Anyone else loving the visual style of this movie?

[fridaynightdestination]

I really love the look of this movie, some of the shots looks awesome. It has a very Mass Effect, Star Trek look to it. Speaking of Mass Effect, they are making a movie of it, I really wish they weren't because I don't see how it can work as a movie, but I hope that Mass Effect uses the same visual style as this movie. But here are some shots that I think demonstrate that:
http://www.flickeringmyth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-2014-teaser-trailer-still-will-arnett.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/hrMCE6K.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WcbShxB.gif
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t31.0-8/10258257_237591403031297_8042530548485517355_o.jpg
https://31.media.tumblr.com/e0e20e8c0f540c898e52ca744020fdc4/tumblr_n7ojl025hU1stxcmio7_1280.png
https://38.media.tumblr.com/9786abac2f66b8da436b6e1dbcfb0e66/tumblr_n7opljr0CB1rac0u1o4_500.gif
https://31.media.tumblr.com/328ee55d4a665b9b6ad33deda99a9b35/tumblr_n7osjm3hOD1td0w8do1_500.gif
https://38.media.tumblr.com/2569ef85adf88e9f6d866436792f777c/tumblr_n7oij9r65b1qbknvio1_500.gif

And the shot that demonstrates the awesome visual style more than any other
http://i.imgur.com/jpfY7BA.gif
Sorry I had to lol

[A_Little_Too_Raph.9859]

I really like the look of it.

[DioLeo451]

Has very nice cinematography and lighting and use of colors they just pop very cool

[Bob]

Yes, the cinematography does look top notch. It also looks visually striking and fairly unique.

[Radical Raph]

Yea, it's pretty awesome and colorful. You can see the individual colors of the turtles within the lighting of almost every shot.

[Shark_Blade]

Yes. The colors are very VIVID and I love that ray of lights that shimmer into the camera from time to time, glorious to behold. Like candy for the eyes. :D

[MrTMNT2012]

This is probably the most colourful movie I've seen since....Kick-Ass!

[IndigoErth]

Yeah, Turtles may not be all too pretty to me, but cinematically speaking it collectively has a nice look to it.

[Candy Kappa]

It's one of the few things I do like about this movie.

[samxsteal]

IM loving the visuals they are awesome And i cant wait to See the full thing

[Andrew NDB]

The visual look of the costuming and such? No, not at all. The cinematography and camerawork? Fairly brilliant, what I've seen so far.

[Leo656]

Yeah I think the cinematography and camera work are gonna be highlights.

I'll agree it has sort of a Star Trek/Mass Effect look to it... but that's not something I really see in my head when I think "TMNT". It's slick, but feels a little too slick for this property's film. And as others have said, skin textures aside, I really can't stand the character designs.

It looks like a lot of stuff I don't like the look of will at least be shot very well and look pretty. The lair's mostly okay; that, I wish they'd just dialed down about, say, 10%, where everything else I wish they toned down about 60-80%.

[Glados]

Yes, everything is very vivid and colorful. As the Black Nerd said: The color correction is TAIGHT! ;)

[Powder]

The visual look of the costuming and such? No, not at all. The cinematography and camerawork? Fairly brilliant, what I've seen so far.

This. The shots are shot nice, but the high contrast & excessive use of lens flare is nothing new. It's flashy for the sake of flashy.

[mexichrist83]

Seeing a lot of orange and teal.....

Item #4
http://www.cracked.com/article_18664_5-annoying-trends-that-make-every-movie-look-same.html

http://theabyssgazes.blogspot.com/2010/03/teal-and-orange-hollywood-please-stop.html

http://****ingorangeandteal.tumblr.com

http://www.slashfilm.com/orangeblue-contrast-in-movie-posters/

The blocked out part of the tumbler link is the F word, by the way

[SwiftNinjaFox]

I really love the look of this movie, some of the shots looks awesome. It has a very Mass Effect, Star Trek look to it.

So long as they don't use lens flares. No lens flares, you put ONE lens flare in this thing and you're in big trouble, dude!

[Shark_Blade]

So long as they don't use lens flares. No lens flares, you put ONE lens flare in this thing and you're in big trouble, dude!

Wtf? Do you not see there's tonnes of lens flares ever since the beginning announcement trailer.

And they are gorgeous to look at! :tlove:

[SwiftNinjaFox]

Wtf? Do you not see there's tonnes of lens flares ever since the beginning announcement trailer.

And they are gorgeous to look at! :tlove:

I hate lens flare. It's not gorgeous, it's usually out of place and distracts more than anything.

And I was paraphrasing Mikey's line about anchovies, btw ;)

[Bry]

Just when I think I'm out...

http://media.giphy.com/media/SkVREjcAhHggE/giphy.gif

I actually really dislike the visual style of this movie, actually. I'll explain why, but for the sake of fairness: it's a totally subjective thing and I don't expect anyone to agree, necessarily. Okay? Okay! :tgrin:

But... I actually don't think it has "good" cinematography or camerawork at all, based on the trailers I've seen. I think it has very flashy cinematography and camerawork, and that has its appeal and is definitely popular with some folks, but to me it just seems really obnoxious and overly-busy. It's eye candy, but... there's a reason you get sick if you eat too much candy in one sitting. :trazz:

The most effective storytelling is often the simplest. The flashy stuff is best used sparingly, and it's more effective because of it. But with this movie, it seems to be all flash: we seem to have the camera almost constantly moving, sweeping and bouncing around, while nearly every shot seems to have spotlights and smoke machines going off in the background. Seriously, look at those shots in the original post - smoke and heavy, artificial-looking filtering and bright lights and lens flares all over the place. And I know that some people really enjoy that, but I think it's totally obnoxious and distracting.

And my worry about this, based on what I've seen so far, is that this movie's overall "look" is more concerned with being the cinematography equivalent of a fireworks show instead of offering any actual decent, legitimate storytelling - all flash, zero substance.

If you haven't seen it yet, there's a great (and fair) video describing the overall Michael Bay style called "Bayhem" (http://vimeo.com/99798626) that sums up a lot of my issues with the look of this movie. (And I know that Bay didn't direct it, but this movie is very much in his style and follows his influence, so I think it's relevant.) IMO, and as it says in the video, that style is great at being flashy, but it's incredibly limited by its need to be flashy at all times, and it suffers because of that on a basic storytelling level. There's no subtlety and no nuance. And I don't care what kind of movie you're making -- even a silly action/comedy -- you need those things, even just a little bit, to make anything worth watching.

[pennydreadful]

I hate lens flare. It's not gorgeous, it's usually out of place and distracts more than anything.

And I was paraphrasing Mikey's line about anchovies, btw ;)

I got it. ;) FWIW, I can't stand lens flare either. *shrugs*

[Leo656]

Just when I think I'm out...

http://media.giphy.com/media/SkVREjcAhHggE/giphy.gif

I actually really dislike the visual style of this movie, actually. I'll explain why, but for the sake of fairness: it's a totally subjective thing and I don't expect anyone to agree, necessarily. Okay? Okay! :tgrin:

But... I actually don't think it has "good" cinematography or camerawork at all, based on the trailers I've seen. I think it has very flashy cinematography and camerawork, and that has its appeal and is definitely popular with some folks, but to me it just seems really obnoxious and overly-busy. It's eye candy, but... there's a reason you get sick if you eat too much candy in one sitting. :trazz:

The most effective storytelling is often the simplest. The flashy stuff is best used sparingly, and it's more effective because of it. But with this movie, it seems to be all flash: we seem to have the camera almost constantly moving, sweeping and bouncing around, while nearly every shot seems to have spotlights and smoke machines going off in the background. Seriously, look at those shots in the original post - smoke and heavy, artificial-looking filtering and bright lights and lens flares all over the place. And I know that some people really enjoy that, but I think it's totally obnoxious and distracting.

And my worry about this, based on what I've seen so far, is that this movie's overall "look" is more concerned with being the cinematography equivalent of a fireworks show instead of offering any actual decent, legitimate storytelling - all flash, zero substance.

If you haven't seen it yet, there's a great (and fair) video describing the overall Michael Bay style called "Bayhem" (http://vimeo.com/99798626) that sums up a lot of my issues with the look of this movie. (And I know that Bay didn't direct it, but this movie is very much in his style and follows his influence, so I think it's relevant.) IMO, and as it says in the video, that style is great at being flashy, but it's incredibly limited by its need to be flashy at all times, and it suffers because of that on a basic storytelling level. There's no subtlety and no nuance. And I don't care what kind of movie you're making -- even a silly action/comedy -- you need those things, even just a little bit, to make anything worth watching.

In general, I like the cut o'yer gib, guy. But face it, you an' I are just doing it wrong. Apparently. :ohwell:

For what it's worth, as I said before, it looks slick. Too slick? Eh, I'unno.

[InsaneZane]

I really cannot wait for this movie! Its going to be the best thing since the first one, and It'll be more action packed with the CGI, I'm glad the haters are starting to realize they were wrong all along! Can't wait to see the new Party Wagon/Shellraiser/Battle Shell LOL what ever its called for this movie... I'm going to watch it 4 times in theaters at least... 1 for each turtle :tlol::tlol:

[Bry]

In general, I like the cut o'yer gib, guy. But face it, you an' I are just doing it wrong. Apparently. :ohwell:

For what it's worth, as I said before, it looks slick. Too slick? Eh, I'unno.

Seems like it. I just might take that break, actually. Maybe see how the temperature is in a month or so.

I'll never get how "'this looks awesome!'; 'YEAH!'" is considered good conversation, but fully, fairly and thoughtfully explaining our criticisms just makes us "haters" and "whiners" with some folks. I guess some people just can't deal with hearing opinions different than their own. I know it seems like the minute someone's not 100% on board with this movie they're put on the defensive, and it's irritating having to fight every time you want to look a little deeper at something you think deserves it, y'know?

Ah well. I wish there was a little more reffing when people get hostile and toss insults around, but... I guess I have to stop letting that bug me. Or just move on entirely. :trazz:

[MrTMNT2012]

I can appreciate a hater changing his opinion after what's been shown to be genuine effort and improvements made to this film rather than sticking to his guns just for the sake of it but unfortunately, I think many critics already have their reviews prepared for this movie without any critique of actual quality...

Seems like it. I just might take that break, actually. Maybe see how the temperature is in a month or so.

I'll never get how "'this looks awesome!'; 'YEAH!'" is considered good conversation, but fully, fairly and thoughtfully explaining our criticisms just makes us "haters" and "whiners" with some folks. I guess some people just can't deal with hearing opinions different than their own. I know it seems like the minute someone's not 100% on board with this movie they're put on the defensive, and it's irritating having to fight every time you want to look a little deeper at something you think deserves it, y'know?

The hypocrisy level is OVER 9000!

[A_Little_Too_Raph.9859]

I can appreciate a hater changing his opinion after what's been shown to be genuine effort and improvements made to this film rather than sticking to his guns just for the sake of it but unfortunately, I think many critics already have their reviews prepared for this movie without any critique of actual quality...

Yeah I have a feeling that this movie will get a majority of hate while Guardians of the Galaxy will get the majority of the praise simply because....MARVEL

[Bry]

The hypocrisy level is OVER 9000!

Truth be told, I've actually had you on ignore for a long time now, and clearly for good reason. But I want you to back this up. How does what I said make me a hypocrite? I want to see if you can actually prove it. And if you can't, how about you apologize?

[MrTMNT2012]

Ok, so you'll never get how people who praise the movie can be considered well-spoken in their conversations but somehow the people who criticise it are?

"I guess some people just can't deal with hearing opinions different than their own." I guess we can put you on that list as well...

[Bry]

Ok, so you'll never get how people who praise the movie can be considered well-spoken in their conversations but somehow the people who criticise it are?

"I guess some people just can't deal with hearing opinions different than their own." I guess we can put you on that list as well...

Did I say that? No, I didn't, and I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't put words in my mouth. Of course there are people here who've praised this movie and backed up their opinions well. I never claimed otherwise, and I'm not talking about those people here at all.

And in fact, I've actually specifically replied to some of those people telling them that I may disagree, but I respect their opinions and how they presented them. I've made a point to say my opinions are subjective and that others are entitled to disagree, repeatedly.

This is exactly the problem around here - people knee-jerk reacting to stuff and throwing around anger and insults without actually fully reading and considering what they're responding to.

You ready to apologize now?

[CyberCubed]

The movie feels like it was filmed on a 90's era sitcom budget. I think Full House looked better than this.

[Glados]

Please, PLEASE stop it with these pointless "lovers/haters" debates! Leave it! Let it go! I've been keeping away from interacting on this place for a while because of how stupid it's gotten, lately it's been a little tad better, let's try to keep it that way so threads don't derail as much as it has in the past.

EDIT: I'm addressing Bry and MrTMNT2012, in case it wasn't clear (I forget to quote)

[MrTMNT2012]

The movie feels like it was filmed on a 90's era sitcom budget. I think Full House looked better than this.

Constructive criticism right here...:trolleye:

Did I say that? No, I didn't, and I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't put words in my mouth. Of course there are people here who've praised this movie and backed up their opinions well. I never claimed otherwise, and I'm not talking about those people here at all.

So what's the point if you KNOW there are people praising the movie just as capable as the naysayers backing up their claims, to generalize those people in the first place?

[Bry]

So what's the point if you KNOW there are people praising the movie just as capable as the naysayers backing up their claims, to generalize those people in the first place?

Are you kidding me with this? I'm not generalizing anyone. I specifically said "SOME people", "SOME folks". I'm specifically talking about the people who aren't backing up their opinions or being civil about differing opinions. That's it.

Yeesh. :trolleye:

Please, PLEASE stop it with these pointless "lovers/haters" debates! Leave it! Let it go! I've been keeping away from interacting on this place for a while because of how stupid it's gotten, lately it's been a little tad better, let's try to keep it that way so threads don't derail as much as it has in the past.

EDIT: I'm addressing Bry and MrTMNT2012, in case it wasn't clear (I forget to quote)

Oh, believe me, I'm done. Gonna take a break from this place entirely, actually. But if someone's calling me out and making false claims about me or what I'm saying, I'm damn well going to refute them. :trazz:

Peace out, Technodrome. Hopefully things get more civil soon.

[Glados]

So what's the point if you KNOW there are people praising the movie just as capable as the naysayers backing up their claims, to generalize those people in the first place?

Are you kidding me with this? I'm not generalizing anyone. I specifically said "SOME people", "SOME folks". I'm specifically talking about the people who aren't backing up their opinions or being civil about differing opinions. That's it.

Yeesh. :trolleye:

There you have the conclusion: There's people on both sides who are backing up their opinions and being civil and there are people on both sides who don't! No side is better, no side is worse! There's no point of further discussion over that topic.

[MrTMNT2012]

Are you kidding me with this? I'm not generalizing anyone. I specifically said "SOME people", "SOME folks". I'm specifically talking about the people who aren't backing up their opinions or being civil about differing opinions. That's it.

Yeesh. :trolleye:

You still fail to acknowledge that there are just as many naysayers who don't back up their claims thoughtfully or thoroughly (Key example being CyberCubed here...) you keep saying 'Our' as if everyone on that side of the fence is being attacked when that's not the case. There are just as many there as there are on this side of the arguement who aren't being taken seriously and by you mentioning those "some folks" just makes it blatantly obvious.

[Bry]

You still fail to acknowledge that there are just as many naysayers who don't back up their claims thoughtfully or thoroughly (Key example being CyberCubed here...) you keep saying 'Our' as if everyone on that side of the fence is being attacked when that's not the case. There are just as many there as there are on this side of the arguement who aren't being taken seriously and by you mentioning those "some folks" just makes it blatantly obvious.

Did you notice that I was directly replying to Leo656 when I said "our"? 'Cause I was.

And I'm not gonna acknowledge that there as "just as many" anything without knowing that as a fact. I know that there are some on both sides, but I don't know that it's even. If you wanna go through the archives and prove it, then feel free.

Okay, that's the last one. I'm out!! :tparty:

[The Boston Ninja Turtle]

i will give this movie one check and say visually its nice.....to bad no movie has ever made me want to see it by how it looks..other wise i would've gone to see Avatar in theaters....or on tv..or on my computer..... i still haven't seen it it just doesn't interest me..i want stories not pretty pictures

[The Vernon]

Let me sum it up briefly... I believe in one thing and one thing only: these are some fugly, mugly, mutha fudda buttface turtles.

- commence quote from trailers -

April: No, that's stupid... they're ninjas.

[Gimme_Three]

i will give this movie one check and say visually its nice.....to bad no movie has ever made me want to see it by how it looks..other wise i would've gone to see Avatar in theaters....or on tv..or on my computer..... i still haven't seen it it just doesn't interest me..i want stories not pretty pictures

Avatar had a great story. The story and the acting made me connect with the characters.. One of my favorite movies.

[Warhorse]

Some scenes, it does look great. The snow scene, some of the other fighting scenes, and a few of the April and the Turtles meeting for the first time look tight. But scenes like the subway station, seem a bit too shaky cam. I'm not a real big fan of shaky cam. I love long sweeping shots though, and this movie seems to have a few of those.

[Zulithe]

I've went through a lot of stanges on my feelings towards the movie designs. It was really hard at first, loving them did not come natural. I have gradually accepted it though.

I would not say I love the turtle designs exactly, though I don't think they are terrible. Just not my preference.

What I will say this this... I like them enough to where I don't find them distracting like I did at first. But I think my feelings were natural since they were so very different from the previous turtle incarnations.

I'll be able to sit in the theater on Aug 8th, watch the movie and not be thinking about how bad the turtles look. I'll be in total enjoyment mode... probably!

There are some on this forum who won't have the same experience. I'm sorry that it will be that way for them.

The rest of the film's look though? I think it has the right feeling to it, the gritty nature of it does remind me some of the 1990 film which I love, but it also has some flash and bright and modern streaks to it that you'd come to expect from a lot of newer films, particularly, yeah, the Transformers franchise.

[Refractive Reflections]

Just when I think I'm out...

http://media.giphy.com/media/SkVREjcAhHggE/giphy.gif

I actually really dislike the visual style of this movie, actually. I'll explain why, but for the sake of fairness: it's a totally subjective thing and I don't expect anyone to agree, necessarily. Okay? Okay! :tgrin:

But... I actually don't think it has "good" cinematography or camerawork at all, based on the trailers I've seen. I think it has very flashy cinematography and camerawork, and that has its appeal and is definitely popular with some folks, but to me it just seems really obnoxious and overly-busy. It's eye candy, but... there's a reason you get sick if you eat too much candy in one sitting. :trazz:

The most effective storytelling is often the simplest. The flashy stuff is best used sparingly, and it's more effective because of it. But with this movie, it seems to be all flash: we seem to have the camera almost constantly moving, sweeping and bouncing around, while nearly every shot seems to have spotlights and smoke machines going off in the background. Seriously, look at those shots in the original post - smoke and heavy, artificial-looking filtering and bright lights and lens flares all over the place. And I know that some people really enjoy that, but I think it's totally obnoxious and distracting.

And my worry about this, based on what I've seen so far, is that this movie's overall "look" is more concerned with being the cinematography equivalent of a fireworks show instead of offering any actual decent, legitimate storytelling - all flash, zero substance.

If you haven't seen it yet, there's a great (and fair) video describing the overall Michael Bay style called "Bayhem" (http://vimeo.com/99798626) that sums up a lot of my issues with the look of this movie. (And I know that Bay didn't direct it, but this movie is very much in his style and follows his influence, so I think it's relevant.) IMO, and as it says in the video, that style is great at being flashy, but it's incredibly limited by its need to be flashy at all times, and it suffers because of that on a basic storytelling level. There's no subtlety and no nuance. And I don't care what kind of movie you're making -- even a silly action/comedy -- you need those things, even just a little bit, to make anything worth watching.

I see what you are saying and I agree mostly with it. Just like the Turtle gear, the cinematography can be very distracting because I find myself looking at the flashy backgrounds and details rather than what's going on in the foreground. It seems so excessive that it does distract away from the storytelling and characters, just for visual "epicness". But I'm already apathetic with the direction of this film anyways... :lol:

[Shark_Blade]

I can sort of see it if it's Transformers what with everything machineries parts going all over the place when they fight, I can't tell what I'm seeing most of the time.

But from the trailers this one is much more tidied up and pleasant to my eyes. :D

[Sumac]

Not really. What basically amounts to the darker Bayformers style is not really appealing to me.

[Miles]

My big concern is that the cinematography of the movie will make it unenjoyable for me, personally. I'm easily visually overwhelmed, which is probably why I find myself preferring older films more and more. It'd be great to go see this and enjoy it, but I fear I may need anti-nausea pills just to make it through. :ohwell:

[Tora]

Yeah it looks good to me. I like the fogginess to it.

http://nintendoplayer.com/ninjaturtles/pizzahut/polarhit.gif

[Cipher]

I want to hate on this for being all blue-and-orange, the easiest and most prolific of all Hollywood color contrasts, but ...

I can't, and it handles it better than just lazily relying on that. The visuals really do have some colorful, comic-booky pop to them, and it fits the designs of the Turtles, Shredder, etc. they've gone with.

It's not for me, but I can't fault that direction one bit. I have no doubt this will be a visually stunning movie, if not a great one in other regards.

[DVD]

I'm loving the cinematography. It's gorgeous.
I'm hoping this doesn't get a late release here. With Transformers 4 getting all the attention - not to mention toy shop shelf space, I'm hoping this doesn't get bypassed. Turtles aren't exactly big here. And TRU are only now stocking the first wave of toys.