![]() |
Are we ever going to get a TV show that isn't mainly a toy commercial?
So up until recently I was a bit annoyed by the Nickelodeon cartoon, in that I was pretty satisfied with the first season but found the general structure of the series as a whole to be bizarre and the writing quality seemed to get worse with time. Of course I did eventually have to accept a simple fact, entertainment value is a lesser priority than toy sales and marketing of the franchise in general. That's why the show is so awkwardly structured.
Let's face it, Nickelodeon was probably never interested in a show that would bring ratings, it's more likely the initial idea was to make kids interested enough in the TMNT to boost the sales of tickets for the 2014 movie and sell toys, I'm pretty sure the toy commercial aspect is the only reason Nickelodeon bothered to renew the show for at least 5 seasons. I know that the other TMNT shows were mainly toy commercials as well but I'm a little more forgiving there since, well, MWS never produced anything else that was successful and 4Kids pretty much only ever did anime dubs, it just seems less acceptable when a much larger production company does this sort of thing. I'm not really sad that the Nickelodeon cartoon is nothing more than a toy commercial since that's what TMNT shows have always been and I do get more interesting TMNT material from IDW, it's just that Nickelodeon had the potential to be far better than 4Kids or Fred Wolf at making a TMNT show but then they decided to just make the same type of marketing tool again. It's just a bit dissappointing, I still enjoy the show to some extent but I had to accept it's not really intended to be anything other than a shallow marketing tool. So obviously TMNT shows are always going to have toylines but I wonder if we're ever going to have one where the marketing aspect doesn't override the story? |
No.
------------------ |
Nah. The most you can hope for is if the IDW comics are adapted to a cartoon at some point, and even then that's still toy/character centric.
|
It not just a toy commercial. Tmnt started as comics anyway.
I hate when shows like this or transformers are labelled as "toy commercials". I know transformers literally started out as toys but seriously these shows have detailed and thought out storylines. Even OT and G1 for the time. Who the heck would go through all the work of coming up with plots, stories and origins and everything else just to sell toys? Obviously toys factor in but because these franchises became so popular there's money to be made from merchandise, that's a given. Regardless, what I'm saying people cared enough to give toylines a universe. That's a whole lot of effort for something supposedly only created to sell toys. That seems like a huge waste of time and money just to sell an already created toy line. Especially multi-season tv shows. |
Even if that was how the first show started, wouldn't any popular series just end up with a toy line anyhow? And is understandable that they might try to predict in advance what might be worth making new figures for.
A lot of thought clearly goes into Nick's series though beyond adding new toys, and there have been plenty of episodes that didn't add anything of new toy potential, so... The show's team does their job, and Nick and the toy companies capitalize on it because it's what they are in business to do. Besides, who doesn't want some of the toys? They get business and we get a show and part of the action... figures. |
Quote:
The answer is, no, we likely won't. Best we can hope for is a direct to DVD animated feature of some sort, but that'd obviously not be a TV series. |
Quote:
The TV shows are clearly more intricate than being one big ad. If it was all just to sell toys there's gotta be easier ways to do so. A basic comic series, dtv animated movie. |
Just because something has a lot of love put into it doesn't mean it's not fundamentally a toy commercial. The people who are responsible for putting it together do their best to make an awesome show, but there wouldn't be a show to make at all if it's purpose was not to sell toys. Corporate America does not care about your fandom, it cares about your dollar. If people are hired who happen take that feeling away with their work, that's a wonderful thing, but the fact remains, & there will always be trace elements of that toy company's say so in the episodes. Hasbro funds Transformers stuff so you'll buy Transformers toys. Playmates funds TMNT stuff so you'll buy TMNT stuff. Etc.
|
Quote:
Like, Let's make a really good show with awesome stories - so we get everyone's money. Haha, They'll be none the wiser!...that's dumb. You and others wanna make it out to be about money. Well if they still cared enough of make good shows then it's not really all about "Corporate America" and your dollar is it? Think about everything it takes to make a quality show, even a bad one. Just to sell an existing toyline does not make sense. Creating a toyline to profit from a popular show make sense. Obviously Hasbro and Transformers are so successful the cartoons/movies are easily backed like most big franchises. I mean back then, to put all that work and resources into a show because of existing toys? |
"Toy Commercial" cartoons are/were often hit or miss. Corporate America, AKA the toy companies funding these shows, are the not the ones that make 'em good, & they don't care that they are, either. It's the people who write it that make the distinction. We turtle fans have gotten lucky that they're not simply shilling like many others have. All that matters to the toy companies is that their products are represented in animation.
If it doesn't make sense to you, then it's clear you don't have a clue about how these things work. Rarely do cartoons for kids get made if they're not pushing a product. The sole incentive for investing parties is that there will be a return, one that is significantly more than what was put in. It's common sense, standard logic. "Just to sell an existing toyline does not make sense" That's literally what happened with the Fred Wolf series, homie. Playmates paid for a 5 episode pilot to push the action figures they had just made. Nick's TMNT would have been cancelled already if not for Playmates, that is a fact. They stepped up to keep it on air & as a result it has become slightly less serialized, more toyetic (variant costumes in frequent use + more vehicles), & there are new (often times one-shot) characters being introduced all the time. |
Quote:
Transformers was not a huge franchise like today. I don't know how popular the toys were themselves prior to the cartoon but I imagine you'd have to care more than usual to turn it into an elaborate show. I'm not going to invest so much resource/effort to boost an existing toy line. There had to have been easier ways or better opportunities. I understand where this mindset comes from but when you really think it over, at least with this, it really does not make sense. |
Yeah, you don't get it.
|
This thread hurts my head.
If such a show existed, would you be content to just watch said show, with no collectibles? Is that really what you want? I'm curious, how many people here would be excited for a great tmnt show, that didn't produce any toys. |
Quote:
I was talking about show creators creating a cartoon on pre-existing toys. This doesn't make sense to me. I know the ot was made with the toys in mind but the comics were first. Someone must have thought they were cool enough to begin with. To make a cartoon out of it...and yes toys to go along. I doubt we would have gotten a cartoon just because there was already a toy line of ninja turtles. Pretending they had not come from Laird and Eastman comics I mean. |
Quote:
Whether or not Playmates "thought that was cool enough to begin with" is beside the point- they saw a money making opportunity. It's not a matter of "Wow, this thing deserves to be seen, we're gonna invest in you guys so you can get your due!" it's a matter of "You guys aren't using this property to it's full potential. We could get one of these things in the hand of every child in America if you let us mess around with the license for a while. We'll all be filthy rich." & that is why we got a cartoon. To tell the toys. To make money. Quote:
|
Quote:
They changed it because the comics were too mature but they saw the potential of the characters. I'm sure they cared if the show turned out good. |
@powder
Yeah, but you get my point. If the show was good, the thread would be "why aren't we getting figures for this series?" I don't understand the op's point. TV "shows" only exist to sell ad time, products, or both. As Powder said, it's a business, and has never been otherwise. |
I think the question is more in the vein of "Will we ever get a show whose demographic is young adults rather than kids?", maybe that will help you to get their point. Something that has us in mind first doesn't have to include lots of colorful monsters, vehicles, or Michelangelo goofiness, it can elect to use such things, but wouldn't be reliant on them.
An Adult Swim show or something would obviously have free reigns to do whatever they want & not bent at the whims of Playmates' creative input. Not sure where the bulk of the dough would be for them, but I guess it'd be in whatever those other shows make bank on. Obviously that's not gonna happen though. |
I can not belive a grown-up is so blind not to see all cartoons are made to sell their toys.
Cartoon shows are aimed for kids. Kids can be easily influenced into what they like and how much they like it. Kids will pressure their parents to buy for them things they like, because they own no money and don't undertad yet how much it takes to earn it. Therefore, companies create show that will be liked by kids, and then a lot of preoduct to be sold along. From toothbush to pijamas, from backpacks to haloween costumes, starting with action figures. Of course, to make the show, they also must hire professional story tellers and animators, because companies know about money, but don't tell stories. But in one point or another, a company executive will come to the animator studio and will say: "We need to launch the 2nd wave of toys, so you have to create new characters and new gears for main characters. There must be at least 20 characters in the next season so we can make a pool on the website and then chose wich 15 we are producing acording to kids feedback." And about the comics-tv transition, it's EXACTLY as Powder said: Eastman & Laird agreed to allow Playmates to change some aspects of their creation in order to, guess what, make it more kids appealing and therefore more profitable. |
Quote:
|
Very, very slim chance of it ever happening. And if I had to guess, if it were ever to come to fruition, it'd be a limited 6 or 9 episode series to test the waters on Netflix or something. Kind of like how Out of the Shadows aimed for the more "mature" TMNT market, but wasn't given a full game budget.
|
Lol. I see.
It could happen, but only if Disney bought the rights. Viacom is too entrenched to do anything else. |
I have to say, TMNT cartoons are the best "toy commercials" I have ever seen. Lots of shows don't even put effort in and you can tell they're just there as an advertisement, I never felt that way of any of the cartoons. Not even the original cartoon.
|
Likewise, we're fortunate in that way. I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as neatoman seems to. I think the current creative team does a great way of working in what they must & weaving around the input/mandates of their "investors". :tlol:
|
I really dug the season premier, not sure if that's the ep that the op thought was too pushy.
If the toys were better, I'd buy. |
I think there is a problem with networks viewing action cartoons as always having to be toy driven, as opposed to comedy driven cartoons which are allowed to stand on their own a little more. This is what killed 2012 Thundercat's and Sym-bionic Titan. :cry:
As for TMNT, I think the sale to Viacom sealed that a TMNT show will always exist at least partially to promote toys. But, a toy driven show can still be good if the creative people they hire to make it still put their heart into making a good show. All three animated TMNT shows are proof of that. I'd say the 2003 show is the least toy-driven. It existed as much because Peter Laird wanted a show that reflects the original comics better and because 4kids wanted to add more variety to a Saturday Morning block that was mostly butchered anime dubs, as it did to sell toys. And, had less toy inspired characters, vehicles, etc.as a result. (Not counting "Back to the Sewers" at least) . The most toy driven IMO would be the original, but that's just because it's a product of it's time. It was the golden age of toy-driven cartoons after all. But, that's all just my opinion. Maybe a DTV movie would be cool, though. |
The only time Playmates' involvement becomes obvious in the bulk of 4kids' series is with all the vehicles. :tlol: Mirage Don was not that savvy/resourceful...
|
Quote:
Except, we never even saw any toys from "Back to the Sewers", did we? Didn't the toyline end with the conclusion of "Fast Forward?" |
Yeah, I guess when I say the 2003 series is the least toy driven. I really mean the first few seasons.
|
Quote:
|
I think the only way you will see one-shot, animated Turtles movies would be if the rights were sold to Warner Bros or Disney, and one of their execs/producers felt a burning desire to make it happen. And don't get me wrong, WB and Disney would still produce a heavily merchandised kids show, but there could be a chance that some small animated projects would be made in parallel, by one of their in-house teams. I don't think Viacom is set up to do something like that.
|
Yeah. That's probably because WB and Disney own DC and Marvel. Whereas I don't think Viacom owns IDW and so has no stake in promoting the comics themselves (from a business standpoint the comics exist to promote the show/toys).
|
Quote:
Although the Nick Toon is heavily catching up to the variants, at least the 80's TMNT never wore any of their made-up extra outfits and gear from the toyline. |
Yeah, good point. I guess they've all been noticeably toy driven from the start.
|
Quote:
You forgot about Undercover Don.... And the Movie III Turtles and April. (Not ton-related, but STILL....) It's too bad we never got a full set of those "Undercover" turtles, though. They ALL had the trench coats and masks! |
They totally missed the memo about a "disguise" not making you look more conspicuous. :lol: Although I get that was the point of the gag, "they stand out no matter what they do". But yeah.
|
Well, it IS kind of hard to disguise the fact that they have that huge shell on their backs, and three-digit hands. I mean, look at Raph in those photos from the cut scene in last year's film! No, nothing suspicious THERE.... :trazz::trolleye::twink::tlol:
|
Quote:
|
With the advent of Netflix, it's a bit more possible than it used to be.
|
Why not have a well done live action or animated web series made for the adult crowd that stays close to the source material?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.