The Technodrome Forums

The Technodrome Forums (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/index.php)
-   TV and Movies (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Star Trek 2009 official discussion (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=18540)

Anarky 02-27-2007 11:52 AM

Star Trek 2009 official discussion
 
IGN Movies reports that there are talks about J.J. Abrams directing the new Star Trek movie. The main cast, also still in talks and not confirmed: Matt Damon as James Tiberius Kirk, Adrien Brody as Spock and Gary Sinise as Bones. Read the article here.

I dunno, but the three seem like a good pick. They look a lot like their 1960s counterparts and they're all good actors. But Lost's Jin as Sulu? Nah, thanks. He doesn't look anything like Takei did back in the day and he's always seeming kinda "wooden" when acting. But I could live with that. What I couldn't live with would be Halle Berry as Uhura. Not that there have been any talks in that direction, but she's the first bombshell black actress that comes to mind. And I wonder who will play Scottie.

All in all, I am happy that they're going back to the traditional Enterprise. The first one there was.

On a completely unrelated sidenote: I hate McCoy's english nickname "Bones". Why can't they just adapt the German version "Pille" (=Pill)? Sounds a lot friendlier, don't you think?

Mecha Cow 02-27-2007 12:04 PM

Can't really see Brody as Spock. Sinise seems like a good choice though.

Barkworm 02-27-2007 12:09 PM

Brody lacks Spock's arrogant look but apart from that he would't be a bad choice.

Dr. Doom 02-27-2007 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarky (Post 470825)
On a completely unrelated sidenote: I hate McCoy's english nickname "Bones". Why can't they just adapt the German version "Pille" (=Pill)? Sounds a lot friendlier, don't you think?

That's the way it really is, slapnuts, get used to it.

Anarky 02-27-2007 12:29 PM

I know that it's his "True" name, but I'm just used to Pille. Bones sounds like someone else, while there's only one Pille out there. Bones can be anyone, from an archeologist to a bad ass biker-dude. But Pille, well, Pille's Pille.

That Matt Guy 02-27-2007 12:39 PM

As long as they visit the Nazi planet (as seen in the original series) then I'm all for it.

ThirdMarioBro 02-27-2007 12:48 PM

I still can't get used to this. Really trying, but it's hard to adjust to.

Dr. Doom 02-27-2007 02:09 PM

...There's nothing to get used to yet. Calm down.

LogicDonny 02-28-2007 12:51 AM

well paramount announced the movie is going to be start to be filmed and made ready by Xmas 08.

Still, it's star trek, I will be seeing it like I did with all the other ones starting with 4. Worst star trek movies for me would be final fontier and Insurrection. Nemesis was a good finale for the next generation but wasn't as good as the undiscovered country.

Anarky 03-08-2007 06:04 PM

Thar be news! To cut a long story very short, since I know nobody likes to read a lot:
  • There is a release date for the new Star Trek movie, we just don't know it yet. All we know is that it's coming in 2008.
  • We have a title. The movie will be called "Star Trek"
  • It will be a sort of "Star Trek Begins", reimagining the whole thing.
  • J.J. Abrams will direct the flick.
  • There will be more action than in any other Star Trek film.
  • Other people with apparently famous names on the movie: Production designer Scott Chambliss and director of photography Daniel Mindel. I have no idea what these job descriptions stand for, but they're working hard on whatever their job is.
  • No Rick Berman and Brannon Braga
  • There will be Technobabble
  • And of course, everyon involved in this project is a huuuuuge fan of Star Trek and it's been their lifelong dream to make this one Star Trek picture together and all that bollocks.

There you go, lots of news. Good news if you ask me, apart from the action-bit. I'm not too sure about that yet. And re-imaginings seem to be all the rage.

Anyways, here's the article, freshly from MTV.com:

Quote:

If Batman and Superman can be reborn, why not Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock? On Christmas Day 2008, the storied "Star Trek" franchise will begin anew on the big screen, and its creators are almost as ecstatic as the series' famously obsessive fans.

"We just got the green light! We have a release date and everything," said Alex Kurtzman, co-screenwriter of the eagerly anticipated new "Trek" adventure. Kurtzman and collaborator Roberto Orci, who are also executive producers of the project — and veterans of "Transformers" and "Mission: Impossible III" — spoke exclusively to MTV about the film Trekkies and Trekkers alike are salivating for any information on (see "An Open Letter To 'Star Trek' Director J.J. Abrams").

First things first: From the sound of it, fans can rest assured that subtitles about undiscovered countries and insurrections are a thing of the past. Kurtzman and Orci told MTV that their film is titled, quite simply, "Star Trek." "That's the intended title. I don't think we want to put any colons or anything on it," Orci said.

Thus far details have been few and far between on the film, the first since Picard and company starred in the much-maligned 2002 flick "Star Trek: Nemesis." In addition to the 2008 release date Paramount recently announced, it has been confirmed that "Lost" co-creator and "M:i:III" director J.J. Abrams will direct. Orci says he was relieved that Abrams agreed to helm the project after reading the very first draft (recent rumors indicated he would only produce).

"When we finally turned in the script I started lining up other directors, and that really got [Abrams] going," Orci joked. Rumors that the film would center on an early adventure of the crew or even on Kirk and Spock's Starfleet Academy days — unlikely, though no doubt provoked by a long-dormant "Trek" movie idea — have yet to be addressed directly.

While Kurtzman and Orci were reluctant to reveal much about the top-secret film, they did offer some hints. "There will be more action in this movie than any 'Trek' that's preceded it," Kurtzman promised. Orci, without discussing a specific budget, added, "It'll be the biggest one. The economic models of the other [films] were very much based on the fans out there and their purchasing power. With this one we're going for the broad audience to bring people into 'Trek' for the first time."

Indeed, broadening the "Trek" base seems to be foremost on the filmmakers' minds. "The challenge of the movie is to be 100 percent true to the fanbase but also to bring in a whole new group of people who've never seen 'Trek' before," Kurtzman said.

Casting has not yet officially begun on the flick, which is scheduled to film in the fall. The writers won't even confirm which characters appear. ("We never said Bones was in it," Orci seemed to joke.) As for recent rumors that Matt Damon, Adrien Brody and Gary Sinise were being considered to play the storied Kirk, Spock and McCoy trio, the duo were reluctant to spill the beans. Asked if they would be happy if Kirk were played by Damon, a long pause followed. Finally Kurtzman allowed, "I'm the hugest Matt Damon fan ever. If he became [Kirk], great."

The mantra of "Who can say?" became Kurtzman and Orci's standard deflection. Will William Shatner or Leonard Nimoy appear? "Really, who can say?" Is the film, as rumors suggest, focused on Kirk and Spock, with supporting characters relegated to the background? "Really, who can say?" Is the old "Trek" plot device of time travel involved? You can guess the answer: "Really, who can say?"

What they will say, however, is that the film will be a starship-based adventure. "I don't know how you make 'Star Trek' without a starship," Orci laughed. "You have to trek through the stars, so you need a ship for that. There, you got something out of us!"

Orci and Kurtzman also confirmed that the film is not in any way a prequel but a reimagining of the franchise. Whether that means a whole new look for "Trek" remains in question. "We're not going to start totally from scratch," Orci said. "We want it to feel like it's updated and of the now. That's actually the discussions we're having now: how to keep the look of the universe yet have it not look like nothing's new. It's tricky."

The duo added that the same production team that assisted them and Abrams on "Alias" and "M:i:III" will join them for "Star Trek," including production designer Scott Chambliss and director of photography Daniel Mindel.

Of course any "Trek" fan worth his salt knows this is a huge change of direction for the franchise in every respect. Since "Star Trek: The Next Generation" premiered in 1987, the brand has been watched over by vets like Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, neither of whom is involved with the new film. Orci and Kurtzman have nothing but praise for the "Next Generation" years, calling it some of the best writing on television. "We just hope they bless us," Kurtzman said.

Speaking of the old guard, Shatner and Nimoy recently visited with Orci, Kurtzman and Abrams. According to the writers, the meetings went well. "It was pretty much the most stressful thing ever, but it was wonderful," Kurtzman said. "They were amazing."

For the longtime friends and collaborators the "Trek" assignment has been both weighty and exciting. While both claim to be big fans of all things "Trek," Orci clearly is the senior Trekker of the team. "I am a crazy fan," Orci said.

"Here's a frame of reference for you," Kurtzman added. "When I first met Bob, he had an Enterprise phone."

All of which made Paramount's offer of no limits and no stipulations too good to pass up. "They were just like, what would you do with 'Star Trek'?" Orci recalled. "We've been watching ['Trek'] all our lives. I've even read the books. It was all about, what have I always wanted to see in 'Trek'?"

Orci and Kurtzman believe their script adheres to the original vision put forth by creator Gene Roddenberry more than 40 years ago. " 'Trek,' more than anything, has always been about the human interactions," Orci said. "It's all about the human soul."

"And the friendships," Kurtzman added. "And everyone being a family. Whatever the story was, we always knew what it had to feel like."

And if all else failed, there was one "Trek" staple to fall back on. So fear not, fans of photon torpedoes and dilithium crystals, Kurtzman's got your back. "I actually love the technobabble!" he said. "I don't think you can do 'Trek' without technobabble."

DrSpengler 03-08-2007 06:22 PM

So why's everyone calling this Star Trek 11 when it's a reboot?

Anyhow, I'm sure I'll see it. I'm by no means a Star Trek fan; I think the only film I've ever seen is Generations. Still, since they're starting from scratch, this seems like a good enough place to jump in.

LogicDonny 03-08-2007 06:38 PM

First star trek movie i went to see was Star trek 4. I seen them all in theatres watched every series on tv and can't wait for the new one.

Those who are new to star trek, this is a good time any to watch the new movie.

I bet you if the movies does really well, they might do another series.

Anarky 03-08-2007 07:17 PM

Sorry, Spengler, I fixed the title, I simply overlooked that. And I believe they'll keep on calling it Star Trek XI until the PR-time's come. Then they'll be more or less forced to call it by its name.

DrSpengler 03-08-2007 07:44 PM

Yeah, after I made that post I thought about it and remembered that people were calling Batman Begins "Batman 5" for the longest time and Superman Returns "Superman 5" as well. No worries.

ZariusTwo 03-08-2007 11:29 PM

Well, since Casino Royale proved reboots are'nt always a bad thing, I'm open to a flexable idea, but this IS from the same hack behind LOST, so I won't hold my breath

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 06:49 PM

Star Trek 11 news - Spock cast
 
Zachary Quinto (Sylar on "Heroes") has been reportadly cast as Spock in the new Star Trek film. J.J Abrahms will be officially announcing this at Comic Con. I for one can't picture Sylar as my Spock.... He's nowhere near as hot as Leonard Nimoy. Hrm...maybe tho he'll look cute with Vulcan ears..... :ohwell:

http://www.trektoday.com/news/240707_01.shtml
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07204/803854-352.stm

Anarky 07-24-2007 07:01 PM

BILBO BAGGINS! Can't you please use already existing threads for your amazing news. I'll let you in on a secret tool of the boards if you do: The Drome Thread Locator! I'm quite honestly sick and tired of cleaning up after you.

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarky (Post 540661)
BILBO BAGGINS! Can't you please use already existing threads for your amazing news. I'll let you in on a secret tool of the boards if you do: The Drome Thread Locator! I'm quite honestly sick and tired of cleaning up after you.

Sorry... I do search for exsisting threads. There's just times when I can't find it in the search. :/

Anyways... I played around in Paint Shop Pro with an image of Zachary Quinto, turning him into the best er Vulcan look I could do. Dude looks weird with pointy ears.

Before:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72...11/ZQuinto.jpg

After:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72...SylarSpock.jpg

gobo 07-24-2007 07:33 PM

:teek: SMILING VULCAN!! That's illegal, right?

Raph's Girl 07-24-2007 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gobo (Post 540682)
:teek: SMILING VULCAN!! That's illegal, right?

*lol*... Spock's half human and he's smiled before so no it's not illegal. :P


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.