's heart for once, because I think Raph wants to know Leo loves him and such. Or Leo might be logical and save Don, because Don is probably capable of doing something good that affects the most people all at once (e.g. through a cool invention). Plus Don has always been so supportive of Leo.

If Raph could only save one of his brothers, I don't know if he would save Mikey. He's pretty obsessed with Leo and I think it's possible he would save Leo, even though Leo would be overjoyed to die in place of one of his brothers. But still, he's really protective of Mikey. Hmm ...

If Don could only save one brother, again I wonder if he might choose Leo above Mikey. He's very logical, and it seems more logical to me to save someone really functional and useful like Leo, as opposed to the youngest cutest one. But then again, Don does have a soft spot for Mikey.

But yeah, actually they'd all probably save Mikey.

And if Mikey had to choose, I think maybe he'd save Raph ... maybe? I think he would want Raph to be with him the most.

I agree with Sage Ninja that Mikey's probably pondered such a thing before, although I don't think he would have as much as, say, Leo or Raph would.

One time I tried to imagine a similar situation, except only one of the Turtles had to die in an ending not dissimilar to that crappy Michael Bay movie Armageddon. As in, one of them has to stay and manually blow up the bomb or something. So Leo and Raph and Don actively wanted to do it--they would be ashamed to live if another brother died, especially Leo and Raph. They'd probably get in a fight over it. As for Mikey ... he didn't really consider his own self-sacrifice to be a possibility. Not because he's selfish--he's anything but--but I think he knows that none of the others would allow him to be the one to die. I think it would probably hurt the TMNT most--not as a ninja team, but as a family--if Mikey died, because he's the young sweet innocent one. And Mikey knows it would probably be cruel of him to die instead of Leo or Don or Raph. Mike also loves life the most and, I think, would be the scaredest to die. I think that Mikey would do it on a whim, or if he had a bit more power in the family dynamic and didn't have three older brothers who would insist on doing it instead.

Don would probably realise that it would be cruel of him to sacrifice himself too, just because Leo and Raph are both so proud and seem to consider themselves the most responsible for the family.

So ... I guess I didn't really answer the initial Leo question. Sorry.

BigApple3AM
08-21-2007, 11:55 PM
The thing is, how close each of the turtles are to Splinter, and how much they care about him are really two completely different things. In the first thing they differ a little, but in the second they don't differ at all...how they choose to express it, inward or outward, doesn't change that.

You're not really arguing with me. I know all the turtles care for splinter. I was trying to explain why Leo attacked in pure rage, something Raph would normally do. All of the turtles coped somehow, and they showed it in the film (except maybe Mikeys, I can't remember if he had a moment like don and casey, leo meditating, or raph yelling on the barn). I was just saying that Leo was more inward while coping, bottling stuff up. While Raph was more explosive and yelling on roofs or in sewers. Thus this may have effected Leo during the final battle with shredder and made him do something out of character.

:)

Revan
08-22-2007, 12:06 AM
But at the end of the movie, when Shredder told the Turtles that Splinter was dead, it was Leo who went bonkers, lost his cool and composure, and very nearly lost his life to the Shredder. The original poster was asking why did the writers have a sudden change in personalities between Raph and Leo?

Best I can gather is that Leo felt like he came so close to saving his father but then failed at the very end. He may have felt most responsible due to his leadership role as well. (He is the leader, it's his job to protect the family, it's his job to save splinter, it's his fault splinter is dead.) So much pressure is put on Leonardo and that last "it had a name" was enough to crack him

triplexxx
08-22-2007, 01:46 AM
it's his job to protect the family, it's his job to save splinter, it's his fault splinter is dead.If you're only voicing what's on his mind, ignore me...but protecting the family, saving Splinter and whatever happens to Splinter is equally EVERY turtle's responsibility, their position on the team is irrelevant.

Leogeddon
08-22-2007, 01:59 AM
What a heartbreaking situation! Whatever choice he made, it'd rip him up.

I don't think Raph would let Leo save him. Raph protects his brothers and I think would rather die than get himself rescued at the others' expense.

So between Donnie and Mikey... I'm really not experienced enough with the turtles in general universes to make the soundest of judgments here. If I can assume that Mikey is seen as the innocent one in most incarnations, I'd say Mikey would be saved.

I can picture Donnie saying something like, "No, I'm hurt too badly. The others are more likely to survive, save them" but my interpretation of the question is that they're all equally likely to survive, so Donnie would have no truthful basis to say this. He could lie, though.

you've nailed what i was gonna say, either Mikey or Donny, if Leo were to save Raph, i could see Raph throwing a fit about why he chose to save HIM instead of Mikey or Donny, and pretty much beat Leo up afterwards.

Warhorse
08-22-2007, 06:20 AM
Hey, here's a reverse question. Which Turtle would cope the best if his whole family died. In other words, if there was a day when a battle got the best of them, or they all die except one in a car crash, which Turtle would eventually adapt and move on with his life and make new memories?

Scandia
08-22-2007, 06:49 AM
Not Raphael. He would be too angry and enraged to even function.

Leonardo would have the most survivor's guilt.

Michelangelo may be able to keep his attitude in check BUT he would have the most trouble being alone. Of the four Turtles, he is the least loner and least independent.

So I will have to go with Donatello. He would likely be able to stay calm. He may be able to put things in perspective. And he is very independent and self-reliant and responsible, so he would be able to make it and possibly even succeed on his own. And he would definitely honor his family's memory and continue their legacy.

Revan
08-22-2007, 12:07 PM
If you're only voicing what's on his mind, ignore me...but protecting the family, saving Splinter and whatever happens to Splinter is equally EVERY turtle's responsibility, their position on the team is irrelevant.

I agree but that's how I figured Leo was feeling. Why do you think Leo was only one to freak out and almost get himself killed?

Scandia
08-22-2007, 01:48 PM
Leo's the closest one to Splinter. He would not only be losing his father and his sensei, but also his best friend. Granted, at this point they did not know many outsiders- but while the other Turtles list a brother as the family member they are closest to, Leonardo definitely lists Splinter.

That, and Leo being the leader, the pressure may have been too much for him to handle. He is usually the perfect boy- one can only take so much.

triplexxx
08-22-2007, 04:31 PM
Hey, here's a reverse question. Which Turtle would cope the best if his whole family died. In other words, if there was a day when a battle got the best of them, or they all die except one in a car crash, which Turtle would eventually adapt and move on with his life and make new memories?
Well, there's no way to ever totally get over something like that, but I'm sure each of them might try to look at the bright side eventually: that his family's in a better afterlife and he'll be back with them one day. They can all take care of themselves, and I'm sure they'd push themselves a little harder than they already do, to become more self-sufficient. As for creating new memories after something like that, sounds completely out of the question to me, though they might try to erase memories.

Time Mistress
08-22-2007, 09:45 PM
Not Raphael. He would be too angry and enraged to even function.

Leonardo would have the most survivor's guilt.

Michelangelo may be able to keep his attitude in check BUT he would have the most trouble being alone. Of the four Turtles, he is the least loner and least independent.

So I will have to go with Donatello. He would likely be able to stay calm. He may be able to put things in perspective. And he is very independent and self-reliant and responsible, so he would be able to make it and possibly even succeed on his own. And he would definitely honor his family's memory and continue their legacy.

This is pretty much how I see it too.

The Christmas Carol Short story of the comics which show a posible future of Raph without his family he's consumed by his anger and reduced to lving as a n animal in a swamp.

Leo and Don, I can see becoming like hermits if it happen, but Leo would be more like the old man in the cave and Don would shun human contact and live though his technology. Don's worst enemy from losing his family would be isolation. In some ways he'd have the opposite problem as Mike by trying to hide away from the world.

Mike would try and create some surogate family to replace his old one, but it would never be the same.

Warhorse
08-22-2007, 11:10 PM
This is pretty much how I see it too.

The Christmas Carol Short story of the comics which show a posible future of Raph without his family he's consumed by his anger and reduced to lving as a n animal in a swamp.

Leo and Don, I can see becoming like hermits if it happen, but Leo would be more like the old man in the cave and Don would shun human contact and live though his technology. Don's worst enemy from losing his family would be isolation. In some ways he'd have the opposite problem as Mike by trying to hide away from the world.

Mike would try and create some surogate family to replace his old one, but it would never be the same.

So you think Mikey would cope the best you think? I always felt that. He loves his brothers, but he seems like the type that can let go and move on. The others would wallow into a dangerous dark path I would believe.

MoreCowbell5263
08-23-2007, 04:27 PM
Hmmm...they all would be guilty and sad for a time after said accident. Here's how I think it would happen for all of them...

Leo: After a long period of time spent feeling guilty and responsible for what happened to his brothers, I imagine Leo getting as close to Splinter as physically possible, like exponentially moreso than he already is (assuming Splinter is dead). I can imagine Leo like training some protegees after Splinter inevitably dies, but I think he'd be more of like a lone superhero kind of. Defending the world against supernatural evil.

Raph: Similar to Leo, but different. I think Raph would take it the worst, but Leo would definitely take it really, really badly. I don't know how he feels now about vigilantism (sp?), but I think he'd go down that path again if his brothers died, as opposed to Leo and him being more of a hero than vigilante. Raph would do some heroic things, but I think he'd still do more vigilante-related things. He would become very loner-like and probably end up with post-traumatic stress disorder or something.

Don: He'd take it badly, like anyone, but he'd get over it sooner than the others. Don would spend most of his time working on his technology and whatnot as opposed to Raph or Leo who would stick with Splinter and continue ninja training. I don't know if Don would continue fighting crime and stuff, I can see it, but I'm not sure he would.

Mike: He wouldn't feel responsible like Leo or Raph, but he'd be miserable for a while. I see him coping with this loss by latching on to Casey and April and forming a new "family" with them and Splinter.

Don: