![]() |
So apparently there are hundreds of TMNT characters according to Nick
If you listened to Andrew's TMNT podcast with Ciro Nieli, he said that Nick gave him a list of characters he could legally use for the Nick show...and it came up to hundreds of characters.
It's something to think about, because out of hundreds of characters there are what....maybe 25-30 essential or popular TMNT characters that are re-used, while the others are forgotten into obscurity? It really makes you realize how many characters there are in TMNT, if you combine Mirage/Fred Wolf/4kids/Nick/IDW/Archie/Playmates characters all together and think of everyone. |
Maybe includes some undisclosed/work-in progress characters too by past artists including Eastman and Laird?
|
More interesting would be to know which characters they can't use, so this podcast had fan questions? someone should ask him about The Next Mutation characters and whether Viacom or Saban owns them..
What were other characters we used to debate about? I remember some of the characters in the TMNT videogames, especifically Aska who was popular with the fandom, but there were others like the mutant panda from TMNT II. Have there even been other game exclusive characters in other games? Also some of the TMNT Adventures characters were debated right? I remember Ninjara being one of them. |
Quote:
|
I doubt the IDW characters are owned by them. Usagi has never been a TMNT character, so I'm ok with that, hope that even without Laird they still let him use him. Which are the Fleetway characters? Archie? Are all Archie characters creator owned? There was indeed that Sonic Archie controversy? I'm not familiar with Pallidium. As far as I know Fred Wolf only owns the show and nothing else of the OT. In fact that's what caused some trouble back in the 90s between them and Mirage. Again I don't know about the game exclusive characters, not sure how the rights work on those.
|
I actually wonder if all those one-shot Mad scientists from the OT are on that list. I mean Ciro Nieli would be scrolling down a list and saying, "Who the hell is Prof. Von Bolt? Or Lloyd Cycloyde? Or Prof. Sopho?"
:lol: |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And I assume by "all the guys who never made it...", you mean all the rejected toy and character designs? Yeah, I won't think too much about who owns them (I assume mostly the original designers/creators). Also, Northshore Investments owned Tatsu, Keno, Prof. Jordan Perry and Chief Sterns. I wonder if the Image TMNT Vol. 3 characters are on Nick's list, since Bobby Curnow said that they weren't on IDW's approved characters list, nor were Prof. Perry or Tatsu. |
The list probably included action figures that were never in the show which also pumps the number up some. Also non-mutant and mutant/altered versions of characters after they transform.
|
Ah, so no chance of seeing Tatsu again? :-?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Does it include characters like Mr. Ogg? Toxeem? |
Quote:
|
I gather characters like Tatsu, Keno and even the Movie III characters like Walker, Princess Mitsu, and Whit can't be used is because of the likeness to the actors.
Meanwhile people in costumes like Rahzar and Tokka can be re-used because there's no human actors visible. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Any character Fred Wolf owns (which is probably noone anyway), would likely be some minor character nobody cares about like Howie, generic mad scientist #138, or Babyface Cleaver.
All the most important Fred Wolf characters were mostly Mirage or Playmates characters anyway. I'm sure others like Tempestra and Lord Dregg are owned by Nick too in case they ever bring them back. |
According to Turtlepedia, there are literally over 500 characters ever made in the franchise's history (681 when you include the "characters" page plus the red/black characters on the "list of TMNT characters" page, and in these days, anything found online is source-able for inclusion. This doesn't include many OT generic scientists such as Dr. Polydorious as CyberCubed mentioned. While lots of characters creates growth, returning many favorites helps preserve the legacy that we've endured in new takes.
BTW if you play the early NES videogames, you'll see the disclaimer that the trademark use was granted to Konami under a license from Mirage, so the Nick purchase eventually included all those video game characters. You'll also find on the closing credits of the OT and TNM that the characters were also licensed by Mirage/Surge, so it all fits the same umbrella. As far I can see with regards to the characters with the exception of Usagi (he was a crossover anyway to begin with) is that all previous characters are held by Nick. Its one of the benefits IMO to continuing the success in IDW and Nick, and hopefully Paramount will continue that trend. |
Quote:
Quote:
Also, AFAIK, the only creator-owned 2000 AD characters are the one that the creators never signed away the rights to (much like most of Alan Moore's Marvel UK work, such as a his Doctor Who stories), so that was basically because of oversight. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, for hundreds of characters, I'd say we have all the zillion-and-one action figures Playmates made for the 80's and 2000s, not all of which made it in the cartoons. Then we have several Mirage-exclusives like Savanti, Renet, Nobody, Shadow, Braunze, Radical, Cha Ocho, Choate, Fugitoid, etc, and characters from the 80's toon that seem to keep re-appearing like the Neutrinos and such. Then we have the new ones they're creating. Like it or not, characters like Snakeweed and Fishface are as much TMNT characters now as everyone else.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.