![]() |
Sony's Kraven the Hunter
Quote:
|
|
What a horrible idea.
|
|
Let's go over the scrapped ideas Sony had for the Spider-Man franchise, shall we?
I know they have to reach in order to make spin-offs (Spidey ain't as extensive as X-Men after all) but yeesh... |
Jaysus, who would even go and see that?
|
Quote:
Its a stretch to make a decent movie out of Venom and how anything can work without Spider-Man involved and it being a quality product is likely zero to none. Studios need to quit announcing films until they go into casting stage of a film. Learn from DC! |
All I remember reading from Spiderman comic is that he’s a hunter nutcase that likes prancing around naked in his house.
|
Quote:
|
I’ll have to re-read the comic again. I bought it because it’s listed as among the greatest Spiderman comic stories ever told. Cheers. :tthumbsu:
|
It looks like Nick Spencer is trying to build him up as a potential major threat again in his ASM run, so I'd be on the look out for that
|
Crazy theory: Sony sees Disney deal for Fox happening. They start "developing" contradictory stuff, beginning with Venom. The worst thing is if Venom is a hit. Then Disney has to listen. Then Sony follows things up with Kraven about to go into production...
My point is... is Sony just jockeying to get Disney to pay maximum top dollar for Spider-Man rights? It actually seems a bit smart and savvy, if true. |
Quote:
Seems kind of silly, seeing how their deal with Disney is set-up. I believe Sony just thinks it's better to take a cut of Disney's profits from "real" Spider-Man movies, while they can safely experiment with the somewhat limited character pool of Spider-Man in hopes that they can make something that works in their favor. You know, not all eggs in the same basket. Main Spider-Man movies will always make Sony some money while investing very little in them (Sony only gave around 35 million to Homecoming's budget), then they can focus on smaller budgeted spin-off franchises they collect all the profits from. Even if Venom and Spider-Verse end up flopping, I'm willing to bet neither one cost more than 100 million. |
Kraven?
Why not someone more decent? Hobgoblin for example? |
Seems like the audiences aren't Kraven this movie.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Keep Petey's dead parents as the American spies. Keep Aunt May as Peter's moral compass. I don't mind Felicia Hardy becoming the Black Cat, but Hardy as VJ? Nope. |
The more I hear of Sony putting out these ideas, the more I worry for their future outside the Playstation division. Kraven is not good enough to get his own movie.
|
Quote:
That Sony is actually run by a cabal of cocaine-addicted autistic pangolins. |
Quote:
Problem is they are lacking talent and their managers just can not sit on their hands for 5 seconds without interfering with production of the movies. This what have killed both Raimi's Spider-Man and ASM. |
Quote:
Actually, that's what Disney/MCU should have done. WAIT. Wait until they could buy everything back, and not settle for this joint-custody arrangement where Sony and Amy Pascal keep screwing things up. |
It wouldn't surprise me to see Sony attempt the "Kraven's Last Hunt" storyline with Eddie Brock in the place of Peter Parker and Kraven donning the symbiote instead of the black spider-man suit.
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
We are at that point of saturation with comic book movies where everyone is trying to get a piece of the pie, and we will start seeing more of this nonsense pumped out to try and cash in until we respond as the market with lack of buying.
|
The downside of Venom doing well is Sony will continue to pursue this pathetic Sony Spiderverse. I can't say I didn't smile when Venom did well and watched the MCU fanboys/Disney/Geek blogs in tears so it was worth it.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Success of comic book movies is currently in the hands of DC - if they can make GOOD movies with different tone than Marvel stuff, it will allow CMBs to fly for some more time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They will use Tom Holland.
|
My hope is that this means Sony and Marvel have worked out a deal in which they can each have their own Spider-Man. Let Marvel do Marvel and bring someone else in for your Sony-Verse. Hell, bring back Tobey Maguire or Andrew Garfield for Kraven's Last Hunt. We can still have Tom Holland's Spider-Man safe and secure in the MCU. That's my ideal scenario.
My prediction is that Sony likes to tactically use the "will they/won't they?!" ploy in order to drum up interest in their films. With Venom, a lot of social media talk revolved around whether or not Spider-Man would show up in his movie. Now we see a bunch of people discussing the same thing with Kraven, due to vague hints. Whether or not Spider-Man will be in it, twice as many people are talking about the film and spreading the word now that the question is in the air. Quite annoying if that is the case. |
Quote:
|
I could get behind this, especially if they actually have Spidey involved. Kraven was originally hired by Jameson to hunt down Spider-Man and bring him to justice as a "menace". The fact that it fits with his own iffy morality of hunting a human as the "ultimate challenge" was just icing. As a long-time fan of Spider-Man, I have always liked Kraven. He is one of the more complicated rogues in Spidey's gallery, and has played several roles over the years. And having read Kraven's Last Hunt, I would love to see that story incorporated somehow.
|
Quote:
|
Aaron Taylor Johnson has been Cast as Kraven
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/spide...ohnson-a185132 January 13, 2023. release date |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.