a new Harry Potter movie
 

I do not know how many of you are Harry Potter fans....but I found out that the next movie, based on the third book, will be at the movie theaters some time in June 2004.

Re: a new Harry Potter movie
 

Cool! I can't wait. But the kids are growing up so fast they wont work in the other movies. So they would have to recast I am thinking. But I can't wait!

also, they indicated that they are currently working on the fourth movie while they are producing the third movie.

http://harrypotter.warnerbros.com/we...?id=POA_photos

http://harrypotter.warnerbros.com/we...OF_Mike_Newell

ooo...is Oliver Wood going to be in it? :lol:
*hugs her Gryffindor Quidditch Team Shirt*

Awesome! I can't wait, althugh the books are far better than the movies will ever be.

yes, the books are much better but it is nice to watch them on the screen

Most people say that while there are people that like to view it in realism version. They series is pretty good. I seen the first ones ofcourse before that I wasn't a total fan of the books but when I saw the first movie I changed my mind about what I thought of it.

I give the first two an average A's. Some reason the second one was as good as the first. The series has good background a good number of actors and perfect visual effects.

I never read book 1 or 2 but I did read book 3,4, & 5 just to know what the next movies will be like. I know that the younger actors for the Hogwarts students grow up but in the book they grow up as the series goes. They re-cast the members if nessary.

Alot of new charaters will appear along with Gary Oldman as Sirius Black and Timothy Spall as Peter Petigrew(Wormtail). Micheal Gamman taking the role of Dumboldure. I'm sorry if some of the Richard Harris fans are still stress about his death one year ago and a month before the release of Chamber of Secrets.

I read the 3rd so I got the main idea of what will happen in it. And I can tell it might be atleast 2hr. 30min. I'm waiting until the previews come out sometime around Winter. Hope it'll have some good effects on the Hippogriffs.

No Wood. Infact, there are very very strong rumours that they've somehow cut Quidditch out of the movie completely. No idea how they're going to explain Harry getting the Firebolt though... or the Dementors comming on to the field. =\.

BTW, this news has been around since..... last year sometime. ;). bigger news is that movie four will be out the year after next, and quite a few of the cast members have signed on for it :).

check out http://www.mugglenet.com for news. they don't update very often though.

The books are way better, but yes, it is nice to see it on screen.

*Pukes....Nothing more, nothing less.*

NO WOOD?!!? *wails* NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And I like Quidditch! :cry:

I thought the first two movies were way too rushed and I guess this won't be petter in the third one. But since it has another director (one who compares G.W. Bush to Lord Voldemort :lol: ) I'll give it a try.

AHHH! NEVER SAY HIS NAME!! :lol:

Who the hell is Lord "Voldermont"??? :D

Voldermort...bleah...that's what I ment..... :dead: :D

So, why does Emma Watson look less and less like Hermione for every movie? :( Bushy hair? yeah right...

I guess I have two movies to look forward to in June 2004....the Harry Potter movie and TMNT 4. :D :D :D

I know some of you are a little disturbed about some charaters not being in the movie. But when the production is over then we might hear full details on previews I just found out who will play Prof. Trelawney.

Wood's already been a confirmed cut though, and has been for quite a long time.
Ron's supposed to be tall and lanky, and Fred and George are supposed to be shorter and stalkier. McGonagle is supposed to have black hair, not grey. There are a lot of little mistakes like this in both movies =\.

Yeah, at least Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson have signed on for movie number four! *sigh* Though, at first they said they were going to limit that movie to a two and a half hour movie, which wouldn't do the book justice. Though, they are rethinking that decision... Which would be wise on their parts.

I just wanna see Emma and Rupert do that terrific row Ron and Hermione have after the Yule Ball. :)

Oh, plus, if you wanna see som pics from Prizoner of Azkaban, go here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0304141/photogallery

they didn't show everything for movies 1 and 2, and every book has been getting longer. I don't know how they are going to keep it together, cause all the plots eventually run into one another. A good Harry Potter movie would have to be atleast 5 hours long to get everything in, especially book 5.

Oh yeah, the movies definitly need to be longer. Now, in the books, it's like almost everything is really important to the story. Lots of details. Last I heard, the movie people were considering either doing a four hour movie with an intermission, or making the movies really long, and having them have two parts for each movie, released on different days.

That might've changed, though, but there's always hope...

Ya I'm not sure how many Based off Book Movie would only have less detail. Since for me I thought the 2 movies did a good job. Yes mostly the off subject parts would have to be taken out. Even when I viewed the deleted scene I can tell that there were some parts not nessary to show or just waisted time.

But the movies did do good didn't they? :)

They did very well, but books 4 and 5 are over twice as long as books one and two.

The WB network might make those 2, 3 hours long or atleast enough time to fit everything. They'll find a way you'll see.

I wish they would finally show us some Dementor pics. I also wish the new movie would be about three hours long.