The Technodrome Forums

The Technodrome Forums (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/index.php)
-   TV and Movies (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Star Trek 2009 official discussion (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=18540)

Anarky 02-27-2007 11:52 AM

Star Trek 2009 official discussion
 
IGN Movies reports that there are talks about J.J. Abrams directing the new Star Trek movie. The main cast, also still in talks and not confirmed: Matt Damon as James Tiberius Kirk, Adrien Brody as Spock and Gary Sinise as Bones. Read the article here.

I dunno, but the three seem like a good pick. They look a lot like their 1960s counterparts and they're all good actors. But Lost's Jin as Sulu? Nah, thanks. He doesn't look anything like Takei did back in the day and he's always seeming kinda "wooden" when acting. But I could live with that. What I couldn't live with would be Halle Berry as Uhura. Not that there have been any talks in that direction, but she's the first bombshell black actress that comes to mind. And I wonder who will play Scottie.

All in all, I am happy that they're going back to the traditional Enterprise. The first one there was.

On a completely unrelated sidenote: I hate McCoy's english nickname "Bones". Why can't they just adapt the German version "Pille" (=Pill)? Sounds a lot friendlier, don't you think?

Mecha Cow 02-27-2007 12:04 PM

Can't really see Brody as Spock. Sinise seems like a good choice though.

Barkworm 02-27-2007 12:09 PM

Brody lacks Spock's arrogant look but apart from that he would't be a bad choice.

Dr. Doom 02-27-2007 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarky (Post 470825)
On a completely unrelated sidenote: I hate McCoy's english nickname "Bones". Why can't they just adapt the German version "Pille" (=Pill)? Sounds a lot friendlier, don't you think?

That's the way it really is, slapnuts, get used to it.

Anarky 02-27-2007 12:29 PM

I know that it's his "True" name, but I'm just used to Pille. Bones sounds like someone else, while there's only one Pille out there. Bones can be anyone, from an archeologist to a bad ass biker-dude. But Pille, well, Pille's Pille.

That Matt Guy 02-27-2007 12:39 PM

As long as they visit the Nazi planet (as seen in the original series) then I'm all for it.

ThirdMarioBro 02-27-2007 12:48 PM

I still can't get used to this. Really trying, but it's hard to adjust to.

Dr. Doom 02-27-2007 02:09 PM

...There's nothing to get used to yet. Calm down.

LogicDonny 02-28-2007 12:51 AM

well paramount announced the movie is going to be start to be filmed and made ready by Xmas 08.

Still, it's star trek, I will be seeing it like I did with all the other ones starting with 4. Worst star trek movies for me would be final fontier and Insurrection. Nemesis was a good finale for the next generation but wasn't as good as the undiscovered country.

Anarky 03-08-2007 06:04 PM

Thar be news! To cut a long story very short, since I know nobody likes to read a lot:
  • There is a release date for the new Star Trek movie, we just don't know it yet. All we know is that it's coming in 2008.
  • We have a title. The movie will be called "Star Trek"
  • It will be a sort of "Star Trek Begins", reimagining the whole thing.
  • J.J. Abrams will direct the flick.
  • There will be more action than in any other Star Trek film.
  • Other people with apparently famous names on the movie: Production designer Scott Chambliss and director of photography Daniel Mindel. I have no idea what these job descriptions stand for, but they're working hard on whatever their job is.
  • No Rick Berman and Brannon Braga
  • There will be Technobabble
  • And of course, everyon involved in this project is a huuuuuge fan of Star Trek and it's been their lifelong dream to make this one Star Trek picture together and all that bollocks.

There you go, lots of news. Good news if you ask me, apart from the action-bit. I'm not too sure about that yet. And re-imaginings seem to be all the rage.

Anyways, here's the article, freshly from MTV.com:

Quote:

If Batman and Superman can be reborn, why not Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock? On Christmas Day 2008, the storied "Star Trek" franchise will begin anew on the big screen, and its creators are almost as ecstatic as the series' famously obsessive fans.

"We just got the green light! We have a release date and everything," said Alex Kurtzman, co-screenwriter of the eagerly anticipated new "Trek" adventure. Kurtzman and collaborator Roberto Orci, who are also executive producers of the project — and veterans of "Transformers" and "Mission: Impossible III" — spoke exclusively to MTV about the film Trekkies and Trekkers alike are salivating for any information on (see "An Open Letter To 'Star Trek' Director J.J. Abrams").

First things first: From the sound of it, fans can rest assured that subtitles about undiscovered countries and insurrections are a thing of the past. Kurtzman and Orci told MTV that their film is titled, quite simply, "Star Trek." "That's the intended title. I don't think we want to put any colons or anything on it," Orci said.

Thus far details have been few and far between on the film, the first since Picard and company starred in the much-maligned 2002 flick "Star Trek: Nemesis." In addition to the 2008 release date Paramount recently announced, it has been confirmed that "Lost" co-creator and "M:i:III" director J.J. Abrams will direct. Orci says he was relieved that Abrams agreed to helm the project after reading the very first draft (recent rumors indicated he would only produce).

"When we finally turned in the script I started lining up other directors, and that really got [Abrams] going," Orci joked. Rumors that the film would center on an early adventure of the crew or even on Kirk and Spock's Starfleet Academy days — unlikely, though no doubt provoked by a long-dormant "Trek" movie idea — have yet to be addressed directly.

While Kurtzman and Orci were reluctant to reveal much about the top-secret film, they did offer some hints. "There will be more action in this movie than any 'Trek' that's preceded it," Kurtzman promised. Orci, without discussing a specific budget, added, "It'll be the biggest one. The economic models of the other [films] were very much based on the fans out there and their purchasing power. With this one we're going for the broad audience to bring people into 'Trek' for the first time."

Indeed, broadening the "Trek" base seems to be foremost on the filmmakers' minds. "The challenge of the movie is to be 100 percent true to the fanbase but also to bring in a whole new group of people who've never seen 'Trek' before," Kurtzman said.

Casting has not yet officially begun on the flick, which is scheduled to film in the fall. The writers won't even confirm which characters appear. ("We never said Bones was in it," Orci seemed to joke.) As for recent rumors that Matt Damon, Adrien Brody and Gary Sinise were being considered to play the storied Kirk, Spock and McCoy trio, the duo were reluctant to spill the beans. Asked if they would be happy if Kirk were played by Damon, a long pause followed. Finally Kurtzman allowed, "I'm the hugest Matt Damon fan ever. If he became [Kirk], great."

The mantra of "Who can say?" became Kurtzman and Orci's standard deflection. Will William Shatner or Leonard Nimoy appear? "Really, who can say?" Is the film, as rumors suggest, focused on Kirk and Spock, with supporting characters relegated to the background? "Really, who can say?" Is the old "Trek" plot device of time travel involved? You can guess the answer: "Really, who can say?"

What they will say, however, is that the film will be a starship-based adventure. "I don't know how you make 'Star Trek' without a starship," Orci laughed. "You have to trek through the stars, so you need a ship for that. There, you got something out of us!"

Orci and Kurtzman also confirmed that the film is not in any way a prequel but a reimagining of the franchise. Whether that means a whole new look for "Trek" remains in question. "We're not going to start totally from scratch," Orci said. "We want it to feel like it's updated and of the now. That's actually the discussions we're having now: how to keep the look of the universe yet have it not look like nothing's new. It's tricky."

The duo added that the same production team that assisted them and Abrams on "Alias" and "M:i:III" will join them for "Star Trek," including production designer Scott Chambliss and director of photography Daniel Mindel.

Of course any "Trek" fan worth his salt knows this is a huge change of direction for the franchise in every respect. Since "Star Trek: The Next Generation" premiered in 1987, the brand has been watched over by vets like Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, neither of whom is involved with the new film. Orci and Kurtzman have nothing but praise for the "Next Generation" years, calling it some of the best writing on television. "We just hope they bless us," Kurtzman said.

Speaking of the old guard, Shatner and Nimoy recently visited with Orci, Kurtzman and Abrams. According to the writers, the meetings went well. "It was pretty much the most stressful thing ever, but it was wonderful," Kurtzman said. "They were amazing."

For the longtime friends and collaborators the "Trek" assignment has been both weighty and exciting. While both claim to be big fans of all things "Trek," Orci clearly is the senior Trekker of the team. "I am a crazy fan," Orci said.

"Here's a frame of reference for you," Kurtzman added. "When I first met Bob, he had an Enterprise phone."

All of which made Paramount's offer of no limits and no stipulations too good to pass up. "They were just like, what would you do with 'Star Trek'?" Orci recalled. "We've been watching ['Trek'] all our lives. I've even read the books. It was all about, what have I always wanted to see in 'Trek'?"

Orci and Kurtzman believe their script adheres to the original vision put forth by creator Gene Roddenberry more than 40 years ago. " 'Trek,' more than anything, has always been about the human interactions," Orci said. "It's all about the human soul."

"And the friendships," Kurtzman added. "And everyone being a family. Whatever the story was, we always knew what it had to feel like."

And if all else failed, there was one "Trek" staple to fall back on. So fear not, fans of photon torpedoes and dilithium crystals, Kurtzman's got your back. "I actually love the technobabble!" he said. "I don't think you can do 'Trek' without technobabble."

DrSpengler 03-08-2007 06:22 PM

So why's everyone calling this Star Trek 11 when it's a reboot?

Anyhow, I'm sure I'll see it. I'm by no means a Star Trek fan; I think the only film I've ever seen is Generations. Still, since they're starting from scratch, this seems like a good enough place to jump in.

LogicDonny 03-08-2007 06:38 PM

First star trek movie i went to see was Star trek 4. I seen them all in theatres watched every series on tv and can't wait for the new one.

Those who are new to star trek, this is a good time any to watch the new movie.

I bet you if the movies does really well, they might do another series.

Anarky 03-08-2007 07:17 PM

Sorry, Spengler, I fixed the title, I simply overlooked that. And I believe they'll keep on calling it Star Trek XI until the PR-time's come. Then they'll be more or less forced to call it by its name.

DrSpengler 03-08-2007 07:44 PM

Yeah, after I made that post I thought about it and remembered that people were calling Batman Begins "Batman 5" for the longest time and Superman Returns "Superman 5" as well. No worries.

ZariusTwo 03-08-2007 11:29 PM

Well, since Casino Royale proved reboots are'nt always a bad thing, I'm open to a flexable idea, but this IS from the same hack behind LOST, so I won't hold my breath

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 06:49 PM

Star Trek 11 news - Spock cast
 
Zachary Quinto (Sylar on "Heroes") has been reportadly cast as Spock in the new Star Trek film. J.J Abrahms will be officially announcing this at Comic Con. I for one can't picture Sylar as my Spock.... He's nowhere near as hot as Leonard Nimoy. Hrm...maybe tho he'll look cute with Vulcan ears..... :ohwell:

http://www.trektoday.com/news/240707_01.shtml
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07204/803854-352.stm

Anarky 07-24-2007 07:01 PM

BILBO BAGGINS! Can't you please use already existing threads for your amazing news. I'll let you in on a secret tool of the boards if you do: The Drome Thread Locator! I'm quite honestly sick and tired of cleaning up after you.

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarky (Post 540661)
BILBO BAGGINS! Can't you please use already existing threads for your amazing news. I'll let you in on a secret tool of the boards if you do: The Drome Thread Locator! I'm quite honestly sick and tired of cleaning up after you.

Sorry... I do search for exsisting threads. There's just times when I can't find it in the search. :/

Anyways... I played around in Paint Shop Pro with an image of Zachary Quinto, turning him into the best er Vulcan look I could do. Dude looks weird with pointy ears.

Before:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72...11/ZQuinto.jpg

After:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72...SylarSpock.jpg

gobo 07-24-2007 07:33 PM

:teek: SMILING VULCAN!! That's illegal, right?

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gobo (Post 540682)
:teek: SMILING VULCAN!! That's illegal, right?

*lol*... Spock's half human and he's smiled before so no it's not illegal. :P

PipingPringle 07-24-2007 07:43 PM

Raph's Girl, you are my hero for that manip!

I haven't even heard of this movie! I'm such a bad trekkie. I should make a bigger effort to be in the loop :(

mattmanw54301 07-24-2007 08:54 PM

From what I have been hearing recently, this will actually be a prequel to TOS, kinda like George Lucas did with Star Wars. Except hopefully this one WONT suck.

Anyhow, all hardcore Trek fans are breathing huge sighs of relief that Matt Damon is NOT Kirk, and Ben Affleck is NOT Spock. Both of those were the early rumors, which would have caused widespread panic and riots all over the world if they were true.


And Quinto, meh. He could be good. I don't watch Heroes, so I have no idea of his acting ability.

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattmanw54301 (Post 540711)
From what I have been hearing recently, this will actually be a prequel to TOS, kinda like George Lucas did with Star Wars. Except hopefully this one WONT suck.

Yes it's a prequel to TOS....it's Star Trek: 90210 cuz it features Spock, Kirk, McCoy, and Scotty at Starfleet Academy. It's how they met and stuff. In the original script that was written some 15 years ago (I've read it), it had McCoy recounting back in flashbacks to some students on how he met his crewmates at the Academy. Unfortunatly since then De Kelley has died.

I have heard that Leonard Nimoy (Spock) is to tell the story now. Shatner's reportadly not too thrilled that Spock got the cameo and not him. Especially since Nimoy is supposadly retired from acting. :roll:

ZariusTwo 07-25-2007 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattmanw54301 (Post 540711)
From what I have been hearing recently, this will actually be a prequel to TOS, kinda like George Lucas did with Star Wars. Except hopefully this one WONT suck.

Anyhow, all hardcore Trek fans are breathing huge sighs of relief that Matt Damon is NOT Kirk, and Ben Affleck is NOT Spock. Both of those were the early rumors, which would have caused widespread panic and riots all over the world if they were true.


And Quinto, meh. He could be good. I don't watch Heroes, so I have no idea of his acting ability.

Suffice to say, a Vulcan Mind-Meld is peanuts compared to Silar's answer to it

Raph's Girl 07-25-2007 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZariusTwo (Post 540753)
Suffice to say, a Vulcan Mind-Meld is peanuts compared to Silar's answer to it

Now aint that the truth!! :lol:

Spike Spiegel 07-25-2007 12:05 PM

I'm rather excited about this. All the casting i've heard so far seems ok.

I'll keep my eye on this one...

Raph's Girl 07-26-2007 09:12 PM

Aaaaand it's official. Sylar is Spock and Leonard Nimoy's coming out of retirement to play Old Spock in the new Star Trek movie! Talk about double your pleasure, double your fun! 2 Spocks!! Muaha! *drools* :evilgrin:

They are also trying to figure out a spot for Shatner to be in the movie.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33460

Here's a piccie from Comic Con of the 2 Spocks together:

http://www.aintitcool.com/images2007/CCspocks.JPG

Barkworm 07-27-2007 12:58 AM

Holy sh*s, Nimoy looks ancient! About Quinto... Well, I love "Heroes" but almost every actor in it is in Jessica Alba's league as far as talent is concerned. I'm officially worried.

gobo 07-27-2007 07:58 AM

O_o That doesn't look like any Nimoy I'm familliar with...

Time Mistress 07-27-2007 09:49 PM

I think "Sylar" is a good choice for Spock. I don't like the idea of a Star Trek reboot.:roll: Isn't there *anything* these days that can remain in continuity without the need for a reboot.:x I also don't like that McCoy won't have as big a part as Kirk or Spock. That said, I think J.J. is a great choice for a director. I love Alias and Lost and trust him to bring the "core essance" of Trek to the big screen despite everything else. And I look forward to seeing Greg Grumburg as a the first Klingon or red shirt who gets killed in the film too.;)

Raph's Girl 07-27-2007 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Time Mistress (Post 541515)
I also don't like that McCoy won't have as big a part as Kirk or Spock.

Huh?? What do you mean McCoy won't have as big a part?? The big 4 will be in it (Kirk, Scotty, Spock, McCoy) as it's a Starfleet Academy movie. It's about how they all met and stuff.

ZariusTwo 07-28-2007 02:25 AM

I have no love for Abrams. Alias and Lost nosedived when he did'nt pay attention to them, and M:I III really scored less on th radar. His Superman script is also more infamous than Kevin Smith's giant-spider and polar bear fight fest (Olsen is gay, Luthor is Kryptonian)

I don't even trust his new "cryptic" movie to be anything but bad eggs. He's simply the most overrated director in Hollywood right now.

Brodie 07-28-2007 02:39 AM

In regards to the Kevin Smith note, Zarius, you know that was because he kept getting notes from Jon Peters, right? Check out Evening With Kevin Smith for the story :

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vgYhLIThTvk

Raph's Girl 08-05-2007 01:56 PM

Check it out...the casting list for Star Trek. We already know that Spock was cast (Sylar!) but now here's the casting call. Looks like the TOS cast are all supposed to be the same age now... WTF?

According to the OFFICIAL source (the official ST site):
Lesse... Kirk was born in 2233, McCoy was born in 2227, Scotty was born in 2222, Uhura was born in 2239, Spock was born in 2230 and Sulu in 2237. Notice something here? So sure lets break continuity and have em all be the same fraking age. They can't even have Chekov in it since he was born in 2245.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33582


STAR TREK
Feature Film
SAG
PARAMOUNT PICTURES/BAD ROBOT

[JAMES KIRK] 23-29 Handsome,cocky self assured and earnest. Great physical condition. 6 ft or less

[LEONARD(BONES)MCOY] -28-32 Medic on the Enterprise. Smart, clever and a bit danger-loving. Dark hair, blue eyes.

[UHURA] 25ish -African American. Brilliant, beautiful, heroic and FUN!, Uhura is almost tom-boyish - as if she grew up in a houseful of brothers.

[SULU] 25-32 -Asian American male (preferably Japanese). Helmsman on the Enterprise. Extremely fit, capable and dedicated. A bit of a wildcat

[MONTGOMERY(SCOTTY) SCOTT] -28-32 a brilliant ship's engineer. Must be able to do a flawless Scottish accent!

Anarky 08-05-2007 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Star Trek
[MONTGOMERY(SCOTTY) SCOTT] -28-32 a brilliant ship's engineer. Must be able to do a flawless Scottish accent while being constantly drunk!

There, I fixed the glitch the Star Trekkers made.

Raph's Girl 08-05-2007 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarky (Post 544433)
There, I fixed the glitch the Star Trekkers made.

:lol: Like it even matters... Scotty's never been played by an actual Scottish person...so why start now?? I mean come on.. James Doohan was Canadian! :roll:

Time Mistress 08-05-2007 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raph's Girl (Post 541524)
Huh?? What do you mean McCoy won't have as big a part?? The big 4 will be in it (Kirk, Scotty, Spock, McCoy) as it's a Starfleet Academy movie. It's about how they all met and stuff.

I heard somewhere (Trek Nation I think) that it was going to be a "big 2" movie with the main focus on Kirk and Spock, but I could have heard wrong.

Raph's Girl 08-08-2007 02:22 PM

Well folks.. Chekov has been cast....yes that's right...Chekov... He's played by child actor Anton Yelchin (he's 18 but looks much younger).

Now I don't really see a problem with this casting since he's a kid and Chekov was always the youngest...but..I don't remember Chekov having such curly hair. :lol:

Here's a pic of him:
http://www.aintitcool.com/images2007/jjcheckov.jpg

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33612

Raph's Girl 09-18-2007 03:43 PM

Looks like we have an Uhura! Altho some reports are saying she's in final negotiations, Veriaty and The Hollywood Reporter are both reporting that Zoe Saldana is indeed confirmed as playing Uhura. She is currently filming the new James Cameron movie, Avatar.

Oddly enough she played a Trekkie in a Tom Hanks movie...

http://trekmovie.com/2007/09/17/saldana-is-new-uhura/

Raph's Girl 10-09-2007 10:33 PM

And we have a villian! Eric Bana! Grrr!!! Hulk Smash Kirk!

Quote:

The villain in the new Star Trek film will be played by an Australian, but not Russell Crowe. Trek’s new bad guy will be played by Eric Bana, star of the 2005 Steven Spielberg film Munich . According to StarTrek.com the 38 year-old Aussie will be playing a character called ‘Nero,’ but no other details have been provided. A source tells TrekMovie.com that Nero is a Romulan. The name fits with Trek’s penchant for portraying the Romulan Empire as a futuristic version of ancient Rome.

The new Star Trek will not be Bana’s first forray into genre films as he stared in the 2003 Hulk film as the the ultimate guy you do not want to get angry…Bruce Banner. Bana’s career spanning thirteen feature films seems to give him plenty of experience to play the role. He has played a stone cold bad guy (Chopper), a Roman (Romulas, My Father) and a time-travller (The Time Traveler’s Wife). He won the Australian Film Institute Best Actor award for the title role in Chopper [highly recommended for a rental by TrekMovie.com]. Bana is currently filming The Time Traveler’s Wife, but apparently there is no confict with the Trek shoot which starts in a month.
http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/09/eric...-trek-villain/


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.