![]() |
Disney planning '10 more Star Wars films' as JJ Abrams confirms 'exciting' plotlines
http://metro.co.uk/2016/03/07/disney...lines-5737976/
Quote:
|
I don't even know how to respond to this.
Most of those characters wouldn't even work in a solo movie. In fact, we don't need any solo movies at all. |
I knew the Mouse House was going to run this franchise into the ground.
|
Overkill much, Disney?
|
Well they might as well make as much money as they can before the franchise burns to the ground. So let them go for it. Its not like you have to watch the spinoff movies anyway.
|
Quote:
I mean, this was obviously going to happen as soon as they announced that Han Solo movie. Quote:
Extreme analogy, but I don't think Cubed would understand it otherwise. I'm actually pretty sure he's not going to understand it either way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As long as their good I don't care. I f*cking love star wars.
Spoiler:
|
Of course they're going to make more movies. Did anyone actually think they bought Lucasfilm to only make Episides VII - IX?
A lot of that report is BS though. |
I'd love a good movie portraying the relationship between Mace Windu and Count Dooku, since they both where students of Yoda and Mace was the superior student despite Dooku being far older and had been in the order longer then Mace.
But beyond that... No thank you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd watch it. I guess there's a novelty seeing the Jedi more in their prime then just being a uniform political group that they've been in the prequels, the mystery of the Jedi have been more or less broken, so why not go all out and explain every corner of the Jedi. |
Quote:
|
On one hand, theres fear of overkill.
On the other, George created an endlessly expansive, fun universe and it'd be a shame not to explore it. |
Quote:
|
I want a movie about young Luke shooting womprats on his T-16 back home.
|
Quote:
I'm probably too stuck in my bias of keeping Jedi/Sith and the Force as ambiguous as possible, the less we really know the more interesting they are, to me at least. Knowing every detail down to how the light saber is constructed kinda removes the allure. But. I'd watch anything featuring Jaxxon, cause I'm weak. |
I wish they would try something less derivative. They had a lot of success with original characters in TFA, and the characters in Rogue One look like they are new, so why not keep the ball rolling. Others may disagree, but the last thing I want to see is an Obi Wan movie. The gaps in his timeline are pre-training, where he was no doubt an irritating kid, and the time he spent on Tatooine after the prequels; living in a cave, eating soup, and applying ointment to his feet (probably).
|
Quote:
|
Well this has been fairly obvious and has already been said since they announced the first spin-offs that SW was now an annual franchise. This is a huge mistake, why burn out fans over the next decade for short term profits and be forced to take a break while Star Wars could be an ever green property in perpetuity? Each movie will continue to see diminishing returns starting with this years spin-off. Sure Ep.VIII and IX will make a big buck but how excited will they be for the next new trilogy that comes out only two years after the last one ended. It took ten years for this new trilogy and fans were starved for Star Wars. A much better strategy would've been to have SW be an event with a new "Episode" every 2-3 years" and after each trilogy ended have a spin-off film every 2 years or so before tackling a new trilogy again in about 10 years give or take. SW would be seen as a huge legendary brand by everyone and continue to make big bucks. With the strategy their going they'll see plenty of money but it'll burn out fans and be making less with each film than they would be able to if they spaced things out. This isn't Marvel and even Marvel is already overcrowding and having people get tired of their movies.
|
Quote:
But won't it be much more fun to watch the trainwreck that both the Marvel and SW franchises will become? I'm honestly waiting for them to announce a crossover. |
Its easy to see what they're doing. They're burning out the franchise now and 30 years from now when Rey, Finn and Poe are all 50 year olds in real life...they'll bring them back for Episode 10, 11 and 12 and do a new younger cast all over again.
|
O L D R E P U B L I C
They don't need movies for Han or Boba, nor do they need a movie for Mace Windu. Obi-Wan would be extremely cool in my opinion, but it's still unnecessary. The best way to go about keeping Star Wars relevant is do an Old Republic trilogy. We already know the stories of Boba, Obi-Wan, Mace, Han, etc. Give us new characters to fall in love with, not recasted old ones. Give us new worlds and adversaries and plotlines. |
Mace Windu is such a terrible character. That would be a terrible idea for a spinoff.
I agree with the sentiment that they shouldn't do these standalone movies on established characters. It's a bad idea. |
Quote:
|
Meh...
As expected. As others said, already, they most likely burn franchise into the ground. Also, I will miss those times, when new SW movie was an EVENT. Of course, it is possible that they will have a competent creative team, that will be able to keep things fresh and interesting, but given how usually things go...its fairly unlikely. On the other hand, it's not like there are a lot of space movies out there. |
I'm surprised they mentioned Mace Windu now that I think about it. I would have bet money that they wouldn’t touch the prequels for the foreseeable future, what with all the opinionated gen-Xers writing these things.
|
o.O TEN? Well, good luck keeping the quality up and not driving Star Wars into the ground.
But if you start Jar-Jar-ering it after a handful, just call it quits early... |
If they're good. Fine.
But all the Star Wars stuff they've done so far hasn't taken any real risk. It's all stuff that they know people identify as 'Star Wars'. A Han Solo origin movie has no reason to exist other than to market that Han Solo is back. I would not be surprised if the main reason for Rogue One being a thing is so they could get Vader in a movie again. I really hope they don't stay in that trap and branch out. New characters, planets and stories. Away from the 'stuff we know'. |
Well they've already confirmed Vader will be in that.
|
Quote:
I guess Disney are trying to keep Wall Street happy by releasing their game plan, but it would've made more sense to wait for the reaction to Rogue One. The plan as it stands reads like two people wrote it over a latte one morning. “What about Obi Wan?” “…um…. Yeah what the hell. Can I get another biscotti over here?!” |
They're probably going down the checklist:
- Han solo movie - Boba Fett movie - Obi-wan movie - Yoda movie - Darth Vader movie etc. They're bound to cast a young Luke too at some point. |
Quote:
|
No actor they cast as young Han Solo will ever be able to pull off Harrison Ford's facial expressions, subtle nuances, and his general personality. It just can't be done. Not to mention the facial structure will just be too different.
Its a disaster in the making. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.