| Leo656 |
01-11-2016 11:07 PM |
...I thought the Russel Crowe one already was "Robin Hood: Origins"? And the Costner one was also a "gritty reboot". I'm puzzled.
I like Robin Hood. But I too am baffled by the constant need to try and update it. I mean, let's completely ignore Errol Flynn just for the sake of argument, but "Prince of Thieves" and TNT's "New Adventures of Robin Hood" both were not THAT long ago, and between them they've already said pretty much everything that needs to be said about the character.
It's like Peter Pan. I like that, too, but Hollywood isn't getting the message that people don't care anymore. Not about those particular characters and stories. They like the older movies just fine and will watch them if they want to visit those characters and the worlds they live in. The most recent films about either character did not do well, and it was not necessarily because they were bad movies, most people who saw them said they were all rather good, but completely pointless. Nobody cares about a "new" Peter Pan, or Robin Hood, they're fine with what already exists. I know that Hollywood wants to turn everything into a franchise series worth 5 or 6 movies of story so they can make two billion dollars on existing IP but some things just don't work, and have already been done better, besides.
Flaws and all, I'm partial to "Prince of Thieves". I know, I know, but it's the one I grew up with. And Christian Slater. C'mon.
|