![]() |
Why are most of the female characters love interests?
I am seeing a trend among the female characters of the show. Most of them are love interests to one of the male characters. I really hope this stops soon.
|
Because it's easy. Especially when your target audience isn't primarily made up of deep thinkers.
Not gonna lie, when I was about 7 or so, basically the target age group for this show, when I'd see a girl character in a show/movie my first instinct was that she was going to be someone's "girlfriend". At that age the people you're most familiar with are your parents, so subconsciously, you tend to pair people up because that's how it's "supposed" to be in your head. It also gives the writers the excuse not to put much thought into making them a fully-formed character. Most of the pen-holders on any show or movie are men, remember, and it's kind of impossible for men to even pretend they know how women think or act. So, since to them, women in real life only exist as potential partners, that's what goes down on paper. |
Don't you make the same thread every other week?
|
Quote:
I am not sure if I can give all the credit to Pendleton Ward but his female characters, even when they're love interests, are multi facade individuals with so much thought put into them and he still thinks that he's not trying hard enough. So it's not impossible for men to write female characters. You just have to be good and not lazy. A poor writer is a writer that is so complacent with status que that he/she never tries anything new and that is real problem with nickelodeon. |
Nick getting their hands on this franchise really was a worst-case scenario all the way around. I remember people being all, "Yay, we get more TMNT product!" But it's all been the drizzling sh*ts so who cares?
|
Agree that part of it comes down to the fact that while there are many women working in animation they're still outnumbered quite a bit by the guys. It would serve writing teams well, as well as those who create and develop characters, to balance out the gender ratio in studios a bit more. As well as recognizing that they might need to beef up their quality in terms of female characters and be willing to have more woman involved in the writing. Or at least get more of their input.
|
Because that's all they're good for apparently.
|
It's typical in writings. Even J.K Rowlings couldn't seem to create female characters without them not having a romantic interest. Unless you were a teacher that is.
|
Hm.. Suppose some of it could be social nonsense that sees part of a woman's value being in relation to her relationship status, and making a relationship or the hunt/want for one an inherent part of a female character's identity.
|
Almost all women in fiction are love interests. Even the female villains are usually paired with someone, or try to seduce one of the male leads away from the "good" female character.
Even in Legend of Korra the female lead was rushed into a relationship with a guy in the first season even before she became a lesbian at the end of the show with the other woman who was just a love interest. |
Quote:
|
Might be ingrained...thinking that a female character will definitely do her own thing and have her own life but may also get paired up with someone...although, for me, I never really thought about romance in general as a kid much. Although, when watching Disney's Adventures of the Gummi Bears back in like the late 80s, I viewed Cavin and Callah as a pair or possibly becoming one if they were adults. I thought it was cute.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The problem with introducing characters as solely love interests, is the writers use that as an excuse to write poorly formed characters. Then again some of these writers also live by the severely outdated notions that female characters aren't interesting to boys, their primary target audience, toy companies use this as an excuse not to make female figures.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know what the most radical thing would be? Not making her a lesbian, its having a woman who is single, and not treating it like it's a bad thing. The sudden lesbian thing also only reinforces the stereotype that a woman never really is content without a relationship, if she can't get with the men for some reason, well, then she's gonna go with the girls. It's either she's always in a relationship, or she's aspiring to be in one. A woman is always defined by her relationship role. And if she somehow happens to be lesbian or bi from the get go? then heaven help the writer that happens to let her be content or desires to be single! It's somehow 'bigoted' or 'homophobic' if she's written to not be in or aspire to a relationship! Gay or bi characters are just as defined by their relationship status as straight female ones. They don't get away from the relationship trap either. |
Not all the females from the show is a love interest, like: Ice Cream Kitty, Ms Campel, The female reporter, Kraang Prime...
But, honestly, I belive this show could use some other females, specially villians. |
So the cat made of ice cream, the robot who's only desire is to shoot rockets at people, a nameless woman (who probably has a husband and two ungrateful brats at home anyhow), and a Kraang who's gender is debatable. :tlol:
Oh but don't forget about Mom-Thing! Bigfoot... well... even she got paired up. (Still hoping that was more a nurturing love and not romantic. lol) |
Because that's all women are good for, duh!
|
You're definitely happier in the long run if you treat 'em like ornaments instead of, y'know, people. That sh*t's just a losing battle.
|
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Female characters are reduced to love interests so often because many writers of fiction are bad at their jobs. |
Also, because laundry-folding and window scrubbing makes for piss-poor TV.
|
Having seen the "let's clean the farmhouse" episode, I'm inclined to agree.
|
I couldn't fit in a sandwich pun without making it clunky. Just wanna say, I really, really, really tried.
|
|
Anything Linkin Park that's not "Shadow of the Day" makes someone a terrible person by default.
|
|
Quote:
I prefer the romance there instead of how the Nick Turtles try. Not too big, not too small. Just right in the middle! |
Quote:
|
Interesting theory. Meanwhile, dinner ain't gonna cook itself, cupcake. Might as well hop to and make ya'self useful, no?
|
We are now no longer broken even.
|
Nah, just plain broken.
|
True enough, my friend.
True enough. |
Quote:
|
Twice I went to add her and considered the thread title... lol Poor kid is default safe for now given her age.
Granted my earliest vague crush was in kindergarten, which appeared to be vaguely mutual, so I suppose they're never too young. :tlol: |
I would like to argue that since there's "not enough" female characters, Raph and Mikey are not paired up with someone. (Though, how Mikey makes out with Ice Cream Kitty sometimes, I gotta wonder if she's his girlfriend. :lol: ) If there were two more girls, they would have have love interests too.
So how I see it, it's not a female problem. It's a main character problem. But that's a common trope with cartoons. Main characters are "suppose to" have someone. Just like real life, if you're not in a relationship, people judge you either as gay or something's wrong. And how are Karai and April flat characters? They are not as generic as you guys are making them out to be. I don't see either of them having their sole purpose on the show as love interests. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.