The Technodrome Forums

The Technodrome Forums (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Triceratops 'never really existed' (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=31543)

jaymq 08-03-2010 07:25 PM

Triceratops 'never really existed'
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...y-existed.html

Huh, wonder what PL thinks... xD

Samhain 08-03-2010 07:57 PM

So, they are just baby versions. Not a huge deal.

Ninjinister 08-03-2010 08:35 PM

Given the fact that they're renaming the Torosaurus, Triceratops, I think it's more like the former being the elder version of the latter.

gobo 08-03-2010 09:25 PM

It's the curse of Pluto! RUN FOR YOU LIVES!!

Peanut 08-03-2010 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ninjinister (Post 790830)
Given the fact that they're renaming the Torosaurus, Triceratops, I think it's more like the former being the elder version of the latter.

Seriously. Why is the headline that Triceratops never existed if they're all being named Triceratops? Shouldn't it be Torosaurus never existed?

TheCanadiandrome 08-03-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gobo (Post 790841)
It's the curse of Pluto! RUN FOR YOU LIVES!!

rofl, good one :tlol:

Koi 08-03-2010 10:40 PM

I know a 9 year old who will now be devastated.

TheCanadiandrome 08-03-2010 10:45 PM

now what's to become of all the other Dinosaurs? if someone tells me that T-Rex wasn't the king of the Dinosaurs after all then i'm going to be mad!

Ninjinister 08-03-2010 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peanut (Post 790842)
Seriously. Why is the headline that Triceratops never existed if they're all being named Triceratops? Shouldn't it be Torosaurus never existed?

Word.

Honestly, I used to be a huge dinosaur nerd when I was a youngin' and I don't remember ever hearing of a Torosaurus. So, y'know, like... this really doesn't effect me.

TheCanadiandrome 08-04-2010 11:41 AM

i still am a dinosaur nerd. but yeah it's no big deal. renaming of dinosaur species isn't anything new

Warhorse 08-04-2010 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMNT_Canadian (Post 790868)
now what's to become of all the other Dinosaurs? if someone tells me that T-Rex wasn't the king of the Dinosaurs after all then i'm going to be mad!

Well, there were several scientists that speculated that the T-Rex was a scavenger like vultures are, never a hunter, they based this claim on that their arms were too small to be of any advantage, but I have to disagree, because we've all seen what them crocodiles in Africa can do with just their mouths!

jaymq 08-04-2010 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhorse (Post 790949)
Well, there were several scientists that speculated that the T-Rex was a scavenger like vultures are, never a hunter, they based this claim on that their arms were too small to be of any advantage, but I have to disagree, because we've all seen what them crocodiles in Africa can do with just their mouths!

I can see T-Rex doing both as necessary, he's a big frakking carnivore. I see him doing what ever suits him to get his food. But I find it hard to believe he' ONLY do scavenging. But who knows really.

TheCanadiandrome 08-04-2010 07:43 PM

this is also from the same group of scientists that claim Dinos had feathers and not all had scales

XERO 08-04-2010 08:09 PM

Er... yeah.

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-..._3455653_n.jpg

Slap-Happy 08-04-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMNT_Canadian (Post 790978)
this is also from the same group of scientists that claim Dinos had feathers and not all had scales

Velociraptors actually did have feathers.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0920145402.htm

gobo 08-04-2010 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slap Happy (Post 791016)
Velociraptors actually did have feathers.

So, I was sold a defective pet velocirapter? O_o gobo pissed. :evil:

Shredder 08-04-2010 11:13 PM

Another "still a dinosaur nerd" here. :) Before reading this, I was familiar with the Torosaurus as pretty much a bigger, better Triceratops. So this makes sense and doesn't surprise me much. Still, good to know. And I agree with Peanut that this really makes the Torosaurus name "extinct" since now they'll all be Triceratops.

Raph's Girl 08-04-2010 11:22 PM

That is one totally misleading headline!! Phew.... Now I need a Torotriceratopsaurus figure....

I doubt anybody would know the difference. People still refere to the Brontosaurs even tho they're really Apatasaurs...

ooglafina 08-05-2010 08:04 AM

This kind of thing actually happens alot in the fossil record. There usually aren't enough samlpes to tell if differences in age and sexual dimorphism are really a new species or else just a difference in size. I took archaeology 101, so I'm an expert. :P They actually have skin imprints that show that some dinosaurs did have feathers, at least at some stage in their life. And t-rex was big enough that he could just take whatever he wanted from other dinosaurs. He was the biggest bully on the block.

BubblyShell22 08-05-2010 08:04 AM

This is interesting news, but I'm still going to refer to the dino as the Triceratops since that's what I know it as.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.