![]() |
Battlestar Galactica To Be Rebooted For NBC "Peacock" Streaming Service
Frak me, Battlestar Galactica is being rebooted, with Mr. Robot's Sam Esmail at the helm.
https://deadline.com/2019/09/battles...ck-1202736127/ |
Quote:
|
Another reboot? Shouldn't they just pick one of the first two incarnations and make a soft reboot?
|
I've never seen any version of this show, but I love science-fiction and constantly hear it being praised. Maybe I should finally get on that.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.newsarama.com/46981-nbcu...-era-show.html |
Oh jeeze. It is reportedly going to be all about "the politics of today."
https://www.tvinsider.com/935779/bat...es-sam-esmail/ |
Quote:
|
So this would be like the third iteration of this franchise, correct?
Quote:
So doing a little research (I've never watched either show) BSG takes place thousands of years in the past? And somehow also the future? In either case, why would the politics of today be relevant to such a distant time period? |
I'm really only a fan of the original because it's fun and cheesy in a late 70's and early 80's kind of way. The original sorta feels like a Saturday morning cartoon but in live action.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Michael Leslie has moved on to another project, leaving the series without a showrunner
https://deadline.com/2021/03/mike-le...ca-1234719550/ |
Eh... what happened to Sam Esmail? I thought he was the showrunner?
https://collider.com/battlestar-gala...ail-interview/ Not a good sign when showrunners start jumping ship, though. Usually that means everything we've been told about a project up until that point might have gotten thrown out the window. |
Tricia Helfer, man. That's what will right this sinking ship.
|
I've never seen anything BSG, what is worth checking out? The old show/movies or the new show, spin-offs? Are they all in continuity like star trek or just reboots?
|
Quote:
The 70s one is super-cheesy, I prefer it over the bleaker modern show because I grew up on it, but the latter is the one most would recommend watching. |
Quote:
|
|
|
That and other articles are falsely painting this as a reboot. It isn't. They've over and over again said they've consulted with Ronald Moore and the overall idea is to make it at least cool to be in the same universe. Which makes it seem like it might be a new, weird thing. But maybe in a good way. Like maybe it's set now or 10-20 years from now and we suddenly have to deal with Cylons, a few years after the series finale.
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is particularly disappointing because the showrunner told fans this was going to take potentially years to crack properly in pre-production, so to be patient. And then Peacock just goes and drops it, before so much as even a pilot is made. Or written. |
There's really not much to do with another reboot, at least now. They either go back to the campy Star Wars-knock off direction like the original but trying to repeat what they did in 2004 would be redundant.
There's really not much else you can do with a bunch of alien robots who nuke a planet. Half of BSG was ripped from Star Wars and the second series half-ripped off Terminator with the human skin on the robots and the planet getting nuked because A.I. got too smart. The series basically became Terminator set in space just without the time travel. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.