| NoPressApril |
01-19-2009 11:17 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoggleKng
(Post 663430)
Yes, I found this article too but didn't answer my question. Is it out of habit because Playmate numbered the regular Star Trek figures too?
|
I'm not really sure what your asking but unless owning a low numbered figure is a really big deal to you then no, it doesn't mean anything. Playmates thought it was cool to number the Trek figures but they screwed it up so much rehashing already numbered legs as well as lotsa times making figures well into the 500,000's that most people didn't really pay attention to it anyway.
They did a few cool things with it like offering sets on QVC with matching high numbers or auctioning really low numbered figures at the "One Weekend On Earth" convention in Alabama (I got a pair of wesleys numbered in the 50's that day) but those were the regular Trek figures not the Trek Turtles. Maybe Playmates thought that numbering the Trek Turtles would make them more appealing to the Star Trek collectors who didn't care about TMNT.
I think that Playmates thought that the numbering thing was a bigger deal to collectors then it actually was. It's been my experience that unless you have #'s 1-10 or #1,701 it was no big deal to most people. It's been said that Playmates kept like the first 100 of most every figure they made anyway so finding an important low number is extremely hard. There were salesman samples that can fetch higher prices and usually instead of numbers they had something like iiiiii on them.
|