![]() |
Hurricane Irma
https://weather.com/storms/hurricane...ward-islands-0
Storm is now a Cat. 5 and Florida is under a state of emergency. Current models have it reaching Florida as a Cat. 4 and is unknown if it'll turn north off the east coast or the west coast of the state. |
Poor Florida. I suppose when you're a large peninsula that sticks out like a sore thumb down that south, it's to be expected sometimes, but one that strong...? :ohwell:
For their sake, I hope it turns sooner, only skirts the coast, and they end up on the "safer" side of it. Comparatively speaking of what the worst side (north/east) could do if it hits from the gulf side instead. :tsad: (But then at the same time, where does it go after that.) I trust FL's got this though, they know the drill and doubt most will just sit in place like Texas unfortunately did. Now to just check in on a friend though and see what her plans with her husband and handful of pets is... |
Horrible to hear this might hit Florida. Looks like hurricane season is starting off with a bang.
|
Irma's going to hit both the US Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico at Category 5 levels.
From the National Weather Service as of 3 hours ago: Quote:
|
All I know is that I have a beach house rented next week in Florida so Irma better stay the f&ck out of the Gulf. If it goes in the Gulf and its a Cat 5 it won't even matter if I stay home. I'll still have a hurricane to deal with.
|
Quote:
|
I know that, but it's still not a good thing that they have to deal with.
|
Quote:
|
Add in the fact that it has been, I believe, quite a while since FL has had a major hurricane make landfall, right? You could have a lot of newcomers to the state in that time that haven't seen more than a minor one or tropical storms.
Sure there have been some near misses, like Matthew last year, but skirting the coast to the east is nothing in comparison to a landfall or a bad one on the Gulf side. Irene (who I keep trying to mistake Irma's name for!) did that to us here. Being on the better side of that thing I was surprised how little impact there was. Being on the "bad" side of Isabel, however, weakened to a TS, in '03 was worse for us, even at the distance it was. Fingers crossed that Irma turns sooner and spares FL the same. Don't want to think about hit hitting anyone else if that happens, but hopefully it might weaken by then. |
Yeah, Hurricane Andrew was the last major one they had in 1992 and I doubt a lot of people have forgotten that horrific storm. I would hate for something like this to happen again.
|
Really, as was said, its not that people who went through it forget, its that 1 million or so people have moved to Florida since Andrew. Those people have no Idea what they're in for.
If you have been through a big one, you don't forget. Mine was Ivan. It made me paranoid about any hurricane that even LOOKS like it might come towards me. |
2 more hurricanes are coming. Katia and Jose.
These are the end times, I tell you. |
Eh, Katia looks to be a short lived TS affecting Mexico only. (edit: Never mind, guess I saw 'old' info, Katia became a hurricane. That fast. Wtf.) Was surprised to just see that one on a radar map thing I just looked at.
End times, no. Common busy part of the season, yes. Shame Irma's projected path doesn't seem to have shifted much from this morning. :ohwell: Just a little more to the east. And Jose is now a hurricane, assumed to become major as well. Lovely. And now that they've put a projected path on that one... Are they spreading out so that everyone can have one? (Turn out to sea, jackass...and drag your big sister off with you.) |
|
She's bringing the big guns, alright.
Ivan, Irma, Isabel, Irene... I-storms are such hurricane I-holes. :tmad: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Hurricane names alternate male and female. We've just gotten a run of fairly strong female ones lately.
|
Quote:
|
No. I'm not sure why they name them other than that it is easier than referring to "the second F3 hurricane in the Atlantic of the 2017 season". People would not remember which one it is. So they just give them names. Mention Sandy or Katrina though and they know EXACTLY which one it is!
|
They started naming them for simplicity of plotting and because people seem to pay attention when they are named. They used to name them by where they did damage, but then you may have had one storm with multiple names and they would have had no idea it was the same storm.
In the 30's or 40's the started being able to track them and decided to name them. The first batch of named hurricanes were named with the military alphabet. (Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot, etc). Then they did all female names alphabetically. Then they changed to alternating male and female names alphabetically. They have six or seven lists that they run through each year. This year happens to be the same list from the year Katrina hit. When a storm is particularly deadly or costly they retire names. Like the year Katrina hit, if they run through all the names on a list for a certian year, they go to the Greek alphabet. ....weather nerd |
Good to know. So then a hurricane will never be named Katrina or Andrew again since those were deadly hurricanes. You learn something new every day.
|
Yeah Harvey and possibly this one will definitely be retired after this season.
|
Quote:
So Irma is edging eastward? This is good I hope for a portion of FL, even if just a little? |
Three confirmed deaths in Puerto Rico. 70% of people without power, 18% without access to running water, and 42% of the hospitals being operational.
|
Good thing we have CNN to inform us, that maybe if this hurricane had a masculine name, maybe this gender-biased society would have taken Hurricane Irma more seriously:
Quote:
|
Saw that turn up on Google the other day, and via multiple sources... so it wasn't CNN's study, so why blame them. Not like they're the only ones who reported on it.
And if a study did find that some people seem to stupidly take a storm less seriously based on its name, so be it. Some humans are dumb like that. Survival of the fittest will take care of them. Undoubtedly similar might happen with softer sounding male names vs more macho sounding. Only an idiot will judge it by its name, but... let said idiot go ahead with it. |
Unfortunately Survival of the Fittest really means Survival of the Just Fit Enough To Eek By.
The study on Female Named Storms being more deadly isn't some grand new revelation, it's from a 2014 paper. You can read a dissection of the paper Here. Or the paper itself Here. It important to note that only female presenting names were used to name storms between 1950 and 1978, so that kind of skews the data a bit. Honestly? There's just way too many variables to consider when one looks at the overall danger of a given storm. The socio-economic background of the community. The severity of the storm. The infrastructure. Where the people in said community get their information. I just read a transcript of a hard-right leaning talking head who told people not to worry about buying bottled water, because the stuff from the tap is fine. Which, I'm sure in their neck of the woods it is...but that's not always the case. And might not be the case after the storm hits. |
Quote:
There's still alot of play in the track. I see they have moved it back slightly to the west again so they have it running straight up the peninsula again. I just hope it stays out of the Gulf. For my vacaton and home's sake. If it goes in the Gulf it will stay HUGE. Its already the longest lived Cat 5 in recorded Atlantic history. |
Bleh, that sucks that it moved back over. :( Best of luck with this thing...
Quote:
Those unsealed containers will also only keep for so long, of course. Better to use those first and still have some sealed ones for backup later. |
Quote:
|
Here's video of Hurricane Irma from the ISS today, she's HUGE!
|
The fact anyone is talking about a study based on what named hurricanes are taken more seriously boggles my mind. We just had Harvey which devastated Houston and now Irma is about to unleash on Florida. Who cares. What's next, are we gonna waste time talking about how hurricanes with latino names arent taken seriously like Jose?
|
Nah, you missed the point. He posted that to be political. "Oh hai guiz! Isn't CNN such fake news! LOL. stupid feminists."
Never mind that plenty of other news outlets posted it as an interesting phenomenon and CNN didn't create the study |
Everyone and their mother tried to make Harvey political and even then, that got annoying. Let's stick to what's important here and that's the safety of the people in the southeast.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Infrastructure maintenance and upgrades are political. Disaster relief is political. All of that stuff comes from somewhere, and has to be paid for somehow. A bunch of the lawmakers looking for funding for Houston denied similar funding for New York for the damage done by Sandy. |
Some are saying Harvey funding will be tied to funding "the wall." That sounds political to me and also reminds me of the following quote.
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." -Rahm Emanuel |
Quote:
I am constantly amazed at what can be exploited to fit some narrative these days. Both sides of the political spectrum have lost their minds. |
Everything in our lives is going to be political nowadays. That's just the way things are and we just have to either deal with it or ignore it. I'm definitely more concerned about the safety of others, but certain things are funded by the government such as FEMA.
|
Quote:
Before, people could be united by their beliefs, but they still were forced to interact with outside world, so their insanity / zelousness was kept in check, either because of ethics or because their day-to-day interactions were not allowed them to become completely brainwashed. Nowadays, people can create an environment, where they can be surrounded by only like-minded individuals almost 24/7. Which allow their zealousness to grow and fester unchecked. Add to this default teenage maximalism and people who want to use others for their own gain (but not necessarily believing in whatever they are preaching), and you are in one heck of a ride. Personally, I have grown weary of this left-right tug-o-war, and really want both radical sides of the spectrum to fall under the earth or something, because at this point it's not battle for progress or status quo, its just dickwaving contest, which doesn't lead to anything, but to more division, confusion and hatred. Both sides, have compromised themselves to the point, when they have become laughing stock for normal people, but I guess, it will take time to tide of insanity to die down. Of course, it doesn't mean that this insanity is something new (idiots were always part of the humanity), but those unstable individuals, who could not influence a lot of people before and were mostly silent, nowadays receive a platform and a way to affect lives of other people. And this is a problem. Sorry, for being slightly off-topic. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.