![]() |
2012 London Olympic Logo (Rant)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...2012_logos.PNG
London 2012 That logo, Which I could recreate in less than 10 minutes on MSPaint Anyone know how much it cost? FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS! £400,000 For what? A quick 10 minute job I'd be happy accepting a fiver for? Can somebody tell me why this cost £400,000? No need, I already know the answer. Quote:
Let me tell you this, Sebastian Coe, Olympics owners, and whoever charged £400,000 for that friggin' logo. If anything, the olympics is not going to reach out to the children. It's difficult to reach out to young people? OF COURSE IT [more censorship] IS! Why? Because you're spending £400,000 on absolute BOLLOCKS! This logo doesn't look like something that'll bring us all together. If anything it looks like a broken window or something. If that logo has any intended purpose, it's to split us apart. Look at the 'Bidding' Logo.. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...2-logo.svg.png Simple, Effective, and stands for sticking together a damnsite more than this new one does, Can I just make one more point? Even if the logo WAS decent.. A logo can't inspire people. A logo CAN NOT make people want to get involved. What does? THE IDEAS BEHIND IT BEING REINFORCED POSITIVELY! How about this.. Instead of paying some DIMWIT £400,000 for a 10 minute MSPaint job.. SPEND £400,000 ON FRIGGIN SCHOOLS AND HELP KIDS THAT WAY, MORONS! Now I don't work in the public sector.. But when we can't ****ing fund schools, or the NHS, but we CAN fund this? Leaves only one question. "What the heck are you playing at, Government!?" sorry for my language, i tried to censor it as much as i could... but that really felt good getting out |
The logo is somewhat reminiscent of a really messed up jigsaw puzzle. It's definatly funky looking. But yes they did spend a tad much on the darned thing and they'll probably spend even more on the mascot.
What were they trying for anyways?? Is the Pangea look in in 2012??? I liked the logo they had in the Doctor Who ep last season that was set during the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympics. They could have used that! :ohwell: Sides....they'll make more money from the Olympics and probably break even on the first day of the games. So they'll get the money back and then some. But it seems that lots of people don't like it (is it supposed to be a Celtic design?). So yay..controversy in the 2012 Olympics already. :lol: http://www.centredaily.com/living/story/127293.html |
I like it. Particularly the purple one on the left hand side. Would I pay 400000 pounds for it. Hells no! But it's not that bad, IMO
|
This is like two weeks old.
But yeah, the logo is crap. I liked the Goatse one that someone sent in. |
That logo sucks. Whoever drew it should be dragged out into the street and shot.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It is awesomely uninspiring.
|
Celtic design? I think it's supposed to look swanky and modern. What matters is that the Olympics themselves go well and everything is built on time. That's right, after all the stick the British press especially gave to Athens there's a serious concern that London's bid may be overly ambitious to finish on time (and guess who gets the Olympics should London fail...). I agree that they should have stuck with the bidding logo and 400 thousand is ridiculous, but they had to design a logo 5 years in advance. Who knows what trends and styles will be popular then? I'm just waiting to see what the mascots look like, I wouldn't mind being one at one of the stadiums!
|
First time I saw it I was like "What is it.....oh its...and....yeah........right"
I like the 'Bidding' Logo seems more traditional. |
Quote:
I agree whole heartedly with that comment. I'd also like to add, how much were people paid to do the cheaply "teen girls squad" ripoff Wintergreen gum commercials, and those anti-drug ads with the stupid dog saying "you disappoint me?" And while we're on the subject, how come people idolize Jackson Pollack and thye don't think animation or comic book art is art? I can tell you the answer... the world is insultingly unfair. Some guy can poop on a canvas and call it Jesus for shock value and get into a museum, while someone who paints beautiful landscapes can barely live in a crap appartment. Same thing there. It's basically all luck of the draw. |
Quote:
I think the entire world is outraged at the logo, the UK particularly (obviously). I'm optimistic that it'll change. |
Looks like Stevie Wonder put together a puzzle.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And Rosealangelo's estimate is pretty damn accurate, I believe it's something like $1.98 to the pound? |
My question is: Why design the logo so soon? We've got five years--- would it have killed them to wait and come up with something far more appealing and actually worth £400,000?
|
Quote:
|
thats the crappiest logo ever
the best was everything from 1984 LA .... |
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.