![]() |
Splinter figure
Am I the only one that notices that the Splinter fig doesn't have the sleeves like he does in the cartoon?
|
Yeah... like it matters? He prolly doesn't heve 'em baecause it would be difficult or something like that.
|
I have no clue why that is. I'm just guessing that the no sleeve thing is easier to put the shirt on? I don't know. Ignore me.
|
Well, they didn't have sleeves on the old Splinter figure either--and at least they've made an improvement on the robe itself, and got rid of the ragged-looking trim on the bottom. Also, the new Splinter seems to have the same accessories he used to have--albeit in multiple incarnations: He has the ninja bow, the sword cane (though they, like the other new weapons have gotten the nifty repaint treatment) from the original, and the ooze, and the quiver of arrows (also repainted) from the movie Splinter. Anyway, I got it as a gift from my girlfriend, and I like it a lot better than the old one. But I do kinda wish it had sleeves, too. :wink:
|
JAh, that reminds me of the old action figure line when they had Shredder with the cape and no shirt on, and I was like, what nonsense is this!?!?!? He didn't look like that in ANY of his incarnations, comics or cartoon. WTF???
|
and have you noticed he is the same size as the turltles,, maybe taller,, whats up with that,,,so i use my MOVIE STAR SPLINTER from TMNT II to display them all together,, looks a lot better
|
And also, why are Michaelangelo's nunchuckas put on his back, when in the cartoon they go on the sides like Raph? Oh well.
|
i agree that the lack of sleeves on the cloth robe made the figure look bad. they could have made a robe similar to the movie star splinter robe, that one was cloth and had sleeves and actually looked good. but the first 2 splinters cloth robes looked more like a dress.
|
Quote:
Knock it the f*ck off. |
Quote:
:tconfuse: |
Quote:
Quote:
man, get bitc*ed at for bumping an old thread, get bitc*ed at for making a new thread, get bitc*ed for using the search function, get bitc*ed at for not using the search function |
Quote:
And I already pointed out the hypocrisy of my reply, there was no need for you to reiterate the point, albeit in a barely-literate fashion. |
Quote:
your logic is flawed and you fail at life. |
Quote:
By the way, if you're defining how well one succeeds at life based upon said individual's conduct in an internet forum, well, you might want to take a long look at your own life there... |
well...
Necro-posting is always fun. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you try that on any other forum, you would be banned straight away. |
Quote:
|
-11 year old post brought back to the front of the line
-10 posts in a row completely off the thread topic afterward -no action taken, no warnings given, no irrelevant posts deleted to set an example -If you're a mod here and you're reading this, you suck at your job. If you run this site and are reading this, what does it take for you to take action? This place is a free-for-all of bad conversation, mixed information, and this new generation of fans not reading the forum rules and getting away with it. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.