The Technodrome Forums

The Technodrome Forums (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/index.php)
-   TV and Movies (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" thread (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=22472)

cqb101 11-23-2007 08:22 PM

"Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" thread
 
Release Date: November 21 2008


Some casting news:

Quote:

The Slug Club just got its leader: Jim Broadbent will play Hogwarts potion master Horace Slughorn in the upcoming "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," the Oscar winner recently revealed to DarkHorizons.com

The former head of Slytherin house, Slughorn is "drawn back out of retirement" by Harry and Dumbledore at the beginning of the novel "because he's got some secrets they need in the battle against the Death Eaters," Broadbent said. Indeed, Harry's quest for a particular memory of Slughorn's is a central mission in the blockbuster sixth novel (see "Daniel Radcliffe Loses It In 'December Boys' Before Getting Back To Harry Potter").

For his part, Slughorn is initially reluctant to reveal details about a seemingly innocent conversation with a young Tom Riddle that centers on Horcruxes, or vessels in which a wizard can imprison part of his soul to keep him immortal. Thinking the damage to be irreversible, Slughorn isn't swayed until Harry confronts him during a particularly emotional scene in Hagrid's cabin.

But despite these dark and tragic undercurrents, the character is "quite comic," insisted Broadbent. "An older man [who wears] tweedy sorts of things."

Part of what makes him comic, of course, is his appearance: Slughorn is described by author J.K. Rowling as a short wizard with a bald head, large belly and an enormous walrus-like mustache. But Slughorn is also something of a professorial groupie, surrounding himself with the best and brightest witches and wizards. As leader of the Slug Club, he has an uncanny knack of picking the Hogwarts students who ultimately go on to accomplish the greatest things.

"He's quite star-struck as a teacher, and he's drawn back into the fold because he likes to notch up celebrity students," Broadbent explained. "He's drawn back by Harry."

Broadbent, who won a Best Supporting Actor Oscar for "Iris" in 2002, will film "Half-Blood Prince" until "May," the actor told Dark Horizons. The film will open next November.

Check out Daniel Radcliffe discussing Slughorn in the MTV Movies Blog.

Check out everything we've got on "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince."

Visit Movies on MTV.com for more from Hollywood, including news, reviews, interviews and more.

Want trailers? Visit the Trailer Park for the newest, scariest and funniest coming attractions anywhere.
Quote:

Eileen Campos - Celebrity News Service News Writer
Burbank, CA (CNS) - Warner Bros. Entertainment, holder of the Harry Potter movie franchise, has released a statement regarding the additions to the sixth installment of the series - Harry Potter and The Half-Blood Prince.

Jeff Robinov, President of Production for Warner Bros. made the announcement that there will be several actors joining the mainstay cast with returning director David Yates.

Some of the additions include Academy award winner Jim Broadbent from "Iris" and "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," who would be playing a professor at Hogwarts. Helen McCrory who has starred in "Becoming Jane" and "The Queen" is also another award winning actor to join the cast.

Younger Potter debutants include Jessie Cave, Frank Dillane and Hero Fiennes Tiffin. Tiffin happens to be the nephew of Ralph Fiennes who plays the adult version of the main villain of the movie, Voldemort.

The Half-Blood Prince will open in theaters November 21, 2008.

Jo Dawn 11-24-2007 08:01 PM

Yay! Can't wait.

Peanut 11-24-2007 08:06 PM

I'm hoping this one will turn out as well as Philosophers Stone did. Since Half-Blood Prince is really so focused with it's story, it shouldn't be as hard to put it on the screen without making any major changes. Hopefully we won't lose all the special character moments that make the books so good, and the last 3 movies so average.

BubblyShell22 11-26-2007 04:44 PM

I'm excited for this movie already. I hope it will be just as dark as OOTP was, maybe even darker with the whole Horcrux thing.

AquaParade 11-26-2007 05:05 PM

I wish I liked Harry Potter.:|

Dr. Doom 11-26-2007 06:32 PM

What a waste of a post.

Cure 11-26-2007 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BubblyShell22 (Post 572648)
I'm excited for this movie already. I hope it will be just as dark as OOTP was, maybe even darker with the whole Horcrux thing.

I dunno what that is, but I assume it's from the books. Let's try to keep in mind that people that watch the movies don't necessarily read the books. Thanks, everyone. :)

AquaParade 11-27-2007 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Doom (Post 572684)
What a waste of a post.

What an Ironic post:lol:

ZariusTwo 11-27-2007 01:35 AM

Frankie Goes To Hollywood to play death-eaters Dumbledore fends off!

BubblyShell22 11-28-2007 11:21 AM

TheCure, I'm sorry for posting that. I sometimes forget that there are certain people who only watch the movies and don't read the books. My bad. I'll try to be more careful in the future.

Mr. Snackpants 07-30-2008 03:44 PM

New trailer:

http://movies.ign.com/dor/objects/40...r1_073008.html

Creepy. I like the dialogue at the very end. Pretty sweet.

愛 07-30-2008 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCure (Post 572703)
I dunno what that is, but I assume it's from the books. Let's try to keep in mind that people that watch the movies don't necessarily read the books. Thanks, everyone. :)

What, you too poor for books?

People who only watch the movies are really missing a lot of the story. But I guess the same can be said for all books turned into movies. But if you're into the movies that much and you keep going to see each movie that comes out, maybe you should give the books a crack. They're masterpieces, in my opinion.

Mecha Cow 07-30-2008 06:07 PM

I wouldn't go as far as calling them masterpieces but the books are definitely great and infinitely better than the movies, most of which are rather poor in my opinion. Any fan of the movies owes it to themselves to pick up the books.

Brodie 07-30-2008 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ai (Post 624575)
What, you too poor for books?

Didn't you say your mom bought your books for you?

愛 07-30-2008 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodie (Post 624581)
Didn't you say your mom bought your books for you?

That doesn't mean that I'm too poor for books. That just means I take advantage of my mom's generosity.

Peanut 07-30-2008 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ai (Post 624587)
That doesn't mean that I'm too poor for books. That just means I take advantage of my mom's generosity.

You totally are too poor for books, though. Or anything else for that matter. At least Kev owns a 360.

Also, you're a new kid on the block. You can't start talking sh*t about Harry Potter movie fans yet. Get out!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecha Cow
I wouldn't go as far as calling them masterpieces

I would. I don't understand what a book requires to be called a masterpiece. Does it need to contain a ton of fancy language, deep social commentary, or an overabundance of hidden philosophical meanings to be a masterpiece?

The Harry Potter series is one of very few to actually illicit some kind of emotional response from me. They're engrossing and highly entertaining books. That's all I need.

Hannah 07-30-2008 07:05 PM

My mommy bought my books for me!

ThirdMarioBro 07-30-2008 07:08 PM

I need to catch up on my reading.

Mecha Cow 07-30-2008 07:27 PM

Quote:

I would. I don't understand what a book requires to be called a masterpiece. Does it need to contain a ton of fancy language, deep social commentary, or an overabundance of hidden philosophical meanings to be a masterpiece?
No, just violence, swearing and full frontal nudity.

Tinuvielsdreams 07-30-2008 08:35 PM

Like always I absolutely can not wait for this next film

I was a little disappointed in a few of the details they have had to leave out in the past movies(Particularly in the Goblet of Fire), I am slightly worried about this film because there are a lot of things happening both past and present they have to handle. However...The little bit of Dumbledore and young Tom I saw in the trailer is really exciting!
I can't wait to see how they do the Horcruxes and see Slughorn introduced.
I usually try to read the books over again right before the respective movies comes out

Raph's Girl 08-14-2008 11:32 PM

In a bit of a "WTF?!" news it seems that Half Blood Prince's release date has been pushed to a later date...how much later?? Try July 2009...

http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b238...rss_topstories

Quote:

Not that the shake-up should give Hogwarts fans any reason to worry that this latest installment in the billion-dollar franchise isn't up to snuff—studio heads say this is purely an economic decision, based on the fact that Potter No. 6 is so darn magical.

"Our reasons for shifting Half-Blood Prince to summer are twofold," Warner Bros. president Alan Horn said Thursday. "We know the summer season is an ideal window for a family tent pole release, as proven by the success of our last Harry Potter film, which is the second-highest grossing film in the franchise, behind only the first installment."

Horn also admitted that even He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named wasn't immune to the industry-wide discomfort wrought by the writers' strike.

"Like every other studio, we are still feeling the repercussions of the writers' strike, which impacted the readiness of scripts for other films—changing the competitive landscape for 2009 and offering new windows of opportunity that we wanted to take advantage of."

Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group president Jeff Robinov also made a fine point: There will now be less of a wait between the sixth and seventh (and eighth) Potter films.The studio is eyeing respective summer releases in 2010 and 2011 for the two-part Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

The sixth book (and film) in J.K. Rowling's hit series focuses mainly on Harry and Dumbledore's search for the remaining horcruxes where Lord Voldemort has stashed his soul.

As the recently released trailer shows, a lot of the action will take place in flashbacks, featuring Hero Fiennes-Tiffin, Ralph Fiennes' nephew, as a young Damien-channeling Tom Riddle, who, as we all know, grew up to be the baddest wizard on the block.

cqb101 08-15-2008 09:54 AM

I wouldn't say it's a "wtf" moment, it actually makes total sense.

Warhorse 08-19-2008 09:56 PM

No, it doesn't make sense. This was the movie I was waiting for 2008, and now it's not coming because WB wants to make this into a money game. This news gives me less faith in them handling the affairs of the TMNT on the big screen.

The Stryker 08-19-2008 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhorse (Post 628348)
No, it doesn't make sense. This was the movie I was waiting for 2008, and now it's not coming because WB wants to make this into a money game. This news gives me less faith in them handling the affairs of the TMNT on the big screen.

How dare the studio want to make money!

Mecha Cow 08-20-2008 09:38 AM

Quote:

No, it doesn't make sense. This was the movie I was waiting for 2008, and now it's not coming because WB wants to make this into a money game. This news gives me less faith in them handling the affairs of the TMNT on the big screen.
So it doesn't make sense because you wanted to see the movie sooner, and the studio's business sense makes you lose faith in them. Alright then.

Sewer Bull 08-20-2008 10:00 AM

Because making movies based on popular books is a public service.

Spitfire 08-20-2008 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhorse (Post 628348)
No, it doesn't make sense. This was the movie I was waiting for 2008, and now it's not coming because WB wants to make this into a money game.

Well for one the movie industry is getting it's ass handed to it right now by video games and illegal downloading so the fact your getting any movies at all period at this point should be a blessing. Also studios have zero idea of what will make money anymore and WB is one of the studios that took too many leaps of faith and while they recently had some big successes they also have screwed themselves and they need to dig themselves out of a hole. While Dark Knight was dominating the box office WB's stock was still going down.

Wanna know why movie tickets are so expensive? There's your answer. No ones making any profit. They spend over one hundred million on a movie like says Hellboy 2 and it only pulls in 74 million. Which is sad because it's a great movie but not what the general public wanted I guess. So because Dark Knight made so much expect tons of studios to try and cash in on it with dark comic books movies. Once people are tired of that then something else will come along.

This choice to push it back I think comes along more as them wanting it to have a good opening weekend, which I'm sure it will, but draw in more people then fans of the series. They want to hook people who aren't fans yet as well and they won't do that when there's something else interesting coming out already or if that's not what's hot on the market at the time.

cqb101 08-21-2008 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhorse (Post 628348)
No, it doesn't make sense. This was the movie I was waiting for 2008, and now it's not coming because WB wants to make this into a money game. This news gives me less faith in them handling the affairs of the TMNT on the big screen.

Shut up until you know what you're talking about. Summer is the biggest time for movies, that's when they make the most money. November is already a hot month with "Quantum of Solace" opening up only 2 weeks before HP was suppose to, and Disney's "Bolt" opening the same day. The movie would have done horrible had it stayed in that spot.

Evenstar227 08-21-2008 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cqb101 (Post 628540)
Shut up until you know what you're talking about.

No need to be nasty.

cqb101 07-13-2009 01:34 AM

Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

If you're a fan of the book, save your time and money and skip this. I'm calling it right now, disappointment of the year.

Boring, anti-climactic, overly cheesy.

Spoiler:

The horcrux's don't even get mentioned until theres only about 30 minutes left in the film.

No funeral for Dumbledore? Seriously. Snape kills Dubledore, Harry tells Hermione and Ron he's not going back to school and then the credits roll.

Remus, one of my favorite characters is in it for maybe 5 minutes.

Snape non-chalantly tells Harry that he's the half-blood prince and than just walks away.


The movie pretty much just focuses on everyone's romantic relationships and seems to just gloss everything else over.

Mecha Cow 07-13-2009 06:44 AM

Eep, I was afraid of that.

Mr. Snackpants 07-13-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cqb101 (Post 705979)
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

If you're a fan of the book, save your time and money and skip this. I'm calling it right now, disappointment of the year.

Boring, anti-climactic, overly cheesy.

Spoiler:

The horcrux's don't even get mentioned until theres only about 30 minutes left in the film.

No funeral for Dumbledore? Seriously. Snape kills Dubledore, Harry tells Hermione and Ron he's not going back to school and then the credits roll.

Remus, one of my favorite characters is in it for maybe 5 minutes.

Snape non-chalantly tells Harry that he's the half-blood prince and than just walks away.


The movie pretty much just focuses on everyone's romantic relationships and seems to just gloss everything else over.

How could this be 'disappointment of the year'? None of these movies have been any good. What made you think this would be any different?

cqb101 07-13-2009 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Snackpants (Post 706031)
How could this be 'disappointment of the year'? None of these movies have been any good. What made you think this would be any different?

While none of them have been all that great, I feel like they've been getting progressively better, while this one may be the worst yet. It had a lot of potential, too, which is a shame. The direction was fine, cinematography was good, music and sound design was great, special effects looked awesome, but the script sucked and it was the worst adaptation yet.

Mr. Snackpants 07-13-2009 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cqb101 (Post 706037)
While none of them have been all that great, I feel like they've been getting progressively better, while this one may be the worst yet. It had a lot of potential, too, which is a shame. The direction was fine, cinematography was good, music and sound design was great, special effects looked awesome, but the script sucked and it was the worst adaptation yet.

I see. I'm shocked reading the reviews on rotten tomatoes right now. 98%.

cqb101 07-13-2009 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Snackpants (Post 706148)
I see. I'm shocked reading the reviews on rotten tomatoes right now. 98%.

Yea, I'm shocked too. I'm surprised the reviews of the previous films were as good as they were, honestly.

Roseangelo 07-13-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cqb101 (Post 705979)
The movie pretty much just focuses on everyone's romantic relationships and seems to just gloss everything else over.

Crap, and I thought I hated Order of the Phoenix.

ZariusTwo 07-13-2009 11:42 PM

I wish they'd switch Directors and get someone more dynamic...hell, the reason they dont is because it's more expensive at this rate

I don't like Harry Potter, but the last two books roped even me in, and it's a shame the movie has to focus on it's bare-bones accomplishments and typical MTV-teen bopper simplistics

plastroncafe 07-13-2009 11:43 PM

Wow...and here I was thinking this was my favorite of the Potter movies to date.

This is the best straight up story-telling movie since "Prisoner."
Oh yeah, they cut a metric crap load of plot from the book, but all in all I think it was a better movie for it.

Really, I think by pushing back the release date for this movie was the best thing they could have done. It's been years since I've read "Half-Blood Prince" and I think that made all the difference in the world. I went in with only a vague remembrance of what <i>had</i> to happen in this movie and really enjoyed myself.

Yeah, if you're looking for a soul-less scene by scene retelling of book six a la Chris Columbus, don't waste your money.

If you're up for seeing this world fleshed out by an actual director, and seeing the characters you've grown to love through the books then I think it's more than worth the price of admission.

And I say this as someone who saw it for free and is paying to see it a second time on opening night.

GK Punk 07-14-2009 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cqb101 (Post 705979)

Spoiler:

The horcrux's don't even get mentioned until theres only about 30 minutes left in the film.

No funeral for Dumbledore? Seriously. Snape kills Dubledore, Harry tells Hermione and Ron he's not going back to school and then the credits roll.

Remus, one of my favorite characters is in it for maybe 5 minutes.

Snape non-chalantly tells Harry that he's the half-blood prince and than just walks away.

Spoiler:

If I remember right, the Horcruxes really didn't get brought up until closer to the end of the book anyway though, right? And Snape kind of just says "I'm the half blood prince" in a very nonchalant way in the book too. That always bothered me that it kind of felt like a throw away plot line in the book

I'm kind of glad to hear they put focus on the relationship parts though. A Majority of the book was Harry saying "Hey, Draco is up to something" and everyone saying "You're imagining it" for 90% of the book, until he says "Hey, Draco AND Snape are up to something" then they all... Pretty much tell him he's imagining that too. I think for a movie they needed to have more depth to the character development.

Of course, I haven't seen the film version yet so it could end up not working well.


cqb101 07-14-2009 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GK (Post 706238)
Spoiler:

And Snape kind of just says "I'm the half blood prince" in a very nonchalant way in the book too. That always bothered me that it kind of felt like a throw away plot line in the book

Spoiler:

Now I haven't read the book since it first came out, but wasn't there atleast an explanation for why he's called the Half-Blood Prince?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.