![]() |
I guess there's no stopping it...
Yep, it looks like we (the US) are going to war with Iraq. I knew this dreaded day would come, and I've felt this way ever since before the 9/11 attacks. In a way, I called this sort of outcome the "second fall of Rome". Look at it this way: the US is the modern-day world power, just as Rome was in its days. It fell because of its own arrogance and lack of respect for other worlds, hence the barbarians were able to attack them without warning. I fear that Iraq represents the barbarians in this case.
Alright, I'll admit that I'm only thinking worst-case scenario when I'm thinkng that we might face a nuclear diaster here, but hey, it can't get any worse than worst-case... I can't exactly think about what to write right now (I'm watching Wolf Blitzer Reports right now...catch you later, feel free to post your thoughts on this, especially you US people)... |
The U.S. needs to do this. It's time for Saddam's regime to go down. Again, let me repeat this....no, this war isn't ONLY about oil. It's only a part of the reason. Iraq needs to be liberated, a government and a madman who gasses their own people need to be taken out. I believe this is a step in the right direction. The President has tried to do this peacefully, and the 'Dipstick Democrats', such as Daschle and Kerry, are whining and crying. Hey, it was these guys that told the President to go to the UN. Hey, it didn't work. Saddam has been given enough time....too much time. This war is expected to last only a few weeks, but will it? We'll have to wait and find out.
|
I wonder sometimes about people...
There is nothing that needs to be done, only things that should be done. I wonder if you people know what you're talking about. As of right now, I'd guess not. |
Quote:
So please don't give me this "I want peace!" crap!. everyone wants peace! that's why we're doing this! |
Re: I guess there's no stopping it...
Quote:
It isn't about use being a world power. We have a responsibility to be a protector of peace and of peoples. Some one must stands up to the stuborn and arrigant Sadam and free the people that are enslaved under his power... If we don't protect an enslaved culture then who will?? |
I imagine it will be a replay of the first Gulf War as far as the Iraqi army is concerned: mass defection by the Iraqi troops. I am sure most of the Iraqi military has been forced to fight for Saddam, and will gladly surrender when given the opportunity.
|
Shadow: Read my post again. I never said anything about us giving Iraq any warnings. I merely made a comparison (fallacious or not), and in fact what I said was that WE might be attacked without warning.
The point in that comparison was that the US, like Rome during its time, is too arrogant for its own good and its citizens are brainwashed into thinking that the US ways are the only right ways. To be blunt, they're not. A lot of these right-winged conservatives I've been talking to at my school lately are always griping about how they are ingrateful to our aid and whatnot. I don't think they're being ingrates; I believe they KNOW that it's not their business to meddle in the affairs of other cultures/countries. That's the main reason why there's so much resentment towards the US; we just don't know when to keep our noses out of others' business. That being said, I should add that maybe reason why the US is in such economic shambles and national debt right now is NOT because of the WTC attack, NOT because of Democrats/Liberals (it's actually the other side that's to blame), but because we've been sending so much of our money and supplies to other countries that quite frankly have little to no significance in our world and thus leaving less for us to use at home! I say let a country solve its own problems, and if it's not able too, well, that's what it gets for not being on top of things. If a country has to suddenly form a command economy to get back on its feet (figuratively speaking), then so be it. That's what Russia had to do to get out of the poor economic state it was in during the late 19th to early 20th century. I know all of that sounds selfish, but you have to admit that there are times where you have to put yourself first. Anybody who doubts this, you'll be thinking differently the day our economy collapses to the point of total chaos where people are willing to kill anybody in their path just for a loaf of bread. Again, fall of Rome... In any case, when this all comes to an end I hope that no weapons of mass destruction are found in Bagdhad (sp) or anywhere in Iraq so that Bush and the rest of the GOP cabinet will look even more like idiots than they already are (anybody on here that's GOP-loyal, don't take that personally). I just want the outcome of this "war" to be a slap in the face to Bush and end up destroying any chance he has of winning the election next year. Good night. |
Rez has a good point. All geat empires have fallen at some point. Like rome, And Germany. Sometime it will happen to the US, but that might take hundred of years. I think that the war will be a short one.
|
PS: I don't need any PMs sent to me on this topic. I'm not saying a name as to who gave it to me, you know who you are. Just so you know, I didn't read it...
|
as much as I REALLY HATE Posting something like this on a Message board, I totally agree with Rez... I try to avoid posting on topics like this, because it always leads to a flame war.
Anyways, as I said... I've had many discussions with friends, and even my brother that ended up going the same direction of everything Rez said, We are the new rome. But I do hope this is just a small skirmish that will be over in just a few short weeks or months, and I really hope this dosn't escalate in to a complete world war, which is entirely possible. I'm just glad my health would prevent me from getting drafted if it ever came to that... |
It's wild to imagine we are at war again, but I guess since we (the US) gone through so many other wars without too much damage, I don't really feel worried. Even after the big slap in the face that was 9-11... I still don't feel reason to be worried. Especially since it seems to be staying over there in the Middle East... and that they said most of the civilians have left Baghdad too.
Grunger Kittie... don't worry. Us mods and admins will keep an eye on this thread and like topics to make sure it doesn't get out of hand. If it does, we might have to ban politcal/war topics from here for the time being. (I've sen them do this on other fourms). |
In Revilations (don't ask me where, please, I cannot remember) it talks about the fall of the second roman empire; it also speaks of several nations becoming one.
If we are the Second Roman empire, then indeed we will someday fall; if we are not, then we will someday not be the superpower of the world. (If that makes any sense). As for several nations becoming one, take a look at Europe and how they've all become one: The Eurodollar. Of course, this all could be mere coincidence and we are years away from seeng anything like what Revilations really speaks of so don't get angry with me. |
Horse Techie: That's cool, atleast you guys'll prevent this from getting to out of hand then...
Jade Green: That's similar to what I was thinking, the EU is like the new US, and I know I am no the only one to think that, as Armstrong And Ghetty (local early AM news show) began talking about that aswell... That's the only thing that has me worried is that we very well could be the new Roam. |
This is a very difficult subject.
This war is not righeous, to bomb a city of 5 million people is not what I would call righeous at all. The oil of course is the main goal, Bush has friends and stocks in the oil buisness you know. It took Donald Rumsfeld only 2 hours after 9/11 to start think of turning the murder of those on the planes, in the Pentagon and World Trade Center into a war with Iraq. Saddam Hussein is a dictator, a brutal one too. But after we have bombed Iraq what will we do? What about Syria? Saudi Arabia? Sudan? The Republic of Congo? Zimbabwe? North Korea? Should we over run all these places too? They all have cruel dictators, not all armed by the USA in the 1980s like Iraq, but they are dictatorships. In 2 years President Bush has turned everything around, we are in a deficit, the economy has gone down the tubes, the majority of thee world hates us, the UN's credibility and purpose are fading, we are the aggressors in war, our closest alies hate us. This war will bring more attacks on the US, in all forms including terrorist attacks, already there is evidence that the number of Al-Qaeda recruits is increasing, a scary thought indeed. The United States which has pushed for globalization so long just tore down its own system. |
If Saddam's forces managed to repell our attack and drive us out of the country, it would be the greatest upset in military history. I don't see that happening.
|
Let me start out by saying that I apologize if I have trouble making myself clear. This is a difficult thing to talk about, and it is difficult to put what I wish to say into words. This is also the only post I plan to make on this topic, unless it is in reply to a post that directly addresses me. I know that no matter what I say, everyone will hold to thier own opinions and beliefs, and I can't change that, and I don't plan on trying. Now, for my opinion on this whole situation:
************************************************** *********** I am backing Bush fully, and I think that we're doing the right thing by taking out this madman. Someone has to stop him, and we have the means, and more than enough of a motive (9/11) by which to do it. And don't you dare try to claim that Saddam had nothing to do with the tragedy of 9/11. His regime has trained countless terrorists, including terrorists with ties to Al-Qaeda. ************************************************** *********** To those of you who are protesting this war, I have this to say to you: You say that you are against the war for humanitarian reasons. You fear for the lives of our military men and women. People who join the military know going in that there is a chance that we could go to war while they serving thier country, and they know that thier lives could be put at risk to defend our country and our world. Then you say, 'But innocent Iraquis could be killed!' So what you're saying is that we should allow this man, this regime, that gases, tortures, starves, and all-around abuses thier own people -- we should allow this to go on? This man who has weapons of mass destruction, who wouldn't hesitate for a moment to hit us with them, and really any other country in the world, including his own -- we're supposed to let him remain in power? You would rather that thousands suffer and die by terroristic acts than to go to war to end this threat and possibly lose a few lives in the process? Better thousands to die by our enemies hand than to for a few to die in the effort to cut that hand off? Get real. We're doing this to PREVENT the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands -- or even millions, of innocent people. Yes, it's possible, and even likely, that some people will lose thier lives in this process. But to save so many more lives, it is worth it. It is precisely for humanitarian reasons that we are going to war. (*Edited for clarification) |
I have heard rumors that US might have Weapons of mass destruction too... :roll:
Yes, Saddam is a dictator, but no one can deny, that it is the oil that motivates this war. If and when attack would be neccesary, it should have UN supporting it. If it's not, the war is Illegal. This shows that when one nation grows strong enough, it can do what ever it wants. Sma e happened with Nazi Germany. Wolrd watched Hitler's actions for awhile, but he crossed the line ivading Poland. Imnot saying that what US is doing can be compared, atleast not yet. But like many have said, right now there is no real justification for this war. |
Quote:
|
Nturtle, I disagree that President Bush had anything to do with decline of the economy. The economy began to decline while former President Clinton was in his last year or so in office. He also had a chance to get bin Laden, but he did nothing.
And Kameko, great statement. I understand how difficult it is to say those things, believe me...even I have trouble speaking up. |
Well the US is the only country to have ever used nukes in a war, but I doubt that's what will happen with Iraq. And the UN really isn't that important, I can see US actually leaving the UN sometime in the next 10 years. And I think the world woke up to Hitler after the Blitzkrieg steam rolled into France.
|
Quote:
Quote:
We should also look in to South Africa, where more people die in one day than in the entire WTC attacks. Where tribal war fare has been going on for years, and where its leaders are restricting the rights of several groups (I am not sure exactaly which groups, as I haven't done near enough research on this). I am also against the war because I feel all peaceful solutions were not explored fully. The U.N. Inspectors should have been allowed to finish what they started. Bush should also have the suppport of the U.N. security council behind him. If Iraq and Saddam are as big of a threat as they keep saying, why diden't they UN give the go ahead for war? I don't want to get in to this though. Everyone has a right to believe what they want, and no one has the right to say any one elses opinion is lesser than theirs. The war is going to happen no matter how much screaming and kicking my side does, and were going to keep screaming and kicking no matter what the pro-war side does. |
I really try not to get involved politically. I stay away from the news. Ignorance is bliss, as they say. However, since everyone else has checked in with their opinions then I guess I will too.
First let me say that this doesn't surprise me. Several of my friends in the army have been telling me for years now that a war with Iraq was just around the corner. The military's been prepared for this since Clinton was in office, so I don't blame Bush for this. He's doing what he thinks is right. Personally, I've always said that we let Desert Storm slide too easily. We should have taken care of business the first time; if we had we probably wouldn't even be having this discussion right now. Secondly, I refuse to listen to any arguments against the war for "humanitarian reasons". I believe that humanity is, by nature, greedy and selfish and confrontational, and that war is the natural order of life. Prehistoric man didn't settle their debates by sitting down and talking, they settled them by kicking the s*** out of each other. "But we live in more civilized times", some are gonna say. I say: stop kidding yourselves. If human beings were so civilized, then there wouldn't be any war at all, anywhere, period. It's nice to dream about, but it aint gonna happen. I support Bush for taking a stand regardless of his supposed personal reasons. It takes guts to be the aggressor in war. Strike first, and you've already won half the battle. We all know, each and every single one of us, that another war with Iraq was simply a matter of time. For once I'm glad that we didn't just sit back and wait to be attacked like we usually do. As for most of the world hating the U.S., let 'em. I say a lot of 'em would probably hate us more if we didn't hold their damn hands so much. Personally, I wouldn't mind if we stopped aiding other countries entirely. No food, no money, no aid, nothing. They hate us? Then let 'em stand on their own two feet without any help from us whatsoever. They want us to butt out of other countries' business, it'd be interesting to see what would happen if we did just that. Oh wait, we did do that once. I think I saw an old film about a country that ran entirely without U.S. interference. And people got tortured and killed by the millions while the U.S, looked the other way. It was a little hard to understand though; the narration was in German. I mean, look, let's be realistic. You show me the people with the guns, the land, the money and the weapons, and I'll show you the people in charge. As for all that stuff about Revelations, the fall of the "second Roman Empire", all that... I don't really know what to say because I don't believe in the Bible. I do agree that we are an incredibly arrogant, elitist society, but that's what happens when the largest damage done to your country in over 200 years added up to 3000 people and two buildings. Personally, I don't think anything is gonna happen to us for a long, long time. We aren't the strongest country in the world like the Yankees are the best team in baseball (oh God it hurts to say that... God I hate the Yankees). No, we're the strongest country in the world like the Yankees playing against a Little League team. I support pretty much everything Kameko said. Again, I'm not one of the people that watches the news and scours the search engines looking for articles about the war and every single person that's involved with it. So if that makes my opinions "uniformed" or "worthless", well, then, that's your prerogative. I was never good in school; I just cite common sense. |
And that is exactly how both the Romans and Germans were, if used in that analogy.
I am against the war, but it isn't only humanitarian reasons, it is the whole concept, the situation in which we are in, how it is being done, the price we pay, (lives and the $ that we don't have since we are in such a huge deficit), etc...the list can go on. The fact is that people are perverse, but that doesn't mean we should just say oh because of that war is now a part of society, I think it shouldn't be. With all the technological advances and things in the past 100 years, war shouldn't even be taking into consideration, we advance by means of peace and understanding, not all out aggression. We act as the big kids on the block and express it in that elitest way, it is possible to be the greatest nation in other ways too you know. Wow, we have the biggest army, that says a lot, such as how we would resort to violence with anyone who disagrees with us. Ok Leo, lets see what would happen if we got no help from any other nation. After the war we will be begging every country to help us rebuild, we will be begging the UN with their order and such. The dollar will be the new penny, no imports from other countries, as well as export money we get for selling things. No more industry, as all of our manufacturing factories are located in foreign countries.....all the while they trade and live in peace with each other, oh heck they may even decide to form a coaltion and take over this land. That is one of the most close-minded things I have heard so far, most extreme conservatives at least agree with foreign relations. Wait a minute, wouldn't we then get attacked by terrorists on a monthly basis? Bingo, why do you think other countries don't get attacked and bashed as much as us? The U.S weakness is that they don't know how to stop terror, so what is to stop foreign countries from forming terrorist groups and splitting this nation apart when they know we don't care for them? You say that we help them so much, yet that is a good thing, why stop just by a petty disagreement? In doing that we make allies, but we don't control their souls like you think, instead we get a great reputation in exchange. Countries disagree because it is by their best interest, not because they hate us, the reason they hate us is because of what you were just saying, this isolation type atitude is no good in today's world Leo, so face the facts. |
You don't quite get what I meant, but that's ok. I probably didn't state it that well.
I'm NOT in favor of isolationism. It didn't work before WWII and it can't work now. It's been proven time and again that it just doesn't work. What I was saying was a snide jab at all the people that say "America should butt out of other countries' affairs". It goes both ways is what I'm saying. Either we "butt in," or we stay out of international affairs entirely, which as you said would be a disaster. My point was that we CAN'T just "mind our own business", because that wouldn't be in the best interests of us OR the countries we try and help. And I maintain that there will never, ever, EVER be peace, because humankind is corrupt. It's nothing more than a good idea, something people say "man, wouldn't it be nice if..." Maybe I'm wrong, I mean I hope I am, everybody wants peace. I'm just a cynical jaded bastard who thinks humanity will destroy itself sooner rather than later. It's just the natural order of nature. 99% of all the species that ever existed on this planet are dead; it's scientific fact. Human beings, for all our money and "intelligence" and wars and hubris are just another species, and when the planet gets tired of us it'll wipe us out the same way it did the dinosaurs. Now that I've clarified my argument, you can feel free to agree or disagree. And that's fine. Everybody has their own opinion. |
I forgot to mention that I don't think the money matters of the war really matters. We don't stand to lose that much. In fact, wars historically help the economy. I'd go out and invest in gunpowder if I had anything to invest. As for the defecit, the amount of money does not physically exist in the world to get this country out of debt. That's how we can still afford to give monetary aid to so many other countries. The debt only exists on paper.
|
If you look at the tax cut, the supposed funds for this war are nonexistant. our economy is already doing bad, but this. This will surely be it's demise.
Personally, I believe this war is needless to say, stupid. I disagree with the president, and I disagree with our goverment. I'd go into detail into why, but I'd just start a big flame war. As for the reasons behind this war. People say it's because this man and the country is a threat. In my opinion, this country is a bigger threat to anyone else then Iraq will ever be. People also say Saddam is a cruel dictator that needs to be stopped because he oppresses and kills his own people. It's funny, because if we really wanted to do the just, right thing and take out all dictator and oppressors, we would have done so. Countries like Cuba and Haiti and Indonesia have oppressive goverments and dictators, torturing and killing their own people, yet we sit here idly by, until one of these countries just so happens to have a needed commodity, like oil for example. Then we just dive in, take charge, and start a war. It's very hypocritical if you ask me. Many of the things our goverment does is just that. The only difference between the people who don't agree with me and the ones that do are that a large percentage of the population only excepts what it's goverment tell them, and what their presidents assures them. Anything that doesn't reach the media, therefore never reaches us, and thus becomes nothing more then mere opinions, when in fact they are true. Some say that ignorance is bliss though, that even if our goverment is built on hypocrisy and lies, that it's better to live here, smile, and just agree with everything. But ignorance is not bliss, ignorance is like a disease. It's spreads between vasts amounts of people, showing no differences between race, creed, or color. Ignorance is the main foundation of what is mostly wrong and unjust in this world today. That's all I have to say. Thanks. |
It's no secret that this country is full of hypocrites. That's ALWAYS been the case. This country was founded by slave-owners who wanted to be free. Doesn't get much more hypocritical than that.
Are we a war-like country? Of course we are, we were birthed out of a war. It would be foolish to think that anything is suddenly gonna change. Does it really, *really* matter what the people think? Hell no, and it never has. The elected officials in this country aren't out for us, make no mistake. Democrat, Republican, it's all a bunch of billionaires pursuing their own agendas. That's why there are "career politicians" that dominate and why it's next to impossible for a third-party candidate to do well. It doesn't really matter if Bush is only going to war to satisfy his own agenda. You can't say conclusively that Gore wouldn't have done the same thing for different reasons. It's all about agendas, people, that's what politics is about. And the fact is that we really *don't* get most of our oil from Iraq, but regardless, people are going to claim that oil is the sole purpose. Ah well, I'm sure it'll be put to good use. I'm not saying that this country, it's leaders, or its policies are perfect. But I honestly believe that what we have here is better than it is anywhere else. Except maybe Canada. They have better beer, money, and donuts. All I am saying is that if we're at war, and we are, it's better to be on the winning team rather than make a lot of noise that won't amount to much. This isn't a people's government anymore and hasn't been for a long, long time. Unlike some, I'm just realistic about it and can deal with it. |
Exactly, but most people either don't believe, over look, or plain out deny this. They truly belief their country is based on just, right reasons. If they only knew. I'm moving to Canada. Canada owns.
|
If there is no noise, everyone will think that the war is right and everyone will have the same opinion, if that is the case, then we will never learn. The U.S government IS based on the people because we have the right to vote for our selected candidate for senate and they vote on issues we have a say in. If this government didn't care for it's people, which the current one isn't doing at all, then we should be the ones getting a new regime. We have the highest homeless rate out of any country and most are in D.C next to Bush who is sitting there smokin his cigar, while people next to them couldn't afford one or will die of hunger, so in a sense we are torturing our own people. So what to do about this.....Hmmm, maybe Bush's brilliant tax cuts might help, that way the poor save 5 bucks a month and they can get that nice cigar like ol Georgie.
Anywho, this is not only about oil, it is about revenge from ol daddy. The reason why we are not after other countries? The terrorist attack was by arabs, so we are forced to believe that the arab countries should pay, being the pathetic society we are. If this was by a spanish dude it would be cuba, asian- north korea, it is simple. Not right of course, but hey, it is the American way. :roll: |
Well I'm sure every country's governments are full of backstabbers and hypocrites working on their own angendas, not just the US Gov.
|
I love America. But Canada's like cornbread...
Aint NUTTIN wrong with THAT! :D |
Quote:
Check this out, I found this on a Japanese Cosplay website... http://www.cyberjunk.jp/coscos/cgi-b...0320193719.jpg Well I guess we know what general feeling there is |
Quote:
|
|
Well after reading this whole thread and watching the news for the last 3 days i feel like posting my opinion, which will pale in comparision to the other ones mainly because i know jack sh*t about politics (too complex :P and besides, my country already has enough problems, i could also catch up with the problems of the other countries but it doesnt exactly cheer me up ;) so if you're surprised i didnt see this war coming 'till like a week, now you know why :roll: )
At first i thought bush just wanted the oil but after reading this i realized saddam was torturing his people...i still think bush is interested in the oil but if this war will lead to the freedom of the irak people then i dont think this war will be so bad, im just concerned about civilians, i don't want 'em to die, they're innocent, they don't have to, they don't have the fault of being on war. As for the cosplay pic, it aint working :ohwell: |
Quote:
|
Amen to the truth.
|
(excellently said, Kameko... ;) )
My brother might be getting sent off to Korea soon...I have friends from everywhere that are enlisted. It worries me what will happen. So many countries are arguing over this. I wish the arguing and slandering would stop... All i will say in this subject, Is that no matter what, My heart will be in support of all our troops, no matter who they are, no matter where they go. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :goofygri: :goofygri: :D :goofygri: :goofygri: :D :D :goofygri: :goofygri: :goofygri: :goofygri: :goofygri: :D :D :D :goofygri: :goofygri: :goofygri: :D :D :D :D :D :goofygri: :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D |
I don't want to get into this battle of For and Agianst... but I am not worried about this war.
War happens. Life happens. Peace Happens. Life Happens. It's just the cycle of nature to keep the balance. But I'm not one to get very deep in political matters aside from what I hear on the evening world news. I do think it's stupid for people to be protesting against the war now. It's already STARTED. What they do seems futile now, like a child crying after skinning his knee. Really makes me wanna smack my head whe the teens (looking for a good excuse to get out of school, more likely) have signs with the Peace symbol looking like a freaking Mercedes sign. They don't even know what a peace sign looks like! :lol: So yeah.. I'm glad we got this war going. Maybe for once something will come out of this to release the pressure from this building conflict with the Middle East. Well, a settlement for at least a decade or so until another conflict boils up. I support Bush, and I support our troops. I have faith that they will bring us the Peace we want back again. Correct me if I'm wrong, I beleive I also heard on the news how many immigrants who fled Iraq to come here, don't want to go back there until Saddam is out. Makes sense to me. But then, I was thinking "WTF?" for a bit when ont he news they also said the US had first helped support Saddam's cause before he became the big PITA that he is now. Now how's that for biting that hand that feeds ya? :evil: |
So you are saying we NEED war to balance out the peace in this world? I don't really see the logic in that, oh well.
People protest to express their viewpoint and to keep it alive. Most of us know that the war will happen but we want others to know that there are some who don't like war and would prefer peace. If we kill off the idea of peace this soon, the Bush administration will think this was a good idea and possibly use it again. Although I do agree that it is really annoying how people will skip school to protest if they just want to get out of school for a day, that is just stupid. I had yet to see the threat in the Middle East so a war to me would start a threat, not stop one. Yes, we did in fact support Saddam's cause in the Iran/Iraq war which is enough of a reason for them to have wmd. But also when he was attacking countries, we didn't even mind because it was just 2 foreign countries getting rid of one another, an elitest attitude which would get us in trouble 15 years from then. I don't know if there are any hopes left, except for less than 10 terrorist attacks within the next decade. :( |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.