Anyone remembers Sonic The Hedgehog (1993 animated series)?
 

I do, i was 12 when it came out in 1993 and it rocked. I was already a Sonic fan when i was 11 when i got my Genesis and got the comics. I think it's a unique and excellent animated show that is far better then the inferior weekday afternoon "Adventures" Sonic show the same year.

Great animation for it's DIC's best since COPS and "Real Ghostbusters", action, some humor, great characterization, darkness and that hot as hell redheaded squirrell chick Princess Sally whom i had the hots for since i was a adoloscent boy.

Nice review, but it'd probably get more attention at a site that specializes in reviews, like Toonzone.

You should change your name from Cropsy to Creepy! LOLOLOLOLZ! AMIRITE U GAIZ?!

I'm just trying to share my memories of this show with everyone who remembers it. And i got it two years ago on DVD and it's still an awesome show that is one of my favorites since 12, yes i do still have the hots for Sally. Come on, she walks around nude including has a sexy voice and attractive looks with brains to go with it i mean she was a wet dream for me.

And wasn't it odd DiC released two different Sonic cartoons that year? Adventures and SatAM. It's almost similar to that whole different Ghostbusters cartoon thing in the 80's with Filmation's and DiCs.

Creepy thread is creepy.

Someone's gonna be a furry when they grow up, lol.

I vaguely remember the toon. I think it stayed pretty true to the game roots but seemed a bit out there like the old Mario Brothers cartoon.

I tried to watch some of the later Sonic shows, but anything that didn't have Dr. Robotnik in it as Robotnik made me lose interest. It'd be like if they suddenly started calling Bowser, Charles or something.

This has officially crossed over into Sonic Fandom territory.

RUN WHILE YOU STILL CAN CHILDREN!!

I'm a huge fan of the show, so I feel compelled to add that yeah, it was great, best Sonic show ever, etc etc. I thought the plots were much better than the "Adventures of..." show, liked the darker tone, wish Season 3 had happened, etc.

Not gonna bother with the other stuff.

That's backwards. The weekday syndicated stuff is always supposed to be darker and whatnot than the Saturday morning stuff. I guess Sonic's just weird like that...

I know what you mean, but yeah, worked out that way. "Adventures" was pretty kiddie and Robotnik was a goofball, and the SatAM show just called "Sonic the Hedgehog" was decently "dark" for a kids' show and Robotnik acted kinda Darth Vader-ish. I loved how the story started to grow as the show went on, too. I'd heard a buncha plans for Season 3 but the network kept screwing the time around and eventually it just got cancelled. Rather unceremoniously, too.

The cast was also pretty good, with such notables as Jaleel Whte, Tim Curry, Kath Soucie and even Rob Paulsen. I'm always surprised this show doesn't get more recognition from TMNT fans b/c he was on it, but then again it did kinda come n go pretty fast.

I agree Kath Soucie has an attractive voice; it's weird though, she doesn't look like I thought she would. Ah well.

Funny that Sonic's been getting a lot of love around here lately. :lol:

But does anyone remember the two Ghostbusters cartoons from the 80's? Filmation's and Real Ghostbusters? It's how Adventures and SatAM were kind of alike.

Here's the story behind Filmation's Ghostbusters if you thought that was just a cheap knockoff. Back in 1975 Filmation created a live-action prime-time series called "The Ghost Busters" which was popular during prime time then in 1984 Columbia released an unrelated but very popular movie called "Ghostbusters" which won to acclaim and audience pleasing that Columbia decided to do an animated series based on their movie. However Filmation sued Columbia over the rights of the name and that they wanted to do a hand at the proposed animated GB series but too late for Columbia already chose DIC to do the animation. But the two companies made an agreement to do each toon on their own GB property, Filmation based their's on their 70's show while Columbia/DIC based it on the 1984 movie entitled "The Real Ghostbusters".

This is a super srs Sonic thread. Ghostbusters have no place here.

>:C

SnooPINGAS usual I see.:P

Ghostbusters have a place everywhere.

I'm just telling a brief history on the confusion of the two different GB toons. But i'm confused on why was there two Sonic cartoons in the same year which are different?

To prove that Sonic is a schizo, probably.