![]() |
Thor: Ragnarok
Thought I'd start a thread for this now that they've got a director and now that the trades are confirming Hulk will be a part of the movie.
http://variety.com/2015/film/news/ma...lk-1201619246/ JoBlo's original report on Hulk being included makes it sound like we'll be getting some variation of Planet Hulk in this. |
While seeing Hulk is great, I just want the Enchantress and Executioner to finally appear in the MCU. Always did love those two.
|
Counting how many Marvel movies come out in a year do we really need a separate therad for all of them? I would think a general MCU thread would work with the exception for bigger movies or a big announcement.
|
Quote:
I dunno, Hulk doesn't really seem like he belongs in a Thor movie. This goes two ways for me: #1 I haven't liked either previous Thor movie very much (they're the only MCU movies NOT on my home shelf) because none of them have felt very gritty grounded Viking warrior Asgard mythological questy. Basically, I want a rolicking warrior Viking-god fantasy tale. But with Eric Selvig running around nekkid, Natalie Portman muttering about "sea bass", and The Warriors Three being nothing more than background character clutter... I don't see this as an indication that things will change for Thor 3. #2 On the other hand, tying in a major character that I DO like (Hulk) makes it much more likely that I'll want to see it. So far, the only main Thor characters I like are Darcy (yeah, I said it) and Loki. Odin's a well done character, but he's a d!ck. And Thor... he's never convinced me as an interesting character. I know, I know... no one else agrees, but y'all don't have to agree. |
I have enjoyed the last two Thor movies but I think adding Hulk would be a little too much.
|
It'll be interesting to see how the Hulk fits in, since it doesn't really feel like he belongs in a Thor movie.
|
|
At the moment, I have very little faith that Thor 3 will be much of an improvement of its weak predecessors... :tconfuse:
|
Looks like Cate Blanchett is joining the cast. Hela, maybe? I'm amazed at the quality of actors Marvel has been getting for their movies.
http://variety.com/2015/film/news/ca...ok-1201658846/ |
Enchantress, I hope.
|
Quote:
BRING ON GALADRIEL! |
I hope she's Enchantress as well.
|
She's not good looking enough, and too old looking, to be the Enchantress.
This is what she needs to look like, I don't see her pulling it off: http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/...20120412173805 |
Quote:
|
It is true though. The Enchantress is supposed to be a blonde bombshell who seduces Thor with her charms in both the comics and the cartoons. Look at the way comic artists always draw her with her boobs popping out of her top, even Avengers: EMH got away with cleavage for a cartoon.
They should have cast a young girl in their early to mid 20's. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/...20120125233630 |
Quote:
And if they cast her as Enchantress, there's literally noting you can do than just suck it up and deal with it. |
Cate Blanchett is a super talented actor who would make that role something far more interesting and memorable than most others could. And Cubey is complaining about not getting enough cleavage.
Business as usual, then? :lol: |
Why isn't anyone talking about Taika Waititi directing Thor 3!!!! :o
Now I suddenly have enormous hopes for it being the next surprise hit after GOTG. |
|
So Natalie Portman has been kicked to the curb. They shouldn't have cast her in the first place.
|
I really liked Natalie Portman's character, I think this Thor is going to be a train wreck. This new actress does nothing for me and even worse, never heard of her.
|
Quote:
|
Thank God. GET RID of Natalie Portman.
Gah. I'll miss Darcy, though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...rGmSIiaQczIedg
Quote:
|
Yeeeeaaah boy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm a Natalie Portman fan since "Léon: The Professional"... I was 14 I saw the film and fell immediately in love with her, so I gonna miss her... :tlove:
|
For those of you who didn't like Natelie Portman's Jane Foster, why is this? And no, being an astrophysicist as opposed to a scientist does not count.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
#2, Jane Foster in the MCU is a vapid boring character who is one-dimensional in the first movie, and a MacGuffin Plot Device who likes sea bass in the second movie who just HAPPENS to stumble across the Aether. |
Are there any rumors of plans for more stand alone Thor films after all of this (post Infinity War)?
|
Is Portman's character getting recasted? I find it annoying when movies spend so much time of the film dealing with love interests only to drop them when things go bad like they do here, Batman Returns/TDKR etc. Either to do it right or ignore it, did every MCU superhero really need a love interest? They should've planned ahead. At this point I'd prefer if they recasted, its better than ignoring like it ever happened.
|
Quote:
Or maybe she tried to get into that magic hot tub with Thor but it fried her. |
Quote:
In the movie, the romance is totally forced. Their infatuation is based on nothing, except physical attraction. I think it was smart to do the whole astrophysicist thing, and I'm glad they didn't make the whole movie about their relationship, but still... she's pretty pointless. Anyways, this new character being a love interest is a rumor at this point. Thor should end up with Sif. http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/201...der-01-800.jpg Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.