![]() |
TMNT info pages for The Technodrome
In another thread, we were discussing the idea of how to make it easier for people to contribute to The Technodrome's main site. In particular, we would like to have more TMNT-related information, such as episode summaries and character profiles. While our main focus is on the original cartoon and we would prefer info about that, we would also welcome info about the other TMNT universes.
The idea I have is to set up a wiki-like system that any forum member could use to edit the info pages (of course, we would give credit to everyone who contributed to each page). At the bottom of each info page, there would be an "Edit This Page" link. Clicking that link would take you to a form where you could edit the text of the page. From there, I thought of two possibilities to maintain quality and prevent abuse:
|
Quote:
|
If you're going to do it, use a moderated system. That way you won't end up with piles of shite like the TMNT Wikia.
|
I think it's a great idea, and I think that the moderated system is the best way to go.
|
Yes, I would use it, and contribute to it, and I think that the moderated system would work best.
|
My lame episode guide can be stolen if you want it Krang.
I do need to get back at that. |
Thanks for the feedback so far, everyone. If we do go ahead with this, we will most likely use the moderated system as suggested.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Your more then welcome to use my comic adaptations list I made for the new toon. I can also provide pictures of the comics if you like, I own virtually all of them or if you want you can steal them from the official site. If you want bigger pics though let me know. I might also have some stuff not on the official site.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
God, it definitely has to be wiki style. Moderation before it shows up is going to kill it. You know when things are changed. Technodrome could have an awesome Turtles wiki but it won't happen if its moderated.
Or at least while its being started leave them open and only close the near complete articles for moderation. |
I think wiki style is not that safe you noe... .. If someone with malignancy comes over and delete/modify some of your works for whatever reason,you gonna go mad.Moderate style is good.
I have some toy pics that loves to share,so thumbs up. |
Quote:
|
It's been a week since this thread was posted, so I'd like to start deciding pretty soon whether to start coding this project or to put it on the shelf for now. At this point, I'm not sure that we have enough support to get it started, but it's not too late for that to change. :) So, is anyone else interested in helping out with this project?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And my concern with moderated style is mostly that none of the moderated wikis I've ever visited have been as good as unmoderated ones. Wikipedia is great. The reason people don't like it is because what they wrote is changed and they don't like not seeing what THEY wrote as part of the article. More than anything because they like seeing their words and opinions as fact. The normal wiki style lets you know any edits that happened, its not like someone can get away with it not being known and vandalism is not as common as people make it out to be. if its moderated, its only going to hurt it as its not going to get as many entries as it would have if it wasn't. |
Quote:
|
Wiki's great, but the fact that any schmuck can edit it and undo any good information makes a moderated site a much better option, IMHO.
|
friendly bump:D
I think it would be great if we could organize something like Toonzone's coverage of the DC and Marvel Cartoons. Bio sections, episode sections with reviews and media, behind the scenes stuff...for the fans by the fans. |
This sounds like a pretty great idea! The moderated queue seems like the best route to get the better quality entries but rather than having the entire load of sorting them through fall on Shredder, why not have a circle of "Wiki mods" that you two select; draw up a short list of things you guys will/will not accept.
|
Good to hear that there is still some interest in this project! If we can get a decent number of people who are interested in helping out, I'd be glad to start working on setting this up again.
Looking back, though, I think the options above might be limiting to the amount of help we get. To help get the ball rolling, I think it would be a better idea to just have a regular wiki, but only open it to forum members who request accounts. That should help screen out the spam and vandalism that happens to wiki pages that can be edited by the public. If things don't work out there, we can go back to one of the two options above. Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.